Muamer Kadic, Daniel Torrent, and Abdelkrim Khelif
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 040001 (2026) - Published 15 October, 2026
Guest Editors Muamer Kadic, Daniel Torrent, and Abdelkrim Khelif reflect on the Collection at its closing.
P. A. Stuermer, D. Wirtitsch, T. Steidl, R. Wörnle, J. Körber, W. Schustereder, C. Zmoelnig, P. Urlesberger, F. Chiapolino, S. Meinardi, K. Edelmann, M. Kern, J. Anders, S. Krainer, H. Heiss, M. Trupke, and J. Wrachtrup
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044002 (2026) - Published 1 October, 2026
SiC-based quantum magnetometry is vital for advanced sensing fields because it offers a path to volume-compatible chips, but it is held back because its sensitivity is lower than other platforms like N-V diamond color centers. This study uses a planar 4H-SiC waveguide platform and wafer-scale fabrication to seamlessly integrate and excite large V2 ensembles. Notably, this streamlined layout achieves a shot-noise limit of 30 nT/√Hz, boosting sensitivity by 2–3 orders of magnitude over that of standard, confocal SiC methods while preserving coherent control.
Maciej Dąbrowski, Tong Wu, Connor R. J. Sait, Jia Xu, Paul S. Keatley, Yizheng Wu, Robert J. Hicken, and Olena Gomonay
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044008 (2026) - Published 2 October, 2026
Antiferromagnets are promising for fast, energy-efficient, high-density memory technologies, but their compensated spins make their domains difficult to image and control optically. The authors use magneto-optical birefringence imaging to show that a Pt capping layer enables ultrafast laser pulses to modify domains in insulating NiO and CoO films. Sweeping the beam generates a thermal gradient that drives domain walls toward colder regions, producing partial switching that can be reversed by changing the sweep direction. These findings provide a path toward optically controlled antiferromagnetic memory devices.
Thomas F. K. Weatherley, Gunnar Kusch, Jean-François Carlin, Raphaël Butté, Rachel A. Oliver, and Nicolas Grandjean
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044011 (2026) - Published 5 October, 2026
Nonradiative point defects in semiconductors are often a major hurdle for efficiency and reliability in optoelectronics, yet directly probing these defects remains difficult. This study uses time-resolved cathodoluminescence mapping plus a diffusion-recombination model to isolate and quantify carrier dynamics at a single point defect in an (In,Ga)N/GaN quantum well. Recombination at the defect is rate-limited by a 16-ps delay, setting a hard bottleneck on defect activity. This insight predicts that defect-related nonradiative recombination saturates at carrier densities routinely reached in LEDs, revealing a fundamental limit not captured by traditional macroscale recombination models.
Abel Thayil, Lasse Ermoneit, Lars R. Schreiber, Thomas Koprucki, and Markus Kantner
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044012 (2026) - Published 5 October, 2026
Silicon spin qubits offer a promising platform for scalable quantum processors, but small and highly variable valley splittings can compromise qubit operation across a device. This work uses constrained variational optimization with epitaxial-growth-motivated constraints to design feasible germanium concentration profiles in Si/Si-Ge quantum wells, to enhance deterministic valley splitting while suppressing variability induced by alloy disorder. The principal result is a “modulated wiggle well”, which provides a large, robust, and electrically tunable valley splitting. The approach provides a systematic route for designing reproducible and epitaxially feasible silicon-qubit devices.
Amy Damitz, George Burns, and Yuan-Yu Jau
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044014 (2026) - Published 6 October, 2026
For electric field (E-field) sensing applications that require high sensitivity with very small sensing volume or high spatial resolution at low frequencies near dc, conventional electronic approaches suffer from low efficiency (due to small antenna size) and higher intrinsic noise. Using a simple vapor cell, innovative technical schemes, and an unexpected phenomenon reminiscent of magnetoresistance, the authors demonstrate a state-of-the-art quasi-dc atomic E-field sensor using “antenna-less” atoms. This approach is expected to enable electronic diagnostics, communication, proximity detection, charge-signature tracing, bioscience and geoscience research, and more.
Maxim Tjøtta, Devashish Shah, Kanishk Modi, Marco Valentini, Rubén Seoane Souto, Georgios Katsaros, and Jeroen Danon
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044017 (2026) - Published 6 October, 2026
Extracting the current-phase relationship (CPR) of superconducting junctions in a noninvasive manner has proven to be difficult in the lab. The authors present an innovative method that overcomes the main limitations of conventional approaches, allowing the full harmonic content of the CPR to be extracted by subjecting the junction to a high-frequency ac drive. This method is demonstrated experimentally and found to be robust against experimental noise.
Blas Durá-Azorín, Antonio I. Fernández-Domínguez, and Alejandro Manjavacas
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044054 (2026) - Published 19 October, 2026
Periodic lattices of quantum emitters are promising platforms for quantum information processing, single-photon storage, and precision sensing. However, their performance is limited by an incomplete understanding of how intrinsic quantum nonlinearities shape their behavior beyond the linear (single-excitation) regime. The authors theoretically investigate coherently driven emitter lattices and show that quantum anharmonicity populates a continuum of excitonic Bloch states, including modes outside the light cone (subradiant), giving rise to broadband, incoherent emission that dominates under strong driving, and revealing an unexpected bistable regime controlled by effective driving renormalization.
Balázs Gulácsi and Guido Burkard
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044056 (2026) - Published 20 October, 2026
Superconducting qubits are a leading platform for quantum computing, but scaling up their circuitry is limited by crosstalk between qubits, and by the growing density of control wiring. This theoretical study uncovers a particular kind of crosstalk: When the magnetic flux through one qubit varies in time, that qubit’s neighbors see this as a voltage source woven into the circuit itself, in a circuit version of Faraday’s law of induction. Rather than a bane, though, this crosstalk mechanism could be turned into a boon, enabling quantum gates with less wiring per qubit.
Shuo Wang, Xiao Qin, Miao Zhang, Tengkun Deng, Fucheng Liu, Yafeng He, and Weili Fan
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, L041001 (2026) - Published 8 October, 2026
Plasma photonic crystals (PPCs) are promising for controlling electromagnetic waves, but conventional systems with water electrodes suffer from strong microwave absorption. This study employs an electrode based on dimethyl silicone oil for dielectric barrier discharge, yielding a number of advantages that include significantly improved microwave signals. The system produces tunable triangular elements in a honeycomb superlattice that hosts robust valley-locked topological edge states. Here is a fresh approach to high-performance PPCs for integrated microwave devices and topological applications.
Bowen Shao, Feng Xu, Yuquan Xiang, Shihang Zhang, Junda Song, Yue Zhai, Mingchao Duan, Tianluo Pan, Zhen Tian, Guanyong Wang, Guangchong Hu, Peihao Huang, Yu He, and Tao Xin
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, L041002 (2026) - Published 9 October, 2026
Although high-spin nuclear qudits in silicon offer a hardware-efficient route to quantum computation and error correction, scale-up is hindered by the weak, short-range interactions between nuclei. This Letter shows that electron spins can serve as a tunable quantum bus, mediating strong interactions between distant nuclear qudits and enabling high-fidelity two-qudit gates. The resulting coupling is robust against electron decoherence and charge noise while reaching a strength of about 100 kHz over distances exceeding 20 nm. This approach is a practical path toward scalable, electrically controlled qudit processors compatible with silicon-based quantum architectures.
Chen Jia, Zhen-Xing Hua, Yu-Xin Chao, and Meng Khoon Tey
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, L041003 (2026) - Published 13 October, 2026
Ultranarrow-linewidth lasers with suppressed high-frequency phase noise are critical for quantum control and precision metrology, but standard optical phase locking (OPL) is limited at high frequencies by feedback latency. This Letter presents a feedforward architecture that recycles the existing beat signal to drive a single electro-optic modulator, achieving robust phase-noise suppression that exceeds 30 dB from 10 kHz to 10 MHz. This approach is hardware-efficient, compatible with standard OPL setups, and readily extendable to gigahertz-level frequency offsets and optical frequency combs, offering a scalable route toward high-fidelity coherent control.
Yuuga Iwata, Kensuke Hayashi, Reiju Furumaki, Satoshi Iihama, Masahiro Sato, and Takahiro Moriyama
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, L041004 (2026) - Published 15 October, 2026
The Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction underlies chiral magnetic phenomena such as skyrmions, but its vectors are generally fixed by crystalline symmetry and difficult to manipulate. In this Letter the authors demonstrate control of DM-vector ordering in magnetic superlattices by mechanically breaking rotational and translational symmetries, using a strain technique. This fresh approach to engineering the DM interaction through control of structural symmetry seems to carry broad implications for chiral magnetism and spintronic applications.
Ryo Tatsumi, Shinji Miwa, Hiroaki Matsueda, and Takahiro Chiba
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, L041005 (2026) - Published 21 October, 2026
Chaotic magnetization dynamics in magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) could provide a compact physical platform for brain-inspired computing, but practical use requires electrical control and robustness against unavoidable thermal fluctuations. The authors use theory to show that spin-transfer torque generated by ac and dc currents enables both the excitation and control of chaos in a perpendicularly magnetized MTJ, with the dc current acting as an effective control parameter. Surprisingly, thermal fluctuations do not simply wash out the nonlinear dynamics; instead, they can promote noise-induced chaos.
Yufan Wang, Yi Huang, Jiarui Niu, Shuai Zhang, Mengdi Yin, Hongna Gu, Zeyi Zhu, Haotian Duan, Xiao Xiao, Lina Chen, Yongbing Xu, and Ronghua Liu
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044001 (2026) - Published 1 October, 2026
P. A. Stuermer, D. Wirtitsch, T. Steidl, R. Wörnle, J. Körber, W. Schustereder, C. Zmoelnig, P. Urlesberger, F. Chiapolino, S. Meinardi, K. Edelmann, M. Kern, J. Anders, S. Krainer, H. Heiss, M. Trupke, and J. Wrachtrup
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044002 (2026) - Published 1 October, 2026
SiC-based quantum magnetometry is vital for advanced sensing fields because it offers a path to volume-compatible chips, but it is held back because its sensitivity is lower than other platforms like N-V diamond color centers. This study uses a planar 4H-SiC waveguide platform and wafer-scale fabrication to seamlessly integrate and excite large V2 ensembles. Notably, this streamlined layout achieves a shot-noise limit of 30 nT/√Hz, boosting sensitivity by 2–3 orders of magnitude over that of standard, confocal SiC methods while preserving coherent control.
Jingyi Zhu, Tao Yuan, Wenbing Tang, Wenjie He, Zhengwen Qi, Jinhong Liao, Xin Su, Fangming Li, Xiaoai Yang, Jing Liu, Guoliang Yuan, Xiubao Sui, Kai Chen, and Weijie Guo
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044003 (2026) - Published 1 October, 2026
Takuya Yoshioka, Keita Sasada, Riku Usuki, Yuichiro Nakano, and Keisuke Fujii
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044004 (2026) - Published 1 October, 2026
J. Baumgarten, N. Lejeune, L. Nulens, I. P. C. Cools, J. Van de Vondel, and A. V. Silhanek
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044005 (2026) - Published 6 October, 2026
Zeheng Huang, Mian Peng, Aowei Yang, Yongzhi Tian, Qiang Wei, and Gang Chen
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044006 (2026) - Published 2 October, 2026
Yapeng Dou, Yihua Zhong, Lingli Ba, Jianmin Zhao, Dongyang Wang, Quan Li, Junliang Yang, and Quanlong Yang
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044007 (2026) - Published 2 October, 2026
Maciej Dąbrowski, Tong Wu, Connor R. J. Sait, Jia Xu, Paul S. Keatley, Yizheng Wu, Robert J. Hicken, and Olena Gomonay
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044008 (2026) - Published 2 October, 2026
Antiferromagnets are promising for fast, energy-efficient, high-density memory technologies, but their compensated spins make their domains difficult to image and control optically. The authors use magneto-optical birefringence imaging to show that a Pt capping layer enables ultrafast laser pulses to modify domains in insulating NiO and CoO films. Sweeping the beam generates a thermal gradient that drives domain walls toward colder regions, producing partial switching that can be reversed by changing the sweep direction. These findings provide a path toward optically controlled antiferromagnetic memory devices.
Huijie Ma, Ziyu He, Jianan Fang, Yanan Li, Ruiyang Qin, Wen Zhang, Jixi Zhang, Min Peng, Zhuohang Wei, Kun Huang, and Heping Zeng
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044009 (2026) - Published 2 October, 2026
Vinaya K. Kavatamane, Dewen Duan, Hadi Zadeh-Haghighi, Manh-Huong Phan, and Gopalakrishnan Balasubramanian
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044010 (2026) - Published 2 October, 2026
Thomas F. K. Weatherley, Gunnar Kusch, Jean-François Carlin, Raphaël Butté, Rachel A. Oliver, and Nicolas Grandjean
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044011 (2026) - Published 5 October, 2026
Nonradiative point defects in semiconductors are often a major hurdle for efficiency and reliability in optoelectronics, yet directly probing these defects remains difficult. This study uses time-resolved cathodoluminescence mapping plus a diffusion-recombination model to isolate and quantify carrier dynamics at a single point defect in an (In,Ga)N/GaN quantum well. Recombination at the defect is rate-limited by a 16-ps delay, setting a hard bottleneck on defect activity. This insight predicts that defect-related nonradiative recombination saturates at carrier densities routinely reached in LEDs, revealing a fundamental limit not captured by traditional macroscale recombination models.
Abel Thayil, Lasse Ermoneit, Lars R. Schreiber, Thomas Koprucki, and Markus Kantner
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044012 (2026) - Published 5 October, 2026
Silicon spin qubits offer a promising platform for scalable quantum processors, but small and highly variable valley splittings can compromise qubit operation across a device. This work uses constrained variational optimization with epitaxial-growth-motivated constraints to design feasible germanium concentration profiles in Si/Si-Ge quantum wells, to enhance deterministic valley splitting while suppressing variability induced by alloy disorder. The principal result is a “modulated wiggle well”, which provides a large, robust, and electrically tunable valley splitting. The approach provides a systematic route for designing reproducible and epitaxially feasible silicon-qubit devices.
Jiayu Ma, Fan Xia, Dengke Qi, Long Xing, Ziyang Chen, Yongmei Sun, Song Yu, and Xiangyu Wang
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044013 (2026) - Published 5 October, 2026
Amy Damitz, George Burns, and Yuan-Yu Jau
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044014 (2026) - Published 6 October, 2026
For electric field (E-field) sensing applications that require high sensitivity with very small sensing volume or high spatial resolution at low frequencies near dc, conventional electronic approaches suffer from low efficiency (due to small antenna size) and higher intrinsic noise. Using a simple vapor cell, innovative technical schemes, and an unexpected phenomenon reminiscent of magnetoresistance, the authors demonstrate a state-of-the-art quasi-dc atomic E-field sensor using “antenna-less” atoms. This approach is expected to enable electronic diagnostics, communication, proximity detection, charge-signature tracing, bioscience and geoscience research, and more.
Rongkun Han, Dahai Wei, Jianhua Zhao, and Yuan Lu
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044015 (2026) - Published 6 October, 2026
M. Alizadeh, Q. Zhong, S. Ozdemir, and R. El-Ganainy
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044016 (2026) - Published 6 October, 2026
Maxim Tjøtta, Devashish Shah, Kanishk Modi, Marco Valentini, Rubén Seoane Souto, Georgios Katsaros, and Jeroen Danon
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044017 (2026) - Published 6 October, 2026
Extracting the current-phase relationship (CPR) of superconducting junctions in a noninvasive manner has proven to be difficult in the lab. The authors present an innovative method that overcomes the main limitations of conventional approaches, allowing the full harmonic content of the CPR to be extracted by subjecting the junction to a high-frequency ac drive. This method is demonstrated experimentally and found to be robust against experimental noise.
Dongping Zhou, Yugan Tang, Yanan Zhang, Haonan Wang, Pengtao Lai, Yuanshuo Liu, Hui Liu, Hua Cheng, and Shuqi Chen
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044018 (2026) - Published 6 October, 2026
Zihao Su, Ze-Guo Chen, and Ming-Hui Lu
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044019 (2026) - Published 6 October, 2026
Linda Greggio, Rémi Robin, Mazyar Mirrahimi, and Alexandru Petrescu
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044020 (2026) - Published 7 October, 2026
S. Messelot, A. Leblanc, J.-S. Tettekpoe, F. Lefloch, Q. Ficheux, J. Renard, and É. Dumur
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044021 (2026) - Published 7 October, 2026
E. Catapano, A. Varanasi, P. Roussel, R. Degraeve, Y. Higashi, R. Asanovski, B. Kaczer, J. Diaz-Fortuny, M. Waltl, V. Afanas’ev, K. De Greve, and A. Grill
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044022 (2026) - Published 7 October, 2026
Vladislav Bushmakin, Oliver von Berg, Colin Sauerzapf, Sreehari Jayaram, Jonathan Enßlin, Tom Jäger, Andrej Denisenko, Ilja Gerhardt, Vadim Vorobyov, Di Liu, and Jörg Wrachtrup
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044023 (2026) - Published 7 October, 2026
Jiachen Zhang, Takamasa Hirai, Pukun Tan, Ryo Iguchi, Fuhua Zhang, Xianzhe Chen, Cheng Song, Zhiyang Wei, Dazhi Hou, and Ken-ichi Uchida
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044024 (2026) - Published 7 October, 2026
Yifan Zhang, Yanjie Liu, Yue Fu, Minghui Wu, Yikun Mei, Yeliang Wang, Zhen Gao, and Bo Zhang
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044025 (2026) - Published 7 October, 2026
Yuanye Zhou, Badreddine Assouar, Zhaokun Wang, Yang Zhang, Siqi Ding, and Kai Zhou
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044026 (2026) - Published 8 October, 2026
Ke Peng, Jun Wang, and Xi Zhao
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044027 (2026) - Published 8 October, 2026
Ioannis Petrides, Arpit Arora, and Prineha Narang
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044028 (2026) - Published 8 October, 2026
Mehrdad Elyasi, Shun Kanai, Hideo Ohno, Shunsuke Fukami, and Gerrit E. W. Bauer
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044029 (2026) - Published 8 October, 2026
M. Belmeguenai, T. Al Maawali, A. Bendjaballah, W. Fotso, M. G. Hafiz, M. Ramu, S. M. Chérif, N. Tiercelin, M. S. Gabor, Y. Roussigné, S. N. Piramanayagam, and R. Sbiaa
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044030 (2026) - Published 9 October, 2026
Léo Pradier, Kévin Billon, Baptiste Chomette, Manuel Collet, and Arnaud Hubert
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044031 (2026) - Published 9 October, 2026
Furqan Zahoor, Ibrahim A. Albulushi, Saleh Bunaiyan, Anupam Chattopadhyay, Hesham ElSawy, and Feras Al-Dirini
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044032 (2026) - Published 9 October, 2026
João C. Serra, Nader Engheta, and Mário G. Silveirinha
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044033 (2026) - Published 9 October, 2026
Hong Jiang, Carlos Barahona-Pascual, and Juan José García-Ripoll
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044034 (2026) - Published 13 October, 2026
Zi-Qi Zeng, Samuel Corona-Aquino, Tao Xie, Bin Yin, Yan Guo, Yukun Song, Yun Meng, Kai Zou, Song Li, Xiaolong Hu, Alfred B. U’Ren, Roberto de J. León-Montiel, Chenglong You, Baihong Li, Dongzhou Wang, and Rui-Bo Jin
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044035 (2026) - Published 13 October, 2026
Leon Bello, Boris Mesits, Michael Hatridge, and Hakan E. Türeci
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044036 (2026) - Published 13 October, 2026
Abhishek Menon, Michael Straus, George Tomaras, Liam Jeanette, April X. Sheffield, Devon Valdez, Yuanheng Xie, Visal So, De Luo, Midhuna Duraisamy Suganthi, Mark Dugan, Philippe Bado, Norbert M. Linke, Guido Pagano, and Roman Zhuravel
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044037 (2026) - Published 13 October, 2026
R. Lopes Seeger, G. Philippe, A. Jenkins, L. C. Benetti, A. Schulman, R. Ferreira, J.-V. Kim, and T. Devolder
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044038 (2026) - Published 14 October, 2026
Siyong Zheng (郑思涌), Maopeng Wu (吴茂鹏), Zhonghai Chi (池中海), Zewen Chen (陈泽炆), Chwee Teck Lim, Qian Zhao (赵乾), and Ji Zhou (周济)
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044039 (2026) - Published 14 October, 2026
Hancong Li, Zhikai Ma, Rui Zhu, Hanqing Liu, Xiqing Chen, Longlong Yang, Haiqiao Ni, Zhichuan Niu, Qihuang Gong, and Xiulai Xu
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044040 (2026) - Published 14 October, 2026
Amlan Datta, Kamal R. Joshi, Sunil Ghimire, Bicky S. Moirangthem, Makariy A. Tanatar, Mustafa Bal, Zuhawn Sung, Sabrina Garattoni, Francesco Crisa, Akshay Murthy, David A. Garcia-Wetten, Dominic P. Goronzy, Mark C. Hersam, Michael J. Bedzyk, Shaojiang Zhu, David Olaya, Peter Hopkins, Matthew J. Kramer, Alexander Romanenko, Anna Grassellino, and Ruslan Prozorov
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044041 (2026) - Published 14 October, 2026
Junyoung Hyun, Krzysztof Szulc, Mateusz Zelent, Nikolai Kuznetsov, Lukáš Flajšman, Maciej Krawczyk, Paweł Gruszecki, and Sebastiaan van Dijken
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044042 (2026) - Published 14 October, 2026
Zhiyin Sun, Liyi Li, Allard Schnabel, Tianhao Liu, and Peter Fierlinger
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044043 (2026) - Published 15 October, 2026
Jun Ren, Meng-Jia Chu, and Z. D. Wang
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044044 (2026) - Published 15 October, 2026
Wen-Hai Tan, Zhi-Jie Lu, Teng-Yu Long, Jian-Ping Liu, Jiu-Fei Yi, Ming-Guang Fu, Zheng-Jie An, and Shan-Qing Yang
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044045 (2026) - Published 16 October, 2026
Jiale Peng, Shangyuan Wang, and Ka Shen
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044046 (2026) - Published 16 October, 2026
Kevin Schultz, Christopher A. Watson, Andrew J. Murphy, Timothy M. Sweeney, and Gregory Quiroz
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044047 (2026) - Published 16 October, 2026
Weiyi Wang, Qingyun Yin, Lingchen Zhang, Di Gong, Linghan Liu, Yazhao Li, Chenghang Sun, Yijin Liu, Fan Wang, Haipeng Zhu, Dinghui Gong, Zitong Xu, Kai Wei, and Jiancheng Fang
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044048 (2026) - Published 16 October, 2026
Benjamin Kauffman and Jayson Paulose
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044049 (2026) - Published 16 October, 2026
Aleksandra Sierant, Diana Méndez-Avalos, Santiago Tabares Giraldo, and Morgan W. Mitchell
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044050 (2026) - Published 19 October, 2026
Griffin S. Hampton, Ryan A. Neff, Jeffrey Han, Aditee Prabhutendolkar, Zezheng Song, Mustapha Bouhrara, Radu Balan, and Richard G. Spencer
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044051 (2026) - Published 19 October, 2026
Alessandro R. Castelli, Kristin M. Beck, Loren D. H. Alegria, Luis A. Martinez, Kevin R. Chaves, Sean R. O’Kelley, Nicholas Materise, Jonathan L DuBois, and Yaniv J. Rosen
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044052 (2026) - Published 19 October, 2026
A. El Kass, B. Harlech-Jones, C. T. Jin, J. D. Watson, G. C. Gardner, S. Fallahi, M. J. Manfra, T. A. Ohki, and D. J. Reilly
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044053 (2026) - Published 19 October, 2026
Blas Durá-Azorín, Antonio I. Fernández-Domínguez, and Alejandro Manjavacas
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044054 (2026) - Published 19 October, 2026
Periodic lattices of quantum emitters are promising platforms for quantum information processing, single-photon storage, and precision sensing. However, their performance is limited by an incomplete understanding of how intrinsic quantum nonlinearities shape their behavior beyond the linear (single-excitation) regime. The authors theoretically investigate coherently driven emitter lattices and show that quantum anharmonicity populates a continuum of excitonic Bloch states, including modes outside the light cone (subradiant), giving rise to broadband, incoherent emission that dominates under strong driving, and revealing an unexpected bistable regime controlled by effective driving renormalization.
Zirui Fang, Benedict A. D. Sukra, and Xing Fan
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044055 (2026) - Published 20 October, 2026
Balázs Gulácsi and Guido Burkard
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044056 (2026) - Published 20 October, 2026
Superconducting qubits are a leading platform for quantum computing, but scaling up their circuitry is limited by crosstalk between qubits, and by the growing density of control wiring. This theoretical study uncovers a particular kind of crosstalk: When the magnetic flux through one qubit varies in time, that qubit’s neighbors see this as a voltage source woven into the circuit itself, in a circuit version of Faraday’s law of induction. Rather than a bane, though, this crosstalk mechanism could be turned into a boon, enabling quantum gates with less wiring per qubit.
Emma Berger, Vivek Maurya, Z. M. McIntyre, Ken Xuan Wei, Holger Haas, and Daniel Puzzuoli
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044057 (2026) - Published 20 October, 2026
Michael Huang and James Camparo
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044058 (2026) - Published 20 October, 2026
Yu-Chen Zhou, Zhenzhen Kong, Rong-Long Ma, Hao-Tian Jiang, Ao-Ran Li, Yang Zhong, Zhi-Tao Wu, Rui Zheng, Gui-Lei Wang, Gang Cao, Hai-Ou Li, and Guo-Ping Guo
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044059 (2026) - Published 20 October, 2026
Zhixiong Li, Xuejuan Liu, Zhejunyu Jin, Guanghua Guo, Xingen Zheng, and Peng Yan
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044060 (2026) - Published 21 October, 2026
Edmon Perkins
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044061 (2026) - Published 21 October, 2026
Caixing Fu, Jingbo Wang, Shuyu Chen, Jiahe Chen, J. Michael Kosterlitz, Min Yang, and Zhi Hong Hang
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044062 (2026) - Published 21 October, 2026
Emma Van Meirvenne, Aude Brinkmann-Hornbogen, Bart Sorée, Christoph Adelmann, and Florin Ciubotaru
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044063 (2026) - Published 21 October, 2026
Soumendra Kumar Das, Sridhar Sahu, Prasanjit Samal, and Brahmananda Chakraborty
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044064 (2026) - Published 22 October, 2026
Anna N. Morozovska, Eugene A. Eliseev, Richard (Yu) Liu, Sergei V. Kalinin, and Dean R. Evans
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044065 (2026) - Published 22 October, 2026
Jianming Wen
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044066 (2026) - Published 22 October, 2026
Qiang Zeng, Abhishek Mishra, Haoyang Wang, and Zhiliang Yuan
Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 044068 (2026) - Published 22 October, 2026