Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Superconductivity via Paramagnon and Magnon Exchange in a 2D Near-Ferromagnetic Full Metal and Ferromagnetic Half-Metal

Zachary M. Raines and Andrey V. Chubukov

  • School of Physics and Astronomy and William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

Phys. Rev. X 16, 011059 – Published 18 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pqq5-3n84

Abstract

We study superconductivity in paramagnetic and ferromagnetically ordered phases in a two-dimensional electron system with parabolic fermionic dispersion and short-range repulsive interaction. In the paramagnetic phase, we find that a weak momentum dependence of a paramagnon propagator parametrically reduces the onset temperature for the pairing compared to that in phenomenological theories, which assume a strong dispersion of a paramagnon, and also changes the topology of the gap function. In the ferromagnetic phase, we show that the order instantly polarizes low-energy fermionic excitations. We derive the fully renormalized pairing interaction between low-energy fermions, mediated by two transverse Goldstone modes, and show that it is attractive in a spatially odd channel. The pairing temperature in the ferromagnetic phase is found to be a fraction of the Fermi energy, significantly larger than in the paramagnetic phase near the transition. Our results are relevant for understanding superconductivity in proximity to itinerant ferromagnetism in multivalley graphene systems, particularly the ones with full valley and spin polarization.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Popular Summary

Article Text

References (79)

  1. N. F. Berk and J. R. Schrieffer, Effect of ferromagnetic spin correlations on superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 433 (1966).
  2. A. Layzer and D. Fay, Spin-fluctuation exchange mechanism for P-wave pairing in liquid 3He, Int. J. Magn. 1, 135 (1971); A. J. Leggett, A theoretical description of the new phases of liquid He3, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 331 (1975).
  3. H. v. Löhneysen, A. Rosch, M. Vojta, and P. Wölfle, Fermi-liquid instabilities at magnetic quantum phase transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1015 (2007).
  4. A. V. Chubukov, A. Abanov, Y. Wang, and Y.-M. Wu, The interplay between superconductivity and non-Fermi liquid at a quantum-critical point in a metal, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 417, 168142 (2020).
  5. P. Monthoux and G. G. Lonzarich, p-wave and d-wave superconductivity in quasi-two-dimensional metals, Phys. Rev. B 59, 14598 (1999).
  6. Z. Wang, W. Mao, and K. Bedell, Superconductivity near itinerant ferromagnetic quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 257001 (2001).
  7. R. Roussev and A. J. Millis, Quantum critical effects on transition temperature of magnetically mediated p-wave superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 63, 140504(R) (2001).
  8. A. V. Chubukov, A. M. Finkel’stein, R. Haslinger, and D. K. Morr, First-order superconducting transition near a ferromagnetic quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 077002 (2003).
  9. A. A. Abrikosov and L. P. Gor’kov, Contribution to the theory of superconducting alloys with paramagnetic impurities, Sov. Phys. JETP 12, 1243 (1961).
  10. P. B. Littlewood and C. M. Varma, Phenomenology of the superconductive state of a marginal Fermi liquid, Phys. Rev. B 46, 405 (1992).
  11. D. Belitz, T. R. Kirkpatrick, and T. Vojta, How generic scale invariance influences quantum and classical phase transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 579 (2005).
  12. A. V. Chubukov, C. Pépin, and J. Rech, Instability of the quantum-critical point of itinerant ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 147003 (2004); D. L. Maslov and A. V. Chubukov, Nonanalytic paramagnetic response of itinerant fermions away and near a ferromagnetic quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 79, 075112 (2009).
  13. M. Brando, D. Belitz, F. M. Grosche, and T. R. Kirkpatrick, Metallic quantum ferromagnets, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 025006 (2016).
  14. D. Fay and J. Appel, Coexistence of p -state superconductivity and itinerant ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 22, 3173 (1980).
  15. N. D. Mathur, F. M. Grosche, S. R. Julian, I. R. Walker, D. M. Freye, R. K. W. Haselwimmer, and G. G. Lonzarich, Magnetically mediated superconductivity in heavy fermion compounds, Nature (London) 394, 39 (1998).
  16. S. S. Saxena, P. Agarwal, K. Ahilan, F. M. Grosche, R. K. W. Haselwimmer, M. J. Steiner, E. Pugh, I. R. Walker, S. R. Julian, P. Monthoux, G. G. Lonzarich, A. Huxleyß, I. Sheikinß, D. Braithwaiteß, and J. Flouquetß, Superconductivity on the border of itinerant-electron ferromagnetism in UGe2, Nature (London) 406, 587 (2000).
  17. D. Aoki, A. Huxley, E. Ressouche, D. Braithwaite, J. Flouquet, J.-P. Brison, E. Lhotel, and C. Paulsen, Coexistence of superconductivity and ferromagnetism in URhGe, Nature (London) 413, 613 (2001).
  18. N. T. Huy, A. Gasparini, D. E. de Nijs, Y. Huang, J. C. P. Klaasse, T. Gortenmulder, A. de Visser, A. Hamann, T. Görlach, and H. V. Löhneysen, Superconductivity on the border of weak itinerant ferromagnetism in UCoGe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 067006 (2007).
  19. V. Kozii, M. P. Zaletel, and N. Bultinck, Spin-triplet superconductivity from intervalley Goldstone modes in magic-angle graphene, Phys. Rev. B 106, 235157 (2022).
  20. A. M. Seiler, F. R. Geisenhof, F. Winterer, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Xu, F. Zhang, and R. T. Weitz, Quantum cascade of correlated phases in trigonally warped bilayer graphene, Nature (London) 608, 298 (2022).
  21. H. Zhou, L. Holleis, Y. Saito, L. Cohen, W. Huynh, C. L. Patterson, F. Yang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and A. F. Young, Isospin magnetism and spin-polarized superconductivity in Bernal bilayer graphene, Science 375, 774 (2022).
  22. H. Zhou, T. Xie, A. Ghazaryan, T. Holder, J. R. Ehrets, E. M. Spanton, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Berg, M. Serbyn et al., Half-and quarter-metals in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Nature (London) 598, 429 (2021).
  23. S. C. de la Barrera, S. Aronson, Z. Zheng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Q. Ma, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and R. Ashoori, Cascade of isospin phase transitions in Bernal bilayer graphene at zero magnetic field, Nat. Phys. 18, 771 (2022).
  24. A. M. Seiler, M. Statz, I. Weimer, N. Jacobsen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Dong, L. S. Levitov, and R. T. Weitz, Interaction-driven quasi-insulating ground states of gapped electron-doped bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 066301 (2024).
  25. T. Arp, O. Sheekey, H. Zhou, C. L. Tschirhart, C. L. Patterson, H. M. Yoo, L. Holleis, E. Redekop, G. Babikyan, T. Xie, J. Xiao, Y. Vituri, T. Holder, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. E. Huber, E. Berg, and A. F. Young, Intervalley coherence and intrinsic spin–orbit coupling in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Nat. Phys. 20, 1413 (2024).
  26. L. Holleis, C. L. Patterson, Y. Zhang, H. M. Yoo, H. Zhou, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Nadj-Perge, and A. F. Young, Ising superconductivity and nematicity in bernal bilayer graphene with strong spin orbit coupling, Nat. Phys. 21, 444 (2025).
  27. Y. Zhang, R. Polski, A. Thomson, É. Lantagne-Hurtubise, C. Lewandowski, H. Zhou, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Alicea, and S. Nadj-Perge, Enhanced superconductivity in spin–orbit proximitized bilayer graphene, Nature (London) 613, 268 (2023).
  28. C. Huang, Tobias M. R. Wolf, W. Qin, N. Wei, I. V. Blinov, and A. H. MacDonald, Spin and orbital metallic magnetism in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 107, L121405 (2023); I. V. Blinov, C. Huang, N. Wei, Q. Wei, T. Wolf, and A. H. MacDonald, Partial condensation of mobile excitons in graphene multilayers, arXiv:2303.17350.
  29. C. L. Patterson, O. I. Sheekey, T. B. Arp, L. F. W. Holleis, J. M. Koh, Y. Choi, T. Xie, S. Xu, E. Redekop, G. Babikyan, H. Zhou, X. Cheng, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, C. Jin, E. Lantagne-Hurtubise, J. Alicea, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity and spin canting in spin-orbit proximitized rhombohedral trilayer graphene, arXiv:2408.10190.
  30. T. Han, Z. Lu, Z. Hadjri, L. Shi, Z. Wu, W. Xu, Y. Yao, A. A. Cotten, O. S. Sedeh, H. Weldeyesus, J. Yang, J. Seo, S. Ye, M. Zhou, H. Liu, G. Shi, Z. Hua, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Xiong, D. M. Zumbühl, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Signatures of chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene, Nature (London) 643, 654 (2025).
  31. K. Levin and O. T. Valls, Strong-coupling theory of superfluid transition temperatures for paramagnon models: Application to He3, Phys. Rev. B 17, 191 (1978).
  32. K. B. Blagoev, J. R. Engelbrecht, and K. S. Bedell, Effect of ferromagnetic spin correlations on superconductivity in ferromagnetic metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 133 (1999).
  33. T. R. Kirkpatrick, D. Belitz, T. Vojta, and R. Narayanan, Strong enhancement of superconducting T c in ferromagnetic phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 127003 (2001).
  34. Z. Dong, É. Lantagne-Hurtubise, and J. Alicea, Superconductivity from spin-canting fluctuations in rhombohedral graphene, arXiv:2406.17036.
  35. Y.-Z. Chou, J. Zhu, and S. D. Sarma, Intravalley spin-polarized superconductivity in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 111, 174523 (2025); M. Geier, M. Davydova, and L. Fu, Chiral and topological superconductivity in isospin polarized multilayer graphene, arXiv:2409.13829; H. Yang and Y.-H. Zhang, Topological incommensurate Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov superconductor and Bogoliubov Fermi surface in rhombohedral tetra-layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 112, 020506 (2025); Q. Qin and C. Wu, Chiral finite-momentum superconductivity in the tetralayer graphene, arXiv:2412.07145; A. Jahin and S.-Z. Lin, Enhanced Kohn-Luttinger topological superconductivity in bands with nontrivial geometry, Phys. Rev. B 113, 014504 (2026); A. Gil and E. Berg, Charge and pair density waves in a spin- and valley-polarized system at a van-Hove singularity, 113, 075154 (2026); Z. Dong and P. A. Lee, Controlled expansion for pairing in a polarized band with strong repulsion, 113, 104501 (2026); F. Gaggioli, D. Guerci, and L. Fu, Spontaneous vortex-antivortex lattice and Majorana fermions in rhombohedral graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 116001 (2025); G. Parra-Martinez, A. Jimeno-Pozo, V. T. Phong, H. Sainz-Cruz, D. Kaplan, P. Emanuel, Y. Oreg, P. A. Pantaleon, J. A. Silva-Guillen, and F. Guinea, Band renormalization, quarter metals, and chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene, 135, 136503 (2025); M. Kim, A. Timmel, L. Ju, and X.-G. Wen, Topological chiral superconductivity beyond pairing in a Fermi liquid, Phys. Rev. B 111, 014508 (2025); M. Christos, P. M. Bonetti, and M. S. Scheurer, Finite-momentum pairing and superlattice superconductivity in valley-imbalanced rhombohedral graphene, arXiv:2503.15471.
  36. K. Mæland, S. Abnar, J. Benestad, and A. Sudbø, Topological superconductivity mediated by magnons of helical magnetic states, Phys. Rev. B 108, 224515 (2023).
  37. U here is the Fourier component of the Hubbard interaction. It has a dimension of (energy × area). The density of states ν has a dimension 1/(energy × area). The product is a dimensionless quantity.

  38. Z. M. Raines, L. I. Glazman, and A. V. Chubukov, Unconventional discontinuous transitions in a two-dimensional system with spin and valley degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. B 110, 155402 (2024); Unconventional discontinuous transitions in isospin systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 146501 (2024); Z. M. Raines and A. V. Chubukov, Two-dimensional Stoner transitions beyond mean field, Phys. Rev. B 110, 235433 (2024).
  39. J. Kanamori, Electron correlation and ferromagnetism of transition metals, Prog. Theor. Phys. 30, 275 (1963).
  40. L. Liu, H. Yao, E. Berg, S. R. White, and S. A. Kivelson, Phases of the infinite U Hubbard model on square lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 126406 (2012).
  41. V. Calvera, A. Valenti, S. D. Huber, E. Berg, and S. A. Kivelson, Theory of Coulomb driven nematicity in a multi-valley two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 111, 155135 (2025).
  42. A. Valenti, V. Calvera, S. A. Kivelson, E. Berg, and S. D. Huber, Nematic metal in a multivalley electron gas: Variational Monte Carlo analysis and application to AlAs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 266501 (2024).
  43. M. Shayegan, E. P. De Poortere, O. Gunawan, Y. P. Shkolnikov, E. Tutuc, and K. Vakili, Two-dimensional electrons occupying multiple valleys in AlAs, Phys. Status Solidi B 243, 3629 (2006).
  44. O. Gunawan, Y. P. Shkolnikov, K. Vakili, T. Gokmen, E. P. De Poortere, and M. Shayegan, Valley susceptibility of an interacting two-dimensional electron system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 186404 (2006).
  45. M. S. Hossain, M. K. Ma, K. A. V. Rosales, Y. J. Chung, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, K. W. Baldwin, and M. Shayegan, Observation of spontaneous ferromagnetism in a two-dimensional electron system, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 32244 (2020).
  46. A. Klein and A. Chubukov, Superconductivity near a nematic quantum critical point: Interplay between hot and lukewarm regions, Phys. Rev. B 98, 220501(R) (2018); A. Klein, Y.-M. Wu, and A. V. Chubukov, Multiple intertwined pairing states and temperature-sensitive gap anisotropy for superconductivity at a nematic quantum-critical point, npj Quantum Mater. 4, 55 (2019).
  47. A. Abanov and A. V. Chubukov, Interplay between superconductivity and non-Fermi liquid at a quantum critical point in a metal. I. The γ model and its phase diagram at T=0: The case 0<γ<1, Phys. Rev. B 102, 024524 (2020).
  48. D. J. Scalapino, A common thread: The pairing interaction for unconventional superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1383 (2012).
  49. S. Maiti and A. V. Chubukov, Superconductivity from repulsive interaction, AIP Conf. Proc. 1550, 3 (2013).
  50. Z. Dong, A. V. Chubukov, and L. Levitov, Transformer spin-triplet superconductivity at the onset of isospin order in bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 107, 174512 (2023); Z. Dong, L. Levitov, and A. V. Chubukov, Superconductivity near spin and valley orders in graphene multilayers, 108, 134503 (2023).
  51. A. V. Chubukov, Kohn-Luttinger effect and the instability of a two-dimensional repulsive Fermi liquid at T=0, Phys. Rev. B 48, 1097 (1993).
  52. D. L. Maslov, P. Sharma, D. Torbunov, and A. V. Chubukov, Gradient terms in quantum-critical theories of itinerant fermions, Phys. Rev. B 96, 085137 (2017).
  53. T. R. Kirkpatrick and D. Belitz, Coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 67, 024515 (2003).
  54. L. Dell’anna and W. Metzner, Fermi surface fluctuations and single electron excitations near Pomeranchuk instability in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 73, 045127 (2006).
  55. A. Abanov, A. V. Chubukov, and A. M. Finkel’stein, Coherent vs. incoherent pairing in 2D systems near magnetic instability, Europhys. Lett. 54, 488 (2001); A. Abanov, A. V. Chubukov, and J. Schmalian, Quantum-critical theory of the spin-fermion model and its application to cuprates: Normal state analysis, Adv. Phys. 52, 119 (2003); A. V. Chubukov and P. Wölfle, Quasiparticle interaction function in a two-dimensional Fermi liquid near an antiferromagnetic critical point, Phys. Rev. B 89, 045108 (2014).
  56. A. L. Fitzpatrick, S. Kachru, J. Kaplan, S. Raghu, G. Torroba, and H. Wang, Enhanced pairing of quantum critical metals near d=3+1, Phys. Rev. B 92, 045118 (2015); H. Wang, S. Raghu, and G. Torroba, Non-Fermi-liquid superconductivity: Eliashberg approach versus the renormalization group, 95, 165137 (2017).
  57. S. Lederer, Y. Schattner, E. Berg, and S. A. Kivelson, Enhancement of superconductivity near a nematic quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 097001 (2015); Y. Schattner, S. Lederer, S. A. Kivelson, and E. Berg, Ising nematic quantum critical point in a metal: A monte carlo study, Phys. Rev. X 6, 031028 (2016); S. Lederer, Y. Schattner, E. Berg, and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductivity and non-Fermi liquid behavior near a nematic quantum critical point, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 4905 (2017).
  58. P. Wölfle and E. Abrahams, Quasiparticles beyond the Fermi liquid and heavy fermion criticality, Phys. Rev. B 84, 041101(R) (2011).
  59. A. V. Chubukov, A. Abanov, I. Esterlis, and S. A. Kivelson, Eliashberg theory of phonon-mediated superconductivity—When it is valid and how it breaks down, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 417, 168190 (2020).
  60. S.-S. Zhang, Z. M. Raines, and A. V. Chubukov, Applicability of Eliashberg theory for systems with electron-phonon and electron-electron interaction: A comparative analysis, Phys. Rev. B 109, 245132 (2024); S.-S. Zhang, E. Berg, and A. V. Chubukov, Free energy and specific heat near a quantum critical point of a metal, 107, 144507 (2023).
  61. A. Chubukov, N. V. Prokof’ev, and B. V. Svistunov, Implicit renormalization approach to the problem of Cooper instability, Phys. Rev. B 100, 064513 (2019); D. Pimenov and A. V. Chubukov, Twists and turns of superconductivity from a repulsive dynamical interaction, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 447, 169049 (2022).
  62. M. H. Christensen and A. V. Chubukov, Dynamical vortices in electron-phonon superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 104, L140501 (2021).
  63. J. R. Schrieffer, X. G. Wen, and S. C. Zhang, Dynamic spin fluctuations and the bag mechanism of high-Tc superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11663 (1989).
  64. J. R. Schrieffer, Ward’s identity and the suppression of spin fluctuation superconductivity, J. Low Temp. Phys. 99, 397 (1995).
  65. S. Sachdev, A. V. Chubukov, and A. Sokol, Crossover and scaling in a nearly antiferromagnetic Fermi liquid in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 51, 14874 (1995); A. V. Chubukov, P. Monthoux, and D. K. Morr, Vertex corrections in antiferromagnetic spin-fluctuation theories, 56, 7789 (1997); A. V. Chubukov and D. K. Morr, Electronic structure of underdoped cuprates, Phys. Rep. 288, 355 (1997).
  66. V. Flambaum, M. Kuchiev, and O. Sushkov, Hole-hole superconducting pairing in the t-J model induced by long-range spin-wave exchange, Physica (Amsterdam) 227C, 267 (1994); M. Yu. Kuchiev and O. Sushkov, Large-size two-hole bound states in the t-J model, 218C, 197 (1993).
  67. J.-P. Ismer, I. Eremin, E. Rossi, D. K. Morr, and G. Blumberg, Theory of multiband superconductivity in spin-density-wave metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 037003 (2010).
  68. H. Watanabe and A. Vishwanath, Criterion for stability of Goldstone modes and Fermi liquid behavior in a metal with broken symmetry, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 16314 (2014).
  69. S. L. Adler, Consistency Conditions on the strong interactions implied by a partially conserved axial-vector current. II, Phys. Rev. 139, B1638 (1965).
  70. K. Vasiliou, Y. He, and N. Bultinck, Electrons interacting with Goldstone modes and the rotating frame, Phys. Rev. B 109, 045155 (2024).
  71. The momentum integral in Eq. (57) can, in principle, be explicitly evaluated if in Sb2 we keep the q dependence of the Green’s functions next to 2μ0c. This sets the cutoff at q0=kFc/c−1≥2kF and yields λsc=c4/[6(c−1)5/2], which is large for all c and, moreover, diverges at c=0 and at large c. However, this result is highly questionable, as the dominant contribution to this λsc comes from magnon momenta q>2kF. A more realistic approach, in our view, is to assume that the magnon dispersion holds up to q0∼kF and cut the magnon-mediated pairing at this momentum, as in Eqs. (57) and (50).

  72. C.-H. Huang, C. Huang, and M. A. Cazalilla, Competition of exchange and correlation energies in two-dimensional n-component electron gas ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 111, 045129 (2025).
  73. Z. M. Raines and A. V. Chubukov, Superconductivity induced by spin-orbit coupling in a two-valley ferromagnet, npj Quantum Materials (2026), 10.1038/s41535-026-00864-w.
  74. M.-R. Li, Y. H. Kwan, H. Yao, and B. A. Bernevig, Berry trashcan with short range attraction:exact px+ipy superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene, arXiv:2509.16312; R. D. Mayrhofer and A. V. Chubukov, Valley- and spin-polarized states in bernal bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 111, 245114 (2025).
  75. L. Holleis, C. L. Patterson, Y. Zhang, Y. Vituri, H. M. Yoo, H. Zhou, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Berg, S. Nadj-Perge, and A. F. Young, Nematicity and orbital depairing in superconducting bernal bilayer graphene, Nat. Phys. 21, 444 (2025).
  76. Y. Guo, O. I. Sheekey, T. Arp, K. Kolář, T. Charpentier, L. Holleis, B. Foutty, A. Keough, M. Kang-Chou, M. E. Huber, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, C. Lewandowski, and A. F. Young, Flat band surface state superconductivity in thick rhombohedral graphene, arXiv:2511.17423.
  77. F. Stern, Polarizability of a two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 546 (1967).
  78. G. Giuliani and G. Vignale, Quantum Theory of the Electron Liquid (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2008).
  79. B. Mihaila, Lindhard function of a d-dimensional Fermi gas, arXiv:1111.5337.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation