Physics of even-even superheavy nuclei with in the quark-meson-coupling model
J. R. Stone, K. Morita, P. A. M. Guichon, and A. W. Thomas
Phys. Rev. C 100, 044302 (2019) - Published 3 October, 2019
The quark-meson-coupling (QMC) model has been applied to the study of the properties of even-even superheavy nuclei with , over a wide range of neutron numbers. The aim is to identify the deformed shell gaps at and , predicted in macroscopic-microscopic (macro-micro) models, in a model based on the mean-field approximation. The predictive power of the model has been tested on proton and neutron spherical shell gaps in light doubly closed (sub)shell nuclei , and , with results in a full agreement with experiment. In the superheavy region, the ground-state binding energies of and differ, in the majority of cases, from the measured values by less than , with the deviation decreasing with increasing and . The axial quadrupole deformation parameter, , calculated over the range of neutron numbers , revealed a prolate-oblate coexistence and shape transition around , followed by an oblate-spherical transition towards the expected shell closure in Cm, Cf, Fm, and No. The closure is not predicted in Rf, Sg, Hs, and Ds as another shape transition to a highly deformed () shape in Sg, Hs, and Ds for appears, while () remains oblate. The bulk properties predicted by QMC, such as ground-state binding energy, two-neutron separation energy, the empirical shell-gap parameter and values, are found to have a limited sensitivity to the deformed shell gaps at and 162. However, the evolution of the neutron single-particle spectra with of , and , as representative examples, gives a (model-dependent) evidence for the location and size of the and 162 gaps as a function of and . In addition, the neutron number dependence of neutron pairing energies provides supporting indication for existence of the energy gaps. Based on these results, the mean-field QMC and macro-micro models and their predictions of deformed shell structure of superheavy nuclei are compared. Clearly the QMC model does not give results as close to the experiment as the macro-micro models. However, considering that it has only four global variable parameters (plus two parameters of the pairing potential), with no local adjustments, the results are promising.