Defect bound states in the continuum of bilayer electronic materials without symmetry protection
Daniel Massatt, Stephen P. Shipman, Ilya Vekhter, and Justin H. Wilson
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060101 (2025) - Published 18 February, 2025
Yoshihito Kuno, Takahiro Orito, and Ikuo Ichinose
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064111 (2025) - Published 19 February, 2025
Decoherence on quantum many-body systems induces nontrivial mixed states with specific properties that have no counterparts in pure states. The authors clarify here the emergence of “intrinsic mixed state topological order” in a toric code state under decoherence, which accompanies exotic anyon proliferation. Furthermore, the authors find that the decoherence-induced phase transition in the stabilizer formalism is described by a percolation picture in two dimensions. The viewpoint of one-form symmetry and its spontaneous symmetry breaking plays an important role in this study.
N. R. Vovk, E. V. Ezerskaya, and R. V. Mikhaylovskiy
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064411 (2025) - Published 7 February, 2025
Antiferromagnetic iron oxides with rare-earth ions provide a promising platform for ultrafast spin switching by light. The magnetic properties in these materials are defined by anisotropic exchange coupling between the rare-earth orbitals and iron spins. Here, the authors present a comprehensive theory, describing the dynamical response of the magnetic rare-earth and iron systems to a strong ultrashort THz pulse. Working out the case of the archetypical orthoferrite TmFeO, the authors identify different coherent spin switching scenarios in this compound.
Bing Li, D. M. Pajerowski, J.-Q. Yan, and R. J. McQueeney
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064418 (2025) - Published 14 February, 2025
MnBiTe belongs to a family of magnetic topological insulators formed from a natural heterostructure of magnetic and nonmagnetic blocks. In these materials, magnetism evolves systematically as nonmagnetic spacers are inserted between the magnetic blocks. The authors explore the magnetic interactions in two members of this family, MnBiTe and MnBiTe, using inelastic neutron scattering. Comparison reveals that the interlayer magnetic coupling weakens as nonmagnetic blocks are introduced, but other key magnetic energy scales within the magnetic block stay the same.
Xin Li, Jamir Marino, Darrick E. Chang, and Benedetta Flebus
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064424 (2025) - Published 20 February, 2025
The authors develop here a theoretical framework for the quantum many-body dynamics of a qubit array interacting via the electromagnetic noise of a shared solid-state bath. Applied to an NV-center ensemble coupled to a YIG film, this study demonstrates that robust many-body effects, such as superradiance and subradiance, are within experimental reach, opening new opportunities for engineering collective quantum phenomena in solid-state platforms and advancing multi-qubit quantum sensing approaches.
Wang Chen, Xiaoying Zhou, Wen-Kai Lou, and Kai Chang
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064428 (2025) - Published 24 February, 2025
Altermagnetism is a magnetic phase characterized by spin-split band structures without spin-orbit coupling (SOC) and rotation symmetry-compensated net magnetization. Here, the authors uncover the magneto-optical properties of a -wave altermagnet. They demonstrate that the spin-polarized bands manifest in the anisotropic spin-resolved optical conductivity, enabling circular dichroism. In the absence (presence) of SOC, only intraband (both intraband and interband) transitions occur which satisfy the selection rule ∆n=±1 (∆n=±1,±3). This research provides valuable insights into the unique optical properties of altermagnetic materials.
Xiao Hu, P. M. Lozano, Feng Ye, Qiang Li, J. Sears, I. A. Zaliznyak, G. D. Gu, and J. M. Tranquada
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064504 (2025) - Published 5 February, 2025
Unlocking the secrets of high-temperature superconductivity, researchers have turned their attention to the La(Ba,Sr)CuO family, where subtle lattice distortions play a pivotal role. By employing neutron diffraction, the authors have successfully identified that the tilt pattern of the CuO octahedra, which breaks the fourfold Cu-O bond symmetry, is uniquely responsible for pinning the charge density wave order to the lattice.
Nicolas Paris, Luca Giacomelli, Romain Daviet, Cristiano Ciuti, Nicolas Dupuis, and Christophe Mora
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064509 (2025) - Published 14 February, 2025
The phase diagram of a resistively shunted Josephson junction has been the subject of recent debate. Using a combination of analytical techniques (perturbative renormalization group and conformal field theory) and exact diagonalization, the authors confirm here the traditional phase diagram, where the transition between insulating and superconducting phases occurs when the shunt resistance is equal to the resistance quantum , regardless of the ratio between Josephson energy and charge energy.
Takumi Funato, Shunichiro Kinoshita, Norihiro Tanahashi, Shin Nakamura, and Mamoru Matsuo
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060403 (2025) - Published 6 February, 2025
The authors study here nonequilibrium spin dynamics in differentially rotating systems, deriving an effective Hamiltonian for conduction electrons in the comoving frame. In contrast to conventional spin current generation mechanisms that require vorticity, this theory describes spins and spin currents arising from differentially rotating systems regardless of vorticity. They demonstrate the generation of spin currents in differentially rotating systems, such as liquid metals with Taylor-Couette flow. This alternative mechanism will be important in the development of nanomechanical spin devices.
Daniel Massatt, Stephen P. Shipman, Ilya Vekhter, and Justin H. Wilson
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060101 (2025) - Published 18 February, 2025
Pratik Nandy, Tanay Pathak, and Masaki Tezuka
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060201 (2025) - Published 6 February, 2025
Budhaditya Bhattacharjee and Pratik Nandy
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060202 (2025) - Published 6 February, 2025
Yin-Quan Huang, Yu-Min Hu, Wen-Tan Xue, and Zhong Wang
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060203 (2025) - Published 18 February, 2025
De-Huan Cai, Wei Yi, and Chen-Xiao Dong
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060301 (2025) - Published 4 February, 2025
J. K. Dewhurst, D. Gill, S. Shallcross, and S. Sharma
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060302 (2025) - Published 6 February, 2025
Luke Causer, Mari Carmen Bañuls, and Juan P. Garrahan
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060303 (2025) - Published 13 February, 2025
Langxuan Chen, Ning Sun, and Pengfei Zhang
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060304 (2025) - Published 25 February, 2025
Maxim A. Makeev, Suyash Rijal, Yousra Nahas, Sergei Prokhorenko, and Laurent Bellaiche
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060305 (2025) - Published 27 February, 2025
Barnabha Bandyopadhyay, Sabyasachi Paul, Jadupati Nag, R. Venkatesh, P. D. Babu, Aftab Alam, and K. G. Suresh
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060401 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
Yi Xu (徐熠), Juraj Hasik, Boris Ponsioen, and Andriy H. Nevidomskyy
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060402 (2025) - Published 4 February, 2025
Takumi Funato, Shunichiro Kinoshita, Norihiro Tanahashi, Shin Nakamura, and Mamoru Matsuo
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060403 (2025) - Published 6 February, 2025
The authors study here nonequilibrium spin dynamics in differentially rotating systems, deriving an effective Hamiltonian for conduction electrons in the comoving frame. In contrast to conventional spin current generation mechanisms that require vorticity, this theory describes spins and spin currents arising from differentially rotating systems regardless of vorticity. They demonstrate the generation of spin currents in differentially rotating systems, such as liquid metals with Taylor-Couette flow. This alternative mechanism will be important in the development of nanomechanical spin devices.
Dapeng Yao and Takehito Yokoyama
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060404 (2025) - Published 10 February, 2025
Paul A. McClarty, Arsen Gukasov, and Jeffrey G. Rau
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060405 (2025) - Published 10 February, 2025
M. Zobel, M. Appel, S. L. J. Thomä, M. Plekhanov, and A. Magerl
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060406 (2025) - Published 11 February, 2025
J. J. Mankenberg and Ar. Abanov
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060407 (2025) - Published 21 February, 2025
Rémy Mosseri, Yasir Iqbal, Roger Vogeler, and Julien Vidal
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060408 (2025) - Published 25 February, 2025
Samuel M. Soares, Lucas Squillante, Henrique S. Lima, Constantino Tsallis, and Mariano de Souza
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060409 (2025) - Published 26 February, 2025
Jihang Zhu, Yang-Zhi Chou, Ming Xie, and Sankar Das Sarma
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060501 (2025) - Published 6 February, 2025
Sourabh Patil, Gaomin Tang, and Wolfgang Belzig
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060502 (2025) - Published 12 February, 2025
Jizheng Wu, Wenyu He, Yong Xu, and Chen Si
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060503 (2025) - Published 19 February, 2025
Jabir Ali Ouassou, Takehito Yokoyama, and Jacob Linder
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060504 (2025) - Published 20 February, 2025
Even Thingstad, Joel Hutchinson, Daniel Loss, and Jelena Klinovaja
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060505 (2025) - Published 25 February, 2025
Li Xu, Zefeng Lin, Wenxin Cheng, Xuewei Wang, Mingyang Qin, Xingyu Jiang, Liping Zhang, Juan Xu, Peiyu Xiong, Ruozhou Zhang, Xiangyu Zhang, Jie Yuan, Qihong Chen, Haiwen Liu, Yangmu Li, and Kui Jin
Phys. Rev. B 111, L060506 (2025) - Published 26 February, 2025
Vikas Arora, D. V. S. Muthu, R. Sankar, and A. K. Sood
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064101 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
Huanhuan Tian, Jianguo Yang, and Ming Liu
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064102 (2025) - Published 5 February, 2025
Rong Qiu, Qiyu Zeng, Jinsen Han, Ke Chen, Dongdong Kang, Xiaoxiang Yu, and Jiayu Dai
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064103 (2025) - Published 6 February, 2025
Gang Bai, Yuhang Chen, Guoliang Yuan, and Cunfa Gao
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064104 (2025) - Published 7 February, 2025
Xingbang Dong, Kaiyuan Shi, Jiaqing Zhang, Wenbo Fu, Zhaoxu Du, Haotian Yang, Jun Kong, Pu Qiao, Xin Zhang, and Lei Su
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064105 (2025) - Published 10 February, 2025
Alejandro Alvarez, Niaz Abdolrahim, and Sobhit Singh
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064106 (2025) - Published 18 February, 2025
Petter Rosander, Erik Fransson, Nicklas Österbacka, Paul Erhart, and Göran Wahnström
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064107 (2025) - Published 18 February, 2025
Huai-Jin Zhang, Yuping Tian, Cui Jiang, Jia-Lin Cai, Tao Jin, and Lian-Lian Zhang
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064108 (2025) - Published 18 February, 2025
Mike N. Pionteck, Matthias Roeper, Boris Koppitz, Samuel D. Seddon, Michael Rüsing, Laura Padberg, Christof Eigner, Christine Silberhorn, Simone Sanna, and Lukas M. Eng
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064109 (2025) - Published 19 February, 2025
Jingtao Fan, Xiaofan Zhou, and Suotang Jia
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064110 (2025) - Published 19 February, 2025
Yoshihito Kuno, Takahiro Orito, and Ikuo Ichinose
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064111 (2025) - Published 19 February, 2025
Decoherence on quantum many-body systems induces nontrivial mixed states with specific properties that have no counterparts in pure states. The authors clarify here the emergence of “intrinsic mixed state topological order” in a toric code state under decoherence, which accompanies exotic anyon proliferation. Furthermore, the authors find that the decoherence-induced phase transition in the stabilizer formalism is described by a percolation picture in two dimensions. The viewpoint of one-form symmetry and its spontaneous symmetry breaking plays an important role in this study.
Hongkai Li, Mingyu Li, Zhongyan Wu, Bing Li, Hechong Wang, Shaojie Wang, Jing Song, Ke Yang, Saori Imada Kawaguchi, Guoying Gao, Lin Wang, and Yongjun Tian
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064112 (2025) - Published 20 February, 2025
Antra Asare, Reinis Lazda, Florian Gahbauer, Volker Cimalla, and Marcis Auzinsh
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064113 (2025) - Published 24 February, 2025
Jose Angel Silva-Guillén and Enric Canadell
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064114 (2025) - Published 24 February, 2025
Liangze Mao, Jizhe Cui, and Rong Yu
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064116 (2025) - Published 26 February, 2025
Shunya Yamada, Kansei Kanayama, and Kazuaki Toyoura
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064117 (2025) - Published 26 February, 2025
Yi-Cai Zhang, Rong Yuan, Shuwei Song, Mingpeng Hu, Chaofei Liu, and Yongjian Wang
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064201 (2025) - Published 6 February, 2025
Kuldeep Suthar
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064202 (2025) - Published 18 February, 2025
Pratik Nandy, Tanay Pathak, Zhuo-Yu Xian, and Johanna Erdmenger
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064203 (2025) - Published 28 February, 2025
Yalun Zhang and Longwen Zhou
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064204 (2025) - Published 28 February, 2025
Shishira Mahunta and Victor Mukherjee
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064301 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
I. Goychuk, A. Panchenko, A. Shahzad, J. Steffen, C. Neiss, K. Götz, C. Vogel, M. Weisser, B. Hakim, J. P. Embs, J. Englhard, J. Bachmann, H. Hildebrand, N. Denisov, P. Schmuki, A. Görling, and T. Unruh
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064302 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
Pinaki Dutta, Sayan Choudhury, and Vishwanath Shukla
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064303 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
Svetislav Mijatović, Stefan Graovac, Djordje Spasojević, and Bosiljka Tadić
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064304 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
Ethan J. Meitz, Gerald J. Wang, and Alan J. H. McGaughey
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064305 (2025) - Published 5 February, 2025
Niuchang Ouyang, Dongyi Shen, Chen Wang, Ruihuan Cheng, Qi Wang, and Yue Chen
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064307 (2025) - Published 5 February, 2025
Fan Yang, Xiang-Bin Wang, and Tian Chen
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064308 (2025) - Published 6 February, 2025
Rupak Bag and Dibyendu Roy
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064309 (2025) - Published 10 February, 2025
Tsuneya Yoshida, Takuma Isobe, and Yasuhiro Hatsugai
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064310 (2025) - Published 14 February, 2025
Y. X. Ma, J. Z. Chang, Y. D. Liu, M. S. Si, G. P. Zhang, and Z. M. Zhang
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064311 (2025) - Published 18 February, 2025
Frank Schindler, Vir B. Bulchandani, and Wladimir A. Benalcazar
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064312 (2025) - Published 25 February, 2025
Rafael D. Soares, Youenn Le Gal, and Marco Schirò
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064313 (2025) - Published 26 February, 2025
Weiwei Zhu
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064314 (2025) - Published 27 February, 2025
Ibuki Terada, Sota Kitamura, Hiroshi Watanabe, and Hiroaki Ikeda
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064315 (2025) - Published 28 February, 2025
Xiyin Ye, Qirui Cui, Weiwei Lin, and Tao Yu
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064401 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
N. Rougemaille, J. Coraux, and B. Canals
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064402 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
David W. Facemyer and Sergio E. Ulloa
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064403 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
Aman Sharma, Mithilesh Nayak, Henrik M. Rønnow, and Frédéric Mila
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064404 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
C. Pfaff, T. Pezeril, R. Arras, L. Calmels, V. Cherruault, S. Andrieu, K. Dumesnil, J. Gorchon, and T. Hauet
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064405 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
Andriy Smolyanyuk, Libor Šmejkal, and Igor I. Mazin
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064406 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
Ivan Jakovac, Tonči Cvitanić, Denis Arčon, Mirta Herak, Dominik Cinčić, Nea Baus Topić, Yuko Hosokoshi, Toshio Ono, Ken Iwashita, Nobuyuki Hayashi, Naoki Amaya, Akira Matsuo, Koichi Kindo, Ivor Lončarić, Mladen Horvatić, Masashi Takigawa, and Mihael S. Grbić
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064407 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
Asliddin Khudoyberdiev and Götz S. Uhrig
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064408 (2025) - Published 6 February, 2025
Dirk Wulferding, Shams Sohel Islam, Youngsu Choi, Gyungbin Ban, Seungyeol Lee, Amit Pawbake, Clément Faugeras, and Kwang-Yong Choi
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064409 (2025) - Published 6 February, 2025
N. Chalus, A. W. D. Leishman, R. M. Menezes, G. Longbons, U. Welp, W.-K. Kwok, J. S. White, M. Bartkowiak, R. Cubitt, Y. Liu, E. D. Bauer, M. Janoschek, M. V. Milošević, and M. R. Eskildsen
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064410 (2025) - Published 7 February, 2025
N. R. Vovk, E. V. Ezerskaya, and R. V. Mikhaylovskiy
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064411 (2025) - Published 7 February, 2025
Antiferromagnetic iron oxides with rare-earth ions provide a promising platform for ultrafast spin switching by light. The magnetic properties in these materials are defined by anisotropic exchange coupling between the rare-earth orbitals and iron spins. Here, the authors present a comprehensive theory, describing the dynamical response of the magnetic rare-earth and iron systems to a strong ultrashort THz pulse. Working out the case of the archetypical orthoferrite TmFeO, the authors identify different coherent spin switching scenarios in this compound.
Quanxing Wei, Yi Zhou, Hengxin Tan, Lingling Gao, Ronghui Liu, Junkai Jing, Yahui Li, Dongyun Chen, Yun-Ze Long, Qiang Li, Yanpeng Qi, Binghai Yan, Bing Teng, and Dong Chen
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064412 (2025) - Published 10 February, 2025
Nirmal Ganguli, Avishek Singh, Vivek Kumar, and Jayita Chakraborty
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064413 (2025) - Published 10 February, 2025
Yang Xiao and K. Xia
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064414 (2025) - Published 11 February, 2025
Takayuki Yokoyama and Yasuhiro Tada
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064415 (2025) - Published 11 February, 2025
Xudong Li, Jize Zhao, Jinbin Li, and Qiang Luo
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064416 (2025) - Published 12 February, 2025
Kristian Tyn Kai Chung and Michel J. P. Gingras
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064417 (2025) - Published 13 February, 2025
Bing Li, D. M. Pajerowski, J.-Q. Yan, and R. J. McQueeney
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064418 (2025) - Published 14 February, 2025
MnBiTe belongs to a family of magnetic topological insulators formed from a natural heterostructure of magnetic and nonmagnetic blocks. In these materials, magnetism evolves systematically as nonmagnetic spacers are inserted between the magnetic blocks. The authors explore the magnetic interactions in two members of this family, MnBiTe and MnBiTe, using inelastic neutron scattering. Comparison reveals that the interlayer magnetic coupling weakens as nonmagnetic blocks are introduced, but other key magnetic energy scales within the magnetic block stay the same.
L. Gries, T. Kleinbeck, D. A. Mayoh, G. D. A. Wood, G. Balakrishnan, and R. Klingeler
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064419 (2025) - Published 18 February, 2025
Markus Kraft, Mariel Kempa, Jiaozi Wang, and Robin Steinigeweg
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064420 (2025) - Published 18 February, 2025
Pingzhi Li, Thomas J. Kools, Hamed Pezeshki, Joao M. B. E. Joosten, Jianing Li, Junta Igarashi, Julius Hohlfeld, Reinoud Lavrijsen, Stephane Mangin, Gregory Malinowski, and Bert Koopmans
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064421 (2025) - Published 18 February, 2025
Ricardo Zarzuela, Rodrigo Jaeschke-Ubiergo, Olena Gomonay, Libor Šmejkal, and Jairo Sinova
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064422 (2025) - Published 19 February, 2025
Diep Minh Nguyen, Azimjon A. Temurjonov, Daigorou Hirai, Zenji Hiroi, Oleg Janson, Hiroshi Yasuoka, Taku Matsushita, Yoshiaki Kobayashi, and Yasuhiro Shimizu
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064423 (2025) - Published 19 February, 2025
Xin Li, Jamir Marino, Darrick E. Chang, and Benedetta Flebus
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064424 (2025) - Published 20 February, 2025
The authors develop here a theoretical framework for the quantum many-body dynamics of a qubit array interacting via the electromagnetic noise of a shared solid-state bath. Applied to an NV-center ensemble coupled to a YIG film, this study demonstrates that robust many-body effects, such as superradiance and subradiance, are within experimental reach, opening new opportunities for engineering collective quantum phenomena in solid-state platforms and advancing multi-qubit quantum sensing approaches.
Patrick J. Wong, Ivan M. Khaymovich, Gabriel Aeppli, and Alexander V. Balatsky
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064425 (2025) - Published 20 February, 2025
Qi-Hui Chen, Fei-Jie Huang, Yong-Ping Fu, and Haibin Su
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064426 (2025) - Published 21 February, 2025
D. V. Dmitriev and V. Ya. Krivnov
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064427 (2025) - Published 24 February, 2025
Wang Chen, Xiaoying Zhou, Wen-Kai Lou, and Kai Chang
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064428 (2025) - Published 24 February, 2025
Altermagnetism is a magnetic phase characterized by spin-split band structures without spin-orbit coupling (SOC) and rotation symmetry-compensated net magnetization. Here, the authors uncover the magneto-optical properties of a -wave altermagnet. They demonstrate that the spin-polarized bands manifest in the anisotropic spin-resolved optical conductivity, enabling circular dichroism. In the absence (presence) of SOC, only intraband (both intraband and interband) transitions occur which satisfy the selection rule ∆n=±1 (∆n=±1,±3). This research provides valuable insights into the unique optical properties of altermagnetic materials.
Zhiwen Wang, JunYi Ji, and Changsong Xu
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064429 (2025) - Published 25 February, 2025
S. K. Gotovko, A. G. Ivanova, P. S. Kudimkina, A. A. Bush, V. I. Kozlov, M. Hemmida, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, and L. E. Svistov
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064430 (2025) - Published 28 February, 2025
P. Telang, T. Treu, M. Klinger, A. A. Tsirlin, P. Gegenwart, and A. Jesche
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064431 (2025) - Published 28 February, 2025
Ellen Lu, Kristen S. Buchanan, and Karen L. Livesey
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064432 (2025) - Published 28 February, 2025
Tsugumi Matsumoto, Youichi Yanase, and Akito Daido
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064501 (2025) - Published 3 February, 2025
Yuri Fukaya, Kazuki Maeda, Keiji Yada, Jorge Cayao, Yukio Tanaka, and Bo Lu
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064502 (2025) - Published 4 February, 2025
Kiyoto Nakamura and Joachim Ankerhold
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064503 (2025) - Published 5 February, 2025
Xiao Hu, P. M. Lozano, Feng Ye, Qiang Li, J. Sears, I. A. Zaliznyak, G. D. Gu, and J. M. Tranquada
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064504 (2025) - Published 5 February, 2025
Unlocking the secrets of high-temperature superconductivity, researchers have turned their attention to the La(Ba,Sr)CuO family, where subtle lattice distortions play a pivotal role. By employing neutron diffraction, the authors have successfully identified that the tilt pattern of the CuO octahedra, which breaks the fourfold Cu-O bond symmetry, is uniquely responsible for pinning the charge density wave order to the lattice.
Biswajit Dutta and A. Banerjee
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064505 (2025) - Published 7 February, 2025
Y. Samukawa, M. Maeda, N. Jiang, R. Nakamura, M. Watanabe, K. Takaki, Y. Moriyasu, T. Ikushima, T. Kida, M. Hagiwara, T. Nakamura, Y. Okada, K. Kudo, and Y. Niimi
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064506 (2025) - Published 7 February, 2025
Y. Y. Wu, L. Mu, Y. L. Zhang, D. Z. Dai, K. Meng, S. Y. Huang, X. Zhang, S. C. Huang, J. Chen, H. G. Yan, and S. Y. Li
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064507 (2025) - Published 12 February, 2025
Yunxiang Liao and Yi-Ting Hsu
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064508 (2025) - Published 14 February, 2025
Nicolas Paris, Luca Giacomelli, Romain Daviet, Cristiano Ciuti, Nicolas Dupuis, and Christophe Mora
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064509 (2025) - Published 14 February, 2025
The phase diagram of a resistively shunted Josephson junction has been the subject of recent debate. Using a combination of analytical techniques (perturbative renormalization group and conformal field theory) and exact diagonalization, the authors confirm here the traditional phase diagram, where the transition between insulating and superconducting phases occurs when the shunt resistance is equal to the resistance quantum , regardless of the ratio between Josephson energy and charge energy.
Daniel Domínguez and Jorge Berger
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064510 (2025) - Published 14 February, 2025
Masayuki Ochi, Hirofumi Sakakibara, Hidetomo Usui, and Kazuhiko Kuroki
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064511 (2025) - Published 18 February, 2025
Victor Velasco, Giovanni Midei, Massimo Capone, and Andrea Perali
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064512 (2025) - Published 18 February, 2025
Maria Recasens, Valentin Kasper, Maciej Lewenstein, and Allan S. Johnson
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064513 (2025) - Published 20 February, 2025
Maxime Burgher, Marco Di Liberto, Nathan Goldman, and Ivan Amelio
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064514 (2025) - Published 25 February, 2025
Senne Van Loon and C. A. R. Sá de Melo
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064515 (2025) - Published 26 February, 2025
Jonas Lidal and Jeroen Danon
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064516 (2025) - Published 27 February, 2025
R. Capecelatro, M. Marciani, G. Campagnano, and P. Lucignano
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064517 (2025) - Published 27 February, 2025
Yingze Su, Hui Li, Huaqing Huang, and Dingping Li
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064518 (2025) - Published 27 February, 2025
Yue Yin, Fanzheng Chen, Guichao Hu, Xiuwen Zhao, Xiaobo Yuan, and Junfeng Ren
Phys. Rev. B 111, 064519 (2025) - Published 28 February, 2025