Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

King-Plot Analysis of Isotope Shifts in Simple Diatomic Molecules

Michail Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis*

Shane G. Wilkins

Alexander A. Breier

Gerda Neyens

  • Experimental Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland and KU Leuven, Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium

  • Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA and Laboratory for Nuclear Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

  • Laboratory for Astrophysics, Institute of Physics, University of Kassel, 34132 Kassel, Germany

  • KU Leuven, Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium

  • *m.athkak@cern.ch

Phys. Rev. X 13, 011015 – Published 9 February, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011015

Abstract

We demonstrate that the isotope shift in isotopomers of diatomic molecules, where the nucleus of one of its constituent atoms is replaced by another isotope, can be expressed as the sum of a field shift and a mass shift similar to the atomic case. We show that a linear relation holds between atomic and molecular isotopes shifts, thus extending the King-plot analysis to molecular isotope shifts. Optical isotope shifts in YbF and ZrO and infrared isotope shifts in SnH are analyzed with a molecular King-plot approach utilizing Yb+ and Zr+ ionic isotope shifts and charge radii of Sn obtained with nonoptical methods. The changes in the mean-squared nuclear charge radii δ⟨r2⟩ of Yb170–174,176 and Zr90–92,94,96 extracted from the molecular transitions are found to be in excellent agreement with the values from the spectroscopy of Yb+ and Zr+, respectively. On the contrary, in the case of the vibrational-rotational transition in SnH, no sensitivity to the nuclear volume can be deduced within the experimental resolution, which makes it unsuitable for the extraction of nuclear charge radii but provides insights into the molecular electronic wave function not accessible via other methods. The new opportunities offered by the molecular King-plot analysis for research in nuclear structure and molecular physics are discussed.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Popular Summary

Article Text

References (78)

  1. W. H. King, Isotope Shifts in Atomic Spectra (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2013).
  2. P. Campbell, I. D. Moore, and M. R. Pearson, Laser Spectroscopy for Nuclear Structure Physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 86, 127 (2016).
  3. P.-G. Reinhard, W. Nazarewicz, and R. F. Garcia Ruiz, Beyond the Charge Radius: The Information Content of the Fourth Radial Moment, Phys. Rev. C 101, 021301(R) (2020).
  4. P.-G. Reinhard and W. Nazarewicz, Nuclear Charge Densities in Spherical and Deformed Nuclei: Toward Precise Calculations of Charge Radii, Phys. Rev. C 103, 054310 (2021).
  5. A. Koszorús et al., Charge Radii of Exotic Potassium Isotopes Challenge Nuclear Theory and the Magic Character of N=32, Nat. Phys. 17, 439 (2021).
  6. L. J. Vormawah, M. Vilén, R. Beerwerth, P. Campbell, B. Cheal, A. Dicker, T. Eronen, S. Fritzsche, S. Geldhof, A. Jokinen, S. Kelly, I. D. Moore, M. Reponen, S. Rinta-Antila, S. O. Stock, and A. Voss, Isotope Shifts from Collinear Laser Spectroscopy of Doubly Charged Yttrium Isotopes, Phys. Rev. A 97, 042504 (2018).
  7. K. Blaum, J. Dilling, and W. Nörtershäuser, Precision Atomic Physics Techniques for Nuclear Physics with Radioactive Beams, Phys. Scr. T152, 014017 (2013).
  8. R. F. Garcia Ruiz et al., Unexpectedly Large Charge Radii of Neutron-Rich Calcium Isotopes, Nat. Phys. 12, 594 (2016).
  9. R. P. de Groote et al., Measurement and Microscopic Description of Odd-Even Staggering of Charge Radii of Exotic Copper Isotopes, Nat. Phys. 16, 620 (2020).
  10. M. Kortelainen, Z. Sun, G. Hagen, W. Nazarewicz, T. Papenbrock, and P.-G. Reinhard, Universal Trend of Charge Radii of Even-Even Ca-Zn Nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 105, L021303 (2022).
  11. H.-W. Hammer, S. König, and U. van Kolck, Nuclear Effective Field Theory: Status and Perspectives, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 025004 (2020).
  12. B. R. Barrett, P. Navrátil, and J. P. Vary, Ab Initio No Core Shell Model, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 69, 131 (2013).
  13. G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and D. J. Dean, Coupled-Cluster Computations of Atomic Nuclei, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 096302 (2014).
  14. P. Navrátil, S. Quaglioni, G. Hupin, C. Romero-Redondo, and A. Calci, Unified Ab Initio Approaches to Nuclear Structure and Reactions, Phys. Scr. 91, 053002 (2016).
  15. H. Hergert, S. K. Bogner, T. D. Morris, A. Schwenk, and K. Tsukiyama, The In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group: A Novel Ab Initio Method for Nuclei, Phys. Rep. 621, 165 (2016).
  16. V. Somà, C. Barbieri, T. Duguet, and P. Navrátil, Moving away from Singly-Magic Nuclei with Gorkov Green’s Function Theory, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 135 (2021).
  17. A. J. Miller, K. Minamisono, A. Klose, D. Garand, C. Kujawa, J. D. Lantis, Y. Liu, B. Maaß, P. F. Mantica, W. Nazarewicz, W. Nörtershäuser, S. V. Pineda, P.-G. Reinhard, D. M. Rossi, F. Sommer, C. Sumithrarachchi, A. Teigelhöfer, and J. Watkins, Proton Superfluidity and Charge Radii in Proton-Rich Calcium Isotopes, Nat. Phys. 15, 432 (2019).
  18. M. Chernykh, H. Feldmeier, T. Neff, P. von Neumann-Cosel, and A. Richter, Structure of the Hoyle State in C12, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 032501 (2007).
  19. Y. Kanada-En’yo, Proton Radii of Be, B, and C Isotopes, Phys. Rev. C 91, 014315 (2015).
  20. T. Duguet, V. Somà, S. Lecluse, C. Barbieri, and P. Navrátil, Ab Initio Calculation of the Potential Bubble Nucleus Si34, Phys. Rev. C 95, 034319 (2017).
  21. G. Hagen, M. Hjorth-Jensen, G. R. Jansen, R. Machleidt, and T. Papenbrock, Continuum Effects and Three-Nucleon Forces in Neutron-Rich Oxygen Isotopes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 242501 (2012).
  22. J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, F. Pederiva, S. C. Pieper, R. Schiavilla, K. E. Schmidt, and R. B. Wiringa, Quantum Monte Carlo Methods for Nuclear Physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1067 (2015).
  23. A. Ekström, G. R. Jansen, K. A. Wendt, G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, B. D. Carlsson, C. Forssén, M. Hjorth-Jensen, P. Navrátil, and W. Nazarewicz, Accurate Nuclear Radii and Binding Energies from a Chiral Interaction, Phys. Rev. C 91, 051301(R) (2015).
  24. S. J. Novario, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, and T. Papenbrock, Charge Radii of Exotic Neon and Magnesium Isotopes, Phys. Rev. C 102, 051303 (2020).
  25. B. Hu, W. Jiang, T. Miyagi, Z. Sun, A. Ekström, C. Forssén, G. Hagen, J. D. Holt, T. Papenbrock, S. R. Stroberg, and I. Vernon, Ab Initio Predictions Link the Neutron Skin of Pb208 to Nuclear Forces, Nat. Phys. 18, 1196 (2022).
  26. U. Köster, O. Arndt, E. Bouquerel, V. N. Fedoseyev, H. Frånberg, A. Joinet, C. Jost, I. S. K. Kerkines, and R. Kirchner, Progress in ISOL Targetion Source Systems, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 266, 4229 (2008).
  27. J. Ballof, Radioactive Molecular Beams at CERN-ISOLDE, Ph.D. thesis, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, 2021.
  28. R. F. Garcia Ruiz et al., Spectroscopy of Short-Lived Radioactive Molecules, Nature (London) 581, 396 (2020).
  29. S. M. Udrescu et al., Isotope Shifts of Radium Monofluoride Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 033001 (2021).
  30. M. Athanasakis et al., Radioactive Molecules at ISOLDE, CERN Technical Report No. CERN-INTC-2021-017, 2021.
  31. W. Demtröder, Laser Spectroscopy (Springer, New York, 1982), Vol. 2.
  32. S. Truppe, S. Marx, S. Kray, M. Doppelbauer, S. Hofsäss, H. C. Schewe, N. Walter, J. Pérez-Ríos, B. G. Sartakov, and G. Meijer, Spectroscopic Characterization of Aluminum Monofluoride with Relevance to Laser Cooling and Trapping, Phys. Rev. A 100, 052513 (2019).
  33. N. H. Pilgram, A. Jadbabaie, Y. Zeng, N. R. Hutzler, and T. C. Steimle, Fine and Hyperfine Interactions in YbOH171 and YbOH173, J. Chem. Phys. 154, 244309 (2021).
  34. A. H. M. Ross, R. S. Eng, and H. Kildal, Heterodyne Measurements of C12O8, C13O16, and C13O18 Laser Frequencies; Mass Dependence of Dunham Coefficients, Opt. Commun. 12, 433 (1974).
  35. J. K. G. Watson, The Isotope Dependence of Diatomic Dunham Coefficients, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 80, 411 (1980).
  36. H. Knöckel and E. Tiemann, Isotopic Field Shift in the Transition A0++−X1Σ+ of PbS, Chem. Phys. 68, 13 (1982).
  37. H. Knöckel and E. Tiemann, Isotope shift of the transition A0++−X1Σ+ of PbO, Chem. Phys. Lett. 104, 83 (1984).
  38. H. Knöckel, T. Kröckertskothen, and E. Tiemann, Molecular-Beam-Laser Studies of the States X1Σ+ and A0+ of PbS, Chem. Phys. 93, 349 (1985).
  39. J. L. Dunham, The Energy Levels of a Rotating Vibrator, Phys. Rev. 41, 721 (1932).
  40. Not to be confused with the spherical tensors that are typically represented by the same symbol.

  41. G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure (D. Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1945).
  42. S. Knecht and T. Saue, Nuclear Size Effects in Rotational Spectra: A Tale with a Twist, Chem. Phys. 401, 103 (2012).
  43. A. Almoukhalalati, A. Shee, and T. Saue, Nuclear Size Effects in Vibrational Spectra, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 15406 (2016).
  44. J. Schlembach and E. Tiemann, Isotopic Field Shift of the Rotational Energy of the Pb-Chalcogenides and Tl-Halides, Chem. Phys. 68, 21 (1982).
  45. R. J. Le Roy, Improved Parameterization for Combined Isotopomer Analysis of Diatomic Spectra and Its Application to HF and DF, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 194, 189 (1999).
  46. B. Cheal, T. E. Cocolios, and S. Fritzsche, Laser Spectroscopy of Radioactive Isotopes: Role and Limitations of Accurate Isotope-Shift Calculations, Phys. Rev. A 86, 042501 (2012).
  47. B. Ohayon, R. F. Garcia Ruiz, Z. H. Sun, G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, and B. K. Sahoo, Nuclear Charge Radii of Na Isotopes: Interplay of Atomic and Nuclear Theory, Phys. Rev. C 105, L031305 (2022).
  48. T. C. Steimle, T. Ma, and C. Linton, The Hyperfine Interaction in the A2Π1/2 and X2Σ+ States of Ytterbium Monofluoride, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 234316 (2007).
  49. A.-M. Mårtensson-Pendrill, D. S. Gough, and P. Hannaford, Isotope Shifts and Hyperfine Structure in the 369.4-nm 6s−6p1/2 Resonance Line of Singly Ionized Ytterbium, Phys. Rev. A 49, 3351 (1994).
  50. B. E. Sauer, J. Wang, and E. A. Hinds, Laser-rf Double Resonance Spectroscopy of YbF174 in the X2Σ+ State: Spin-Rotation, Hyperfine Interactions, and the Electric Dipole Moment, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 7412 (1996).
  51. T. C. Steimle, T. Ma, and C. Linton, The Hyperfine Interaction in the A2Π1/2 and X2Σ+ States of Ytterbium Monofluoride, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 234316 (2007); 128, 209903(E) (2008).
  52. M. Wang, W. J. Huang, F. G. Kondev, G. Audi, and S. Naimi, The AME 2020 Atomic Mass Evaluation (II). Tables, Graphs and References*, Chin. Phys. C 45, 030003 (2021).
  53. The mean-squared nuclear charge radii in Ref. [49] are given with respect to Yb176. There is a disagreement between the values of the mean-squared charge radii in Ref. [49] and Refs. [54, 55]. An explanation for the discrepancy can be found in Ref. [49]. The disagreement between the results of the two works falls beyond the scope of the present work, as the linearity of the molecular isotope shift would be valid for any choice of isotope-shift factors for Yb+.

  54. D. L. Clark, M. E. Cage, D. A. Lewis, and G. W. Greenlees, Optical Isotopic Shifts and Hyperfine Splittings for Yb, Phys. Rev. A 20, 239 (1979).
  55. I. Angeli and K. P. Marinova, Table of Experimental Nuclear Ground State Charge Radii: An Update, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 99, 69 (2013).
  56. B. Simard, S. A. Mitchell, M. R. Humphries, and P. A. Hackett, High-Resolution Spectroscopy and Photophysics of Refractory Molecules at Low Temperature: The C1Σ+−X1Σ+ system of ZrO, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 129, 186 (1988).
  57. P. Campbell, H. L. Thayer, J. Billowes, P. Dendooven, K. T. Flanagan, D. H. Forest, J. A. R. Griffith, J. Huikari, A. Jokinen, R. Moore, A. Nieminen, G. Tungate, S. Zemlyanoi, and J. Äystö, Laser Spectroscopy of Cooled Zirconium Fission Fragments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 082501 (2002).
  58. U. Simon, M. Petri, W. Zimmermann, and W. Urban, Infrared Diode-Laser Spectroscopy of the Ground State of SnH (XΠ21/2), Mol. Phys. 71, 1163 (1990).
  59. G. Fricke and K. Heilig, Nuclear Charge Radii, 50-Sn Tin: Datasheet from Landolt-Börnstein—Group I Elementary Particles, Nuclei and Atoms, Vol. 20, Nuclear Charge Radii, 10.1007/10856314_52.
  60. In such cases, the uncertainty in the extracted δ⟨r2⟩A′,A′′ will probably be greater than the error bars for T0 in Sec. 3, as the T0 values used in the present analysis are extracted from a statistical fit involving high-resolution optical measurements.

  61. Y. Blumenfeld, T. Nilsson, and P. Van Duppen, Facilities and Methods for Radioactive Ion Beam Production, Phys. Scr. T152, 014023 (2013).
  62. M. J. G. Borge and B. Jonson, ISOLDE Past, Present and Future, J. Phys. G 44, 044011 (2017).
  63. R. Neugart, J. Billowes, M. L. Bissell, K. Blaum, B. Cheal, K. T. Flanagan, G. Neyens, W. Nörtershäuser, and D. T. Yordanov, Collinear Laser Spectroscopy at ISOLDE: New Methods and Highlights, J. Phys. G 44, 064002 (2017).
  64. B. A. Marsh et al., New Developments of the In-Source Spectroscopy Method at RILIS/ISOLDE, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 317, 550 (2013).
  65. R. Heinke, T. Kron, S. Raeder, T. Reich, P. Schönberg, M. Trümper, C. Weichhold, and K. Wendt, High-Resolution In-Source Laser Spectroscopy in Perpendicular Geometry, Hyperfine Interact. 238, 6 (2017).
  66. I. Pohjalainen, I. D. Moore, T. Kron, S. Raeder, V. Sonnenschein, H. Tomita, N. Trautmann, A. Voss, and K. Wendt, In-Gas-Cell Laser Ionization Studies of Plutonium Isotopes at IGISOL, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 376, 233 (2016).
  67. J. Ballof, C. Seiffert, B. Crepieux, C. E. Düllmann, M. Delonca, M. Gai, A. Gottberg, T. Kröll, R. Lica, M. Madurga Flores, Y. Martinez Palenzuela, T. M. Mendonca, M. Owen, J. P. Ramos, S. Rothe, T. Stora, O. Tengblad, and F. Wienholtz, Radioactive Boron Beams Produced by Isotope Online Mass Separation at CERN-ISOLDE, Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 65 (2019).
  68. U. Köster, P. Carbonez, A. Dorsival, J. Dvorak, R. Eichler, S. Fernandes, H. Frånberg, J. Neuhausen, Z. Novackova, R. Wilfinger, and A. Yakushev, (Im-) Possible ISOL Beams, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 150, 285 (2007).
  69. M. Au and J. Ballof, Molecular Sidebands for Radioactive Ion Beam Extraction, 10.5281/zenodo.6884293 (2022).
  70. A. V. Oleynichenko, A. Zaitsevskii, L. V. Skripnikov, and E. Eliav, Relativistic Fock Space Coupled Cluster Method for Many-Electron Systems: Non-Perturbative Account for Connected Triple Excitations, Symmetry 12, 1101 (2020).
  71. L. V. Skripnikov, Communication: Theoretical Study of HfF+ Cation to Search for the T,P-Odd Interactions, J. Chem. Phys. 147, 021101 (2017).
  72. L. V. Skripnikov, Combined 4-Component and Relativistic Pseudopotential Study of ThO for the Electron Electric Dipole Moment Search, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 214301 (2016).
  73. S. O. Allehabi, V. A. Dzuba, and V. V. Flambaum, Theoretical Study of the Electronic Structure of Hafnium (Hf, Z=72) and Rutherfordium (Rf, Z=104) Atoms and Their Ions: Energy Levels and Hyperfine-Structure Constants, Phys. Rev. A 104, 052811 (2021).
  74. C. Gorges et al., Laser Spectroscopy of Neutron-Rich Tin Isotopes: A Discontinuity in Charge Radii across the N=82 Shell Closure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 192502 (2019).
  75. B. A. McGuire, 2021 Census of Interstellar, Circumstellar, Extragalactic, Protoplanetary Disk, and Exoplanetary Molecules, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 259, 30 (2022).
  76. A. A. Breier, B. Waßmuth, G. W. Fuchs, J. Gauss, and T. F. Giesen, Mass-Independent Analysis of the Stable Isotopologues of Gas-Phase Titanium Monoxide TiO, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 355, 46 (2019).
  77. G. J. Farooq-Smith et al., Laser and Decay Spectroscopy of the Short-Lived Isotope Fr214 in the Vicinity of the N=126 Shell Closure, Phys. Rev. C 94, 054305 (2016).
  78. R. P. de Groote et al., Dipole and Quadrupole Moments of Cu73–78 as a Test of the Robustness of the Z=28 Shell Closure near Ni78, Phys. Rev. C 96, 041302(R) (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation