Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Measuring Nonlocal Brane Order with Error-Corrected Quantum Gas Microscopes

Junhyeok Hur1,*, Wonjun Lee2,3,*, Kiryang Kwon1, SeungJung Huh1, Gil Young Cho2,3,4,†, and Jae-yoon Choi1,‡

  • 1Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
  • 2Department of Physics, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, 37673, Republic of Korea
  • 3Center for Artificial Low Dimensional Electronic Systems, Institute for Basic Science, Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea
  • 4Asia-Pacific Center for Theoretical Physics, Pohang, 37673, Republic of Korea

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †gilyoungcho@postech.ac.kr
  • ‡jaeyoon.choi@kaist.ac.kr

Phys. Rev. X 14, 011003 – Published 8 January, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011003

Abstract

Exotic quantum many-body states, such as Haldane and spin liquid phases, can exhibit remarkable features like fractional excitations and non-Abelian statistics and offer new understandings of quantum entanglement in many-body quantum systems. These phases are classified by nonlocal correlators that can be directly measured in atomic analog quantum simulating platforms, such as optical lattices and Rydberg atom arrays. However, characterizing these phases in large systems is experimentally challenging because they are sensitive to local errors like atom loss, which suppress its signals exponentially. Additionally, protocols for systematically identifying and mitigating uncorrelated errors in analog quantum simulators are lacking. Here, we address these challenges by developing an error-correction method for large-scale neutral atom quantum simulators using optical lattices. Our error-correction method can distinguish correlated particle-hole pairs from uncorrelated holes in the Mott insulator. After removing the uncorrelated errors, we observe a dramatic improvement in the nonlocal parity correlator and find the perimeter scaling law. Furthermore, the error model provides a statistical estimation of fluctuations in site occupation, from which we measure the generalized brane correlator and confirm that it can be an order parameter for Mott insulators in two dimensions. Our work provides a promising avenue for investigating and characterizing exotic phases of matters in large-scale quantum simulators.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Popular Summary

Article Text

References (48)

  1. K. G. Wilson, Confinement of quarks, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445 (1974).
  2. M. den Nijs and K. Rommelse, Preroughening transitions in crystal surfaces and valence-bond phases in quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 40, 4709 (1989).
  3. T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, Hidden Z2×Z2 symmetry breaking in Haldane-gap antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 45, 304 (1992).
  4. A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 303, 2 (2003).
  5. M. B. Hastings and X.-G. Wen, Quasiadiabatic continuation of quantum states: The stability of topological ground-state degeneracy and emergent gauge invariance, Phys. Rev. B 72, 045141 (2005).
  6. F. D. M. Haldane, Nonlinear field theory of large-spin Heisenberg antiferromagnets: Semiclassically quantized solitons of the one-dimensional easy-axis Néel state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1153 (1983).
  7. W. S. Bakr, J. I. Gillen, A. Peng, S. Fölling, and M. Greiner, A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice, Nature (London) 462, 74 (2009).
  8. J. F. Sherson, C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, M. Cheneau, I. Bloch, and S. Kuhr, Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic Mott insulator, Nature (London) 467, 68 (2010).
  9. E. G. Dalla Torre, E. Berg, and E. Altman, Hidden order in 1D Bose insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 260401 (2006).
  10. E. Berg, E. G. Dalla Torre, T. Giamarchi, and E. Altman, Rise and fall of hidden string order of lattice bosons, Phys. Rev. B 77, 245119 (2008).
  11. M. Endres, M. Cheneau, T. Fukuhara, C. Weitenberg, P. Schauß, C. Gross, L. Mazza, M. C. Bañuls, L. Pollet, I. Bloch, and S. Kuhr, Observation of correlated particle-hole pairs and string order in low-dimensional Mott insulators, Science 334, 200 (2011).
  12. T. A. Hilker, G. Salomon, F. Grusdt, A. Omran, M. Boll, E. Demler, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Revealing hidden antiferromagnetic correlations in doped Hubbard chains via string correlators, Science 357, 484 (2017).
  13. P. Sompet, S. Hirthe, D. Bourgund, T. Chalopin, J. Bibo, J. Koepsell, P. Bojović, R. Verresen, F. Pollmann, G. Salomon, C. Gross, T. A. Hilker, and I. Bloch, Realizing the symmetry-protected Haldane phase in Fermi-Hubbard ladders, Nature (London) 606, 484 (2022).
  14. C. Degli Esposti Boschi, A. Montorsi, and M. Roncaglia, Brane parity orders in the insulating state of Hubbard ladders, Phys. Rev. B 94, 085119 (2016).
  15. S. Fazzini, F. Becca, and A. Montorsi, Nonlocal parity order in the two-dimensional Mott insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 157602 (2017).
  16. G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kalinowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science 374, 1242 (2021).
  17. R. Verresen, M. D. Lukin, and A. Vishwanath, Prediction of toric code topological order from Rydberg blockade, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031005 (2021).
  18. Z. Cai, R. Babbush, S. C. Benjamin, S. Endo, W. J. Huggins, Y. Li, J. R. McClean, and T. E. O’Brien, Quantum error mitigation, arXiv:2210.00921.
  19. S. Cao, P. Tang, X. Guo, X. Chen, W. Zhang, and X. Zhou, Extraction and identification of noise patterns for ultracold atoms in an optical lattice, Opt. Express 27, 12710 (2019).
  20. A. Impertro, J. F. Wienand, S. Häfele, H. von Raven, S. Hubele, T. Klostermann, C. R. Cabrera, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, An unsupervised deep learning algorithm for single-site reconstruction in quantum gas microscopes, Commun. Phys. 6, 166 (2023).
  21. D. Jaksch, C. Bruder, J. I. Cirac, C. W. Gardiner, and P. Zoller, Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3108 (1998).
  22. M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature (London) 415, 39 (2002).
  23. K. Kwon, K. Kim, J. Hur, S. J. Huh, and J.-y. Choi, Site-resolved imaging of a bosonic Mott insulator of Li7 atoms, Phys. Rev. A 105, 033323 (2022).
  24. F. Gerbier, Boson Mott insulators at finite temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 120405 (2007).
  25. B. Capogrosso-Sansone, S. G. Söyler, N. Prokof’ev, and B. Svistunov, Monte Carlo study of the two-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A 77, 015602 (2008).
  26. C. Castelnovo and C. Chamon, Quantum topological phase transition at the microscopic level, Phys. Rev. B 77, 054433 (2008).
  27. A. W. Sandvik, Stochastic series expansion method with operator-loop update, Phys. Rev. B 59, R14157 (1999).
  28. O. F. Syljuåsen and A. W. Sandvik, Quantum Monte Carlo with directed loops, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046701 (2002).
  29. E. Dennis, A. Kitaev, A. Landahl, and J. Preskill, Topological quantum memory, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4452 (2002).
  30. A. G. Fowler, Minimum weight perfect matching of fault-tolerant topological quantum error correction in average O(1) parallel time, Quantum Inf. Comput. 15, 145 (2015).
  31. G. Duclos-Cianci and D. Poulin, Fast decoders for topological quantum codes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 050504 (2010).
  32. S. P. Rath, W. Simeth, M. Endres, and W. Zwerger, Non-local order in Mott insulators, duality and Wilson loops, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 334, 256 (2013).
  33. P. M. Preiss, R. Ma, M. E. Tai, J. Simon, and M. Greiner, Quantum gas microscopy with spin, atom-number, and multilayer readout, Phys. Rev. A 91, 041602(R) (2015).
  34. A. M. Kaufman, M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Quantum thermalization through entanglement in an isolated many-body system, Science 353, 794 (2016).
  35. J. Koepsell, S. Hirthe, D. Bourgund, P. Sompet, J. Vijayan, G. Salomon, C. Gross, and I. Bloch, Robust bilayer charge pumping for spin- and density-resolved quantum gas microscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 010403 (2020).
  36. T. Hartke, B. Oreg, N. Jia, and M. Zwierlein, Doublon-hole correlations and fluctuation thermometry in a Fermi-Hubbard gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 113601 (2020).
  37. S. Greschner, L. Santos, and D. Poletti, Exploring unconventional Hubbard models with doubly modulated lattice gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 183002 (2014).
  38. K. Duivenvoorden and T. Quella, Discriminating string order parameter for topological phases of gapped SU(N) spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 86, 235142 (2012).
  39. A. Catuneanu, E. S. Sørensen, and H.-Y. Kee, Nonlocal string order parameter in the S=12 Kitaev-Heisenberg ladder, Phys. Rev. B 99, 195112 (2019).
  40. T. Hartke, B. Oreg, C. Turnbaugh, N. Jia, and M. Zwierlein, Direct observation of nonlocal fermion pairing in an attractive Fermi-Hubbard gas, Science 381, 82 (2023).
  41. K. J. Satzinger, Y.-J. Liu, A. Smith, C. Knapp, M. Newman, C. Jones, Z. Chen, C. Quintana, X. Mi, A. Dunsworth et al., Realizing topologically ordered states on a quantum processor, Science 374, 1237 (2021).
  42. I. Cong, N. Maskara, M. C. Tran, H. Pichler, G. Semeghini, S. F. Yelin, S. Choi, and M. D. Lukin, Enhancing detection of topological order by local error correction, arXiv:2209.12428.
  43. Z.-P. Cian, M. Hafezi, and M. Barkeshli, Extracting Wilson loop operators and fractional statistics from a single bulk ground state, arXiv:2209.14302.
  44. J. B. Kogut, An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659 (1979).
  45. D. Wei, D. Adler, K. Srakaew, S. Agrawal, P. Weckesser, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Observation of brane parity order in programmable optical lattices, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021042 (2023).
  46. T. Stöferle, H. Moritz, C. Schori, M. Köhl, and T. Esslinger, Transition from a strongly interacting 1D superfluid to a Mott insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 130403 (2004).
  47. O. F. Syljuåsen, Directed loop updates for quantum lattice models, Phys. Rev. E 67, 046701 (2003).
  48. N. Prokof’ev and B. Svistunov, Worm algorithms for classical statistical models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 160601 (2001).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation