- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review X

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Existence of a Thermodynamic Spin-Glass Phase in the Zero-Concentration Limit of Anisotropic Dipolar Systems

Juan Carlos Andresen1,2, Helmut G. Katzgraber3,4,5,*, Vadim Oganesyan6,7, and Moshe Schechter8

  • 1Theoretische Physik, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
  • 2Department of Theoretical Physics, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
  • 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4242, USA
  • 4Materials Science and Engineering Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
  • 5Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501, USA
  • 6Department of Engineering Science and Physics, College of Staten Island, CUNY, Staten Island, New York 10314, USA
  • 7Initiative for the Theoretical Sciences, The Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, New York 10016, USA
  • 8Department of Physics, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel

  • *Corresponding author.
PDF

Phys. Rev. X 4, 041016 – Published 28 October, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.041016

Abstract

The nature of ordering in dilute dipolar interacting systems dates back to the work of Debye and is one of the most basic, oldest and as-of-yet unsettled problems in magnetism. While spin-glass order is readily observed in several RKKY-interacting systems, dipolar spin glasses are the subject of controversy and ongoing scrutiny, e.g., in LiHoxY1−xF4, a rare-earth randomly diluted uniaxial (Ising) dipolar system. In particular, it is unclear if the spin-glass phase in these paradigmatic materials persists in the limit of zero concentration or not. We study an effective model of LiHoxY1−xF4 using large-scale Monte Carlo simulations that combine parallel tempering with a special cluster algorithm tailored to overcome the numerical difficulties that occur at extreme dilutions. We find a paramagnetic to spin-glass phase transition for all Ho+ ion concentrations down to the smallest concentration numerically accessible, 0.1%, and including Ho+ ion concentrations that coincide with those studied experimentally up to 16.7%. Our results suggest that randomly diluted dipolar Ising systems have a spin-glass phase in the limit of vanishing dipole concentration, with a critical temperature vanishing linearly with concentration. The agreement of our results with mean-field theory testifies to the irrelevance of fluctuations in interactions strengths, albeit being strong at small concentrations, to the nature of the low-temperature phase and the functional form of the critical temperature of dilute anisotropic dipolar systems. Deviations from linearity in experimental results at the lowest concentrations are discussed.

View figure in article

Popular Summary

LiHoxY1−xF4 is an archetypal dipolar quantum magnet and, at the same time, one of the most versatile materials to study fascinating phenomena in condensed-matter physics, such as many-body quantum systems and large-spin tunneling. Despite intense scrutinization of the properties of this rare-earth magnet—experimentally, numerically, and theoretically—the nature of its low-temperature phase at small Ho concentrations remains an open question. We investigate the ordering mechanism of anisotropic dipolar systems at small magnetic ion concentrations. We numerically employ a special cluster algorithm tailored to overcome the central obstacle that has hindered progress to date, namely, the enhancement of fluctuations as concentration is reduced, and are able to show that the low-concentration limit is governed by a spin-glass state, hence adding to the versatility of this jack-of-all-trades material.

We use large-scale Monte Carlo simulations that combine parallel tempering Monte Carlo with a special cluster algorithm and show that a spin-glass phase extends to the lowest concentrations accessible numerically: a record-breaking 0.1%. We note that this concentration is 2 orders of magnitude lower than the values investigated by other studies. The critical temperature is linear with Ho concentration for 2 orders of magnitude, demonstrating that the low-temperature phase is stable against fluctuations and shows geometric similarity down to the smallest concentrations, and highlighting the adequacy of mean-field description for the determination of the phase of dilute anisotropic dipolar systems.

These results will serve as a basis for any experiment in anisotropic dipolar systems at low concentrations. By establishing a spin-glass phase down to zero concentration, we also establish the existence of the paramagnetic phase at higher temperatures. Therefore, relatively large experimental estimates for the critical temperature at rather low concentrations may be reinterpreted as a dynamic crossover to a frozen regime, rather than a thermodynamic transition.

Article Text

References (50)

  1. J. M. Luttinger and L. Tisza, Theory of Dipole Interaction in Crystals, Phys. Rev. 70, 954 (1946).
  2. B. E. Vugmeister and M. D. Glinchuk, Dipole Glass and Ferroelectricity in Random-Site Electric Dipole Systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 993 (1990).
  3. K. Binder and A. P. Young, Spin Glasses: Experimental Facts, Theoretical Concepts and Open Questions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 801 (1986).
  4. M. J. Stephen and A. Aharony, Percolation with Long-Range Interactions, J. Phys. C 14, 1665 (1981).
  5. H. J. Xu, B. Bergersen, F. Niedermayer, and Z. Racz, Ordering of Ising Dipoles, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 3, 4999 (1991).
  6. D. Bitko, T. F. Rosenbaum, and G. Aeppli, Quantum Critical Behavior for a Model Magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 940 (1996).
  7. H. M. Ronnow, R. Parthasarathy, J. Jensen, G. Aeppli, T. F. Rosenbaum, and D. F. McMorrow, Quantum Phase Transition of a Magnet in a Spin Bath, Science 308, 389 (2005).
  8. M. Schechter and P. C. E. Stamp, Significance of the Hyperfine Interactions in the Phase Diagram of LiHoxY1−xF4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 267208 (2005).
  9. R. Giraud, W. Wernsdorfer, A. M. Tkachuk, D. Mailly, and B. Barbara, Nuclear Spin Driven Quantum Relaxation in LiY0.998Ho0.002F4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 057203 (2001).
  10. R. Giraud, A. M. Tkachuk, and B. Barbara, Quantum Dynamics of Atomic Magnets: Cotunneling and Dipolar-Based Tunneling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 257204 (2003).
  11. Y. Pollack and M. Schechter, Proposal for Direct Measurement of Random Fields in the LiHox1−Xf4 Crystal, Phys. Rev. B 89, 064414 (2014).
  12. J. Brooke, D. Bitko, T. F. Rosenbaum, and G. Aepli, Quantum Annealing of a Disordered Magnet, Science 284, 779 (1999).
  13. S. Ghosh, T. F. Rosenbaum, G. Aeppli, and S. N. Coppersmith, Entangled Quantum State of Magnetic Dipoles, Nature (London) 425, 48 (2003).
  14. J. Brooke, T. F. Rosenbaum, and G. Aepli, Tunable Quantum Tunneling of Magnetic Domain Walls, Nature (London) 413, 610 (2001).
  15. M. Schechter and N. Laflorencie, Quantum Spin Glass and the Dipolar Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 137204 (2006).
  16. S. M. A. Tabei, M. J. P. Gingras, Y.-J. Kao, P. Stasiak, and J.-Y. Fortin, Induced Random Fields in the LiHoxY1−xF4 Quantum Ising Magnet in a Transverse Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 237203 (2006).
  17. M. Schechter, LiHoxY1−xF4 as a Random-Field Ising Ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 77, 020401(R) (2008).
  18. D. M. Silevitch, D. Bitko, J. Brooke, S. Ghosh, G. Aeppli, and T. F. Rosenbaum, A Ferromagnet in a Continuously Tunable Random Field, Nature (London) 448, 567 (2007).
  19. J. C. Andresen, C. K. Thomas, H. G. Katzgraber, and M. Schechter, Novel Disordering Mechanism in Ferromagnetic Systems with Competing Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 177202 (2013).
  20. D. H. Reich, T. F. Rosenbaum, and G. Aeppli, Glassy Relaxation without Freezing in a Random Dipolar-Coupled Ising Magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1969 (1987).
  21. S. Ghosh, R. Parthasarathy, T. F. Rosenbaum, and G. Aeppli, Coherent Spin Oscillations in a Disordered Magnet, Science 296, 2195 (2002).
  22. P. E. Jönsson, R. Mathieu, W. Wernsdorfer, A. M. Tkachuk, and B. Barbara, Absence of Conventional Spin-Glass Transition in the Ising Dipolar System LiHoxY1−xF4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 256403 (2007).
  23. D. M. Silevitch, C. M. S. Gannarelli, A. J. Fisher, G. Aeppli, and T. F. Rosenbaum, Quantum Projection in an Ising Spin Liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 057203 (2007).
  24. J. A. Quilliam, S. Meng, C. G. A. Mugford, and J. B. Kycia, Evidence of Spin Glass Dynamics in Dilute LiHox1−Xf4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 187204 (2008).
  25. J. A. Quilliam, S. Meng, and J. B. Kycia, Experimental Phase Diagram and Dynamics of a Dilute Dipolar-Coupled Ising System, Phys. Rev. B 85, 184415 (2012).
  26. M. A. Schmidt, D. M. Silevitch, G. Aeppli, and T. F. Rosenbaum, Using Thermal Boundary Conditions to Engineer the Quantum State of a Bulk Magnet, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 3689 (2014).
  27. G. Ayton, M. Gingras, and G. Patey, Ferroelectric and Dipolar Glass Phases of Noncrystalline Systems, Phys. Rev. E 56, 562 (1997).
  28. J. Snider and C. C. Yu, Absence of Dipole Glass Transition for Randomly Dilute Classical Ising Dipoles, Phys. Rev. B 72, 214203 (2005).
  29. A. Biltmo and P. Henelius, Phase Diagram of the Dilute Magnet LiHoxY1−xF4, Phys. Rev. B 76, 054423 (2007).
  30. A. Biltmo and P. Henelius, Low-Temperature Properties of the Dilute Dipolar Magnet LiHoxY1−xF4, Phys. Rev. B 78, 054437 (2008).
  31. H. G. Ballesteros, A. Cruz, L. A. Fernandez, V. Martin-Mayor, J. Pech, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, A. Tarancon, P. Tellez, C. L. Ullod, and C. Ungil, Critical Behavior of the Three-Dimensional Ising Spin Glass, Phys. Rev. B 62, 14237 (2000).
  32. K.-M. Tam and M. J. P. Gingras, Spin-Glass Transition at Nonzero Temperature in a Disordered Dipolar Ising System: The Case of LiHoxY1−xF4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 087202 (2009).
  33. A. Biltmo and P. Henelius, Unreachable Glass Transition in Dilute Dipolar Magnet, Nat. Commun. 3, 857 (2012).
  34. K. Hukushima and K. Nemoto, Exchange Monte Carlo Method and Application to Spin Glass Simulations, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 1604 (1996).
  35. K. Janzen, A. K. Hartmann, and A. Engel, Replica Theory for Levy Spin Glasses, J. Stat. Mech. (2008) P04006.
  36. J. C. Andresen, K. Janzen, and H. G. Katzgraber, Critical Behavior and Universality in Levy Spin Glasses, Phys. Rev. B 83, 174427 (2011).
  37. M. Schechter and P. C. E. Stamp, The Low-T Phase Diagram of LiHoxY1−xF4, Phys. Rev. B 78, 054438 (2008).
  38. A. Biltmo and P. Henelius, The Ferromagnetic Transition and Domain Structure in LiHoxY1−xF4, Europhys. Lett. 87, 27007 (2009).
  39. I. A. Campbell, K. Hukushima, and H. Takayama, An Extended Scaling Scheme for Critically Divergent Quantities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 117202 (2006).
  40. H. G. Katzgraber, M. Körner, and A. P. Young, Universality in Three-Dimensional Ising Spin Glasses: A Monte Carlo Study, Phys. Rev. B 73, 224432 (2006).
  41. Z. Wang and C. Holm, Estimate of the Cutoff Errors in the Ewald Summation for Dipolar Systems, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6351 (2001).

  42. The cluster algorithm used in our work was introduced by Janzen et al.. [35] to overcome the large thermalization times of mean-field spin glasses with bonds drawn from a fat-tailed Levy distribution. Subsequently, we applied the method to a three-dimensional system with Levy bonds to see if strong fat-tailed interaction distributions affect universality in spin glasses [36]. In Ref. [36], we performed a very careful comparison of our results for the energy, spin-overlap, and two-point correlation length using either simple Monte Carlo with parallel tempering or simple Monte Carlo with parallel tempering including the cluster moves. In the regime where the numerical effort was not exorbitant (not-too-strong bonds, i.e., close to a Gaussian), both methods delivered results indistinguishable within statistical errors. Furthermore, we verified the correctness of our results for dilute dipolar magnets by reproducing the results for concentrations of 6.25% and 12.5% with and without the cluster algorithm. Finally, we also compared our results directly to the published results of Tam and Gingras [32] and found perfect agreement. One might, at first, see an apparent discrepancy between our results and the ones of Tam and Gingras. However, if one restricts our system sizes to the ones used by Tam and Gingras, the agreement of the data is within statistical error bars. Based on these rigorous tests, we are certain that the fact that the cluster moves do not fully obey detailed balance does not affect the quality of the Monte Carlo data.

  43. K. Kjaer, J. Als-Nielsen, I. Laursen, and F. K. Larsen, A Neutron Scattering Study of the Dilute Dipolar-Coupled Ferromagnets LiTb0.3Y0.7F4 and LiHo0.3Y0.7F4. Structure, Magnetisation and Critical Scattering, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1, 5743 (1989).
  44. C. Ancona-Torres, D. M. Silevitch, T. F. Rosenbaum, and G. Aeppli, Quantum and Classical Glass Transitions in LiHoxY1−xF4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 057201 (2008).
  45. W. Wu, D. Ellman, T. F. Rosenbaum, G. Aeppli, and D. H. Reich, From Classical to Quantum Glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2076 (1991).
  46. J. N. Cederberg, A Course in Modern Geometries, Springer Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics and Technology (Springer, New York, 2001).
  47. A. I. Larkin and D. E. Khmel’nitskii, Virial Expansion for Magnetic Impurities in Metals, Sov. Phys. JETP 31, 958 (1970).
  48. M. Schechter and P. C. E. Stamp, Correlated Random Fields in Dielectric and Spin Glasses, Europhys. Lett. 88, 66002 (2009).
  49. Y. Imry and S.-K. Ma, Random-Field Instability of the Ordered State of Continuous Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1399 (1975).
  50. D. S. Fisher and D. A. Huse, Ordered Phase of Short-Range Ising Spin-Glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1601 (1986).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. X 4, 041016– Published 28 October, 2014
  • Received 4 August 2014
Creative Commons Logo

This article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation