- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review E

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Lindblad many-body scars

Antonio M. García-García1,*, Zhongling Lu1,2,†, Lucas Sá3,‡, and Jacobus J. M. Verbaarschot4,§

  • *Contact author: amgg@sjtu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: zhongling_lu@sjtu.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: ld710@cam.ac.uk
  • §Contact author: jacobus.verbaarschot@stonybrook.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 113, 024116 – Published 11 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/x15w-zchv

Abstract

Quantum many-body scars have received much recent attention for being both intriguing nonergodic states in otherwise quantum chaotic systems and promising candidates to encode quantum information efficiently. So far, these studies have mostly been restricted to Hermitian systems. Here, we study many-body scars in many-body quantum chaotic systems coupled to a Markovian bath, which we term Lindblad many-body scars. They are defined as simultaneous eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian and dissipative parts of the vectorized Liouvillian. Importantly, because their eigenvalues are purely real, they are not related to revivals. The number and nature of the scars depend on both the symmetry of the Hamiltonian and the choice of jump operators. For a dissipative four-body Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model with N fermions, either Majorana or complex, we construct analytically some of these Lindblad scars while others could only be obtained numerically. As an example of the former, we identify N/2+1 scars for complex fermions due to the U(1) symmetry of the model and two scars for Majorana fermions as a consequence of the parity symmetry. Similar results are obtained for a dissipative XXZ spin chain. We also characterize the physical properties of Lindblad scars. First, the operator size is independent of the disorder realization and has a vanishing variance. By contrast, the operator size for nonscarred states, believed to be quantum chaotic, is well described by a distribution centered around a specific size and a finite variance, which could be relevant for a precise definition of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis in dissipative quantum chaos. Moreover, the entanglement entropy of these scars has distinct features such as a strong dependence on the partition choice and, in certain cases, a large entanglement.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (92)

  1. E. J. Heller, Bound-state eigenfunctions of classically chaotic Hamiltonian systems: Scars of periodic orbits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1515 (1984).
  2. Z. Ge, A. M. Graf, J. Keski-Rahkonen, S. Slizovskiy, P. Polizogopoulos, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, R. Van Haren, D. Lederman, V. I. Fal’ko, et al., Direct visualization of relativistic quantum scars in graphene quantum dots, Nature (London) 635, 841 (2024).
  3. B. Evrard, A. Pizzi, S. I. Mistakidis, and C. B. Dag, Quantum scars and regular eigenstates in a chaotic spinor condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 020401 (2024).
  4. B. Evrard, A. Pizzi, S. I. Mistakidis, and C. B. Dag, Quantum many-body scars from unstable periodic orbits, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144302 (2024).
  5. A. Pizzi, L.-H. Kwan, B. Evrard, C. B. Dag, and J. Knolle, Quantum scars in many-body systems, Nat. Commun. 16, 6722 (2025).
  6. A. M. Graf, S. Atwood, M. Xiao, E. J. Heller, and J. Keski-Rahkonen, Quantum birthmarks: Ergodicity breaking beyond scarring, arXiv:2412.02982.
  7. A. Pizzi, Quantum trails and memory effects in the phase space of chaotic quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 140402 (2025).
  8. Z. Lu, A. M. Graf, E. J. Heller, J. Keski-Rahkonen, and C. B. Dag, Antiscarring from eigenstate stacking in a chaotic spinor condensate, Phys. Rev. A 112, 043307 (2025).
  9. Q. Hummel, K. Richter, and P. Schlagheck, Genuine many-body quantum scars along unstable modes in Bose-Hubbard systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 250402 (2023).
  10. M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papić, Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nat. Phys. 17, 675 (2021).
  11. H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, et al., Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature (London) 551, 579 (2017).
  12. D. Bluvstein, A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, A. A. Michailidis, N. Maskara, W. W. Ho, et al., Controlling quantum many-body dynamics in driven Rydberg atom arrays, Science 371, 1355 (2021).
  13. C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papić, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nat. Phys. 14, 745 (2018).
  14. K. Pakrouski, P. N. Pallegar, F. K. Popov, and I. R. Klebanov, Many-body scars as a group invariant sector of Hilbert space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 230602 (2020).
  15. M. Sporre, J. J. M. Verbaarschot, and I. Zahed, Solution of the three anyon problem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1813 (1991).
  16. M. Sporre, J. J. M. Verbaarschot, and I. Zahed, Four anyons in a harmonic well, Phys. Rev. B 46, 5738 (1992).
  17. M. Sporre, J. J. M. Verbaarschot, and I. Zahed, Anyon spectra and the third virial coefficient, Nucl. Phys. B 389, 645 (1993).
  18. Y.-S. Wu, Multiparticle quantum mechanics obeying fractional statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 111 (1984).
  19. M. A. Shifman and A. V. Turbiner, Quantal problems with partial algebraization of the spectrum, Commun. Math. Phys. 126, 347 (1989).
  20. M. A. Shifman, ITEP lectures on particle physics and field theory volume 2, in World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999), Vol. 62, pp. 775–785.
  21. N. Shiraishi and T. Mori, Systematic construction of counterexamples to the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 030601 (2017).
  22. S. Moudgalya, S. Rachel, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Exact excited states of nonintegrable models, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235155 (2018).
  23. I.-C. Chen, B. Burdick, Y. Yao, P. P. Orth, and T. Iadecola, Error-mitigated simulation of quantum many-body scars on quantum computers with pulse-level control, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043027 (2022).
  24. H. Cao, D. G. Angelakis, and D. Leykam, Unsupervised learning of quantum many-body scars using intrinsic dimension, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 5, 025049 (2024).
  25. G. Ramírez, J. Rodríguez-Laguna, and G. Sierra, Entanglement over the rainbow, J. Stat. Mech. (2015) P06002.
  26. C. M. Langlett, Z.-C. Yang, J. Wildeboer, A. V. Gorshkov, T. Iadecola, and S. Xu, Rainbow scars: From area to volume law, Phys. Rev. B 105, L060301 (2022).
  27. H. Dong, J.-Y. Desaules, Y. Gao, N. Wang, Z. Guo, J. Chen, Y. Zou, F. Jin, X. Zhu, P. Zhang, et al., Disorder-tunable entanglement at infinite temperature, Sci. Adv. 9, eadj3822 (2023).
  28. S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quantum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: A review of exact results, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 086501 (2022).
  29. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
  30. B. Buča, J. Tindall, and D. Jaksch, Non-stationary coherent quantum many-body dynamics through dissipation, Nat. Commun. 10, 1730 (2019).
  31. Q. Chen, S. A. Chen, and Z. Zhu, Weak ergodicity breaking in non-Hermitian many-body systems, SciPost Phys. 15, 052 (2023).
  32. R. Shen, F. Qin, J.-Y. Desaules, Z. Papić, and C. H. Lee, Enhanced many-body quantum scars from the non-Hermitian Fock skin effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 216601 (2024).
  33. M. de Leeuw, C. Paletta, B. Pozsgay, and E. Vernier, Hidden quasilocal charges and Gibbs ensemble in a Lindblad system, Phys. Rev. B 109, 054311 (2024).
  34. S. Maity and R. Hamazaki, Kinetically constrained models constructed from dissipative quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 110, 014301 (2024).
  35. T.-H. Yang and D. A. Abanin, Integrals of motion as slow modes in dissipative many-body operator dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 112, 094304 (2025).
  36. H.-R. Wang, D. Yuan, S.-Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, D.-L. Deng, and L.-M. Duan, Embedding quantum many-body scars into decoherence-free subspaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 150401 (2024).
  37. X.-P. Jiang, M. Xu, X. Yang, Y. Wang, and L. Pan, Robustness of quantum many-body scars in the presence of Markovian bath, Commun. Phys. 9, 14 (2026).
  38. A. Teretenkov and O. Lychkovskiy, Duality between open systems and closed bilayer systems: Thermofield double states as quantum many-body scars, Phys. Rev. B 110, L241105 (2024).
  39. A. M. García-García, L. Sá, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Universality and its limits in non-Hermitian many-body quantum chaos using the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 107, 066007 (2023).
  40. G. Cipolloni and J. Kudler-Flam, Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians violate the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Phys. Rev. B 109, L020201 (2024).
  41. Y. Mao, P. Zhong, H. Lin, X. Wang, and S. Hu, Diagnosing thermalization dynamics of non-Hermitian quantum systems via GKSL master equations, Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 070301 (2024).
  42. S. S. Roy, S. Bandyopadhyay, R. C. de Almeida, and P. Hauke, Unveiling eigenstate thermalization for non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 180405 (2025).
  43. R. Hamazaki, M. Nakagawa, T. Haga, and M. Ueda, Lindbladian many-body localization, arXiv:2206.02984.
  44. G. Almeida, P. Ribeiro, M. Haque, and L. Sá, Universality, robustness, and limits of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E 113, L012101 (2026).
  45. L. Sá, P. Ribeiro, and T. Prosen, Lindbladian dissipation of strongly-correlated quantum matter, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L022068 (2022).
  46. A. Kulkarni, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Lindbladian dynamics of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B 106, 075138 (2022).
  47. A. M. García-García, L. Sá, J. J. M. Verbaarschot, and J. P. Zheng, Keldysh wormholes and anomalous relaxation in the dissipative Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 107, 106006 (2023).
  48. K. Kawabata, A. Kulkarni, J. Li, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Lindbladians, Phys. Rev. B 108, 075110 (2023).
  49. K. Kawabata, A. Kulkarni, J. Li, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Symmetry of open quantum systems: Classification of dissipative quantum chaos, PRX Quantum 4, 030328 (2023).
  50. A. M. García-García, L. Sá, J. J. M. Verbaarschot, and C. Yin, Toward a classification of PT-symmetric quantum systems: From dissipative dynamics to topology and wormholes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 105017 (2024).
  51. O. Bohigas and J. Flores, Two-body random Hamiltonian and level density, Phys. Lett. B 34, 261 (1971).
  52. J. French and S. Wong, Validity of random matrix theories for many-particle systems, Phys. Lett. B 33, 449 (1970).
  53. J. B. French and S. S. M. Wong, Some random-matrix level and spacing distributions for fixed-particle-rank interactions, Phys. Lett. B 35, 5 (1971).
  54. A. Gervois, Level densities for random one- or two-body potentials, Nucl. Phys. A 184, 507 (1972).
  55. S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993).
  56. L. Benet and H. A. Weidenmüller, Review of the k-body embedded ensembles of Gaussian random matrices, J. Phys. A 36, 3569 (2003).
  57. A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, in KITP Program: Entanglement in Strongly-Correlated Quantum Matter (2015), http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/.
  58. J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016).
  59. J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, J. High Energ. Phys. 08 (2016) 106.
  60. A. M. García-García and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Spectral and thermodynamic properties of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 94, 126010 (2016).
  61. G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976).
  62. V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys. 17, 821 (1976).
  63. L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 096001 (2016).
  64. J. Maldacena, G. J. Turiaci, and Z. Yang, Two dimensional nearly de Sitter gravity, J. High Energ. Phys. 01 (2021) 139.
  65. A. M. García-García, Y. Jia, D. Rosa, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Sparse Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, quantum chaos, and gravity duals, Phys. Rev. D 103, 106002 (2021).
  66. J. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2003) 021.
  67. B. Buča and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: Transport in constrained open spin chains, New J. Phys. 14, 073007 (2012).
  68. S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. Büchler, and P. Zoller, Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms, Nat. Phys. 4, 878 (2008).
  69. B. Kraus, H. P. Büchler, S. Diehl, A. Kantian, A. Micheli, and P. Zoller, Preparation of entangled states by quantum Markov processes, Phys. Rev. A 78, 042307 (2008).
  70. D. A. Lidar, I. L. Chuang, and K. B. Whaley, Decoherence-free subspaces for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2594 (1998).
  71. D. A. Lidar and K. Birgitta Whaley, Decoherence-free subspaces and subsystems, in Irreversible Quantum Dynamics, edited by F. Benatti and R. Floreanini (Springer, Berlin, 2003), pp. 83–120.
  72. Y. Gu, A. Kitaev, S. Sachdev, and G. Tarnopolsky, Notes on the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, J. High Energ. Phys. 02 (2020) 157.
  73. D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford, and A. Streicher, Operator growth in the SYK model, J. High Energ. Phys. 06 (2018) 122.
  74. X.-L. Qi, E. J. Davis, A. Periwal, and M. Schleier-Smith, Measuring operator size growth in quantum quench experiments, arXiv:1906.00524.
  75. X.-L. Qi and A. Streicher, Quantum epidemiology: Operator growth, thermal effects, and SYK, J. High Energ. Phys. 08 (2019) 012.
  76. T. Schuster, B. Kobrin, P. Gao, I. Cong, E. T. Khabiboulline, N. M. Linke, M. D. Lukin, C. Monroe, B. Yoshida, and N. Y. Yao, Many-body quantum teleportation via operator spreading in the traversable wormhole protocol, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031013 (2022).
  77. T. Schuster and N. Y. Yao, Operator growth in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 160402 (2023).
  78. B. Bhattacharjee, X. Cao, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, Operator growth in open quantum systems: Lessons from the dissipative SYK, J. High Energ. Phys. 03 (2023) 054.
  79. T. Mori, Liouvillian-gap analysis of open quantum many-body systems in the weak dissipation limit, Phys. Rev. B 109, 064311 (2024).
  80. J. Richter, L. Sá, and M. Haque, Integrability versus chaos in the steady state of many-body open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E 111, 064103 (2025).
  81. M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
  82. J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991).
  83. J. P. Draayer, J. B. French, and S. S. M. Wong, Strength distributions and statistical spectroscopy. I. General theory, Ann. Phys. 106, 472 (1977).
  84. J. P. Draayer, J. B. French, and S. S. M. Wong, Strength distributions and statistical spectroscopy II. Shell-model comparisons, Ann. Phys. 106, 503 (1977).
  85. J. J. M. Verbaarschot and P. J. Brussaard, Fixed-JT averages of electromagnetic operators, Nucl. Phys. A 423, 77 (1984).
  86. J. J. M. Verbaarschot and P. J. Brussaard, Distribution of electromagnetic transition amplitudes, Z. Phys. A 321, 125 (1985).
  87. T. Prosen and I. Pižorn, Operator space entanglement entropy in a transverse Ising chain, Phys. Rev. A 76, 032316 (2007).
  88. T. Zhou and D. J. Luitz, Operator entanglement entropy of the time evolution operator in chaotic systems, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094206 (2017).
  89. D. Wellnitz, G. Preisser, V. Alba, J. Dubail, and J. Schachenmayer, Rise and fall, and slow rise again, of operator entanglement under dephasing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 170401 (2022).
  90. D. J. Luitz, N. Laflorencie, and F. Alet, Many-body localization edge in the random-field Heisenberg chain, Phys. Rev. B 91, 081103 (2015).
  91. L. Sá, P. Ribeiro, and T. Prosen, Complex spacing ratios: A signature of dissipative quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021019 (2020).
  92. L. Sá, P. Ribeiro, and T. Prosen, Symmetry classification of many-body Lindbladians: Tenfold way and beyond, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031019 (2023).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 113, 024116– Published 11 February, 2026
  • Received 16 June 2025
  • Revised 1 October 2025
  • Accepted 14 January 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation