Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Irreversibility of the pendulum revisited from Husimi's adiabaticity parameter

Yuki Izumida*

  • Department of Complexity Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8561, Japan

  • *Contact author: izumida@k.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. E 112, 064131 – Published 29 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/r7cg-vxz1

Abstract

We revisit the irreversibility of the pendulum with time-dependent angular frequency, considered in a classical paper by K. Husimi. He introduced a parameter that measures the adiabaticity of a process utilizing an adiabatic invariant for the equation of motion of the pendulum. With this adiabaticity parameter, Husimi showed the irreversibility of the pendulum for a cyclic process, which is reminiscent of the Planck principle in thermodynamics, based on the microscopic mechanics. In this study, we generalize the argument by Husimi to a damped pendulum with friction, and highlight the role of conservation of a phase-space area on the Husimi's adiabaticity parameter. Moreover, we also investigate the second law of thermodynamics and its generalization for a general noncyclic process as well as a cyclic process, and elucidate how the Husimi's adiabaticity parameter impacts this law. In particular, for a general noncyclic process, we show the law of entropy nondecrease for the pendulum without friction by using the property of the Husimi's adiabaticity parameter.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (39)

  1. A. Lenard, Thermodynamical proof of the Gibbs formula for elementary quantum systems, J. Stat. Phys. 19, 575 (1978).
  2. H. Tasaki, Statistical mechanical derivation of the second law of thermodynamics, arXiv:cond-mat/0009206.
  3. S.-I. Sasa and T. S. Komatsu, Thermodynamic irreversibility from high-dimensional Hamiltonian chaos, Prog. Theor. Phys. 103, 1 (2000).
  4. A. E. Allahverdyan and Th M. Nieuwenhuizen, Minimal work principle: Proof and counterexamples, Phys. Rev. E 71, 046107 (2005).
  5. M. Campisi, Statistical mechanical proof of the second law of thermodynamics based on volume entropy, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 39, 181 (2008).
  6. M. Campisi, Increase of Boltzmann entropy in a quantum forced harmonic oscillator, Phys. Rev. E 78, 051123 (2008).
  7. C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2690 (1997).
  8. C. Jarzynski, Fluctuation relations and strong inequalities for thermally isolated systems, Physica A 552, 122077 (2020).
  9. U. Seifert, Entropy and the second law for driven, or quenched, thermally isolated systems, Physica A 552, 121822 (2020).
  10. Hereafter, The adiabatic change of the parameter is used as the same meaning as the quasistatic change.
  11. K. Husimi, Miscellanea in elementary quantum mechanics II, Prog. Theor. Phys. 9, 381 (1953).
  12. S. Deffner and E. Lutz, Nonequilibrium work distribution of a quantum harmonic oscillator, Phys. Rev. E 77, 021128 (2008).
  13. A. Sone and S. Deffner, Jarzynski equality for conditional stochastic work, J. Stat. Phys. 183, 11 (2021).
  14. J. D. Jaramillo, J. Deng, and J. Gong, Quantum work fluctuations in connection with the Jarzynski equality, Phys. Rev. E 96, 042119 (2017).
  15. J. Jaramillo, M. Beau, and A. del Campo, Quantum supremacy of many-particle thermal machines, New J. Phys. 18, 075019 (2016).
  16. O. Abah, J. Roßnagel, G. Jakob, S. Deffner, F. Schmidt-Kaler, K. Singer, and E. Lutz, Single-Ion heat engine at maximum power, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203006 (2012).
  17. J. Roßnagel, O. Abah, F. Schmidt-Kaler, K. Singer, and E. Lutz, Nanoscale heat engine beyond the Carnot limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 030602 (2014).
  18. M. Beau, J. Jaramillo, and A. del Campo, Scaling-Up quantum heat engines efficiently via shortcuts to adiabaticity, Entropy 18, 168 (2016).
  19. H. Mishima and Y. Izumida, Transition probability generating function of a transitionless quantum parametric oscillator, Phys. Rev. E 96, 012133 (2017).
  20. O. Abah and E. Lutz, Performance of shortcut-to-adiabaticity quantum engines, Phys. Rev. E 98, 032121 (2018).
  21. O. Abah and M. Paternostro, Shortcut-to-adiabaticity Otto engine: A twist to finite-time thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. E 99, 022110 (2019).
  22. A. Soriani, E. Miranda, S. Deffner, and M. V. S. Bonançça, Shortcuts to thermodynamic quasistaticity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 170602 (2022).
  23. D. Mandal, and M. R. DeWeese, Nonequilibrium work energy relation for non-Hamiltonian dynamics, Phys. Rev. E 93, 042129 (2016).
  24. K. Sato, An example of a mechanical system whose ensemble average energy, starting with a microcanonical ensemble, decreases after an operation, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 1065 (2002).
  25. M. Fernández-Guasti and A. Gil-Villegas, Orthogonal functions invariant for the time-dependent harmonic oscillator, Phys. Lett. A 292, 243 (2002).
  26. V. P. Ermakov, Second-order differential equations: Conditions of complete integrability, Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 2, 123 (2008) [English translation of Univ. Izv. Kiev 20, 1 (1880) (in Russian)].
  27. E. Pinney, The nonlinear differential equation y′′+p(x)y+cy−3=0, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 1, 681 (1950).
  28. P. G. L. Leach and K. Andriopoulos, The ermakov equation: A commentary, Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 2, 146 (2008).
  29. A. B. Adib, Does the Boltzmann principle need a dynamical correction? J. Stat. Phys. 117, 581 (2004).
  30. M. Campisi, On the mechanical foundations of thermodynamics: The generalized Helmholtz theorem, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 36, 275 (2005).
  31. S.-I. Sasa and Y. Yokokura, Thermodynamic entropy as a Noether invariant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 140601 (2016).
  32. A. Beyen and C. Maes, The first part of Clausius' heat theorem in terms of Noether's theorem, Math. Mech. Compl. Sys. 13, 1 (2025).
  33. H. R. Lewis, Jr., Classical and quantum systems with time-dependent harmonic-oscillator-type Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 510 (1967); H. R. Lewis Jr., 18, 636(E) (1967).
  34. C. J. Eliezer and A. Gray, A note on the time-dependent harmonic oscillator, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 30, 463 (1976).
  35. M. Lutzky, Noether's theorem and the time-dependent harmonic oscillator, Phys. Lett. A 68, 3 (1978).
  36. M. Fernández-Guasti, The Wronskian and the Ermakov-Lewis invariant, Int. Math. Forum 4, 795 (2009).
  37. G. J. Martyna, M. L. Klein, and M. Tuckerman, Nosé-Hoover chains: The canonical ensemble via continuous dynamics, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 2635 (1992).
  38. M. Tuckerman, C. J. Mundy, and G. J. Martyna, On the classical statistical mechanics of non-hamiltonian systems, Europhys. Lett. 45, 149 (1999).
  39. Y. Izumida, Irreversibility of the pendulum revisited from Husimi's adiabaticity parameter, by Yuki Izumida, Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17875816.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation