Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Predicting bifurcation points via extreme learning machine methods trained on time-series datasets and parameters in discrete dynamical systems

Kaito Kato1,*, Yoshitaka Itoh2, and Takuji Kousaka1

  • *Contact author: k.kato@ieee.org

Phys. Rev. E 112, 014208 – Published 10 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qzl8-4c4g

Abstract

This paper proposes a data-driven method for obtaining the bifurcation points of a system utilizing a method based on Extreme Learning Machine with input parameter channels (ELM-IPC) trained on the time-series datasets from discrete dynamical systems. The input parameter channels permit the proposed method to align the original parameter spaces of the time-series datasets with the derived parameter spaces of the ELM-IPC model; this results in the accurate analysis of the bifurcation points of a system. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, we apply it to two discrete dynamical systems: the two-dimensional Hénon map and the four-dimensional system comprising two conservatively coupled Hénon maps. Our results indicate that it is possible to obtain the bifurcation points of a system even in parameter spaces where multiple solutions coexist or periodic solutions with periods exceeding 100 are present.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. E. J. Doedel, Congr. Numer. 30, 265 (1981).
  2. H. Kawakami, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 31, 248 (1984).
  3. T. Kousaka, T. Ueta, and H. Kawakami, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II 46, 878 (1999).
  4. T. Kousaka, T. Ueta, Y. Ma, and H. Kawakami, IJCTA 33, 263 (2005).
  5. P. Thota and H. Dankowicz, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 7, 1283 (2008).
  6. Z. Wang, Z. Li, H. Pan, G. Liu, Y. Chen, Q. Wu, G. Tyson, and G. Cheng, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 34, 1390 (2023).
  7. S. Guo, C. Guan, and S. Leng, Adv. Intell. Syst. 6, 2400163 (2024).
  8. J. Bi, X. Zhang, H. Yuan, J. Zhang, and M. Zhou, IEEE Trans. Automat. Sci. Eng. 19, 1869 (2022).
  9. R. Tokunaga, S. Kajiwara, and T. Matsumoto, Physica D 79, 348 (1994).
  10. I. Tokuda, S. Kajiwara, R. Tokunaga, and T. Matsumoto, Physica D 95, 380 (1996).
  11. E. Bagarinao Jr., T. Nomura, K. Pakdaman, and S. Sato, Physica D 124, 258 (1998).
  12. E. Bagarinao, K. Pakdaman, T. Nomura, and S. Sato, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1073 (1999).
  13. E. Bagarinao, K. Pakdaman, T. Nomura, and S. Sato, Methods Inf. Med. 39, 146 (2000).
  14. Y. Itoh, Y. Tada, and M. Adachi, Nonlin. Theor. Appl., IEICE 8, 2 (2017).
  15. Y. Itoh and M. Adachi, Nonlin. Theor. Appl., IEICE 12, 391 (2021).
  16. G. Langer and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. E 70, 056217 (2004).
  17. M. Roy, S. Mandal, C. Hens, A. Prasad, N. V. Kuznetsov, and M. D. Shrimali, Chaos 32, 101104 (2022).
  18. D. Köglmayr and C. Räth, Sci. Rep. 14, 507 (2024).
  19. D. E. Ozan and L. Magri, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 103902 (2024).
  20. E. Bagarinao Jr., K. Pakdaman, T. Nomura, and S. Sato, Physica D 130, 211 (1999).
  21. Y. Itoh and M. Adachi, Phys. Rev. E 98, 013301 (2018).
  22. Y. Itoh, S. Uenohara, M. Adachi, T. Morie, and K. Aihara, Chaos 30, 013128 (2020).
  23. Y. Itoh, Nonlin. Theor. Appl., IEICE 14, 356 (2023).
  24. Y. Itoh, Nonlin. Theor. Appl., IEICE 14, 579 (2023).
  25. K. Pearson, Lond. Edinb. Dubl. Phil. Mag. J. Sci. 2, 559 (1901).
  26. W. S. McCulloch and W. Pitts, Bull. Math. Biophys. 5, 115 (1943).
  27. G. B. Huang, Q. Y. Zhu, and C. K. Siew, Neurocomputing 70, 489 (2006).
  28. M. Hénon, Commun. Math. Phys. 50, 69 (1976).
  29. O. E. Rössler, Phys. Lett. A 57, 397 (1976).
  30. A. Wolf, J. B. Swift, H. L. Swinney, and J. A. Vastano, Physica D 16, 285 (1985).
  31. J. Moody and C. J. Darken, Neural Comput. 1, 281 (1989).
  32. H. Jaeger, GMD Report 148, 13 (2001).
  33. D. J. Gauthier, E. Bollt, A. Griffith, and W. A. Barbosa, Nat. Commun. 12, 5564 (2021).
  34. K. McCann and P. Yodzis, Am. Nat. 144, 873 (1994).
  35. X. Wang and G. Chen, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 17, 1264 (2012).
  36. I. Dobson and H. D. Chiang, Syst. Control Lett. 13, 253 (1989).
  37. P. R. Sharma, M. D. Shrimali, A. Prasad, N. V. Kuznetsov, and G. A. Leonov, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 25, 1550061 (2015).
  38. M. P. Kennedy, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 41, 771 (1994).
  39. Y. Itoh and M. Adachi, Nonlin. Theor. Appl., IEICE 10, 268 (2019).
  40. D. V. Savin, A. P. Kuznetsov, A. V. Savin, and U. Feudel, Phys. Rev. E 91, 062905 (2015).
  41. Y. A. Kuznetsov and H. G. E. Meijer, Numerical Bifurcation Analysis of Maps: From Theory to Software (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation