Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Evolutionary emergent metabolic interactions in cell cultures: A statistical mechanics point of view

A. R. Batista-Tomás1,*, C. Díaz-Faloh2, and R. Mulet2

  • 1Group of Complex Systems and Statistical Physics, Department of Applied Physics, Physics Faculty, University of Havana, Cuba
  • 2Group of Complex Systems and Statistical Physics, Department of Theoretical Physics, Physics Faculty, University of Havana, Cuba

  • *Contact author: albertbatista1988@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. E 112, 014402 – Published 8 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dm8r-hzmk

Abstract

Cell cultures exhibit rich and complex behaviors driven by dynamic metabolic interactions among cells. In this work, we present a model that captures these interactions through a framework inspired by statistical mechanics. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we explore the equilibrium and dynamical properties of a population of cells arranged in a two-dimensional lattice, where each cell is characterized by fluxes of three reactions: glucose consumption (g), respiration (r), and waste production/absorption (w). The system minimizes an energy function influenced by competitive (Jg>0) and cooperative (Jw<0) couplings between cells. Our results reveal three distinct phases: a competitive phase dominated by glucose competition, a cooperative phase marked by ordered waste exchange, and a disordered phase with local-scale cooperation. By incorporating evolutionary dynamics, we demonstrate how initially noninteracting cells can develop effective metabolic interactions, leading to heterogeneous cultures sustained by cross feeding. These findings are further supported by analytical solutions derived using mean-field approximations. The model provides insights into how environmental constraints and stochastic fluctuations shape community structures, offering a versatile approach to study several emergent phenomena in biological systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (39)

  1. C. Chang, J. Qiu, D. O'Sullivan, M. D. Buck, T. Noguchi, J. D. Curtis, Q. Chen, M. Gindin, M. M. Gubin, G. J. Van Der Windt, E. Tonc, R. D. Schreiber, E. J. Pearce, and E. L. Pearce, Metabolic competition in the tumor microenvironment is a driver of cancer progression, Cell 162, 1229 (2015).
  2. M. Robertson-Tessi, R. J. Gillies, R. A. Gatenby, and A. R. Anderson, Impact of metabolic heterogeneity on tumor growth, invasion, and treatment outcomes, Cancer Res. 75, 1567 (2015).
  3. C. E. Badr, D. J. Silver, F. A. Siebzehnrubl, and L. P. Deleyrolle, Metabolic heterogeneity and adaptability in brain tumors, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 77, 5101 (2020).
  4. E. A. Shirshin, M. V. Shirmanova, A. V. Gayer, M. M. Lukina, E. E. Nikonova, B. P. Yakimov, G. S. Budylin, V. V. Dudenkova, N. I. Ignatova, D. V. Komarov, V. V. Yakovlev, W. Becker, E. V. Zagaynova, V. I. Shcheslavskiy, and M. O. Scully, Label-free sensing of cells with fluorescence lifetime imaging: The quest for metabolic heterogeneity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2118241119 (2022).
  5. J. Fernandez-de-Cossio-Diaz, K. Leon, and R. Mulet, Characterizing steady states of genome-scale metabolic networks in continuous cell cultures, PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005835 (2017).
  6. B. A. Pérez-Fernández, J. Fernandez-de-Cossio-Diaz, T. Boggiano, K. León, and R. Mulet, In-silico media optimization for continuous cultures using genome scale metabolic networks: The case of CHO-K1, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 118, 1884 (2021).
  7. A. R. Batista-Tomás, A. De Martino, and R. Mulet, Path-integral solution of MacArthur's resource-competition model for large ecosystems with random species-resources couplings, Chaos 31, 103113 (2021).
  8. V. Onesto, S. Forciniti, F. Alemanno, K. Narayanankutty, A. Chandra, S. Prasad, A. Azzariti, G. Gigli, A. Barra, A. De Martino, D. De Martino, and L. L. del Mercato, Probing single-cell fermentation fluxes and exchange networks via pH-sensing hybrid nanofibers, ACS Nano 17, 3313 (2023).
  9. D. J. Kiviet, P. Nghe, N. Walker, S. Boulineau, V. Sunderlikova, and S. J. Tans, Stochasticity of metabolism and growth at the single-cell level, Nature (London) 514, 376 (2014).
  10. V. Takhaveev and M. Heinemann, Metabolic heterogeneity in clonal microbial populations, Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 45, 30 (2018).
  11. E. M. De Francesco, F. Sotgia, and M. P. Lisanti, Cancer stem cells (CSCs): metabolic strategies for their identification and eradication, Biochem. J. 475, 1611 (2018).
  12. A. Di Gregorio, S. Bowling, and T. A. Rodriguez, Cell competition and its role in the regulation of cell fitness from development to cancer, Dev. Cell 38, 621 (2016).
  13. N. Kedia-Mehta and D. K. Finlay, Competition for nutrients and its role in controlling immune responses, Nat. Commun. 10, 2123 (2019).
  14. A. Ollé-Vila and R. Solé, Cellular heterogeneity results from indirect effects under metabolic tradeoffs, R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 190281 (2019).
  15. E. Şimşek and M. Kim, The emergence of metabolic heterogeneity and diverse growth responses in isogenic bacterial cells, ISME J. 12, 1199 (2018).
  16. J. Wimpenny, W. Manz, and U. Szewzyk, Heterogeneity in biofilms, FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 24, 661 (2000).
  17. D. De Martino, F. Capuani, and A. De Martino, Growth against entropy in bacterial metabolism: the phenotypic trade-off behind empirical growth rate distributions in E.coli, Phys. Biol. 13, 036005 (2016).
  18. A. Traven, A. Jänicke, P. Harrison, A. Swaminathan, T. Seemann, and T. H. Beilharz, Transcriptional profiling of a yeast colony provides new insight into the heterogeneity of multicellular fungal communities, PLoS ONE 7, e46243 (2012).
  19. N. Li, X. Zhan, and X. Zhan, Energy metabolism heterogeneity-based molecular biomarkers for ovarian cancer, in Molecular Medicine, edited by S. Nalbantoglu and H. Amri (IntechOpen, Rijeka, 2018).
  20. L. Liang, W. Li, X. Li, X. Jin, Q. Liao, Y. Li, and Y. Zhou, ‘Reverse Warburg effect’ of cancer-associated fibroblasts (Review), Int. J. Oncol. 60, 67 (2022) .
  21. L. Wilde, M. Roche, M. Domingo-Vidal, K. Tanson, N. Philp, J. Curry, and U. Martinez-Outschoorn, Metabolic coupling and the Reverse Warburg Effect in cancer: Implications for novel biomarker and anticancer agent development, Semin. Oncol. 44, 198 (2017).
  22. D. De Martino, A. M. Andersson, T. Bergmiller, C. C. Guet, and G. Tkačik, Statistical mechanics for metabolic networks during steady state growth, Nat. Commun. 9, 2988 (2018).
  23. A. Varma, B. W. Boesch, and B. O. Palsson, Biochemical production capabilities of Escherichia coli, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 42, 59 (1993).
  24. T. Khazaei, R. L. Williams, S. R. Bogatyrev, J. C. Doyle, C. S. Henry, and R. F. Ismagilov, Metabolic multistability and hysteresis in a model aerobe-anaerobe microbiome community, Sci. Adv. 6, eaba0353 (2020).
  25. V. Dotsenko, An Introduction to the Theory of Spin Glasses and Neural Networks, World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 54 (World Scientific Publishing Company, Hackensack, NJ, 1995).
  26. J. Fernandez-de-Cossio-Diaz, and R. Mulet, Maximum entropy and population heterogeneity in continuous cell cultures, PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006823 (2019).
  27. J. Fernandez-de-Cossio-Diaz and R. Mulet, Statistical mechanics of interacting metabolic networks, Phys. Rev. E 101, 042401 (2020).
  28. D. De Martino, F. Capuani, and A. De Martino, Quantifying the entropic cost of cellular growth control, Phys. Rev. E 96, 010401 (2017).
  29. K. Narayanankutty, J. A. Pereiro-Morejon, A. Ferrero, V. Onesto, S. Forciniti, L. L. del Mercato, R. Mulet, A. De Martino, D. S. Tourigny, and D. De Martino, Emergent behaviour and phase transitions in spatially distributed multi-cellular metabolic networks, Commun Phys 8, 205 (2025).
  30. E. Armingol, A. Officer, O. Harismendy, and N. E. Lewis, Deciphering cell–cell interactions and communication from gene expression, Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 71 (2021).
  31. A. Coolen, R. W. Penney, and D. Sherrington, Coupled dynamics of fast neurons and slow interactions, in NIPS'93 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by J. D. Cowan, G. Tesauro, and J. Alspector (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1993).
  32. V. Dotsenko, S. Franz, and M. Mezard, Partial annealing and overfrustration in disordered systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 27, 2351 (1994).
  33. R. W. Penney, A. C. C. Coolen, and D. Sherrington, Coupled dynamics of fast spins and slow interactions in neural networks and spin systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 26, 3681 (1993).
  34. P. Häunggi and P. Jung, in Colored Noise in Dynamical Systems, edited by I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice, Advances in Chemical Physics Vol. 89 (John Wiley & Sons, 1994).
  35. H. Jonker and A. Coolen, Unsupervised dynamic learning in layered neural networks, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 24, 4219 (1991).
  36. H. Jonker, A. Coolen, and J. J. D. van der Gon, On the function and development of spatial structure in layered neural networks, J. Phys. A 26, 2549 (1993).
  37. S. Shinomoto, Memory maintenance in neural networks, J. Phys. A 20, L1305 (1987).
  38. D. Sherrington and S. Kirkpatrick, Solvable model of a Spin-Glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1792 (1975).
  39. https://github.com/kopppa/CoupEvol.git.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation