- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review E

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Non-Markovian route to coherence in heterogeneous diffusive systems

Aranyak Sarkar*

  • *Contact author: Aranyak.Sarkar@uni-bayreuth.de; aranyak@barc.gov.in
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 112, 054117 – Published 12 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6r83-n97h

Abstract

Temporal coherence—persistent alignment across time—can arise between agents with fundamentally distinct dynamics, yet classical diffusion models (Brownian motion, fractional Brownian motion, generalized Langevin equations with shared noise) struggle under strong heterogeneity and asymmetry. We introduce the coupled memory graph process (CMGP), in which internal memory and directed, distance-gated coupling jointly produce synchronized behavior without reciprocity or common noise. Crucially, CMGP exhibits long-time coherence that reaches far beyond typical inherent memory times: an active particle with long-range memory remains temporally coherent with a subdiffusive partner despite mismatched scaling exponents. We show that this persistence arises from emergent long-range correlations generated by the coupling field rather than direct kernel overlap. Using Bayesian optimization, we identify broad parameter regions that support this “ghost coherence” (coherence without trajectory convergence) while preserving distinct exponents. These results outline a minimal mechanism for coordination in heterogeneous active systems and viscoelastic environments—one that standard stochastic models do not capture under comparable asymmetry unless augmented with explicit common drives or symmetric couplings.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (42)

  1. A. V. Ratushny, R. A. Saleem, K. Sitko, S. A. Ramsey, and J. D. Aitchison, Asymmetric positive feedback loops reliably control biological responses, Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 577 (2012).
  2. N. Levernier, O. Bénichou, R. Voituriez, and T. Guérin, Kinetics of rare events for non-Markovian stationary processes and application to polymer dynamics, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012057 (2020).
  3. M. Weiss, M. Elsner, F. Kartberg, and T. Nilsson, Anomalous subdiffusion is a measure for cytoplasmic crowding in living cells, Biophys. J. 87, 3518 (2004).
  4. R. Metzler and J. Klafter, The random walk's guide to anomalous diffusion: A fractional dynamics approach, Phys. Rep. 339, 1 (2000).
  5. E. Barkai, Y. Garini, and R. Metzler, Strange kinetics of single molecules in living cells, Phys. Today 65, 29 (2012).
  6. I. M. Sokolov, Models of anomalous diffusion in crowded environments, Soft Matter 8, 9043 (2012).
  7. N. Fakhri, A. D. Wessel, C. Willms, M. Pasquali, D. R. Klopfenstein, F. C. MacKintosh, and C. F. Schmidt, Long-range correlated motion in the cytoplasm of living cells, Science 344, 1031 (2014).
  8. B. G. Mitterwallner, C. Schreiber, J. O. Daldrop, J. O. Rädler, and R. R. Netz, Non-Markovian data-driven modeling of single-cell motility, Phys. Rev. E 101, 032408 (2020).
  9. Y. Qiu, R. P. Wiewiora, J. A. Izaguirre, H. Xu, W. Sherman, W. Tang, and X. Huang, Non-Markovian dynamic models identify non-canonical KRAS-VHL encounter complex conformations for novel PROTAC design, JACS Au 4, 3857 (2024).
  10. B. B. Mandelbrot and J. W. V. Ness, Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications, SIAM Rev. 10, 422 (1968).
  11. J.-H. Jeon, V. Tejedor, S. Burov, E. Barkai, C. Selhuber-Unkel, K. Berg-Sørensen, L. B. Oddershede, and R. Metzler, In vivo anomalous diffusion and weak ergodicity breaking of lipid granules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 048103 (2011).
  12. S. C. Kou and X. S. Xie, Generalized langevin equation with fractional Gaussian noise: Subdiffusion within a single protein molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 180603 (2004).
  13. E. Lutz, Fractional Langevin equation, Phys. Rev. E 64, 051106 (2001).
  14. E. Barkai, Aging in subdiffusion generated by a deterministic dynamical system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 104101 (2003).
  15. J.-H. Jeon and R. Metzler, Noisy continuous time random walks, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46, 345002 (2013).
  16. D. Mizuno, C. Tardin, C. F Schmidt, and F. C MacKintosh, Nonequilibrium mechanics of active cytoskeletal networks, Science 315, 370 (2007).
  17. L. Onsager, Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. I, Phys. Rev. 37, 405 (1931).
  18. F. Höfling and T. Franosch, Anomalous transport in the crowded world of biological cells, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 046602 (2013).
  19. A. Caspi, R. Granek, and M. Elbaum, Enhanced diffusion in active intracellular transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5655 (2000).
  20. I. Golding and E. C. Cox, Physical nature of bacterial cytoplasm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 098102 (2006).
  21. S. C Weber, A. J Spakowitz, and J. A Theriot, Nonthermal atp-dependent fluctuations contribute to the in vivo motion of chromosomal loci, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7338 (2012).
  22. P. Dieterich, R. Klages, R. Preuss, and A. Schwab, Anomalous dynamics of cell migration, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 459 (2008).
  23. T. J. Lampo, S. Stylianidou, M. P. Backlund, P. A. Wiggins, and A. J. Spakowitz, Cytoplasmic rna-protein particles exhibit non-gaussian subdiffusive behavior, Biophys. J. 112, 532 (2017).
  24. I. Goychuk, Viscoelastic subdiffusion: From anomalous to normal, Phys. Rev. E 86, 021113 (2012).
  25. R. Kupferman, Fractional kinetics in Kac-Zwanzig heat bath models, J. Stat. Phys. 114, 291 (2004).
  26. Z. Li, H. S. Lee, E. Darve, and G. Em Karniadakis, Computing the non-Markovian coarse-grained interactions derived from the Mori–Zwanzig formalism in molecular systems: Application to dissipative particle dynamics, J. Chem. Phys. 146, 014104 (2017).
  27. G. Jung, M. Hanke, and F. Schmid, Generalized Langevin dynamics: Construction and numerical integration of non-Markovian particle-based models, Soft Matter 14, 9368 (2018).
  28. T. J. Doerries, S. A. M. Loos, and S. H. L. Klapp, Correlation functions of non-Markovian systems out of equilibrium: Analytical expressions beyond single-exponential memory, J. Stat. Mech. (2021) 033202.
  29. A. Zidovska, D. A. Weitz, and T. J. Mitchison, Micron-scale coherence in interphase chromatin dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15555 (2013).
  30. M. Hidalgo-Soria, Y. Haddad, E. Barkai, Y. Garini, and S. Burov, Directed motion and spatial coherence in the cell nucleus, arXiv:2407.08899.
  31. C.-M. Svensson, K. Reglinski, W. Schliebs, R. Erdmann, C. Eggeling, and M. T. Figge, Quantitative analysis of peroxisome tracks using a hidden Markov model, Sci. Rep. 13, 19694 (2023).
  32. M. Magdziarz, A. Weron, K. Burnecki, and J. Klafter, Fractional Brownian motion versus the continuous-time random walk: A simple test for subdiffusive dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 180602 (2009).
  33. J. R. Gomez-Solano, A. Blokhuis, and C. Bechinger, Dynamics of self-propelled Janus particles in viscoelastic fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 138301 (2016).
  34. S. Fahy and D. R. Hamann, Transition from chaotic to nonchaotic behavior in randomly driven systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 761 (1992).
  35. P. J. Daniell, The theory of functionals, and of integral and integro-differential equations. By Vito Volterra. Translated by M. Long. Pp. x + 226. 25s. 1930. (Blackie), The Mathematical Gazette 16, 59 (1932).
  36. R. Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Rep. Prog. Phys. 29, 255 (1966).
  37. M. V. Chubynsky and G. W. Slater, Diffusing diffusivity: A model for anomalous, yet Brownian, diffusion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 098302 (2014).
  38. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/6r83-n97h for detailed derivations of the CMGP model, extended simulation results, supporting discussions, and additional figures.
  39. A. Jadbabaie, J. Lin, and A. S. Morse, Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules, IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 48, 988 (2003).
  40. H. Hinrichsen, Non-equilibrium critical phenomena and phase transitions into absorbing states, Adv. Phys. 49, 815 (2000).
  41. T. Schreiber, Measuring information transfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 461 (2000).
  42. D. J. C. MacKay, Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 112, 054117– Published 12 November, 2025
  • Received 28 April 2025
  • Revised 10 July 2025
  • Accepted 27 October 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation