- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quark-lepton color-flavor unification

Antonio Delgado* and Seth Koren†

  • *Contact author: adelgad2@nd.edu
  • †Contact author: skoren@nd.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 075021 – Published 14 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9h7r-2zpr

This article was published on 14 October, 2026. Please update your links.

Abstract

We present an SU(12)×SU(2)L×U(1)R model unifying SU(9) quark color-flavor with SU(3) lepton flavor as a flavorful alternative to conventional theories of unification. We begin in the ultraviolet with a single Yukawa shared by the unified up-type quarks and neutrinos and no further new fermions. We show that gauged quark color-flavor and lepton-flavor instantons dynamically generate the bottom and tau Yukawas, which implements a massless quark solution to the strong CP problem and sets up a flavored type-I seesaw mechanism. Only two new scalar irreps are needed for the symmetry-breaking steps, which include quark color-flavor deconstruction and then infrared reunification, and the Standard Model (SM) gauge group in this theory emerges as GSM=SU(3)C×SU(2)L×U(1)Y×Z18XZ3×Γ×Z3, where Γ∈{1,Z2} is the electroweak global structure and there is a discrete gauge symmetry X=B−3(Li+Lj−Lk) which brings additional Z3 global structure to the SM. This gauge symmetry acts as a flavorful upgrade of the Z18B+L anomaly-free global symmetry of the SM and stabilizes the proton absolutely. Noninvertible chiral symmetry breaking is crucial to our model, and we discuss the rich spectrum of emergent generalized symmetries and topological defects appearing at various stages. In the infrared, the novel shared quotient between continuous and discrete groups links the one-form and two-form global symmetries of the Standard Model.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (120)

  1. H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Unity of all elementary particle forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974).
  2. G. Nordstrom, On the possibility of unifying the electromagnetic and the gravitational fields, Phys. Z. 15, 504 (1914).
  3. T. Kaluza, Zum Unitätsproblem der physik, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 1921, 966 (1921).
  4. O. Klein, Quantum theory and five-dimensional theory of relativity. (in German and English), Z. Phys. 37, 895 (1926).
  5. K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Search for proton decay via p→e+π0 and p→μ+π0 in 0.31  megaton·years exposure of the Super-Kamiokande water Cherenkov detector, Phys. Rev. D 95, 012004 (2017).
  6. S. Koren and A. Martin, Fractionally charged particles at the energy frontier: The SM gauge group and one-form global symmetry, SciPost Phys. 18, 004 (2025).
  7. S. Koren and A. Martin, Phenomenology of fractionally charged particles: Two reps are better than one, Nucl. Phys. B1021, 117196 (2025).
  8. R. Alonso, D. Dimakou, and M. West, Fractional-charge hadrons and leptons to tell the Standard Model group apart, Phys. Lett. B 863, 139354 (2025).
  9. H.-L. Li and L.-X. Xu, Understanding the SM gauge group from SMEFT, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 199.
  10. C. Cordova, S. Hong, and L.-T. Wang, Axion domain walls, small instantons, and non-invertible symmetry breaking, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 325.
  11. M. Reece, Axion-gauge coupling quantization with a twist, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 116.
  12. Y. Choi, M. Forslund, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, Quantization of axion-gauge couplings and noninvertible higher symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 121601 (2024).
  13. P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig, Axion couplings in grand unified theories, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 141.
  14. P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig, Axion couplings in heterotic string theory, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 188.
  15. P. Agrawal, M. Nee, and M. Reig, Axion couplings in Orbifold GUTs, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2026) 032.
  16. J. N. Benabou, K. Fraser, M. Reig, and B. R. Safdi, String theory and grand unification suggest a submicroelectronvolt QCD axion, Phys. Rev. D 112, 066003 (2025).
  17. M. Reig and T. Weigand, Testing the heterotic string with the axion-photon coupling, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2026) 006.
  18. S. Koren, A note on proton stability in the Standard Model, Universe 8, 308 (2022).
  19. J. Wang, Z. Wan, and Y.-Z. You, Proton stability: From the standard model to beyond grand unification, Phys. Rev. D 106, 025016 (2022).
  20. J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Lepton number as the fourth color, Phys. Rev. D 10, 275 (1974); Phys. Rev. D 11, 703(E) (1975).
  21. A. De Rújula, H. Georgi, and S. Glashow, Trinification of all elementary particle forces, in Fifth workshop on grand unification, Vol. 7 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1984).
  22. H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Unified interactions of leptons and hadrons, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 93, 193 (1975).
  23. H. Georgi, H. R. Quinn, and S. Weinberg, Hierarchy of interactions in unified gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 451 (1974).
  24. U. Amaldi, W. de Boer, and H. Furstenau, Comparison of grand unified theories with electroweak and strong coupling constants measured at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 260, 447 (1991).
  25. C. Giunti, C. W. Kim, and U. W. Lee, Running coupling constants and grand unification models, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 06, 1745 (1991).
  26. P. Langacker and M.-x. Luo, Implications of precision electroweak experiments for Mt, ρ0, sin2θW and grand unification, Phys. Rev. D 44, 817 (1991).
  27. H. Georgi, Towards a grand unified theory of flavor, Nucl. Phys. B156, 126 (1979).
  28. Z. G. Berezhiani, Horizontal symmetry and quark—lepton mass spectrum: The SU(5)×SU(3)-h model, Phys. Lett. 150B, 177 (1985).
  29. Z. G. Berezhiani, Grand unification of fermion masses, in Summer Institute: From Particle Physics to Cosmology (1993).arXiv:hep-ph/9312222.
  30. B. C. Allanach, B. Gripaios, and J. Tooby-Smith, Semisimple extensions of the Standard Model gauge algebra, Phys. Rev. D 104, 035035 (2021); Phys. Rev. D106, 019901(E) (2022).
  31. J. Davighi and J. Tooby-Smith, Electroweak flavour unification, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 193.
  32. T.-K. Kuo and N. Nakagawa, The generation problem and the symplectic group, Nucl. Phys. B250, 641 (1985).
  33. T.-K. Kuo and N. Nakagawa, An Sp(6)—Left X U(1) hypercharge extension of the electroweak theory, Phys. Rev. D 30, 2011 (1984).
  34. S. Koren, A. Martin, and P. Sesma, Proton stability in electroweak flavour unification (to be published).
  35. K. S. Babu, B. Bajc, and V. Susič, Trinification from E6 symmetry breaking, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 011.
  36. C. Cordova, S. Hong, S. Koren, and K. Ohmori, Neutrino masses from generalized symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031033 (2024).
  37. C. Cordova, S. Hong, and S. Koren, Noninvertible Peccei-Quinn symmetry and the massless quark solution to the strong CP problem, Phys. Rev. X 15, 031011 (2025).
  38. A. Delgado and S. Koren, Non-invertible Peccei-Quinn symmetry, natural 2HDM alignment, and the visible axion, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 178.
  39. G. Choi, S. Hong, and S. Koren, Global structure, non-invertible PQ symmetry, and the DFSZ domain wall problem (2026).arXiv:2603.26867.
  40. K. S. Babu, I. Gogoladze, and K. Wang, Gauged baryon parity and nucleon stability, Phys. Lett. B 570, 32 (2003).
  41. J. Davighi, A. Greljo, and A. E. Thomsen, Leptoquarks with exactly stable protons, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137310 (2022).
  42. G. ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci. Ser. B 59, 135 (1980).
  43. J. Fan, K. Fraser, M. Reece, and J. Stout, Axion mass from magnetic monopole loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 131602 (2021).
  44. C. Csáki, R. Ovadia, O. Telem, J. Terning, and S. Yankielowicz, Abelian instantons and monopole scattering, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 165.
  45. I. Garcia Garcia, M. Kongsore, and K. Van Tilburg, Dyon loops and Abelian instantons, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2026) 244.
  46. I. Garcia Garcia and E. Maderazo, Black holes and Abelian instantons, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2026) 029.
  47. M. M. Anber, S. Hong, and M. Son, New anomalies, TQFTs, and confinement in bosonic chiral gauge theories, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 062.
  48. S. Hong, H. Kim, S. M. Lee, and D. Seo, Multi-instantons, multi-axions, and non-invertible symmetries in 4d QFT, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2026) 204.
  49. C. Cordova and K. Ohmori, Noninvertible chiral symmetry and exponential hierarchies, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011034 (2023).
  50. Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, Noninvertible global symmetries in the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 161601 (2022).
  51. T. D. Brennan, S. Hong, and L.-T. Wang, Coupling a cosmic string to a TQFT, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 145.
  52. T. D. Brennan, A new solution to the Callan Rubakov effect, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 170.
  53. C. Córdova and S. Koren, Higher flavor symmetries in the Standard Model, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 535, 2300031 (2023).
  54. N. Craig and M. Kongsore, High-quality axions from higher-form symmetries in extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 111, 015047 (2025).
  55. D. Sehayek and N. Craig, Generalized symmetries and emergence in axion effective field theories, arXiv:2604.11877.
  56. D. Aloni, E. García-Valdecasas, M. Reece, and M. Suzuki, Spontaneously broken (-1)-form U(1) symmetries, SciPost Phys. 17, 031 (2024).
  57. C. Cheung, M. Derda, J.-H. Kim, V. Nevoa, I. Rothstein, and N. Shah, Generalized symmetry in dynamical gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 007.
  58. M. van Beest, P. Boyle Smith, D. Delmastro, Z. Komargodski, and D. Tong, Monopoles, scattering, and generalized symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 014.
  59. M. van Beest, P. Boyle Smith, D. Delmastro, R. Mouland, and D. Tong, Fermion-monopole scattering in the Standard Model, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 004.
  60. J. Davighi, B. Gripaios, and N. Lohitsiri, Global anomalies in the Standard Model(s) and Beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 232.
  61. J. Davighi, A. Greljo, and N. Selimovic, Topological portal to the dark sector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 111804 (2025).
  62. J. Davighi and N. Lohitsiri, WZW terms without anomalies: Generalised symmetries in chiral Lagrangians, SciPost Phys. 17, 168 (2024).
  63. J. Davighi, S. Moldovsky, H. Murayama, C. Scherb, and N. Selimovic, Topological freeze-out by semi-annihilation, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 133.
  64. S. Chen, A. Cherman, G. Choi, and M. Neuzil, Cheshire θ terms, Aharonov-Bohm effects, and axions, Phys. Rev. D 112, 045012 (2025).
  65. C. P. Burgess and F. Quevedo, Dual is different: EFTs, axions and nonpropagating form fields in cosmology, arXiv:2509.11340.
  66. M. Suzuki and R. Yokokura, Lazarides-Shafi axion models as Dijkgraaf-Witten theories, Phys. Rev. D 113, L091902 (2026).
  67. T. D. Brennan, L.-T. Wang, and H. Xiao, Monopole Catalyzed Baryogenesis with a θ angle, arXiv:2412.14239.
  68. N. Kaloper, General relativity on the multiverse and nature’s hierarchies, Phys. Rev. D 106, 044023 (2022).
  69. E. García-Valdecasas, M. Reece, and M. Suzuki, Monopole breaking of Chern-Weil symmetries, SciPost Phys. 18, 162 (2025).
  70. S. Hong, S. Kim, and S. Koren, Non-invertible symmetry, dirac neutrino masses, and deconstucting B-L (to be published).
  71. T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).
  72. C. G. Callan, Jr., Dyon-fermion dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 26, 2058 (1982).
  73. V. A. Rubakov, Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly and fermion number breaking in the presence of a magnetic monopole, Nucl. Phys. B203, 311 (1982).
  74. C. Csáki, R. T. D’Agnolo, E. Kuflik, and M. Ruhdorfer, Instanton NDA and applications to axion models, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 074.
  75. P. Sesma, A functional treatment of small instanton-induced axion potentials, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 026.
  76. M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martin, and G. Isidori, A three-site gauge model for flavor hierarchies and flavor anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 779, 317 (2018).
  77. J. Davighi and G. Isidori, Non-universal gauge interactions addressing the inescapable link between Higgs and flavour, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 147.
  78. A. S. Schwarz, Field theories with no local conservation of the electric charge, Nucl. Phys. B 208, 141 (1982).
  79. M. G. Alford, K. Benson, S. R. Coleman, J. March-Russell, and F. Wilczek, The interactions and excitations of nonabelian vortices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1632 (1990); Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 668(E) (1990).
  80. M. Bucher, H.-K. Lo, and J. Preskill, Topological approach to Alice electrodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B386, 3 (1992).
  81. G. R. Dvali and G. Senjanovic, Semiglobal Alice strings, Phys. Rev. D 51, 7148 (1995).
  82. R. Sato, F. Takahashi, and M. Yamada, Unified origin of axion and monopole dark matter, and solution to the domain-wall problem, Phys. Rev. D 98, 043535 (2018).
  83. C. Chatterjee, T. Higaki, and M. Nitta, Note on a solution to domain wall problem with the Lazarides-Shafi mechanism in axion dark matter models, Phys. Rev. D 101, 075026 (2020).
  84. B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius, and I. Valenzuela, Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spectrum, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 203.
  85. J. McNamara and M. Reece, Reflections on parity breaking, arXiv:2212.00039.
  86. G. Arias-Tamargo and D. Rodriguez-Gomez, Non-invertible symmetries from discrete gauging and completeness of the spectrum, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 093.
  87. P. Agrawal and K. Howe, A flavorful factoring of the strong CP problem, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2018) 035.
  88. P. Agrawal and K. Howe, Factoring the strong CP problem, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2018) 029.
  89. M. Agostini et al. (GERDA Collaboration), Search for tri-nucleon decays of Ge76 in GERDA, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 778 (2023).
  90. S. Koren and A. Martin, Alchemy at the energy and underground Frontiers (to be published).
  91. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  92. D. Tong, Line operators in the Standard Model, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 104.
  93. M. C. Bento, L. J. Hall, and G. G. Ross, Generalized matter parities from the superstring, Nucl. Phys. B292, 400 (1987).
  94. L. E. Ibanez and G. G. Ross, Discrete gauge symmetry anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 260, 291 (1991).
  95. L. E. Ibanez and G. G. Ross, Discrete gauge symmetries and the origin of baryon and lepton number conservation in supersymmetric versions of the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B368, 3 (1992).
  96. R. Jeannerot, A New mechanism for leptogenesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3292 (1996).
  97. N. Craig, I. Garcia Garcia, and S. Koren, Discrete gauge symmetries and the weak gravity conjecture, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 140.
  98. S. Koren, Cosmological lithium solution from discrete gauged B-L, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 091003 (2023).
  99. T. D. Brennan and S. Hong, Introduction to generalized global symmetries in QFT and particle physics, arXiv:2306.00912.
  100. T. Banks and N. Seiberg, Symmetries and strings in field theory and gravity, Phys. Rev. D 83, 084019 (2011).
  101. N. Sahu, P. Bhattacharjee, and U. A. Yajnik, B—L cosmic strings and baryogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 70, 083534 (2004).
  102. P.-H. Gu and H. Mao, Constraint on B—L cosmic string from leptogenesis with degenerate neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 619, 226 (2005).
  103. C. G. Callan, Jr. and J. A. Harvey, Anomalies and fermion zero modes on strings and domain walls, Nucl. Phys. B250, 427 (1985).
  104. E. Witten, Superconducting strings, Nucl. Phys. B249, 557 (1985).
  105. J. L. Chkareuli, Flavored cosmic strings and monopoles, Phys. Lett. B 272, 207 (1991).
  106. T. M. Bibilashvili and G. R. Dvali, Superconducting cosmic strings in models with spontaneously broken family symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 248, 259 (1990).
  107. Z. Wan and J. Wang, Beyond standard models and grand unifications: Anomalies, topological terms, and dynamical constraints via cobordisms, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 062.
  108. J. Wang, Anomaly and cobordism constraints beyond the Standard Model: Topological force, arXiv:2006.16996.
  109. J. Wang, Anomaly and cobordism constraints beyond grand unification: Energy hierarchy, arXiv:2008.06499.
  110. J. Wang, Ultra unification, Phys. Rev. D 103, 105024 (2021).
  111. J. Wang and Y.-Z. You, Gauge enhanced quantum criticality beyond the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 025013 (2022).
  112. J. Wang, Z. Wan, and Y.-Z. You, Cobordism and deformation class of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 106, L041701 (2022).
  113. J. Wang and Y.-Z. You, Gauge enhanced quantum criticality between grand unifications: Categorical higher symmetry retraction, arXiv:2111.10369.
  114. P. Putrov and J. Wang, Categorical symmetry of the standard model from gravitational anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 110, 125028 (2024).
  115. S. Koren, A. Martin, and P. Sesma, Completing our understanding of proton decay in minimal unified theories (to be published).
  116. A. Greljo, P. Stangl, A. E. Thomsen, and J. Zupan, On (g−2)μ from gauged U(1)X, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 098.
  117. A. Greljo, X. Ponce Díaz, and A. E. Thomsen, Insights on the cosmic origin of matter from proton stability, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 043.
  118. M. Berbig and S. Koren, Rise of the lepto-axion (to be published).
  119. L. Bündgen, R. V. Harlander, S. Y. Klein, and M. C. Schaaf, FeynGame 3.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 314, 109662 (2025).
  120. R. Feger, T. W. Kephart, and R. J. Saskowski, LieART 2.0—A Mathematica application for Lie algebras and representation theory, Comput. Phys. Commun. 257, 107490 (2020).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 075021– Published 14 October, 2026
  • Received 9 June 2026
  • Accepted 14 September 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation