Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Hard-region fermion self-energy and fermion-photon vertex in thermal QED through two loops

Ali Hataei*

  • *Contact author: a.hataei@alumni.sbu.ac.ir; Hataeiali76@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 114, 076016 – Published 13 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zxnj-1vtz

Abstract

We compute hard-region contributions to the fermion self-energy and the off-shell fermion-photon vertex in massless thermal QED in a covariant Rξ gauge. The calculation includes the one-loop next-to-leading-power and two-loop leading-power terms in the expansion in soft external momenta, together with the zero-temperature counterterms required to remove ultraviolet subdivergences. In the real-time formalism, we first derive symmetry constraints on the two-fermion-N-photon amplitudes, which lead to distinct selection rules in the soft-momentum expansion. The fermion-photon vertex is decomposed into Dirac-vector and axial-vector coefficients. The former satisfies the Ward-Takahashi identity, while the latter is transverse to the photon momentum. These relations are verified at the integrand level. The hard self-energy corrections computed here produce no finite contribution to the fermion damping rate. Our results provide previously unavailable two- and three-point hard-region data for higher-order analyses of fermion mass shifts and inclusive rates, as well as for the construction of a next-to-leading-order fermionic effective action.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (88)

  1. V. V. Klimov, Sov. Phys. JETP 55, 199 (1982).
  2. H. A. Weldon, Phys. Rev. D 26, 2789 (1982).
  3. E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1338 (1990).
  4. P. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2002) 030.
  5. P. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2001) 057.
  6. D. Bödeker, G. D. Moore, and K. Rummukainen, Phys. Rev. D 61, 056003 (2000).
  7. J.-P. Blaizot, E. Iancu, and A. Rebhan, Phys. Lett. B 470, 181 (1999).
  8. M. G. Mustafa, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 232, 1369 (2023).
  9. N. Haque and M. G. Mustafa, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 140, 104136 (2025).
  10. P. Graf and F. D. Steffen, Phys. Rev. D 83, 075011 (2011).
  11. M. L. Bellac, Thermal Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011).
  12. S.-Y. Wang, D. Boyanovsky, H. J. de Vega, and D.-S. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 62, 105026 (2000).
  13. M. E. Carrington, C. Manuel, and J. Soto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011905 (2025).
  14. M. E. Carrington, C. Manuel, and J. Soto, Phys. Rev. D 113, 016006 (2026).
  15. E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Nucl. Phys. B337, 569 (1990).
  16. E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Nucl. Phys. B339, 310 (1990).
  17. J.-P. Blaizot and E. Iancu, Phys. Rep. 359, 355 (2002).
  18. J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale, Finite-temperature field theory: Principles and applications, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011).
  19. J. Frenkel and J. Taylor, Nucl. Phys. B334, 199 (1990).
  20. J. Taylor and S. Wong, Nucl. Phys. B346, 115 (1990).
  21. E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. D 45, R1827 (1992).
  22. P. Elmfors, T. H. Hansson, and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 59, 045018 (1999).
  23. J.-P. Blaizot and E. Iancu, Nucl. Phys. B390, 589 (1993).
  24. J.-P. Blaizot and E. Iancu, Nucl. Phys. B417, 608 (1994).
  25. E. Braaten and A. Nieto, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6990 (1995).
  26. J.-P. Blaizot, E. Iancu, and A. Rebhan, arXiv:hep-ph/0303185.
  27. J. Ghiglieri, J. Hong, A. Kurkela, E. Lu, G. D. Moore, and D. Teaney, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 010.
  28. J. Ghiglieri and G. D. Moore, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 029.
  29. S. Caron-Huot and G. D. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 052301 (2008).
  30. S. Caron-Huot and G. D. Moore, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 081.
  31. J. Ghiglieri, G. D. Moore, and D. Teaney, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 179.
  32. D. Besak and D. Bödeker, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2012) 029.
  33. G. Jackson and M. Laine, Nucl. Phys. B950, 114870 (2020).
  34. E. Mottola and Z. Szép, Phys. Rev. D 81, 025014 (2010).
  35. R. Kobes, G. Kunstatter, and K. Mak, Phys. Rev. D 45, 4632 (1992).
  36. E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1829 (1992).
  37. A. Mirza and M. E. Carrington, Phys. Rev. D 87, 065008 (2013).
  38. M. E. Carrington, Phys. Rev. D 75, 045019 (2007).
  39. M. E. Carrington, A. Gynther, and D. Pickering, Phys. Rev. D 78, 045018 (2008).
  40. Sumit, N. Haque, and B. K. Patra, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 171.
  41. E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2156 (1990).
  42. H. Schulz, Nucl. Phys. B413, 353 (1994).
  43. S. Carignano, C. Manuel, and J. Soto, Phys. Lett. B 780, 308 (2018).
  44. C. Manuel, J. Soto, and S. Stetina, Phys. Rev. D 94, 025017 (2016).
  45. T. Gorda, R. Paatelainen, S. Säppi, and K. Seppänen, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 021.
  46. S. Carignano, M. E. Carrington, and J. Soto, Phys. Lett. B 801, 135193 (2020).
  47. T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, J. Österman, R. Paatelainen, S. Säppi, P. Schicho, K. Seppänen, and A. Vuorinen, Phys. Rev. D 107, 036012 (2023).
  48. A. Ekstedt, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 135.
  49. A. Ayala and A. Bashir, Phys. Rev. D 64, 025015 (2001).
  50. J. S. Ball and T.-W. Chiu, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2542 (1980).
  51. A. Kizilersü, M. Reenders, and M. Pennington, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1242 (1995).
  52. A. K𝚤z𝚤lersü and M. R. Pennington, Phys. Rev. D 79, 125020 (2009).
  53. B. Jantzen, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2011) 076.
  54. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/zxnj-1vtz for the complete machine-readable one-loop NLP and two-loop LP expressions, including the Ward-Takahashi identity and axial-transversality checks.
  55. L. V. Keldysh, Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1018 (1965).
  56. N. Landsman and C. van Weert, Phys. Rep. 145, 141 (1987).
  57. M. A. van Eijck, R. Kobes, and C. G. van Weert, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4097 (1994).
  58. M. Carrington, H. Defu, and M. Thoma, Eur. Phys. J. C 7, 347 (1999).
  59. M. Carrington, T. Fugleberg, D. Irvine, and D. Pickering, Eur. Phys. J. C 50, 711 (2007).
  60. J. Ghiglieri, A. Kurkela, M. Strickland, and A. Vuorinen, Phys. Rep. 880, 1 (2020).
  61. S. Caron-Huot, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 004.
  62. G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B44, 189 (1972).
  63. P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison, Commun. Math. Phys. 52, 11 (1977).
  64. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun. 306, 109357 (2024).
  65. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun. 256, 107478 (2020).
  66. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun. 207, 432 (2016).
  67. R. Mertig, M. Böhm, and A. Denner, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64, 345 (1991).
  68. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995).
  69. S. Caron-Huot, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2010) 080.
  70. J.-P. Blaizot and U. Reinosa, Nucl. Phys. A764, 393 (2006).
  71. O. Espinosa, Phys. Rev. D 71, 065009 (2005).
  72. S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 1: Foundations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2005).
  73. J. F. Donoghue and B. R. Holstein, Phys. Rev. D 28, 340 (1983).
  74. K. Ahmed and S. Saleem, Phys. Rev. D 35, 4020 (1987).
  75. K. Ahmed and S. Saleem, Phys. Rev. D 35, 1861 (1987).
  76. J. F. Donoghue, B. R. Holstein, and R. W. Robinett, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 164, 233 (1985); 172, 483(E) (1986).
  77. M. E. Carrington, H. Defu, and M. H. Thoma, Phys. Rev. D 58, 085025 (1998).
  78. Y. Fueki, H. Nakkagawa, H. Yokota, and K. Yoshida, Prog. Theor. Phys. 107, 759 (2002).
  79. D. F. Hou and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. D 55, 4450 (1997).
  80. D. F. Hou, M. E. Carrington, R. Kobes, and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. D 61, 085013 (2000).
  81. R. Bonciani, P. Mastrolia, and E. Remiddi, Nucl. Phys. B702, 359 (2004).
  82. R. Bonciani, P. Mastrolia, and E. Remiddi, Nucl. Phys. B676, 399 (2004).
  83. T. Kinoshita, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 650 (1962).
  84. T. D. Lee and M. Nauenberg, Phys. Rev. 133, B1549 (1964).
  85. R. Runkel, Z. Szőr, J. P. Vesga, and S. Weinzierl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 111603 (2019).
  86. J. Bang-Jensen and G. Z. Gutin, Digraphs: Theory, Algorithms and Applications, 2nd ed., Springer Monographs in Mathematics (Springer, London, 2009).
  87. M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, and H. Liu, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 095.
  88. F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 069.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation