Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

RETRACTED: Schwinger-Keldysh formulation of electromagnetic leptogenesis in an EFT framework

Rin Takada*

  • *Contact author: takada-rin@resceu.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 113, 123544 – Published 24 June, 2026Retraction Phys. Rev. D 114, 049901 (2026)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zq67-v2rj

Abstract

This article has been retracted: see Phys. Rev. D 114, 049901 (2026)

Can the electromagnetic dipole interactions probed in precision experiments be the same interactions that generated the baryon asymmetry of the Universe? We address this question by formulating low-scale electromagnetic leptogenesis (EMLG) as a gauge-invariant effective field theory (EFT), rather than as a broken-phase dipole ansatz. The point is not only to connect leptogenesis to laboratory dipole observables, but first to test whether the dipole-dominated dynamics itself can satisfy the cosmological viability requirement. Starting from a softly broken Z2 UV completion, we match onto the νSMEFT dipole operators ONB and ONW, run their Wilson coefficients to the electroweak scale, and construct the broken-phase dipole couplings to γ, Z, and W±. The soft breaking keeps the ordinary Yukawa-mediated sector subleading, thereby isolating the electromagnetic mechanism. We find that the nonresonant hierarchical regime is structurally inefficient, while in the quasidegenerate regime the self-energy contribution is resonantly enhanced and dipole-dominated EMLG can reproduce the observed baryon asymmetry for viable TeV-scale parameters. The same EFT pipeline maps the successful EMLG parameter space onto low-energy dipole observables, including charged-lepton flavor violation, electric dipole moments, and anomalous magnetic moments. Precision dipole searches can therefore constrain, discriminate, and potentially falsify an electromagnetic origin of baryogenesis.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Erratum

Article Text

References (117)

  1. A. D. Sakharov, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5, 32 (1967) [JETP Lett. 5, 24 (1967)].
  2. N. S. Manton, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2019 (1983).
  3. F. R. Klinkhamer and N. S. Manton, Phys. Rev. D 30, 2212 (1984).
  4. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986).
  5. P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. 67B, 421 (1977).
  6. T. Yanagida, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Unified Theory and the Baryon Number in the Universe, edited by O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto (KEK, Tsukuba, Japan, 1979), p. 95.
  7. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, in Supergravity, edited by P. van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Z. Freedman (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), p. 315.
  8. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  9. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Phys. Rev. D 23, 165 (1981).
  10. M. Magg and C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. 94B, 61 (1980).
  11. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2227 (1980).
  12. C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B187, 343 (1981).
  13. G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi, and C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B181, 287 (1981).
  14. R. Foot, H. Lew, X. G. He, and G. C. Joshi, Z. Phys. C 44, 441 (1989).
  15. E. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1171 (1998).
  16. E. Ma and D. P. Roy, Nucl. Phys. B644, 290 (2002).
  17. W. Buchmuller, P. Di Bari, and M. Plumacher, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 315, 305 (2005).
  18. S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir, Phys. Rep. 466, 105 (2008).
  19. N. F. Bell, B. J. Kayser, and S. S. C. Law, Phys. Rev. D 78, 085024 (2008).
  20. G. Magill, R. Plestid, M. Pospelov, and Y.-D. Tsai, Phys. Rev. D 98, 115015 (2018).
  21. D. Barducci, E. Bertuzzo, M. Taoso, and C. Toni, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 239.
  22. D. Barducci, E. Bertuzzo, M. Taoso, C. A. Ternes, and C. Toni, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 016.
  23. A. Crivellin, S. Najjari, and J. Rosiek, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 167.
  24. J. Aebischer, W. Dekens, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, D. Sengupta, and P. Stoffer, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 107.
  25. R. Takada, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 010.
  26. A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5431 (1997).
  27. A. Pilaftsis and T. E. Underwood, Nucl. Phys. B692, 303 (2004).
  28. P. S. B. Dev, M. Garny, J. Klaric, P. Millington, and D. Teresi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1842003 (2018).
  29. R. Takada, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2026) 073.
  30. D. Choudhury, N. Mahajan, S. Patra, and U. Sarkar, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2012) 017.
  31. A. Pilaftsis and T. E. J. Underwood, Phys. Rev. D 72, 113001 (2005).
  32. G. Sigl and G. Raffelt, Nucl. Phys. B406, 423 (1993).
  33. M. Garny, A. Kartavtsev, and A. Hohenegger, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 328, 26 (2013).
  34. Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 96, 015012 (2017).
  35. H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu, and Y.-H. Zheng, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 003.
  36. A. Datta, J. Kumar, H. Liu, and D. Marfatia, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 015.
  37. A. Datta, J. Kumar, H. Liu, and D. Marfatia, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 037.
  38. M. D’Onofrio, K. Rummukainen, and A. Tranberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 141602 (2014).
  39. M. D’Onofrio and K. Rummukainen, Phys. Rev. D 93, 025003 (2016).
  40. E. Nardi, Y. Nir, E. Roulet, and J. Racker, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2006) 164.
  41. A. Abada, S. Davidson, A. Ibarra, F.-X. Josse-Michaux, M. Losada, and A. Riotto, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2006) 010.
  42. F. F. Deppisch, J. Harz, W.-C. Huang, M. Hirsch, and H. Päs, Phys. Rev. D 92, 036005 (2015).
  43. L. Autonne, Ann. Univ. Lyon, Nouvelle Sér. I 38, 1 (1915).
  44. T. Takagi, Jpn. J. Math. 1, 83 (1924).
  45. G. ’t Hooft, NATO Sci. Ser. B 59, 135 (1980).
  46. W. Buchmuller, P. Di Bari, and M. Plumacher, Nucl. Phys. B643, 367 (2002); B793, 362(E) (2008).
  47. I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 216.
  48. Y. B. Zeldovich, I. Y. Kobzarev, and L. B. Okun, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 67, 3 (1974).
  49. B. Holdom, Phys. Rev. D 27, 332 (1983).
  50. H. Fleming, Phys. Lett. 146B, 191 (1984).
  51. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  52. I. Brivio and M. Trott, Phys. Rep. 793, 1 (2019).
  53. S. S. C. Law, Neutrino models and leptogenesis, Ph.D. thesis, Melbourne University, 2008, arXiv:0901.1232.
  54. G. Källén, Elementary Particle Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1964).
  55. M. Flanz, E. A. Paschos, and U. Sarkar, Phys. Lett. B 345, 248 (1995).
  56. M. Flanz, E. A. Paschos, U. Sarkar, and J. Weiss, Phys. Lett. B 389, 693 (1996).
  57. L. Covi, E. Roulet, and F. Vissani, Phys. Lett. B 384, 169 (1996).
  58. L. Covi and E. Roulet, Phys. Lett. B 399, 113 (1997).
  59. T. Altherr and D. Seibert, Phys. Lett. B 333, 149 (1994).
  60. A. Pilaftsis, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14, 1811 (1999).
  61. C. H. Albright and S. M. Barr, Phys. Rev. D 70, 033013 (2004).
  62. P. C. Martin and J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 115, 1342 (1959).
  63. L. V. Keldysh, Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1018 (1965).
  64. G. Baym and L. P. Kadanoff, Phys. Rev. 124, 287 (1961).
  65. G. Baym, Phys. Rev. 127, 1391 (1962).
  66. J. Berges, AIP Conf. Proc. 739, 3 (2004).
  67. M. Garny, A. Hohenegger, A. Kartavtsev, and M. Lindner, Phys. Rev. D 80, 125027 (2009).
  68. M. Beneke, B. Garbrecht, C. Fidler, M. Herranen, and P. Schwaller, Nucl. Phys. B843, 177 (2011).
  69. M. Beneke, B. Garbrecht, M. Herranen, and P. Schwaller, Nucl. Phys. B838, 1 (2010).
  70. J. Rammer and H. Smith, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 323 (1986).
  71. A. D. Simone and A. Riotto, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2007) 002.
  72. E. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932).
  73. K. Ala-Mattinen, M. Heikinheimo, K. Tuominen, and K. Kainulainen, Phys. Rev. D 108, 096034 (2023).
  74. N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963).
  75. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
  76. A. M. Abdullahi et al., J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 50, 020501 (2023).
  77. K. Afanaciev et al. (MEG II Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1177 (2025).
  78. T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, T. Wright, W. B. Cairncross, Y. Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, A. Wang, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, Science 381, 46 (2023).
  79. D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161802 (2023).
  80. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  81. M. Aker et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), Science 388, adq9592 (2025).
  82. E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2013) 087.
  83. E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 035.
  84. J. C. Ward, Phys. Rev. 78, 182 (1950).
  85. Y. Takahashi, Nuovo Cimento (1955–1965) 6, 371 (1957).
  86. A. A. Slavnov, Theor. Math. Phys. 10, 99 (1972).
  87. J. Taylor, Nucl. Phys. B33, 436 (1971).
  88. G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B33, 173 (1971).
  89. C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, Phys. Lett. 52B, 344 (1974).
  90. C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, Commun. Math. Phys. 42, 127 (1975).
  91. C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 98, 287 (1976).
  92. I. V. Tyutin, arXiv:0812.0580.
  93. L. D. Faddeev and V. N. Popov, Phys. Lett. 25B, 29 (1967).
  94. T. Kugo, Quantum Theory of Gauge Fields, New Physics Series No. 24 Vol. II (Baifukan, Tokyo, 1989).
  95. M. D. Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2013).
  96. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995).
  97. M. E. Machacek and M. T. Vaughn, Nucl. Phys. B236, 221 (1984).
  98. R. E. Cutkosky, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 1, 429 (1960).
  99. A. Denner, H. Eck, O. Hahn, and J. Kublbeck, Nucl. Phys. B387, 467 (1992).
  100. J. Knoll, Y. Ivanov, and D. Voskresensky, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 293, 126 (2001).
  101. P. Danielewicz, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 152, 239 (1984).
  102. W. Botermans and R. Malfliet, Phys. Rep. 198, 115 (1990).
  103. T. Kugo, Quantum Theory of Gauge Fields, New Physics Series No. 23 Vol. I (Baifukan, Tokyo, 1989).
  104. C. Møller, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk., Mat.-Fys. Medd. 23, 1 (1945), Original source for the invariant flux factor (“Møller flux”).
  105. E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Nucl. Phys. B337, 569 (1990).
  106. R. D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1129 (1989).
  107. M. Le Bellac, Thermal Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1996).
  108. G. Giudice, A. Notari, M. Raidal, A. Riotto, and A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B685, 89 (2004).
  109. H. A. Weldon, Phys. Rev. D 26, 1394 (1982).
  110. D. C. Langreth and J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. B 6, 3189 (1972).
  111. D. C. Langreth, in Linear and Nonlinear Electron Transport in Solids, edited by J. T. Devreese and V. E. van Doren (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1976), pp. 3–32.
  112. J. E. Moyal, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 45, 99 (1949).
  113. P. Lipavský, V. Špička, and B. Velický, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6933 (1986).
  114. J. S. Toll, Phys. Rev. 104, 1760 (1956).
  115. R. Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570 (1957).
  116. H. Araki, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 64, 12 (1978).
  117. S. Eijima, M. Shaposhnikov, and I. Timiryasov, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2017) 030.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation