Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

From target to projectile: CSS evolution of quark TMD in different light-cone gauges

Tolga Altinoluk1, Guillaume Beuf1, Jamal Jalilian-Marian2,3, and Mirja Tevio1,4

Phys. Rev. D 114, 074055 – Published 26 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yyj8-lx6w

Abstract

We calculate the one-loop corrections to the quark transverse momentum dependent (TMD) in the projectile light-cone gauge using the background field formalism, with the Mandelstam-Leibbrandt (ML) prescription for the extra singularity present in the light-cone gauge propagator. We use the pure rapidity regulator for rapidity divergences. The Collins-Soper-Sterman (CSS) evolution equations are obtained after one-loop renormalization of the quark TMD in this gauge. We discuss how the structure of the rapidity divergences and the double-logarithmic contributions to the CSS resummation compares with the analogous calculation performed in the target light-cone gauge, and discuss the implications for the connection between the TMD factorization and color glass condensate frameworks.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (72)

  1. C. J. Bomhof, P. J. Mulders, and F. Pijlman, Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 147 (2006).
  2. A. Bacchetta, M. Diehl, K. Goeke, A. Metz, P. J. Mulders, and M. Schlegel, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2007) 093.
  3. J. Collins, Foundations of Perturbative QCD, Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2023), Vol. 32.
  4. R. Angeles-Martinez et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B 46, 2501 (2015).
  5. R. Boussarie et al., arXiv:2304.03302.
  6. F. Gelis, E. Iancu, J. Jalilian-Marian, and R. Venugopalan, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60, 463 (2010).
  7. J. L. Albacete and C. Marquet, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 76, 1 (2014).
  8. J.-P. Blaizot, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 032301 (2017).
  9. J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Nucl. Phys. B193, 381 (1981); B213, 545(E) (1983).
  10. J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Nucl. Phys. B194, 445 (1982).
  11. J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B250, 199 (1985).
  12. S. Mandelstam, Nucl. Phys. B213, 149 (1983).
  13. G. Leibbrandt, Phys. Rev. D 29, 1699 (1984).
  14. G. Leibbrandt and S.-L. Nyeo, Phys. Lett. 140B, 417 (1984).
  15. A. Bassetto, M. Dalbosco, I. Lazzizzera, and R. Soldati, Phys. Rev. D 31, 2012 (1985).
  16. I. Balitsky, Nucl. Phys. B463, 99 (1996).
  17. Y. V. Kovchegov, Phys. Rev. D 60, 034008 (1999).
  18. Y. V. Kovchegov, Phys. Rev. D 61, 074018 (2000).
  19. J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, L. D. McLerran, and H. Weigert, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5414 (1997).
  20. J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov, and H. Weigert, Nucl. Phys. B504, 415 (1997).
  21. J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov, and H. Weigert, Phys. Rev. D 59, 014014 (1998).
  22. J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, and H. Weigert, Phys. Rev. D 59, 014015 (1998).
  23. A. Kovner, J. G. Milhano, and H. Weigert, Phys. Rev. D 62, 114005 (2000).
  24. H. Weigert, Nucl. Phys. A703, 823 (2002).
  25. E. Iancu, A. Leonidov, and L. D. McLerran, Nucl. Phys. A692, 583 (2001).
  26. E. Iancu, A. Leonidov, and L. D. McLerran, Phys. Lett. B 510, 133 (2001).
  27. E. Ferreiro, E. Iancu, A. Leonidov, and L. McLerran, Nucl. Phys. A703, 489 (2002).
  28. F. Dominguez, C. Marquet, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 83, 105005 (2011).
  29. C. Marquet, C. Roiesnel, and P. Taels, Phys. Rev. D 97, 014004 (2018).
  30. T. Altinoluk, N. Armesto, A. Kovner, M. Lublinsky, and E. Petreska, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2018) 063.
  31. T. Altinoluk, R. Boussarie, C. Marquet, and P. Taels, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 079.
  32. T. Altinoluk, R. Boussarie, C. Marquet, and P. Taels, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 143.
  33. P. Taels, T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf, and C. Marquet, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 184.
  34. P. Caucal, F. Salazar, B. Schenke, T. Stebel, and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 081902 (2024).
  35. P. Caucal and F. Salazar, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 130.
  36. P. Taels, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 005.
  37. P. Kotko, K. Kutak, C. Marquet, E. Petreska, S. Sapeta, and A. van Hameren, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 106.
  38. A. van Hameren, P. Kotko, K. Kutak, C. Marquet, E. Petreska, and S. Sapeta, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 034; 02 (2019) 158.
  39. M. Bury, A. van Hameren, P. Kotko, and K. Kutak, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 175.
  40. H. Fujii, C. Marquet, and K. Watanabe, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 181.
  41. T. Altinoluk, C. Marquet, and P. Taels, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 085.
  42. R. Boussarie and Y. Mehtar-Tani, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094012 (2021).
  43. R. Boussarie, H. Mäntysaari, F. Salazar, and B. Schenke, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 178.
  44. T. Altinoluk, N. Armesto, and G. Beuf, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074023 (2023).
  45. T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf, A. Czajka, and C. Marquet, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014010 (2025).
  46. T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf, E. Blanco, and S. Mulani, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 097.
  47. S. Mukherjee, V. V. Skokov, A. Tarasov, S. Tiwari, and F. Yao, Phys. Rev. D 114, 036022 (2026).
  48. H. Duan, A. Kovner, and M. Lublinsky, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054022 (2025).
  49. H. Duan, A. Kovner, and M. Lublinsky, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 136.
  50. H. Duan, A. Kovner, and M. Lublinsky, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 137.
  51. P. Caucal and E. Iancu, Phys. Rev. D 111, 074008 (2025).
  52. T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf, and J. Jalilian-Marian, Phys. Rev. D 112, 034021 (2025).
  53. S. Mukherjee, V. V. Skokov, A. Tarasov, and S. Tiwari, Phys. Rev. D 109, 034035 (2024).
  54. S. Mukherjee, V. V. Skokov, A. Tarasov, and S. Tiwari, Phys. Rev. D 111, 114034 (2025).
  55. T. Altinoluk, G. Beuf, and J. Jalilian-Marian, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 1077 (2026).
  56. I. Scimemi, A. Tarasov, and A. Vladimirov, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 125.
  57. F. Rein, S. Rodini, A. Schäfer, and A. Vladimirov, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 116.
  58. A. Vladimirov, V. Moos, and I. Scimemi, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 110.
  59. M. A. Ebert, I. Moult, I. W. Stewart, F. J. Tackmann, G. Vita, and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2018) 123.
  60. X.-d. Ji and F. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B 543, 66 (2002).
  61. A. V. Belitsky, X. Ji, and F. Yuan, Nucl. Phys. B656, 165 (2003).
  62. I. O. Cherednikov and N. G. Stefanis, Phys. Rev. D 80, 054008 (2009).
  63. A. Idilbi and I. Scimemi, Phys. Lett. B 695, 463 (2011).
  64. M. Garcia-Echevarria, A. Idilbi, and I. Scimemi, Phys. Rev. D 84, 011502 (2011).
  65. J.-y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill, and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 151601 (2012).
  66. J.-Y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill, and I. Z. Rothstein, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2012) 084.
  67. G. Beuf, T. Lappi, and R. Paatelainen, Phys. Rev. D 104, 056032 (2021).
  68. A. Bassetto, M. Dalbosco, and R. Soldati, Phys. Rev. D 33, 617 (1986).
  69. A. Bassetto, M. Dalbosco, and R. Soldati, Phys. Rev. D 36, 3138 (1987).
  70. A. Dumitru, A. Hayashigaki, and J. Jalilian-Marian, Nucl. Phys. A765, 464 (2006).
  71. G. A. Chirilli, B.-W. Xiao, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 122301 (2012).
  72. T. Altinoluk and A. Kovner, Phys. Rev. D 83, 105004 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation