Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Vacuum polarization corrections to the μ+μ− spectrum

Wayne W. Repko*

  • *Contact author: repko@msu.edu

Phys. Rev. D 112, 013011 – Published 28 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yqyn-v8pn

Abstract

The energy levels of the n=1 and n=2 bound states of the μ+μ− atom (true muonium) are calculated starting from a previously derived potential that correctly describes positronium to order α5 supplemented by the known α6 contributions. All electron vacuum polarization corrections on the true muonium levels are computed to order α6. The second-order perturbative contributions from all of the α4 and α5 terms in the potential are also included. Additional order α6 contributions from the two-photon and three-photon annihilation processes are included in the evaluation of the ground state (1S31−1S10) hyperfine splitting.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (28)

  1. V. W. Hughes and B. Maglic, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 16, 65 (1971).
  2. D. A. Owen and W. W. Repko, Phys. Rev. A 5, 1570 (1972).
  3. U. D. Jentschura, G. Soff, V. G. Ivanov, and S. G. Karshenboim, Phys. Rev. A 56, 4483 (1997).
  4. H. Lamm and R. F. Lebed, J. Phys. G 41, 125003 (2014).
  5. H. Lamm, Phys. Rev. D 91, 073008 (2015).
  6. H. Lamm and R. Lebed, Phys. Rev. D 94, 016004 (2016).
  7. Y. Ji and H. Lamm, Phys. Rev. A 94, 032507 (2016).
  8. H. Lamm and Y. Ji, arXiv:1701.04362.
  9. S. J. Brodsky and R. F. Lebed, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 213401 (2009).
  10. A. Banburski and P. Schuster, Phys. Rev. D 86, 093007 (2012).
  11. T. Itahashi, H. Sakamoto, A. Sato, and K. Takahisa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. Conf. Proc. 8, 025004 (2015).
  12. K. Sakimoto, Eur. Phys. J. D 69, 276 (2015).
  13. Y. Ji and H. Lamm, Phys. Rev. D 98, 053008 (2018).
  14. W. W. Repko and D. A. Dicus, Phys. Rev. D 98, 013002 (2018).
  15. Note: The pion loop corrections use Δππ(2)(λ)=α(1−4mπ2/λ)3/2F2(λ)/12π.

  16. G. S. Adkins, D. B. Cassidy, and J. Pérez-Ríos, Phys. Rep. 975, 1 (2022).
  17. S. N. Gupta, W. W. Repko, and C. J. Suchyta III, Phys. Rev. D 40, 4100 (1989).
  18. A. Pineda and J. Soto, Phys. Rev. D 59, 016005 (1998).
  19. A. Czarnecki, K. Melnikov, and A. Yelkhovsky, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4316 (1999).
  20. G. Källen, Helv. Phys. Acta. 25, 417 (1952).
  21. H. Lehmann, Nuovo Cimento 11, 342 (1954).
  22. G. Källen and A. Sabry, Dan. Mat. Fys. Medd. 29 (1955).
  23. G. S. Adkins, Y. Aksu, and M. H. T. Bui, Phys. Rev. A 47, 2640 (1993).
  24. S. G. Karshenboim, V. G. Ivanov, U. D. Jentschura, and G. Soff, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 113, 409 (1998) [J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 86, 226 (1998)].
  25. V. K. Cung, A. Devoto, T. Fulton, and W. W. Repko, Phys. Lett. 68B, 474 (1977).
  26. V. K. Cung, A. Devoto, T. Fulton, and W. W. Repko, Nuovo Cimento A 43, 643 (1978).
  27. G. S. Adkins, M. H. T. Bui, and D. Zhu, Phys. Rev. A 37, 4071 (1988).
  28. H. Lamm and Y. Ji, EPJ Web Conf. 181, 01016 (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation