Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Imprint of intrinsic quark-gluon correlations: A nonmonotonic feature in e(x)

Chao Shi1,*, Liming Lu1, Ian C. Cloët2,†, Wenbao Jia1, and Peter C. Tandy3,‡

  • *Contact author: cshi@nuaa.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: icloet@anl.gov
  • ‡Contact author: tandy@kent.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, L111501 – Published 3 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yklv-ntq9

Abstract

We present the first rainbow-ladder Dyson-Schwinger equations study of the pion’s chiral-odd, twist-3 parton distribution eq(x). By deriving a novel Dyson–Schwinger equation for the pion’s quark–quark correlation matrix, we simultaneously extract from it both the unpolarized twist-2 parton distribution function fq(x) and the twist-3 distribution eq(x). Our results show that chiral symmetry strongly suppresses the twist-2 component of eq(x), leaving the genuine twist-3 quark-gluon component dominant and featuring a node. We therefore argue that the genuine twist-3 term can make a substantial contribution to hadronic e(x), producing a nonmonotonic structure that is a clear imprint of intrinsic quark-gluon correlations. We point out that the existence of a humplike feature is compatible with, although not uniquely indicated by, recent proton extractions and awaits more precise determination.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. R. L. Jaffe and X.-D. Ji, Nucl. Phys. B375, 527 (1992).
  2. A. V. Efremov and P. Schweitzer, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2003) 006.
  3. R. Abdul Khalek et al., Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022).
  4. D. P. Anderle et al., Front. Phys. (Beijing) 16, 64701 (2021).
  5. R. L. Jaffe and X.-D. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 552 (1991).
  6. A. V. Belitsky and D. Mueller, Nucl. Phys. B503, 279 (1997).
  7. J. P. Ma and G. P. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135947 (2020).
  8. S. Bhattacharya, K. Cichy, M. Constantinou, A. Metz, A. Scapellato, and F. Steffens, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114025 (2020).
  9. Y. Hatta and Y. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 102, 034004 (2020).
  10. M. Wakamatsu and Y. Ohnishi, Phys. Rev. D 67, 114011 (2003).
  11. A. Mukherjee, Phys. Lett. B 687, 180 (2010).
  12. F. Aslan and M. Burkardt, Phys. Rev. D 101, 016010 (2020).
  13. A. V. Efremov, K. Goeke, and P. Schweitzer, Phys. Rev. D 67, 114014 (2003).
  14. A. Courtoy, A. S. Miramontes, H. Avakian, M. Mirazita, and S. Pisano, Phys. Rev. D 106, 014027 (2022).
  15. P. Maris and C. D. Roberts, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 12, 297 (2003).
  16. I. C. Cloet and C. D. Roberts, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 77, 1 (2014).
  17. G. Eichmann, H. Sanchis-Alepuz, R. Williams, R. Alkofer, and C. S. Fischer, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 91, 1 (2016).
  18. R. L. Jaffe, Nucl. Phys. B229, 205 (1983).
  19. V. Barone, A. Drago, and P. G. Ratcliffe, Phys. Rep. 359, 1 (2002).
  20. P. Maris and C. D. Roberts, Phys. Rev. C 56, 3369 (1997).
  21. J. C. R. Bloch, Phys. Rev. D 66, 034032 (2002).
  22. P. C. Tandy, Phys. Lett. B 842, 137972 (2023).
  23. K. D. Bednar, I. C. Cloët, and P. C. Tandy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 042002 (2020).
  24. P. Maris and P. C. Tandy, Phys. Rev. C 60, 055214 (1999).
  25. S.-x. Qin, L. Chang, Y.-x. Liu, C. D. Roberts, and D. J. Wilson, Phys. Rev. C 84, 042202 (2011).
  26. S.-x. Qin, C. D. Roberts, and S. M. Schmidt, Few Body Syst. 60, 26 (2019).
  27. Z.-Q. Yao, D. Binosi, Z.-F. Cu, and C. D. Roberts, arXiv:2403.08088.
  28. R. D. Tangerman and P. J. Mulders, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3357 (1995).
  29. V. V. Flambaum, A. Holl, P. Jaikumar, C. D. Roberts, and S. V. Wright, Few Body Syst. 38, 31 (2006).
  30. P. J. Mulders and R. D. Tangerman, Nucl. Phys. B461, 197 (1996); B484, 538(E) (1997).
  31. T. B. Hayward et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 152501 (2021).
  32. C. Shi, P. Liu, Y.-L. Du, and W. Jia, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094010 (2024).
  33. P. C. Barry, N. Sato, W. Melnitchouk, and C.-R. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 152001 (2018).
  34. S. Bailey, T. Cridge, L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, and R. S. Thorne, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 341 (2021).
  35. Y. Koike and N. Nishiyama, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3068 (1997).
  36. I. I. Balitsky, V. M. Braun, Y. Koike, and K. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3078 (1996).
  37. P. Schweitzer, Phys. Rev. D 67, 114010 (2003).
  38. Y. Ohnishi and M. Wakamatsu, Phys. Rev. D 69, 114002 (2004).
  39. B. Pasquini and S. Rodini, Phys. Lett. B 788, 414 (2019).
  40. Z. Zhu, S. Xu, J. Wu, H. Yu, Z. Hu, J. Lan, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, and J. P. Vary (BLFQ Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 855, 138829 (2024).
  41. P. Agostini et al. (LHeC, FCC-he Study Group Collaborations), J. Phys. G 48, 110501 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation