Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Toward celestial chiral algebras of self-dual black holes

Giuseppe Bogna*

Simon Heuveline†

  • *Contact author: giuseppe.bogna@maths.ox.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: sph48@cam.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 113, 046010 – Published 18 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/y7ql-z2r1

Abstract

In this article, we show that several self-dual spacetimes previously studied in the context of celestial and twisted holography arise as limits of a certain Taub-NUT AdS4 metric, the Pedersen metric, in which their mass, NUT charge, and cosmological constant obey a self-duality relation. In particular, self-dual Taub-NUT, a singular double cover of Eguchi-Hanson space, Euclidean AdS4, and noncompact CP2, which is conformally equivalent to Burns space, arise as special limits of the Pedersen metric. The Pedersen metric can be derived from a curved twistor space which we conjecture to arise from a backreaction of self-dual gravity in the presence of a cosmological constant when coupled to a defect operator wrapping a certain CP1 at infinity. The curved twistor space gives rise to a 2-parameter deformation of the celestial symmetry algebra Lw∧ which reduces to previously studied algebras in various limits.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (72)

  1. A. Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2017); arXiv:1703.05448.
  2. A.-M. Raclariu, arXiv:2107.02075.
  3. S. Pasterski, M. Pate, and A.-M. Raclariu, in Snowmass 2021 (2021), arXiv:2111.11392.
  4. A. Strominger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 221601 (2021).
  5. A. Guevara, E. Himwich, M. Pate, and A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 152.
  6. T. Adamo, L. Mason, and A. Sharma, SIGMA 18, 016 (2022).
  7. R. Bittleston, S. Heuveline, and D. Skinner, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 008.
  8. R. Bittleston, G. Bogna, S. Heuveline, A. Kmec, L. Mason, and D. Skinner, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 010.
  9. T. R. Taylor and B. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 221602 (2024).
  10. W. Bu, S. Heuveline, and D. Skinner, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 011.
  11. W. Melton, S. A. Narayanan, and A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 233.
  12. K. Costello and N. M. Paquette, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 193.
  13. J. Mago, L. Ren, A. Y. Srikant, and A. Volovich, SIGMA 19, 044 (2023).
  14. M. Carrillo González, A. Lipstein, and S. Nagy, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 183.
  15. A. Lipstein and S. Nagy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 081501 (2023).
  16. T. McLoughlin, N. Moynihan, and A. Puhm, arXiv:2408.13234.
  17. T. Adamo, W. Bu, and B. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 076.
  18. T. Adamo, W. Bu, P. Tourkine, and B. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 192.
  19. K. Costello, N. M. Paquette, and A. Sharma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 061602 (2023).
  20. K. Costello, N. M. Paquette, and A. Sharma, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 174.
  21. N. Garner and N. M. Paquette, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 088.
  22. N. Garner and N. M. Paquette, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 228.
  23. R. Gonzo, T. McLoughlin, and A. Puhm, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 073.
  24. W. Melton, A. Sharma, and A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 132.
  25. W. Melton, F. Niewinski, A. Strominger, and T. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 046.
  26. E. Casali, W. Melton, and A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 140.
  27. W. Fan, A. Fotopoulos, S. Stieberger, T. R. Taylor, and B. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 213.
  28. A. Kmec, L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Yelleshpur Srikant, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 250.
  29. T. Adamo, G. Bogna, L. Mason, and A. Sharma, Classical Quantum Gravity 41, 015030 (2024).
  30. E. Crawley, A. Guevara, E. Himwich, and A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 109.
  31. E. Crawley, A. Guevara, N. Miller, and A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 135.
  32. A. Guevara and U. Kol, arXiv:2311.07933.
  33. D. A. Easson and M. W. Pezzelle, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044007 (2024).
  34. J. Desai, G. Herczeg, D. McNutt, and M. Pezzelle, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 044.
  35. R. Bittleston, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 018.
  36. K. J. Costello, arXiv:2111.08879.
  37. R. Bittleston, K. Costello, and K. Zeng, arXiv:2412.02680.
  38. K. Zoubos, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2002) 037.
  39. A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson, and R. C. Myers, Phys. Rev. D 59, 064010 (1999).
  40. S. W. Hawking, C. J. Hunter, and D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D 59, 044033 (1999).
  41. D. Martelli, A. Passias, and J. Sparks, Nucl. Phys. B876, 810 (2013).
  42. J. F. Plebanski and M. Demianski, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 98, 98 (1976).
  43. J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolsky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 335 (2006).
  44. N. H. Rodríguez and M. J. Rodriguez, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 044.
  45. S. W. Hawking, Phys. Lett. 60A, 81 (1977).
  46. G. W. Gibbons and C. N. Pope, Commun. Math. Phys. 61, 239 (1978).
  47. E. Ivanov and G. Valent, Classical Quantum Gravity 16, 1039 (1999).
  48. H. Pedersen, Math. Ann. 274, 35 (1986).
  49. H. Pedersen, Geometry and magnetic monopoles, Ph.D. thesis, Citeseer, 1985.
  50. C. R. LeBrun, Proc. R. Soc. A 380, 171 (1982).
  51. C. LeBrun, Duke Math. J. 63, 723 (1991).
  52. N. J. Hitchin, J. Diff. Geom. 42, 30 (1995).
  53. G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Lett. 78B, 430 (1978).
  54. C. LeBrun, J. Diff. Geom. 34, 223 (1991).
  55. S. S. Costa, arXiv:math-ph/0112039.
  56. L. J. Mason and M. Wolf, Commun. Math. Phys. 288, 97 (2009).
  57. R. S. Ward, Commun. Math. Phys. 78, 1 (1980).
  58. R. Penrose, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 7, 171 (1976).
  59. T. Adamo, L. Mason, and A. Sharma, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 27, 623 (2023).
  60. A. Swann, HyperKähler and quaternionic Kähler geometry, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford, 1990.
  61. We thank David Skinner for pointing this backreaction out to us.

  62. N. J. Hitchin, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 85, 465 (1979).
  63. N. Hitchin, Séminaire Bourbaki 1991, 137 (1992).
  64. A. L. Besse, Einstein Manifolds (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1987).
  65. D. Calderbank and H. Pedersen, Surv. Diff. Geom. 6, 387 (2001).
  66. K. Budzik, in Proceedings of the 21st String Phenomenology 2022 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, USA, 2023); arXiv:2310.16721.
  67. R. Bittleston, A. Sharma, and D. Skinner, Commun. Math. Phys. 403, 1543 (2023).
  68. L. F. Alday, T. Hansen, and J. A. Silva, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161603 (2023).
  69. Be careful not to confuse this 3-sphere with the 3-sphere parametrized by (χ,θ,ϕ).

  70. T. Eguchi and A. J. Hanson, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 120, 82 (1979).
  71. S. Helgason, in Battelle Rencontres (W. A. Benjamin, New York, NY, 1968), pp. 1–71.
  72. R. Britto-Pacumio, A. Strominger, and A. Volovich, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (1999) 013.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation