Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Lepton-flavor violating decays induced by Lorentz violation in the Yukawa sector of the standard model extension

J. Montaño-Domínguez1, F. Ramírez-Zavaleta2, E. S. Tututi2, and O. Vázquez-Hernández1

  • 1SECIHTI, Avenida Insurgentes Sur 1582, Colonia Crédito Constructor, Alcaldía Benito Juárez, 03940, CDMX, México
  • 2Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Avenida Francisco J. Múgica s/n, C. P. 58060, Morelia, Michoacán, México

Phys. Rev. D 114, 015014 – Published 8 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/y115-274b

Abstract

Tree-level lepton-flavor violating decays induced by Lorentz-violating effects within the Yukawa sector of the standard model extension are studied. These new-physics effects are parametrized by the (Yf)μνAB tensor, with μ and ν denoting Lorentz indices and A, B being indices in the flavor space. Since this tensor is antisymmetric under the interchange of Lorentz indices, in analogy with the electromagnetic tensor Fμν, (Yf)μνAB can be expressed in terms of six components associated with two complex three-vectors denoted by elAB and blAB. On the assumption that these three-vectors are purely real or purely imaginary and mutually orthogonal, constraints on their magnitudes via experimental bounds on lepton-flavor violating processes Br(lB→γlA) and Br(lB→lAlCl¯C) are estimated. Thus, the lB→γlA decay provides the following upper bounds: |elμτ|<1.51×10−11, |eleτ|<1.34×10−11, |eleμ|<3.65×10−18, |blμτ|<1.95×10−11, |bleτ|<1.73×10−11, |bleμ|<4.71×10−18. Conversely, by assuming that the Lorentz-violating coefficients are purely real, for the lB→lAlCl¯C process it is found that |elμτ|<2.87×10−12 and |blμτ|<4.05×10−12. These results offer more restrictive bounds than those previously reported in the literature.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (83)

  1. S. L. Glashow, Partial-symmetries of weak interactions, Nucl. Phys. 22, 579 (1961).
  2. A. Salam, Weak and electromagnetic interactions, Conf. Proc. C 680519, 367 (1968).
  3. S. Weinberg, A model of leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967).
  4. F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 321 (1964).
  5. P. W. Higgs, Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 508 (1964).
  6. G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, Global conservation laws and massless particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 585 (1964).
  7. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  8. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  9. V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 39, 683 (1989).
  10. V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, Gravitational phenomenology in higher dimensional theories and strings, Phys. Rev. D 40, 1886 (1989).
  11. V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, Phenomenological gravitational constraints on strings and higher dimensional theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 224 (1989).
  12. R. Gambini and J. Pullin, Nonstandard optics from quantum space-time, Phys. Rev. D 59, 124021 (1999).
  13. S. M. Carroll, J. A. Harvey, V. A. Kostelecky, C. D. Lane, and T. Okamoto, Noncommutative field theory and Lorentz violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 141601 (2001).
  14. J. Alfaro, H. A. Morales-Tecotl, and L. F. Urrutia, Loop quantum gravity and light propagation, Phys. Rev. D 65, 103509 (2002).
  15. C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen, Derivation of Lorentz invariance and three space dimensions in generic field theory, Bled Workshops Phys. 3, 1 (2002).
  16. C. P. Burgess, J. M. Cline, E. Filotas, J. Matias, and G. D. Moore, Loop generated bounds on changes to the graviton dispersion relation, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2002) 043.
  17. V. A. Kostelecky, R. Lehnert, and M. J. Perry, Spacetime—varying couplings and Lorentz violation, Phys. Rev. D 68, 123511 (2003).
  18. R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi, Chern-Simons modification of general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 68, 104012 (2003).
  19. N. Arkani-Hamed, H.-C. Cheng, M. Luty, and J. Thaler, Universal dynamics of spontaneous Lorentz violation and a new spin-dependent inverse-square law force, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2005) 029.
  20. P. Horava, Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point, Phys. Rev. D 79, 084008 (2009).
  21. M. Pospelov and Y. Shang, On Lorentz violation in Horava-Lifshitz type theories, Phys. Rev. D 85, 105001 (2012).
  22. R. Bluhm, V. A. Kostelecky, and N. Russell, CPT and Lorentz tests in Penning traps, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3932 (1998).
  23. R. Bluhm, V. A. Kostelecky, and N. Russell, Hydrogen and antihydrogen spectroscopy for studies of CPT and Lorentz symmetry, AIP Conf. Proc. 457, 70 (1999).
  24. H. Dehmelt, R. Mittleman, R. S. van Dyck, Jr., and P. Schwinberg, Past electron positron g—2 experiments yielded sharpest bound on CPT violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4694 (1999).
  25. G. Ahuatzin, I. Bautista, J. A. Hernandez-Lopez, F. Ramirez-Zavaleta, and J. J. Toscano, The decay b→sγ in the presence of a constant antisymmetric tensor field, Phys. Rev. D 82, 053001 (2010).
  26. A. Crivellin, F. Kirk, and M. Schreck, Impact of Lorentz violation on anomalous magnetic moments of charged leptons, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 109.
  27. J. S. Hurtado-Silva, J. J. Toscano, and O. Vázquez-Hern, CPT-Odd effects on the electromagnetic properties of charged leptons in the standard model extension, J. Phys. G 52, 025002 (2025).
  28. D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky, Lorentz violating extension of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 58, 116002 (1998).
  29. V. A. Kostelecky, Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 69, 105009 (2004).
  30. V. A. Kostelecky and R. Lehnert, Stability, causality, and Lorentz and CPT violation, Phys. Rev. D 63, 065008 (2001).
  31. V. A. Kostelecky and M. Mewes, Electrodynamics with Lorentz-violating operators of arbitrary dimension, Phys. Rev. D 80, 015020 (2009).
  32. V. A. Kostelecky and C. D. Lane, Constraints on Lorentz violation from clock comparison experiments, Phys. Rev. D 60, 116010 (1999).
  33. R. Bluhm, V. A. Kostelecky, and C. D. Lane, CPT and Lorentz tests with muons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1098 (2000).
  34. V. W. Hughes, M. Grosse Perdekamp, D. Kawall, W. Liu, K. Jungmann, and G. zu Putlitz, Test of CPT and Lorentz invariance from muonium spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 111804 (2001).
  35. R. Bluhm, V. A. Kostelecky, C. D. Lane, and N. Russell, Clock comparison tests of Lorentz and CPT symmetry in space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 090801 (2002).
  36. V. A. Kostelecky and M. Mewes, Signals for Lorentz violation in electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 66, 056005 (2002).
  37. L.-S. Hou, W.-T. Ni, and Y.-C. M. Li, Test of cosmic spatial isotropy for polarized electrons using a rotatable torsion balance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 201101 (2003).
  38. B. Altschul, Astrophysical limits on Lorentz violation for all charged species, Astropart. Phys. 28, 380 (2007).
  39. B. R. Heckel, C. E. Cramer, T. S. Cook, E. G. Adelberger, S. Schlamminger, and U. Schmidt, New CP-violation and preferred-frame tests with polarized electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 021603 (2006).
  40. B. Altschul, Cerenkov radiation in a Lorentz-violating and birefringent vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 75, 105003 (2007).
  41. B. R. Heckel, E. G. Adelberger, C. E. Cramer, T. S. Cook, S. Schlamminger, and U. Schmidt, Preferred-frame and CP-violation tests with polarized electrons, Phys. Rev. D 78, 092006 (2008).
  42. A. Crivellin, F. Kirk, and M. Schreck, Implications of SU(2)L gauge invariance for constraints on Lorentz violation, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 082.
  43. G. P. de Brito, J. T. Guaitolini Junior, D. Kroff, P. C. Malta, and C. Marques, Lorentz violation in simple QED processes, Phys. Rev. D 94, 056005 (2016).
  44. T. Mariz, R. V. Maluf, J. R. Nascimento, and A. Y. Petrov, On one-loop corrections to the CPT-even Lorentz-breaking extension of QED, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1850018 (2018).
  45. L. C. T. Brito, J. C. C. Felipe, J. R. Nascimento, A. Y. Petrov, and A. P. Baêta Scarpelli, Higher-order one-loop renormalization in the spinor sector of minimal Lorentz-violating extended QED, Phys. Rev. D 102, 075017 (2020).
  46. E. O. Iltan, The Lorentz and CPT violating effects on H0→f+f−(ZZ,W+W−) decays, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, 327 (2004).
  47. E. O. Iltan, The Lorentz and CPT violating effects on the Z→l+l− decay, Eur. Phys. J. C 40, 269 (2005).
  48. J. I. Aranda, F. Ramírez-Zavaleta, D. A. Rosete, F. J. Tlachino, J. J. Toscano, and E. S. Tututi, Effects of Lorentz violation through the γe→Wνe process in the standard model extension, J. Phys. G 41, 055003 (2014).
  49. J. Castro-Medina, H. Novales-Sánchez, J. J. Toscano, and E. S. Tututi, Decays Z→γγ and Z→gg in the standard model extension, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1550216 (2015).
  50. D. Colladay, J. P. Noordmans, and R. Potting, Cosmic-ray fermion decay by emission of on-shell W bosons with CPT violation, Phys. Rev. D 96, 035034 (2017).
  51. A. I. Hernández-Juárez, J. Montaño, H. Novales-Sánchez, M. Salinas, J. J. Toscano, and O. Vázquez-Hernández, One-loop structure of the photon propagator in the standard model extension, Phys. Rev. D 99, 013002 (2019).
  52. Y. M. P. Gomes, P. C. Malta, and M. J. Neves, Testing Lorentz-symmetry violation via electroweak decays, Phys. Rev. D 101, 075001 (2020).
  53. J. A. Ahuatzi-Avendaño, J. Montaño, and M. Salinas Ibañez, Bounds on Lorentz-violating Yukawa couplings via lepton electromagnetic moments, Phys. Rev. D 103, 055003 (2021); 104, 119902(E) (2021).
  54. D. Colladay and P. McDonald, One-loop renormalization of QCD with Lorentz violation, Phys. Rev. D 77, 085006 (2008).
  55. A. R. Vieira, Lorentz-violating QCD corrections to deep inelastic scattering, in 7th Meeting on CPT and Lorentz Symmetry (2017), pp. 232–234.
  56. V. A. Kostelecký, E. Lunghi, and A. R. Vieira, Lorentz violation and deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Lett. B 769, 272 (2017).
  57. V. A. Kostelecký, E. Lunghi, N. Sherrill, and A. R. Vieira, Lorentz and CPT violation in partons, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 143.
  58. E. Lunghi, N. Sherrill, A. Szczepaniak, and A. Vieira, Quark-sector Lorentz violation in Z-boson production, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 228; 07 (2024) 167(E).
  59. S. Aghababaei, M. Haghighat, and I. Motie, Muon anomalous magnetic moment in the standard model extension, Phys. Rev. D 96, 115028 (2017).
  60. J. Montaño-Domínguez, H. Novales-Sánchez, M. Salinas, and J. J. Toscano, Lorentz violation in nucleon electromagnetic moments, Phys. Rev. D 105, 075018 (2022).
  61. J. Montaño-Domínguez, H. Novales-Sánchez, M. Salinas, and J. J. Toscano, Lorentz violation in electromagnetic moments of fermions, in 9th Meeting on CPT and Lorentz Symmetry (2022).
  62. Y. Flores-Orea and J. J. Toscano, Effects of CPT violation on the neutrino charge radius in the standard model extension, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 40, 2550083 (2025).
  63. J. J. Toscano and O. Vázquez-Hernández, Vacuum polarization in Yang-Mills theories with Lorentz violation, Phys. Rev. D 108, 055017 (2023).
  64. D. Colladay, Scattering cross-sections and Lorentz violation, in 2nd Meeting on CPT and Lorentz Symmetry (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2002), pp. 245–253.
  65. B. Charneski, M. Gomes, R. V. Maluf, and A. J. da Silva, Lorentz violation bounds on Bhabha scattering, Phys. Rev. D 86, 045003 (2012).
  66. J. O’Connor and B. Altschul, Dalitz plot kinematics for a Lorentz-violating three-body decay, Phys. Rev. D 112, 075047 (2025).
  67. V. A. Kostelecky and N. Russell, Data tables for Lorentz and CPT violation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 11 (2011).
  68. Y. Fukuda et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998).
  69. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  70. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II), Search for the lepton-flavor-violating τ−→e∓l±l∓ decays at Belle II, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 169.
  71. B. W. Lee and R. E. Shrock, Natural suppression of symmetry violation in gauge theories: Muon—lepton and electron lepton number nonconservation, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1444 (1977).
  72. S. M. Bilenky, S. T. Petcov, and B. Pontecorvo, Lepton mixing, μ→e+γ decay and neutrino oscillations, Phys. Lett. 67B, 309 (1977).
  73. W. J. Marciano and A. I. Sanda, Exotic decays of the muon and heavy leptons in gauge theories, Phys. Lett. 67B, 303 (1977).
  74. W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1986).
  75. B. A. Campbell, D. W. Maybury, and B. Murakami, Seesaw induced CMSSM lepton flavor violation post-WMAP, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2004) 052.
  76. B. M. Dassinger, T. Feldmann, T. Mannel, and S. Turczyk, Model-independent analysis of lepton flavour violating tau decays, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2007) 039.
  77. C. Giunti and C. W. Kim, Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007).
  78. A. M. Baldini et al. (MEG Collaboration), Search for the lepton flavour violating decay μ+→e+γ with the full dataset of the MEG experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 434 (2016).
  79. H. Novales-Sánchez, M. Salinas, J. J. Toscano, and O. Vázquez-Hernández, Electric dipole moments of charged leptons at one loop in the presence of massive neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 95, 055016 (2017).
  80. A. M. Teixeira, Theoretical aspects of charged lepton flavour violation, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 888, 012029 (2017).
  81. G. Hernández-Tomé, G. López Castro, and P. Roig, Flavor violating leptonic decays of τ and μ leptons in the Standard Model with massive neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 84 (2019); 80, 438(E) (2020).
  82. N. D. Barrie and S. T. Petcov, Lepton flavour violation tests of Type II seesaw leptogenesis, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 001.
  83. L. Calibbi and G. Signorelli, Charged lepton flavour violation: An experimental and theoretical introduction, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 41, 71 (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation