Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Bound of Casimir effect by holography

Rong-Xin Miao

Phys. Rev. D 112, L081901 – Published 2 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xs4m-qjsb

Abstract

Inspired by the Kovtun-Son-Starinet bound, we propose that holography imposes a lower bound on the Casimir effect. For simplicity, we focus on the Casimir effect between parallel planes for three-dimensional conformal field theories and briefly comment on the generalizations to other boundary shapes and higher dimensions. Remarkably, the ghost-free holographic models impose a universal lower bound on the Casimir effect. We verify the holographic bound by free theories, the Ising model, and O(N) models with N=2, 3 at critical points and prove it for the two-dimensional case. Remarkably, a general class of quantum field theories without conformal symmetries also obeys the holographic bound.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (49)

  1. H. B. G. Casimir, Indagat. Math 10, 261 (1948).
  2. G. Plunien, B. Muller, and W. Greiner, Phys. Rep. 134, 87 (1986).
  3. M. Bordag, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepanenko, Phys. Rep. 353, 1 (2001).
  4. K. A. Milton, J. Phys. A 37, R209 (2004).
  5. M. Bordag, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepanenko, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009), Vol. 145, pp. 1–768.
  6. S. Wang, Y. Wang, and M. Li, Phys. Rep. 696, 1 (2017).
  7. L. Vepstas, A. D. Jackson, and A. S. Goldhaber, Phys. Lett. 140B, 280 (1984).
  8. M. S. Morris, K. S. Thorne, and U. Yurtsever, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1446 (1988).
  9. J. Maldacena and A. Milekhin, Phys. Rev. D 103, 066007 (2021).
  10. U. Mohideen and A. Roy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4549 (1998).
  11. G. Bressi, G. Carugno, R. Onofrio, and G. Ruoso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 041804 (2002).
  12. G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepanenko, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1827 (2009).
  13. J. M. Maldacena, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999) [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998)].
  14. P. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 111601 (2005).
  15. G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 081601 (2001).
  16. M. Brigante, H. Liu, R. C. Myers, S. Shenker, and S. Yaida, Phys. Rev. D 77, 126006 (2008).
  17. Y. Kats and P. Petrov, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 044.
  18. M. Brigante, H. Liu, R. C. Myers, S. Shenker, and S. Yaida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 191601 (2008).
  19. R. X. Miao, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 084.
  20. K. Jensen and A. O’Bannon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 091601 (2016).
  21. M. Fujita, T. Takayanagi, and E. Tonni, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2011) 043.
  22. M. Billò, V. Gonccalves, E. Lauria, and M. Meineri, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2016) 091.
  23. S. Bellucci and A. A. Saharian, Phys. Rev. D 80, 105003 (2009).
  24. D. M. McAvity and H. Osborn, Nucl. Phys. B406, 655 (1993).
  25. R. X. Miao, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2019) 098.
  26. A. Romeo and A. A. Saharian, J. Phys. A 35, 1297 (2002).
  27. F. P. Toldin and M. A. Metlitski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 215701 (2022).
  28. F. Parisen Toldin and S. Dietrich, J. Stat. Mech. 11 (2010) P11003.
  29. M. Hasenbusch, Phys. Rev. B 82, 104425 (2010).
  30. J. L. Cardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1443 (1990).
  31. T. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 101602 (2011).
  32. G. R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and M. Porrati, Phys. Lett. B 485, 208 (2000).
  33. R. X. Miao, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 043.
  34. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/xs4m-qjsb for holographic bound of Casimir effect for DGP gravity.
  35. S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin, and K. Skenderis, Commun. Math. Phys. 217, 595 (2001).
  36. M. Miyaji, T. Takayanagi, and T. Ugajin, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 023.
  37. We thank Takayanagi for valuable comments on negative brane tension and its irrelevance to conical singularity, See also Ref. [36].

  38. D. M. Dantchev and S. Dietrich, Phys. Rep. 1005, 1 (2023).
  39. D. Deutsch and P. Candelas, Phys. Rev. D 20, 3063 (1979).
  40. R. X. Miao, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 023.
  41. R. X. Miao and C. S. Chu, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 046.
  42. H. W. J. Bloete, J. L. Cardy, and M. P. Nightingale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 742 (1986).
  43. C. P. Bachas, J. Phys. A 40, 9089 (2007).
  44. O. Diatlyk, H. Khanchandani, F. K. Popov, and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 261601 (2024).
  45. M. Krech, The Casimir Effect in Critical Systems (World Scientific, London, 1994).
  46. D. M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2008) 012.
  47. D. M. Hofman, D. Li, D. Meltzer, D. Poland, and F. Rejon-Barrera, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 111.
  48. P. Bueno, H. Casini, O. L. Andino, and J. Moreno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 171601 (2023).
  49. S. Collier, D. Mazac, and Y. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 019.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation