Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Comment on “Chiral symmetry restoration, the eigenvalue density of the Dirac operator, and the axial U(1) anomaly at finite temperature”

Matteo Giordano*

  • *Contact author: giordano@bodri.elte.hu

Phys. Rev. D 114, 018501 – Published 21 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xs2n-c7t9

Abstract

Aoki, Fukaya, and Taniguchi claim that both the spectral density of the Dirac operator at the origin and the topological susceptibility must vanish identically for sufficiently small but nonzero quark mass m in the chirally symmetric phase of quantum chromodynamics with two light quark flavors, under certain technical assumptions on the spectrum and on the dependence of observables on m. I argue that a crucial step of their proof is not justified and the validity of these conclusions should be reassessed.

View figure in article

Comments & Replies

Article Text

Original Article

Chiral symmetry restoration, the eigenvalue density of the Dirac operator, and the axial U(1) anomaly at finite temperature

Sinya Aoki, Hidenori Fukaya, and Yusuke Taniguchi
Phys. Rev. D 86, 114512 (2012)

References (11)

  1. S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, and Y. Taniguchi, Phys. Rev. D 86, 114512 (2012).
  2. G. Cossu, S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, H. Matsufuru, and J.-I. Noaki, Phys. Rev. D 87, 114514 (2013); 88, 019901(E) (2013).
  3. A. Tomiya, G. Cossu, S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, and J. Noaki, Phys. Rev. D 96, 034509 (2017); 96, 079902(A) (2017).
  4. S. Aoki, Y. Aoki, G. Cossu, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, C. Rohrhofer, and K. Suzuki (JLQCD collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 074506 (2021).
  5. S. Aoki, Y. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, I. Kanamori, T. Kaneko, Y. Nakamura, C. Rohrhofer, K. Suzuki, and D. Ward (JLQCD collaboration), Proc. Sci., LATTICE2023 (2024) 185 [arXiv:2401.14022].
  6. S. Chandrasekharan, D. Chen, N. H. Christ, W.-J. Lee, R. Mawhinney, and P. M. Vranas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2463 (1999).
  7. V. Dick, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, S. Mukherjee, and S. Sharma, Phys. Rev. D 91, 094504 (2015).
  8. H.-T. Ding et al. (HotQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 062002 (2019).
  9. H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, S. Mukherjee, A. Tomiya, X. D. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 082001 (2021).
  10. O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur, and S. Sharma, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094518 (2021).
  11. M. Giordano, arXiv:2510.24381.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation