Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Self-interaction effects on the Kerr black hole superradiance and their observational implications

Ning Xie and Fa Peng Huang*

  • MOE Key Laboratory of TianQin Mission, TianQin Research Center for Gravitational Physics & School of Physics and Astronomy, Frontiers Science Center for TianQin, Gravitational Wave Research Center of CNSA, Sun Yat-sen University (Zhuhai Campus), Zhuhai 519082, China

  • *Contact author: huangfp8@sysu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 055028 – Published 19 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xmhn-cpv4

Abstract

Through the black hole (BH) superradiance, ultralight bosons can form dense clouds around rotating Kerr BHs. Certain ultralight bosons, such as axions and axionlike particles (promising dark matter candidates), naturally possess self-interactions, and thus may significantly modify the dynamics of the superradiance process. Previous studies on the detection or constraint of ultralight bosons through superradiance have usually neglected the self-interaction effects of bosons. In this work, we investigate the formation and evolution of self-interacting boson clouds in the full Kerr spacetime during BH superradiance. Using numerical methods, we compute the superradiant growth rate of boson clouds with self-interactions around Kerr BHs and quantitatively evaluate how the self-interaction strength of scalar bosons affects the growth rate. We also assess the evolution of the BH’s mass and spin. Our results reveal that, in addition to the superradiance-imposed upper bound on the boson cloud mass, self-interaction of ultralight bosons introduces a new, lower critical mass limit, beyond which the growth rate of the boson cloud approaches zero. This implies that the superradiance process terminates earlier when self-interaction is considered. Furthermore, we explore how self-interaction affects both the oscillation frequency of boson clouds in gravitational atoms and the frequency of gravitational waves (GWs) emitted through cloud annihilation. The anticipated frequency shift might be detectable by the GW observatories. Given that self-interaction substantially alters the evolution of BH superradiance, its effects can significantly relax existing constraints on scalar bosons derived from superradiance. Taking the spin measurements from GW190412 and GW190517 as examples, we discuss the impact of self-interaction on the constraint results in detail.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (85)

  1. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977).
  2. S. Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978).
  3. F. Wilczek, Problem of strong P and T invariance in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978).
  4. J. E. Kim, Weak interaction singlet and strong CP invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 103 (1979).
  5. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Can confinement ensure natural CP invariance of strong interactions?, Nucl. Phys. B166, 493 (1980).
  6. A. R. Zhitnitsky, On possible suppression of the axion hadron interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980).
  7. M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, A simple solution to the strong CP problem with a harmless axion, Phys. Lett. 104B, 199 (1981).
  8. P. Sikivie, Invisible axion search methods, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015004 (2021).
  9. P. Svrcek and E. Witten, Axions in string theory, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2006) 051.
  10. Y. B. Zel’Dovich, Generation of waves by a rotating body, JETP Lett. 14, 180 (1971); Amplification of cylindrical electromagnetic waves reflected from a rotating body, Sov. Phys. JETP 35, 1085 (1972).
  11. A. A. Starobinsky, Amplification of waves reflected from a rotating “black hole”, Sov. Phys. JETP 37, 28 (1973).
  12. T. J. M. Zouros and D. M. Eardley, Instabilities of massive scalar perturbations of a rotating black hole, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 118, 139 (1979).
  13. M. Y. Khlopov, B. A. Malomed, I. B. Zeldovich, and Y. B. Zeldovich, Gravitational instability of scalar fields and formation of primordial black holes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 215, 575 (1985).
  14. S. R. Dolan, Instability of the massive Klein-Gordon field on the Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 76, 084001 (2007).
  15. R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Superradiance. New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics (Springer Cham, Cham, 2020), Vol. 971.
  16. J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the invisible axion, Phys. Lett. 120B, 127 (1983).
  17. M. Dine and W. Fischler, The not so harmless axion, Phys. Lett. 120B, 137 (1983).
  18. P. Sikivie, Axion cosmology, Lect. Notes Phys. 741, 19 (2008).
  19. C. B. Adams et al., Axion dark matter, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2203.14923.
  20. A. Arvanitaki, M. Baryakhtar, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, and R. Lasenby, Black hole mergers and the QCD axion at Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 95, 043001 (2017).
  21. J. Zhang and H. Yang, Gravitational floating orbits around hairy black holes, Phys. Rev. D 99, 064018 (2019).
  22. J. Zhang and H. Yang, Dynamic signatures of black hole binaries with superradiant clouds, Phys. Rev. D 101, 043020 (2020).
  23. O. A. Hannuksela, K. W. K. Wong, R. Brito, E. Berti, and T. G. F. Li, Probing the existence of ultralight bosons with a single gravitational-wave measurement, Nat. Astron. 3, 447 (2019).
  24. D. Baumann, H. S. Chia, and R. A. Porto, Probing ultralight bosons with binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 99, 044001 (2019).
  25. D. Baumann, G. Bertone, J. Stout, and G. M. Tomaselli, Ionization of gravitational atoms, Phys. Rev. D 105, 115036 (2022).
  26. D. Baumann, G. Bertone, J. Stout, and G. M. Tomaselli, Sharp signals of boson clouds in black hole binary inspirals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 221102 (2022).
  27. N. Xie and F. P. Huang, Imprints of ultralight axions on the gravitational wave and pulsar timing measurement, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 210411 (2024).
  28. A. Arvanitaki and S. Dubovsky, Exploring the string axiverse with precision black hole physics, Phys. Rev. D 83, 044026 (2011).
  29. A. Arvanitaki, M. Baryakhtar, and X. Huang, Discovering the QCD axion with black holes and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 91, 084011 (2015).
  30. R. Brito, S. Ghosh, E. Barausse, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, I. Dvorkin, A. Klein, and P. Pani, Stochastic and resolvable gravitational waves from ultralight bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 131101 (2017).
  31. R. Brito, S. Ghosh, E. Barausse, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, I. Dvorkin, A. Klein, and P. Pani, Gravitational wave searches for ultralight bosons with LIGO and LISA, Phys. Rev. D 96, 064050 (2017).
  32. W. E. East, Massive boson superradiant instability of black holes: Nonlinear growth, saturation, and gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 131104 (2018).
  33. N. Siemonsen, T. May, and W. E. East, Modeling the black hole superradiance gravitational waveform, Phys. Rev. D 107, 104003 (2023).
  34. J. Yang and F. P. Huang, Gravitational waves from axions annihilation through quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D 108, 103002 (2023).
  35. J. Yang, N. Xie, and F. P. Huang, Implication of nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background on ultralight axion particles, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2024) 045.
  36. A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, String axiverse, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123530 (2010).
  37. H. Witek, V. Cardoso, A. Ishibashi, and U. Sperhake, Superradiant instabilities in astrophysical systems, Phys. Rev. D 87, 043513 (2013).
  38. W. E. East, Superradiant instability of massive vector fields around spinning black holes in the relativistic regime, Phys. Rev. D 96, 024004 (2017).
  39. W. E. East and F. Pretorius, Superradiant instability and backreaction of massive vector fields around Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 041101 (2017).
  40. K. K. Y. Ng, O. A. Hannuksela, S. Vitale, and T. G. F. Li, Searching for ultralight bosons within spin measurements of a population of binary black hole mergers, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063010 (2021).
  41. K. K. Y. Ng, S. Vitale, O. A. Hannuksela, and T. G. F. Li, Constraints on ultralight scalar bosons within black hole spin measurements from the LIGO-Virgo GWTC-2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 151102 (2021).
  42. P. Du, D. Egana-Ugrinovic, R. Essig, G. Fragione, and R. Perna, Searching for ultra-light bosons and constraining black hole spin distributions with stellar tidal disruption events, Nat. Commun. 13, 4626 (2022).
  43. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  44. G. M. Harry (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Advanced LIGO: The next generation of gravitational wave detectors, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 084006 (2010).
  45. J. Luo et al. (TianQin Collaboration), TianQin: A space-borne gravitational wave detector, Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 035010 (2016).
  46. J. Mei et al. (TianQin Collaboration), The TianQin project: Current progress on science and technology, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A107 (2021).
  47. J. Luo et al., Progress of the TianQin project, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 173001 (2025).
  48. P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA Collaboration), Laser interferometer space antenna, arXiv:1702.00786.
  49. W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, The Taiji program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity, Natl. Sci. Rev. 4, 685 (2017).
  50. M. Baryakhtar, M. Galanis, R. Lasenby, and O. Simon, Black hole superradiance of self-interacting scalar fields, Phys. Rev. D 103, 095019 (2021).
  51. H. Omiya, T. Takahashi, T. Tanaka, and H. Yoshino, Impact of multiple modes on the evolution of self-interacting axion condensate around rotating black holes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2023) 016.
  52. J. a. G. Rosa and T. W. Kephart, Stimulated axion decay in superradiant clouds around primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 231102 (2018).
  53. S. Sen, Plasma effects on lasing of a uniform ultralight axion condensate, Phys. Rev. D 98, 103012 (2018).
  54. T. Ikeda, R. Brito, and V. Cardoso, Blasts of light from axions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 081101 (2019).
  55. A. Mathur, S. Rajendran, and E. H. Tanin, Clockwork mechanism to remove superradiance limits, Phys. Rev. D 102, 055015 (2020).
  56. T. F. M. Spieksma, E. Cannizzaro, T. Ikeda, V. Cardoso, and Y. Chen, Superradiance: Axionic couplings and plasma effects, Phys. Rev. D 108, 063013 (2023).
  57. Y. Chen, X. Xue, and V. Cardoso, Black holes as fermion factories, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2025) (035).
  58. S. Choudhary, N. Sanchis-Gual, A. Gupta, J. C. Degollado, S. Bose, and J. A. Font, Gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers surrounded by scalar field clouds: Numerical simulations and observational implications, Phys. Rev. D 103, 044032 (2021).
  59. X. Tong, Y. Wang, and H.-Y. Zhu, Termination of superradiance from a binary companion, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043002 (2022).
  60. K. Fan, X. Tong, Y. Wang, and H.-Y. Zhu, Modulating binary dynamics via the termination of black hole superradiance, Phys. Rev. D 109, 024059 (2024).
  61. E. Cannizzaro, L. Sberna, S. R. Green, and S. Hollands, Relativistic perturbation theory for black-hole boson clouds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 051401 (2024).
  62. M. Bošković, M. Koschnitzke, and R. A. Porto, Signatures of ultralight bosons in the orbital eccentricity of binary black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 121401 (2024).
  63. A. Guo, J. Zhang, and H. Yang, Superradiant clouds may be relevant for close compact object binaries, Phys. Rev. D 110, 023022 (2024).
  64. H. S. Chia, C. Doorman, A. Wernersson, T. Hinderer, and S. Nissanke, Self-interacting gravitational atoms in the strong-gravity regime, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2023) 018.
  65. S. J. Witte and A. Mummery, Stepping up superradiance constraints on axions, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083044 (2025).
  66. G. Lambiase, T. K. Poddar, and L. Visinelli, Impact of the cosmic neutrino background on black hole superradiance, Phys. Rev. D 112, 016010 (2025).
  67. C. Palomba et al., Direct constraints on ultra-light boson mass from searches for continuous gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 171101 (2019).
  68. L. Sun, R. Brito, and M. Isi, Search for ultralight bosons in Cygnus X-1 with Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 101, 063020 (2020); 102, 089902(E) (2020).
  69. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), All-sky search for gravitational wave emission from scalar boson clouds around spinning black holes in LIGO O3 data, Phys. Rev. D 105, 102001 (2022).
  70. R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, and Virgo Collaborations), Search for continuous gravitational wave emission from the Milky Way center in O3 LIGO-Virgo data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 042003 (2022).
  71. H. Yoshino and H. Kodama, Bosenova collapse of axion cloud around a rotating black hole, Prog. Theor. Phys. 128, 153 (2012).
  72. H. Yoshino and H. Kodama, Gravitational radiation from an axion cloud around a black hole: Superradiant phase, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2014, 043E02 (2014).
  73. S. L. Detweiler, Klein-Gordon equation and rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2323 (1980).
  74. D. Baumann, H. S. Chia, J. Stout, and L. ter Haar, The spectra of gravitational atoms, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2019) 006.
  75. E. Seidel, A comment on the eigenvalues of spin weighted spheroidal functions, Classical Quantum Gravity 6, 1057 (1989).
  76. S. Pincherle, Sur la génération de systémes récurrents: Au moyen d’une équation linéaire différentielle, Acta Math. 16, 341 (1892).
  77. W. Gautschi, Computational aspects of three-term recurrence relations, SIAM Rev. 9, 24 (1967).
  78. K. S. Thorne, Disk accretion onto a black hole. 2. Evolution of the hole, Astrophys. J. 191, 507 (1974).
  79. M. Volonteri, P. Madau, E. Quataert, and M. J. Rees, The distribution and cosmic evolution of massive black hole spins, Astrophys. J. 620, 69 (2005).
  80. A. Sesana, E. Barausse, M. Dotti, and E. M. Rossi, Linking the spin evolution of massive black holes to galaxy kinematics, Astrophys. J. 794, 104 (2014).
  81. D. Izquierdo-Villalba, S. Bonoli, M. Dotti, A. Sesana, Y. Rosanhbs-Guevara, and D. Spinoso, From galactic nuclei to the halo outskirts: Tracing supermassive black holes across cosmic history and environments, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 495, 4681 (2020).
  82. C. S. Reynolds, Observing black holes spin, Nat. Astron. 3, 41 (2019).
  83. O. Burke, J. R. Gair, J. Simón, and M. C. Edwards, Constraining the spin parameter of near-extremal black holes using LISA, Phys. Rev. D 102, 124054 (2020).
  84. T. May, W. E. East, and N. Siemonsen, Self-gravity effects of ultralight boson clouds formed by black hole superradiance, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044062 (2025).
  85. R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), GW190412: Observation of a binary-black-hole coalescence with asymmetric masses, Phys. Rev. D 102, 043015 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation