Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Aspects of propagator sparsening in lattice QCD

Sam Christian* and William Detmold†

  • *Contact author: samdc@mit.edu
  • †Contact author: wdetmold@mit.edu

Phys. Rev. D 111, 114514 – Published 17 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xfmp-c2d4

Abstract

In lattice field theory, field sparsening aims to replace quantum fields, or objects constructed from them, with approximations that preserve the appropriate symmetries and maintain many aspects of the physics that the fields determine. For example, an effective sparsening of a quark propagator provides an efficient map from a quark propagator on a fine lattice geometry to a quark propagator defined on a coarser geometry in order to reduce storage and computational costs of subsequent calculational stages while maintaining long-distance correlations and corresponding low-energy physical information. Previous studies have focused on decimating lattice sites or randomly sampling lattice sites to reduce the size of the propagator and subsequent costs of Wick contractions. Here, we extend the study of sparsening to incorporate covariant averaging of spatial sites and examine the effects on two-point and three-point correlation functions involving various hadrons. We find that sparsening is most effective in reproducing the unsparsened versions of these correlation functions when weighted covariant-averaging is sequentially applied many times.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (35)

  1. P. Weisz, Nucl. Phys. B212, 1 (1983).
  2. P. Weisz and R. Wohlert, Nucl. Phys. B236, 397 (1984); B247, 544(E) (1984).
  3. K. Symanzik, Nucl. Phys. B226, 187 (1983).
  4. K. Symanzik, Nucl. Phys. B226, 205 (1983).
  5. Y. Iwasaki, Nucl. Phys. B258, 141 (1985).
  6. Y. Iwasaki, arXiv:1111.7054.
  7. M. Lüscher and P. Weisz, Phys. Lett. 158B, 250 (1985).
  8. B. Sheikholeslami and R. Wohlert, Nucl. Phys. B259, 572 (1985).
  9. P. Hasenfratz and F. Niedermayer, Nucl. Phys. B414, 785 (1994).
  10. W. Bietenholz and U. J. Wiese, Nucl. Phys. B464, 319 (1996).
  11. T. A. DeGrand, A. Hasenfratz, P. Hasenfratz, and F. Niedermayer, Nucl. Phys. B454, 587 (1995).
  12. P. Hasenfratz, in Advanced Summer School on Nonperturbative Quantum Field Physics (1998), pp. 137–199, arXiv:hep-lat/9803027.
  13. M. G. Endres, R. C. Brower, W. Detmold, K. Orginos, and A. V. Pochinsky, Phys. Rev. D 92, 114516 (2015).
  14. W. Detmold and M. G. Endres, Phys. Rev. D 94, 114502 (2016).
  15. W. Detmold and M. G. Endres, Phys. Rev. D 97, 074507 (2018).
  16. P. E. Shanahan, A. Trewartha, and W. Detmold, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094506 (2018).
  17. R. Abbott, M. S. Albergo, D. Boyda, D. C. Hackett, G. Kanwar, F. Romero-López, P. E. Shanahan, and J. M. Urban, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2023 (2024) 035 [arXiv:2404.10819].
  18. W. Detmold, D. J. Murphy, A. V. Pochinsky, M. J. Savage, P. E. Shanahan, and M. L. Wagman, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034502 (2021).
  19. Y. Li, S.-C. Xia, X. Feng, L.-C. Jin, and C. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014514 (2021).
  20. S. Amarasinghe, R. Baghdadi, Z. Davoudi, W. Detmold, M. Illa, A. Parreño, A. V. Pochinsky, P. E. Shanahan, and M. L. Wagman, Phys. Rev. D 107, 094508 (2023).
  21. W. Detmold, M. Illa, W. I. Jay, A. Parreño, R. J. Perry, P. E. Shanahan, and M. L. Wagman, arXiv:2404.12039.
  22. R. Abbott, W. Detmold, F. Romero-López, Z. Davoudi, M. Illa, A. Parreño, R. J. Perry, P. E. Shanahan, and M. L. Wagman (NPLQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 114506 (2023).
  23. R. Abbott, W. Detmold, M. Illa, A. Parreño, R. J. Perry, F. Romero-López, P. E. Shanahan, and M. L. Wagman (NPLQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011903 (2025).
  24. X. Feng, L. Jin, and M. J. Riberdy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 052003 (2022).
  25. C. Lehner, grid python Toolkit (gpt), https://github.com/lehner/gpt.
  26. D. Daniel, R. Gupta, G. W. Kilcup, A. Patel, and S. R. Sharpe, Phys. Rev. D 46, 3130 (1992).
  27. C. Morningstar and M. J. Peardon, Phys. Rev. D 69, 054501 (2004).
  28. J. M. Zanotti, D. B. Leinweber, A. G. Williams, J. Zhang, W. Melnitchouk, S. Choe et al., Phys. Rev. D 68, 054506 (2003).
  29. L. Hockley, W. Kamleh, D. Leinweber, and A. Thomas, Few Body Syst. 64, 46 (2023).
  30. S. R. Beane et al. (NPLQCD, QCDSF Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 103, 054504 (2021).
  31. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/xfmp-c2d4 for a set of figures similar to Figs. 2 through 9 but for a more comprehensive set of blocking and decimation steps.
  32. Z. Davoudi, W. Detmold, Z. Fu, A. V. Grebe, W. Jay, D. Murphy, P. Oare, P. E. Shanahan, and M. L. Wagman (NPLQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 109, 114514 (2024).
  33. R. G. Edwards and B. Joó (SciDAC, LHPC, UKQCD Collaborations), Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 140, 832 (2005).
  34. P. A. Boyle, G. Cossu, A. Yamaguchi, and A. Portelli, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2015 (2016) 023.
  35. A. Reuther, J. Kepner, C. Byun, S. Samsi, W. Arcand, D. Bestor, B. Bergeron, V. Gadepally, M. Houle, M. Hubbell, M. Jones, A. Klein, L. Milechin, J. Mullen, A. Prout, A. Rosa, C. Yee, and P. Michaleas, in Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE High Performance extreme Computing Conference (HPEC) (IEEE, Waltham, MA, 2018), pp. 1–6.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation