Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Analysis of the fragmentation function of gluon at next-to-leading order approximation

H. S. Nakhaei* and G. R. Boroun†

  • *Contact author: SaghaeNakhaei.Hossein@razi.ac.ir
  • †Contact author: boroun@razi.ac.ir

Phys. Rev. D 112, 054039 – Published 23 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/x9vl-d6pm

Abstract

We are investigating the behavior of the fragmentation function of a gluon, denoted as Dg(x,μ2), where μ represents the observable scale. This function is derived from the Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi evolution equations. Our objective is to evolve the fragmentation function of a gluon for heavy-quark-antiquark bound states with large transverse momentum using a Laplace transform technique. This method enables us to calculate numerical solutions for two and four quarkonium states based on the known initial fragmentation function of gluons. We examine both leading-order and higher-order approximations for the fragmentation function of a gluon, [g→TnQ], by integrating the evolved fragmentation function of the gluon at the initial scale. In our computations, we utilize the initial scales for Tg2c from Braaten and Yuan [Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1673 (1993)] and for Tg4c and Tg4b from Celiberto et al. [Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1071 (2024)] and Celiberto and Gatto [Phys. Rev. D 111, 034037 (2025)], respectively. Through comparing our predictions with existing literature results, we can accurately determine the evolution of the fragmentation function of a gluon at scale μ.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (36)

  1. E. Braaten and T. Chiang Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1673 (1993).
  2. DELPHI Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 398, 194 (1997); DELPHI CollaborationZ. Phys. C 70, 179 (1996).
  3. K. Hagiwara, A. D. Martin, and W. J. Stirling, Phys. Lett. B 267, 527 (1991).
  4. G. C. Nayak, arXiv:1508.05078.
  5. V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15, 438 (1972).
  6. G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Nucl. Phys. B126, 298 (1977).
  7. Y. L. Dokshitzer, Sov. Phys. JETP 46, 641 (1977).
  8. S. M. Moosavi Nejad, M. Roknabady, and M. Delpasand, Nucl. Phys. B956, 115036 (2020).
  9. S. M. Moosavi Nejad, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130, 136 (2015).
  10. M. Suzuki, Phys. Lett. B 71, 139 (1977); Phys. Rev. D 33, 676 (1986).
  11. X. Gao, Y. Jia, L. Li, and X. Xiong, Chin. Phys. C 41, 023103 (2017).
  12. S. Albino, B. A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, and W. Ochs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 232002 (2005); Eur. Phys. J. C 36, 49 (2004).
  13. S. Albino, B. A. Kniehl, and G. Kramer, Eur. Phys. J. C 38, 177 (2004).
  14. P. Bolzoni, B. A. Kniehl, and A. V. Kotikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 242002 (2012).
  15. F. Feng, S. Ishaq, Yu Jia, and Jia-Yue Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 102, 014038 (2020).
  16. F. Feng, Yu Jia, and D. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054030 (2022).
  17. M. Zarei, F. Taghavi-Shahri, S. Atashbar Tehrani, and M. Sarbishei, Phys. Rev. D 92, 074046 (2015); F. Taghavi-Shahri, S. Atashbar Tehrani, and M. Zare, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31, 1650100 (2016).
  18. M. Soleymaninia, A. N. Khorramian, S. M. Moosavi Nejad, and F. Arbabifar, Phys. Rev. D 88, 054019 (2013); M. Soleymaninia, H. Hashamipour, and H. Khanpour, 105, 114018 (2022); M. Soleymaninia and H. Khanpour, 100, 094033 (2019).
  19. H. Abdolmaleki et al. (xFitter Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 104, 056019 (2021).
  20. S. Dadfar and S. Zarrin, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 949 (2021); R. Sepahvand and S. Dadfar, Phys. Rev. D 95, 034012 (2017); G. R. Boroun, S. Zarrin, and S. Dadfar, Nucl. Phys. A953, 21 (2016); G. R. Boroun, T. Osati, and S. Zarrin, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54, 3831 (2015).
  21. F. G. Celiberto, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 384 (2024); Symmetry 16, 550 (2024); ; arXiv:2502.11136; Hong-Hao Ma, Zheng-Kui Tao, and Juan-Juan Niu, arXiv:2502.20891.
  22. F. G. Celiberto, G. Gatto, and A. Papa, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1071 (2024).
  23. F. G. Celiberto and G. Gatto, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034037 (2025); F. G. Celiberto, arXiv:2507.09744.
  24. S. K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003).
  25. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Science bulletin 65, 1983 (2020).
  26. F. Feng, Y. Huang, Y. Jia, W.-L. Sang, X. Xiong, and J.-Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 106, 114029 (2022); F. Feng, Y. Huang, Y. Jia, W.-L. Sang, D.-S. Yang, and J.-Y. Zhang, 108, L051501 (2023).
  27. R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling, and B. R. Webber, QCD and Collider Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1996).
  28. Martin M. Block, Loyal Durand, and Douglas W. McKay, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014031 (2009).
  29. Martin M. Block, Loyal Durand, Phuoc Ha, and Douglas W. McKay, Phys. Rev. D 83, 054009 (2011).
  30. Martin M. Block, Loyal Durand, Phuoc Ha, and Douglas W. McKay, Phys. Rev. D 84, 094010 (2011).
  31. Martin M. Block, Loyal Durand, Phuoc Ha, and Douglas W. McKay, Phys. Rev. D 88, 014006 (2013).
  32. G. R. Boroun and Phuoc Ha, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094037 (2024).
  33. G. R. Boroun and B. Rezaei, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034002 (2022).
  34. Martin M. Block, Loyal Durand, Phuoc Ha, and Douglas W. McKay, arXiv:1004.1440.
  35. Martin M. Block, Loyal Durand, Phuoc Ha, and Douglas W. McKay, Eur. Phys. J. C 69, 425 (2010).
  36. L. P. Kaptari, A. V. Kotikov, N. Yu. Chernikova, and P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 99, 096019 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation