Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Singly heavy omega baryon spectroscopy in the relativistic framework of an independent quark model

Rameshri V. Patel* and Manan Shah†

Smruti Patel

Bhoomika Pandya

  • Government Arts, Commerce, and Science College, Limbayat, Surat, Gujarat

  • Department of Physics Education, Teachers College, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea and Department of Physics, Education Research Center for Quantum Nature of Particles and Matter, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea

  • *Contact author: rameshri.patel1712@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: mnshah09@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 112, 056025 – Published 22 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/x8lw-8vfs

Abstract

The independent quark model, formulated for a three-body system within a relativistic framework, is applied to singly heavy baryons Ωc0 and Ωb− to investigate their spectroscopic properties. A Martin-like potential with an equal mixture of scalar and vector components is employed, with potential parameters fitted using ground-state experimental data. The resulting mass spectra include both radial and orbital excitations. The spin-parity for the recently observed states Ωc0(3000), Ωc0(3050), Ωc0(3067), Ωc0(3120), and Ωc0(3185), as well as possible spin assignments for the four newly observed excited states of Ωb− (Ωb−(6316), Ωb−(6330), Ωb−(6340), and Ωb−(6350), are proposed. The magnetic moments of the ground and first excited states are also calculated, along with radiative decay widths and transition magnetic moments. The nonleptonic weak decays of Ωc0 are analyzed, with decay widths and branching ratios computed and compared with experimental data to validate the predictive power of the model. The branching ratios for the nonleptonic decays of Ωb− are also predicted for future observations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (107)

  1. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 232001 (2006).
  2. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 182001 (2017).
  3. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 104, 9 (2021).
  4. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 131902 (2023).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 082002 (2020).
  6. G. Chiladze and A. F. Falk, Phys. Rev. D 56, R6738 (1997).
  7. H. Garcilazo, J. Vijande, and A. Valcarce, J. Phys. G 34, 961 (2007).
  8. D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Lett. B 659, 612 (2008).
  9. A. Valcarce, H. Garcilazo, and J. Vijande, Eur. Phys. J. A 37, 217 (2008).
  10. W. Roberts and M. Pervin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23, 2817 (2008).
  11. Z. G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 54, 231 (2008).
  12. X. Liu, H. X. Chen, Y. R. Liu, A. Hosaka, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 77, 014031 (2008).
  13. Z. G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 61, 321 (2009).
  14. Z. G. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 685, 59 (2010).
  15. D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Rev. D 84, 014025 (2011).
  16. J. Vijande, A. Valcarce, T. F. Carames, and H. Garcilazo, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 22, 1330011 (2013).
  17. M. Padmanath, R. G. Edwards, N. Mathur, and M. Peardon, arXiv:1311.4806.
  18. T. Yoshida, E. Hiyama, A. Hosaka, M. Oka, and K. Sadato, Phys. Rev. D 92, 114029 (2015).
  19. H. X. Chen, W. Chen, Q. Mao, A. Hosaka, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 91, 054034 (2015).
  20. T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, T. Barakat, and M. Savc𝚤, Phys. Rev. D 92, 036004 (2015).
  21. J. X. Lu, Y. Zhou, H. X. Chen, J. J. Xie, and L. S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 92, 014036 (2015).
  22. Z. Shah, K. Thakkar, A. K. Rai, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Chin. Phys. C 40, 123102 (2016).
  23. M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114012 (2017).
  24. H. X. Chen, Q. Mao, W. Chen, A. Hosaka, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 95, 094008 (2017).
  25. K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 22 (2017).
  26. H. C. Kim, M. V. Polyakov, M. Praszalowicz, and G. S. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094021 (2017).
  27. K. L. Wang, Y. X. Yao, X. H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 96, 116016 (2017).
  28. K. L. Wang, L. Y. Xiao, X. H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 95, 116010 (2017).
  29. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, Phys. Rev. D 95, 094018 (2017).
  30. Z. Zhao, D. D. Ye, and A. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114024 (2017).
  31. W. Wang and R. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 96, 014024 (2017).
  32. M. Padmanath and N. Mathur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 042001 (2017).
  33. Z. G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 325 (2017).
  34. S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, and H. Sundu, Europhys. Lett. 118, 61001 (2017).
  35. S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, and H. Sundu, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 395 (2017).
  36. S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, and H. Sundu, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094011 (2017).
  37. B. Chen and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094015 (2017).
  38. C. S. An and H. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 96, 034012 (2017).
  39. Q. Mao, H. X. Chen, A. Hosaka, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 96, 074021 (2017).
  40. Y. X. Yao, K. L. Wang, and X. H. Zhong, Phys. Rev. D 98, 076015 (2018).
  41. G. Yang and J. Ping, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034023 (2018).
  42. R. Chen, A. Hosaka, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 97, 036016 (2018).
  43. J. Nieves, R. Pavao, and L. Tolos, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 114 (2018).
  44. Y. Huang, C. Xiao, Q. F. Lü, R. Wang, J. He, and L. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094013 (2018).
  45. B. Chen and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 98, 074032 (2018).
  46. V. R. Debastiani, J. M. Dias, W. H. Liang, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094035 (2018).
  47. G. Montaña, A. Feijoo, and À. Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 64 (2018).
  48. E. Santopinto, A. Giachino, J. Ferretti, H. García-Tecocoatzi, M. A. Bedolla, R. Bijker, and E. Ortiz-Pacheco, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 1012 (2019).
  49. E. L. Cui, H. M. Yang, H. X. Chen, and A. Hosaka, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094021 (2019).
  50. H. M. Yang, H. X. Chen, E. L. Cui, A. Hosaka, and Q. Mao, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 80 (2020).
  51. H. g. Xu, G. Chen, Y. L. Yan, D. M. Zhou, L. Zheng, Y. L. Xie, Z. L. She, and B. H. Sa, Phys. Rev. C 102, 054319 (2020).
  52. A. Ramos, A. Feijoo, Q. Llorens, and G. Montaña, Few Body Syst. 61, 34 (2020).
  53. S. Hu, G. Meng, and F. Xu, Phys. Rev. D 101, 094033 (2020).
  54. H. M. Yang and H. X. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034037 (2021).
  55. H. J. Wang, Z. Y. Di, and Z. G. Wang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73, 035201 (2021).
  56. A. Ramirez Morales, Proc. Sci., ICHEP2022 (2022) 913.
  57. A. Kakadiya, Z. Shah, and A. K. Rai, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37, 2250053 (2022).
  58. P. Jakhad, J. Oudichhya, K. Gandhi, and A. K. Rai, Phys. Rev. D 108, 014011 (2023).
  59. J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 123 (2023).
  60. G. L. Yu, Z. Y. Li, Z. G. Wang, J. Lu, and M. Yan, Nucl. Phys. B 990, 116183 (2023).
  61. J. Oudichhya, P. Jakhad, and A. K. Rai, Springer Proc. Phys. 304, 1120 (2024).
  62. P. Jakhad, J. Oudichhya, and A. K. Rai, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094005 (2024).
  63. A. P. Kobushkin, ITF-76-58E (1976), https://inspirehep.net/literature/109768.
  64. P. Leal Ferreira, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 20, 157 (1977).
  65. N. Barik and S. n. Jena, Phys. Rev. D 26, 2420 (1982).
  66. N. Barik, B. K. Dash, and M. Das, Phys. Rev. D 31, 1652 (1985).
  67. N. Barik and M. Das, Phys. Rev. D 33, 172 (1986).
  68. M. Shah, B. Patel, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Phys. Rev. D 90, 014009 (2014).
  69. P. C. Vinodkumar, M. Shah, and B. Patel, Nucl. Phys. 59, 638–639 (2014).
  70. M. Shah, B. Patel, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Nucl. Phys. 59, 650 (2014).
  71. P. C. Vinodkumar, M. Shah, and B. Patel, Nucl. Phys. 60, 676 (2015).
  72. M. Shah, B. Patel, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 36 (2016).
  73. M. Shah, B. Patel, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094028 (2016).
  74. B. Pandya, M. Shah, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 935 (2021).
  75. R. Patel, M. Shah, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Few Body Syst. 64, 30 (2023).
  76. M. Shah, R. Patel, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Few Body Syst. 64, 34 (2023).
  77. R. V. Patel and M. N. Shah, Phys. Rev. D 110, 036010 (2024).
  78. S. Patel and M. Shah, Few Body Syst. 64, 37 (2023).
  79. W. Greiner, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. Wave Equations (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2000), ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat], [Amazon][WorldCat].
  80. W. Lucha and F. Schoberl, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 10, 607 (1998).
  81. P. C. VinodkumarK. B. Vijayakumar, and S. B. Khadkikar et al., Pramana 39, 47 (1992).
  82. A. P. Monteiro and K. B. Vijaya Kumar, Nat. Sci. 2, 1292 (2010).
  83. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  84. S. Küçüky𝚤lmaz and H. Mutuk, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139733 (2025).
  85. B. Patel, A. K. Rai, and P. C. Vinodkumar, J. Phys. G 35, 065001 (2008).
  86. K. U. Can, G. Erkol, M. Oka, and T. T. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. D 92, 114515 (2015).
  87. G. J. Wang, L. Meng, H. S. Li, Z. W. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 98, 054026 (2018).
  88. U. Özdem, Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 62 (2025).
  89. A. Bernotas and V. Simonis, Lith. J. Phys. 53, 2 (2013).
  90. J. Dey, V. Shevchenko, P. Volkovitsky, and M. Dey, Phys. Lett. B 337, 185 (1994).
  91. K. Thakkar, B. Patel, A. Majethiya, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Pramana 77, 1053 (2011).
  92. R. Dhir and R. C. Verma, Eur. Phys. J. A 42, 243 (2009).
  93. Y. L. Wang, H. J. Zhao, and Y. K. Hsiao, Phys. Rev. D 111, 016022 (2025).
  94. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
  95. J. Zou, F. Xu, G. Meng, and H. Y. Cheng, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014011 (2020).
  96. X. Han et al. (Belle Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 055.
  97. H. W. Ke, N. Hao, and X. Q. Li, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 540 (2019).
  98. Y. S. Li and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 105, 013003 (2022).
  99. C. K. Chua, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034025 (2019).
  100. H. Y. Cheng, Phys. Rev. D 56, 2799 (1997).
  101. M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Korner, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and A. G. Rusetsky, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 13, 181 (1998).
  102. M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Korner, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and A. G. Rusetsky, Phys. Rev. D 57, 5632 (1998).
  103. Z. X. Zhao, Chin. Phys. C 42, 093101 (2018).
  104. T. Gutsche, M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Körner, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Phys. Rev. D 98, 074011 (2018).
  105. L. L. Chau, H. Y. Cheng, and B. Tseng, Phys. Rev. D 54, 2132 (1996).
  106. H. Y. Cheng, Phys. Lett. B 289, 455 (1992).
  107. H. Y. Cheng, Phys. Rev. D 56, 2799 (1997).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation