Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Natural realization of tens-of-GeV dark matter in the general NMSSM

Fei Li1 and Junjie Cao1,2,*

  • *Contact author: junjiec@alumni.itp.ac.cn

Phys. Rev. D 113, 115002 – Published 2 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/x7j7-5mtq

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of a light dark matter (DM) scenario in the minimal supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), the Z3-symmetric next-to-minimal supersymmetric Standard Model, and the general next-to-minimal supersymmetric Standard Model (GNMSSM), incorporating constraints from DM relic density, the LUX-ZEPLIN 2024 experiment, Higgs data, and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The results suggest that, among the three frameworks, only GNMSSM can naturally accommodate light DM with a mass below 100 GeV. As such, the viable supersymmetry candidate is primarily Singlino-like. One key advantage of the GNMSSM is the effective decoupling between interactions that establish the relic density and those that control direct detection, allowing the model to satisfy all current experimental bounds simultaneously. We further explore two characteristic mass hierarchies in the GNMSSM parameter space, each exhibiting distinct phenomenological behaviors. The first hierarchy, S˜<B˜<H˜ (Singlino-Bino-Higgsino), involves a relatively light Bino and allows the Higgsino mass parameter, μtot, to be as low as about 200 GeV, naturally yielding light DM at tens of GeV. The dominant annihilation channels are then χ˜10χ˜10→AsAs in the h1 scenario and χ˜10χ˜10→hsAs in the h2 scenario, where hs and As denote singlet-dominated CP-even and CP-odd Higgs bosons, respectively. The second hierarchy, S˜<H˜<B˜, corresponds to a heavy Bino. In this case, although the DM phenomenology remains qualitatively similar, LHC constraints require μtot≳900  GeV, implying a significant degree of fine-tuning in reproducing the Z-boson mass.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (128)

  1. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rep. 267, 195 (1996).
  2. S. Baum, M. Carena, N. R. Shah, and C. E. M. Wagner, Higgs portals for thermal dark matter. EFT perspectives and the NMSSM, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2018) 069.
  3. J. Cao, L. Meng, Y. Yue, H. Zhou, and P. Zhu, Suppressing the scattering of WIMP dark matter and nucleons in supersymmetric theories, Phys. Rev. D 101, 075003 (2020).
  4. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Dark matter search results from 4.2 tonne-years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  5. M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, Secluded WIMP dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 662, 53 (2008).
  6. C. M. Ho and R. J. Scherrer, Limits on MeV dark matter from the effective number of neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 87, 023505 (2013).
  7. K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski, Unitarity limits on the mass and radius of dark matter particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 615 (1990).
  8. J. Smirnov and J. F. Beacom, TeV-scale thermal WIMPs: Unitarity and its consequences, Phys. Rev. D 100, 043029 (2019).
  9. J. L. Feng, Dark matter candidates from particle physics and methods of detection, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 48, 495 (2010).
  10. G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre et al., The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 203 (2018).
  11. J. Abdallah et al., Simplified models for dark matter searches at the LHC, Phys. Dark Universe 9–10, 8 (2015).
  12. A. Bottino, N. Fornengo, and S. Scopel, Light relic neutralinos, Phys. Rev. D 67, 063519 (2003).
  13. A. Bottino, F. Donato, N. Fornengo, and S. Scopel, Light neutralinos and WIMP direct searches, Phys. Rev. D 69, 037302 (2004).
  14. P. Belli, R. Bernabei, A. Bottino, F. Cappella, R. Cerulli, N. Fornengo et al., Observations of annual modulation in direct detection of relic particles and light neutralinos, Phys. Rev. D 84, 055014 (2011).
  15. J. F. Gunion, D. Hooper, and B. McElrath, Light neutralino dark matter in the NMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 73, 015011 (2006).
  16. H. E. Haber and G. L. Kane, The search for supersymmetry: Probing physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Rep. 117, 75 (1985).
  17. J. F. Gunion and H. E. Haber, Higgs bosons in supersymmetric models. 1., Nucl. Phys. B272, 1 (1986).
  18. U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, and A. M. Teixeira, The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rep. 496, 1 (2010).
  19. D. J. Miller, R. Nevzorov, and P. M. Zerwas, The Higgs sector of the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B681, 3 (2004).
  20. A. Djouadi et al. (MSSM Working Group Collaboration), The minimal supersymmetric standard model: Group summary report, in GDR (Groupement De Recherche)—Supersymetrie (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9901246.
  21. R. Arnowitt, A. H. Chamseddine, and P. Nath, The development of supergravity grand unification: Circa 1982-85, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27, 1230028 (2012).
  22. G. L. Kane, C. F. Kolda, L. Roszkowski, and J. D. Wells, Study of constrained minimal supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6173 (1994).
  23. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rep. 459, 1 (2008).
  24. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Searches for additional Higgs bosons and for vector leptoquarks in ττ final states in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 073.
  25. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 051801 (2020).
  26. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  27. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  28. H. E. Haber and R. Hempfling, Can the mass of the lightest Higgs boson of the minimal supersymmetric model be larger than mZ?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1815 (1991).
  29. Y. Okada, M. Yamaguchi, and T. Yanagida, Upper bound of the lightest Higgs boson mass in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 85, 1 (1991).
  30. J. R. Ellis, G. Ridolfi, and F. Zwirner, Radiative corrections to the masses of supersymmetric Higgs bosons, Phys. Lett. B 257, 83 (1991).
  31. R. Barbieri, M. Frigeni, and F. Caravaglios, The supersymmetric Higgs for heavy superpartners, Phys. Lett. B 258, 167 (1991).
  32. J. R. Espinosa and M. Quiros, Two loop radiative corrections to the mass of the lightest Higgs boson in supersymmetric standard models, Phys. Lett. B 266, 389 (1991).
  33. A. Pierce, N. R. Shah, and K. Freese, Neutralino dark matter with light staus, arXiv:1309.7351.
  34. Y. He, L. Meng, Y. Yue, and D. Zhang, Impact of the recent measurement of (g−2)μ, the LHC search for supersymmetry, and the LZ experiment on the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115010 (2023).
  35. P. Huang and C. E. M. Wagner, Blind spots for neutralino dark matter in the MSSM with an intermediate mA, Phys. Rev. D 90, 015018 (2014).
  36. E. Bagnaschi et al., Likelihood analysis of the pMSSM11 in light of LHC 13-TeV data, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 256 (2018).
  37. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for chargino–neutralino pair production in final states with three leptons and missing transverse momentum in s=13  TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1118 (2021).
  38. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for charginos and neutralinos in final states with two boosted hadronically decaying bosons and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 104, 112010 (2021).
  39. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles in final states with two τ-leptons in s=13  TeV ppcollisions with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 150.
  40. Y. Okada, M. Yamaguchi, and T. Yanagida, Renormalization group analysis on the Higgs mass in the softly broken supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 262, 54 (1991).
  41. A. Brignole, J. R. Ellis, G. Ridolfi, and F. Zwirner, The supersymmetric charged Higgs boson mass and LEP phenomenology, Phys. Lett. B 271, 123 (1991).
  42. J. R. Ellis, G. Ridolfi, and F. Zwirner, On radiative corrections to supersymmetric Higgs boson masses and their implications for LEP searches, Phys. Lett. B 262, 477 (1991).
  43. P. H. Chankowski, S. Pokorski, and J. Rosiek, Complete on-shell renormalization scheme for the minimal supersymmetric Higgs sector, Nucl. Phys. B423, 437 (1994).
  44. D. M. Pierce, J. A. Bagger, K. T. Matchev, and R.-j. Zhang, Precision corrections in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B491, 3 (1997).
  45. H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang, and X. Tata, Natural supersymmetry: LHC, dark matter and ILC searches, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2012) 109.
  46. H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang, A. Mustafayev, and X. Tata, Radiative natural SUSY with a 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 161802 (2012).
  47. H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang, D. Mickelson, A. Mustafayev, and X. Tata, Radiative natural supersymmetry: Reconciling electroweak fine-tuning and the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. D 87, 115028 (2013).
  48. H. Baer, V. Barger, and D. Mickelson, How conventional measures overestimate electroweak fine-tuning in supersymmetric theory, Phys. Rev. D 88, 095013 (2013).
  49. J. Cao, Y. He, L. Shang, Y. Zhang, and P. Zhu, Current status of a natural NMSSM in light of LHC 13 TeV data and XENON-1T results, Phys. Rev. D 99, 075020 (2019).
  50. P. Fayet, Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino, Nucl. Phys. B90, 104 (1975).
  51. J. Cao, D. Li, J. Lian, Y. Yue, and H. Zhou, Singlino-dominated dark matter in general NMSSM, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 176.
  52. J. Cao, X. Jia, J. Lian, and L. Meng, 95 GeV diphoton and bb¯ excesses in the general next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075001 (2024).
  53. G. G. Ross and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, The fine-tuning of the generalised NMSSM, Nucl. Phys. B862, 710 (2012).
  54. U. Ellwanger, Nonrenormalizable interactions from supergravity, quantum corrections and effective low-energy theories, Phys. Lett. 133B, 187 (1983).
  55. S. A. Abel, Destabilizing divergences in the NMSSM, Nucl. Phys. B480, 55 (1996).
  56. C. F. Kolda, S. Pokorski, and N. Polonsky, Stabilized singlets in supergravity as a source of the μ—parameter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5263 (1998).
  57. C. Panagiotakopoulos and K. Tamvakis, Stabilized NMSSM without domain walls, Phys. Lett. B 446, 224 (1999).
  58. H. M. Lee, S. Raby, M. Ratz, G. G. Ross, R. Schieren, K. Schmidt-Hoberg et al., Discrete R symmetries for the MSSM and its singlet extensions, Nucl. Phys. B850, 1 (2011).
  59. G. G. Ross, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and F. Staub, The generalised NMSSM at one loop: Fine tuning and phenomenology, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2012) 074.
  60. H. M. Lee, S. Raby, M. Ratz, G. G. Ross, R. Schieren, K. Schmidt-Hoberg et al., A unique Z4R symmetry for the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 694, 491 (2011).
  61. L. Meng, J. Cao, F. Li, and S. Yang, Dark matter physics in general NMSSM, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 212.
  62. J.-J. Cao, Z.-X. Heng, J. M. Yang, Y.-M. Zhang, and J.-Y. Zhu, A SM-like Higgs near 125 GeV in low energy SUSY: A comparative study for MSSM and NMSSM, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 086.
  63. H. Bahl, T. Biekötter, S. Heinemeyer, C. Li, S. Paasch, G. Weiglein et al., higgstools: BSM scalar phenomenology with new versions of HiggsBounds and HiggsSignals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 291, 108803 (2023).
  64. J. Cao, X. Jia, and J. Lian, Unified interpretation of the muon g−2 anomaly, the 95 GeV diphoton, and bb¯ excesses in the general next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 110, 115039 (2024).
  65. H. Zhou, J. Cao, J. Lian, and D. Zhang, Singlino-dominated dark matter in Z3-symmetric NMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 104, 015017 (2021).
  66. J.-J. Cao, K.-i. Hikasa, W. Wang, J. M. Yang, K.-i. Hikasa, W.-Y. Wang et al., Light dark matter in NMSSM and implication on Higgs phenomenology, Phys. Lett. B 703, 292 (2011).
  67. J. Cao, F. Ding, C. Han, J. M. Yang, and J. Zhu, A light Higgs scalar in the NMSSM confronted with the latest LHC Higgs data, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 018.
  68. W. G. Hollik, S. Liebler, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. Paßehr, and G. Weiglein, Phenomenology of the inflation-inspired NMSSM at the electroweak scale, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 75 (2019).
  69. W. G. Hollik, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, Impact of vacuum stability constraints on the phenomenology of supersymmetric models, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 109.
  70. J. Cao, X. Jia, L. Meng, Y. Yue, and D. Zhang, Status of the singlino-dominated dark matter in general next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 198.
  71. F. Staub, sarah, arXiv:0806.0538.
  72. F. Staub, sarah 3.2: Dirac gauginos, UFO output, and more, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1792 (2013).
  73. F. Staub, sarah 4: A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1773 (2014).
  74. F. Staub, Exploring new models in all detail with sarah, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, 840780 (2015).
  75. W. Porod, SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+e− colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 153, 275 (2003).
  76. W. Porod and F. Staub, SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2458 (2012).
  77. W. Porod, F. Staub, and A. Vicente, A flavor kit for BSM models, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2992 (2014).
  78. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs: A Program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 149, 103 (2002).
  79. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, C. Hugonie, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, Relic density of dark matter in the NMSSM, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2005) 001.
  80. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 2.0: A program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 367 (2007).
  81. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, micrOMEGAs: A tool for dark matter studies, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 033N2C, 111 (2010).
  82. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, micrOMEGAs_3: A program for calculating dark matter observables, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 960 (2014).
  83. D. Barducci, G. Belanger, J. Bernon, F. Boudjema, J. Da Silva, S. Kraml et al., Collider limits on new physics within micrOMEGAs_4.3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 222, 327 (2018).
  84. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  85. J. Cao, Y. He, Y. Pan, Y. Yue, H. Zhou, and P. Zhu, Impact of leptonic unitarity and dark matter direct detection experiments on the NMSSM with inverse seesaw mechanism, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 023.
  86. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), First dark matter search results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  87. S. Matsumoto, S. Mukhopadhyay, and Y.-L. S. Tsai, Effective theory of WIMP dark matter supplemented by simplified models: Singlet-like Majorana fermion case, Phys. Rev. D 94, 065034 (2016).
  88. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stål, T. Stefaniak, and G. Weiglein, HiggsSignals: Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2711 (2014).
  89. O. Stål and T. Stefaniak, Constraining extended Higgs sectors with HiggsSignals, Proc. Sci., EPS-HEP2013 (2013) 314 [arXiv:1310.4039].
  90. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stål, T. Stefaniak, and G. Weiglein, Probing the standard model with Higgs signal rates from the tevatron, the LHC and a future ILC, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2014) 039.
  91. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, HiggsSignals-2: Probing new physics with precision Higgs measurements in the LHC 13 TeV era, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 145 (2021).
  92. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, HiggsBounds: Confronting arbitrary higgs sectors with exclusion bounds from LEP and the tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 138 (2010).
  93. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, HiggsBounds 2.0.0: Confronting neutral and charged Higgs sector predictions with exclusion bounds from LEP and the tevatron, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 2605 (2011).
  94. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein et al., Recent developments in HiggsBounds and a preview of HiggsSignals, Proc. Sci., CHARGED2012 (2012) 024 [arXiv:1301.2345].
  95. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stål, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein et al., HiggsBounds−4: Improved tests of extended Higgs sectors against exclusion bounds from LEP, the tevatron and the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2693 (2014).
  96. P. Bechtle, D. Dercks, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein et al., HiggsBounds-5: Testing Higgs sectors in the LHC 13 TeV era, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1211 (2020).
  97. L. M. Carpenter, R. Colburn, J. Goodman, and T. Linden, Indirect detection constraints on s and t channel simplified models of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 94, 055027 (2016).
  98. X.-J. Huang, C.-C. Wei, Y.-L. Wu, W.-H. Zhang, and Y.-F. Zhou, Antiprotons from dark matter annihilation through light mediators and a possible excess in AMS-02 p¯/p data, Phys. Rev. D 95, 063021 (2017).
  99. K. K. Boddy, S. Hill, J. Kumar, P. Sandick, and B. Shams Es Haghi, madhat: Model-agnostic dark halo analysis tool, Comput. Phys. Commun. 261, 107815 (2021).
  100. K. K. Boddy, Z. J. Carter, J. Kumar, L. Rufino, P. Sandick, and N. Tapia-Arellano, New dark matter analysis of Milky Way dwarf satellite galaxies with madhatv2, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103007 (2024).
  101. M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018).
  102. F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson, and M. Bridges, MultiNest: An efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 1601 (2009).
  103. W. Beenakker, R. Hopker, and M. Spira, PROSPINO: A program for the production of supersymmetric particles in next-to-leading order QCD, arXiv:hep-ph/9611232.
  104. C. K. Khosa, S. Kraml, A. Lessa, P. Neuhuber, and W. Waltenberger, smodels database update v1.2.3, Lett. High Energy Phys. 2020, 158 (2020).
  105. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 128.
  106. E. Conte, B. Fuks, and G. Serret, MadAnalysis 5, a user-friendly framework for collider phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 222 (2013).
  107. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten et al., An introduction to pythia8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  108. M. Drees, H. Dreiner, D. Schmeier, J. Tattersall, and J. S. Kim, checkmate: Confronting your favourite new physics model with LHC data, Comput. Phys. Commun. 187, 227 (2015).
  109. D. Dercks, N. Desai, J. S. Kim, K. Rolbiecki, J. Tattersall, and T. Weber, checkmate2: From the model to the limit, Comput. Phys. Commun. 221, 383 (2017).
  110. J. S. Kim, D. Schmeier, J. Tattersall, and K. Rolbiecki, A framework to create customised LHC analyses within checkmate, Comput. Phys. Commun. 196, 535 (2015).
  111. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens et al. (DELPHES 3 Collaboration), DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  112. J. Cao, J. Lian, Y. Pan, D. Zhang, and P. Zhu, Improved (g−2)μ measurement and singlino dark matter in μ-term extended Z3-NMSSM, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 175.
  113. ATLAS Collaboration, Search for supersymmetry with two and three leptons and missing transverse momentum in the final state at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 995 (2018).
  114. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in s=13  TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 123 (2020).
  115. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles in final states with two or three leptons at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 995 (2018).
  116. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 166.
  117. ATLAS Collaboration, Search for chargino-neutralino production with mass splittings near the electroweak scale in three-lepton final states in s=13  TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 101, 072001 (2020).
  118. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for supersymmetry in events with four or more charged leptons in 139  fb−1 of s=13  TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 167.
  119. CMS Collaboration, Search for new physics in the compressed mass spectra scenario using events with two soft opposite-sign leptons and missing momentum energy at 13 TeV, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2205866.
  120. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for electroweak production of supersymmetric states in scenarios with compressed mass spectra at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 97, 052010 (2018).
  121. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Searches for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles with compressed mass spectra in s=13  TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 101, 052005 (2020).
  122. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for new physics in events with two soft oppositely charged leptons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 782, 440 (2018).
  123. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for supersymmetry in final states with two oppositely charged same-flavor leptons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 123.
  124. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for direct production of electroweakinos in final states with one lepton, missing transverse momentum and a Higgs boson decaying into two b-jets in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 691 (2020).
  125. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for direct production of electroweakinos in final states with missing transverse momentum and a Higgs boson decaying into photons in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 005.
  126. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for photonic signatures of gauge-mediated supersymmetry in 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 97, 092006 (2018).
  127. Z. Heng, Z. Li, and H. Zhou, Constraining the light Higgs bosons in the GNMSSM with recent Higgs data, Chin. J. Phys. (Taipei) 101, 267 (2026).
  128. K. Griest and D. Seckel, Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3191 (1991).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation