Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

When Bob orbits Alice: Entanglement harvesting in circular motion

F. Sobrero*, M. S. Soares†, and N. F. Svaiter‡

  • *Contact author: felipesobrero@cbpf.br
  • †Contact author: matheus.soares@cbpf.br
  • ‡Contact author: nfuxsvai@cbpf.br

Phys. Rev. D 114, 065026 – Published 24 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/w3w4-l72g

Abstract

We study radiative processes of two qubits coupled to a massless scalar field prepared in the Minkowski vacuum state. We perform an analysis of the effects of vacuum fluctuations in the generation of qubits’ entangled states is performed. We assume one of the qubits is at rest in an inertial frame while the other comoves with a uniformly rotating frame, i.e., undergoing circular motion. We investigate how the entanglement harvesting phenomenon depends on the radius and angular velocity of the noninertial qubit. We compute the concurrence and mutual information to identify the set of circular motion parameters that maximizes entanglement generation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (56)

  1. P. C. W. Davies, Scalar particle production in Schwarzschild and Rindler metrics, J. Phys. A 8, 609 (1975).
  2. W. G. Unruh, Notes on black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).
  3. S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).
  4. B. S. DeWitt, Quantum field theory in curved spacetime, Phys. Rep. 19, 295 (1975).
  5. D. W. Sciama, P. Candelas, and D. Deutsch, Quantum field theory, horizons and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 30, 327 (1981).
  6. N. D. Birell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982).
  7. S. A. Fulling, Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1989), Vol. 17.
  8. L. H. Ford, D3: Quantum field theory in curved spacetime, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 490 (2002).
  9. S. Takagi, Vacuum noise and stress induced by uniform acceleration: Hawking-Unruh effect in Rindler manifold of arbitrary dimension, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 88, 1 (1986).
  10. R. Zhou, R. O. Behunin, S.-Y. Lin, and B. Hu, Boundary effects on quantum entanglement and its dynamics in a detector-field system, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2013) 040.
  11. E. Martín-Martínez, A. R. H. Smith, and D. R. Terno, Spacetime structure and vacuum entanglement, Phys. Rev. D 93, 044001 (2016).
  12. G. Menezes and N. Svaiter, Radiative processes of uniformly accelerated entangled atoms, Phys. Rev. A 93, 052117 (2016).
  13. E. Arias, J. Dueñas, G. Menezes, and N. Svaiter, Boundary effects on radiative processes of two entangled atoms, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 147.
  14. J. Zhang and H. Yu, Entanglement harvesting for Unruh–Dewitt detectors in circular motion, Phys. Rev. D 102, 065013 (2020).
  15. L. Bozanic, M. Naeem, K. Gallock-Yoshimura, and R. B. Mann, Correlation harvesting between particle detectors in uniform motion, Phys. Rev. D 108, 105017 (2023).
  16. J.-T. Hsiang and B.-L. Hu, Atom-field-medium interactions: Graded influence actions for n harmonic atoms in a dielectric-altered quantum field, Phys. Rev. A 110, 062807 (2024).
  17. J.-T. Hsiang and B.-L. Hu, Atom-field-medium interactions. II. Covariance matrix dynamics for n harmonic atoms in a dielectric-altered quantum field and effects of dielectric on atom-field entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 112, 012820 (2025).
  18. J.-T. Hsiang and B.-L. Hu, Atom-field-medium interactions. III. Quantum-field-mediated entanglement between two atoms near a conducting surface, Phys. Rev. A 113, 012809 (2026).
  19. B. F. Svaiter and N. F. Svaiter, Inertial and noninertial particle detectors and vacuum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 46, 5267 (1992); 47, 4802(E) (1993).
  20. M. Soares, N. Svaiter, and G. Menezes, Entanglement dynamics: Generalized master equation for uniformly accelerated two-level systems, Phys. Rev. A 106, 062440 (2022).
  21. M. S. Soares, G. Menezes, and N. F. Svaiter, A dynamic theory of entanglement for uniformly accelerated atoms, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 115013 (2025).
  22. E. Tjoa, The Roles of Causal Propagator in Relativistic Quantum Information, Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo, 2023.
  23. D. E. Bruschi, J. Louko, E. Martín-Martínez, A. Dragan, and I. Fuentes, Unruh effect in quantum information beyond the single-mode approximation, Phys. Rev. A 82, 042332 (2010).
  24. D. E. Bruschi, I. Fuentes, and J. Louko, Voyage to alpha centauri: Entanglement degradation of cavity modes due to motion, Phys. Rev. D 85, 061701 (2012).
  25. E. Martín-Martínez, Relativistic quantum information: Developments and perspectives, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 626, 012026 (2015).
  26. Y. Pan, J. Zhang, and H. Yu, Influence of field mass and acceleration on entanglement of detectors in uniform and circular motion, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 58 (2024).
  27. G. Denardo and E. Percacci, Quantum field theory for a rotating observer, Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996) 48, 81 (1978).
  28. J. R. Letaw and J. D. Pfautsch, Quantized scalar field in rotating coordinates, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1345 (1980).
  29. J. S. Bell and J. M. Leinaas, Electrons as accelerated thermometers, Nucl. Phys. B212, 131 (1983).
  30. J. S. Bell and J. Leinaas, The unruh effect and quantum fluctuations of electrons in storage rings, Nucl. Phys. B284, 488 (1987).
  31. J. Doukas, S.-Y. Lin, B. Hu, and R. B. Mann, Unruh effect under non-equilibrium conditions: Oscillatory motion of an unruh-dewitt detector, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 119.
  32. P. C. Davies, T. Dray, and C. A. Manogue, Detecting the rotating quantum vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 53, 4382 (1996).
  33. R. J. Glauber, The quantum theory of optical coherence, Phys. Rev. 130, 2529 (1963).
  34. R. J. Glauber, Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963).
  35. M. S. Soares, N. F. Svaiter, C. A. D. Zarro, and G. Menezes, Uniformly accelerated quantum counting detector in Minkowski and fulling vacuum states, Phys. Rev. A 103, 042225 (2021).
  36. F. Sobrero, M. S. Soares, T. Guerreiro, and N. F. Svaiter, Time-dependent accelerated Unruh-Dewitt detector without event horizon, Classical Quantum Gravity (2025).
  37. P. Ehrenfest, Gleichförmige rotation Starrer Körper und relativitätstheorie, Phys. Z. 10, 918 (1909), https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Gleichf%C3%B6rmige_Rotation_starrer_K%C3%B6rper_und_Relativit%C3%A4tstheorie.
  38. M. Born, Die theorie des starren elektrons in der kinematik des relativitätsprinzips, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 335, 1 (1909).
  39. M. Planck, Gleichförmige Rotation und Lorentz-Kontraktion (S. Hirzel, Leipzig, Germany, 1910).
  40. A. Einstein, Zum ehrenfestschen paradoxon, Phys. Z. 12, 509 (1910), https://assets.press.princeton.edu/books/einstein11/writings.pdf.
  41. L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields: Volume 2 (Butterworth-Heinemann, Washington, DC, 1975), Vol. 2.
  42. P. Franklin, The meaning of rotation in the special theory of relativity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 8, 265 (1922).
  43. H. Takeno, On relativistic theory of rotating disk, Prog. Theor. Phys. 7, 367 (1952).
  44. V. De Lorenci and N. Svaiter, A rotating quantum vacuum, Found. Phys. 29, 1233 (1999).
  45. V. A. De Lorenci, R. D. M. De Paola, and N. F. Svaiter, The rotatingdetector and vacuum fluctuations, Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 4241 (2000).
  46. R. D. M. De Paola and N. F. Svaiter, A rotating vacuum Anda quantum version Ofnewton’s bucket experiment, Classical Quantum Gravity 18, 1799 (2001).
  47. G. Sagnac, L’éther lumineux démontré par l’effet du vent relatif d’éther dans un interféromètre en rotation uniforme, C.R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 157, 708 (1913).
  48. Ø. Grøn, Relativistic description of a rotating disk, Am. J. Phys. 43, 869 (1975).
  49. Ø. Grøn, Rotating frames in special relativity analyzed in light of a recent article by M. Strauss, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 16, 603 (1977).
  50. R. D. Klauber, New perspectives on the relativistically rotating disk and non-time-orthogonal reference frames, Found. Phys. Lett. 11, 405 (1998).
  51. G. Rizzi and M. L. Ruggiero, Relativity in Rotating Frames: Relativistic Physics in Rotating Reference Frames (Springer, New York, 2004).
  52. V. E. Ambruş and E. Winstanley, Exact solutions in quantum field theory under rotation, in Strongly Interacting Matter under Rotation (Springer, New York, 2021), pp. 95–135.
  53. A. Lopez-Raven, R. B. Mann, and J. Louko, Quenched entanglement harvesting, Phys. Rev. D 112, 085001 (2025).
  54. W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
  55. R. Tanaś and Z. Ficek, Entangling two atoms via spontaneous emission, J. Opt. B 6, S90 (2004).
  56. A. Pozas-Kerstjens and E. Martin-Martinez, Harvesting correlations from the quantum vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 92, 064042 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation