Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Chaos-integrability transition in the BPS subspace of the N=2 SYK model

Leon Miyahara* and Shono Shibuya†

  • *Contact author: leon@eken.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp
  • †Contact author: shibuya.shono.n8@s.mail.nagoya-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 114, 066011 – Published 17 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/w3qx-wlf8

Abstract

We study a chaos-integrability transition purely within a BPS subspace, the subspace of exactly degenerate ground states annihilated by the supercharges, in a supersymmetric model that interpolates between the chaotic N=2 SYK model and an integrable N=2 “commuting” SYK model. Since all BPS states are degenerate under the Hamiltonian, conventional Hamiltonian level statistics cannot diagnose chaos within the BPS subspace. Using the framework of BPS chaos, we instead analyze the spectrum of a simple operator projected onto the BPS subspace. We numerically find that its spectral statistics exhibit random-matrix behavior near the SYK regime and undergo a smooth crossover to Poisson statistics near the integrable regime. Our results provide a direct example in which the BPS data alone diagnose the chaos-integrability crossover.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (47)

  1. Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast scramblers, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2008) 065.
  2. J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 106.
  3. S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339–3342 (1993).
  4. A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, Talks at KITP, April 7, 2015 and May 27, 2015, available at: http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/.
  5. J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016).
  6. R. Jackiw, Lower dimensional gravity, Nucl. Phys. B252, 343 (1985).
  7. C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian structure in two space-time dimensions, Phys. Lett. 126B, 41 (1983).
  8. K. Jensen, Chaos in AdS2 holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 111601 (2016).
  9. J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional nearly anti-de-Sitter space, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 12C104 (2016).
  10. A. M. García-García, B. Loureiro, A. Romero-Bermúdez, and M. Tezuka, Chaotic-integrable transition in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 241603 (2018).
  11. T. Nosaka, D. Rosa, and J. Yoon, The Thouless time for mass-deformed SYK, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 041.
  12. A. M. García-García, Y. Jia, D. Rosa, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Sparse Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, quantum chaos and gravity duals, Phys. Rev. D 103, 106002 (2021).
  13. M. Tezuka, O. Oktay, E. Rinaldi, M. Hanada, and F. Nori, Binary-coupling sparse Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model: An improved model of quantum chaos and holography, Phys. Rev. B 107, L081103 (2023).
  14. H. W. Lin, J. Maldacena, L. Rozenberg, and J. Shan, Holography for people with no time, SciPost Phys. 14, 150 (2023).
  15. H. W. Lin, J. Maldacena, L. Rozenberg, and J. Shan, Looking at supersymmetric black holes for a very long time, SciPost Phys. 14, 128 (2023).
  16. Y. Chen, H. W. Lin, and S. H. Shenker, BPS chaos, SciPost Phys. 18, 072 (2025).
  17. C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes, arXiv:2402.10129.
  18. W. Fu, D. Gaiotto, J. Maldacena, and S. Sachdev, Supersymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. D 95, 026009 (2017); 95, 069904(A) (2017).
  19. Usually, they are called supersymmetric states because they preserve all the supercharges, i.e., QΨ=Q†Ψ=0, but we call them BPS states in a sense that they satisfy the BPS bound. Generally, when there are multiple supercharges, not all of them can be preserved at the same time. In fact, in a suitable basis, supercharges Q˜i should follow the relation {Q˜i,Q˜i†}=H−qi≥0, with central charges qi. Then the BPS bound becomes H=maxi(qi), and states that saturate this bound are called BPS states.

  20. T. Kanazawa and T. Wettig, Complete random matrix classification of SYK models with N=0, 1 and 2 supersymmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 050.
  21. For the classification of general pairs of (N,f), see (6.13) in [20].

  22. Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux, Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 084101 (2013).
  23. P. Gao, Commuting SYK: A pseudo-holographic model, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 149.
  24. The exponential N dependence of the coefficient is chosen in analogy with the generalized Rosenzweig-Porter model [46, 47], where the strength of off-diagonal mixing scales as a power of the Hilbert-space dimension. In our numerics, the smooth transition occurs around g=1 due to this N dependence.

  25. If one further resolves the Hilbert space using the additional conserved block quantum numbers of Hcom, the remaining level statistics are expected to become Poisson. However, these block quantum numbers are not preserved once the QSYK is turned on, and hence the same refinement cannot be employed for the deformed model (15).

  26. C.-M. Chang, Y. Chen, B. S. Sia, and Z. Yang, Fortuity in SYK models, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 003.
  27. For H={Q,Q†}, the Hodge decomposition implies that every nontrivial Q-cohomology class has a unique representative annihilated by both Q and Q†. Hence the Q-cohomology is isomorphic to the BPS subspace. The same statement holds for Q†-cohomology.

  28. Here, BPS chaos is diagnosed through the spectral statistics of the restricted operator OBPS. This diagnostic is distinct from operator growth under Hamiltonian time evolution, which is not studied in this work.

  29. The randomness of Ai alone does not generate random-matrix statistics, since the same probe ensemble yields Poisson-like statistics at the integrable endpoint. A fixed probe such as O=ψ1†ψ1 gives the same qualitative crossover, although its degeneracies make the spectral statistics less clean.

  30. H. Gharibyan, M. Hanada, S. H. Shenker, and M. Tezuka, Onset of random matrix behavior in scrambling systems, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 124; 02 (2019) 197(E).
  31. G. J. Turiaci and E. Witten, N=2 JT supergravity and matrix models, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 003.
  32. S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, Evolution with(out) time: Relational holography & BPS complexity growth in N=2 double-scaled SYK, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 229.
  33. M. Berkooz, N. Brukner, V. Narovlansky, and A. Raz, The double scaled limit of super–symmetric SYK models, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 110.
  34. M. Berkooz, N. Brukner, Y. Jia, and O. Mamroud, From chaos to integrability in double scaled Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model via a chord path integral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 221602 (2024).
  35. M. Berkooz, N. Brukner, Y. Jia, and O. Mamroud, Path integral for chord diagrams and chaotic-integrable transitions in double scaled SYK, Phys. Rev. D 110, 106015 (2024).
  36. S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, R. N. Das, J. Erdmenger, and Z.-Y. Xian, Probing the chaos to integrability transition in double-scaled SYK, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2026) 109.
  37. X. Wang, S. Ghose, B. C. Sanders, and B. Hu, Entanglement as a signature of quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. E 70, 016217 (2004).
  38. T. Pathak, Relaxation fluctuations of correlation functions: Spin and random matrix models, Phys. Rev. E 111, 024201 (2025).
  39. V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, J. M. Magan, and Q. Wu, Quantum chaos and the complexity of spread of states, Phys. Rev. D 106, 046007 (2022).
  40. B. Bhattacharjee, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, Krylov complexity in large q and double-scaled SYK model, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 099.
  41. L. V. Iliesiu, M. Mezei, and G. Sárosi, The volume of the black hole interior at late times, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 073.
  42. M. Miyaji, S.-M. Ruan, S. Shibuya, and K. Yano, Non-perturbative overlaps in JT gravity: From spectral form factor to generating functions of complexity, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 251.
  43. M. Miyaji, S.-M. Ruan, S. Shibuya, and K. Yano, Universal time evolution of holographic and quantum complexity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 151602 (2026).
  44. Y. Chen, S. Colin-Ellerin, O. Mamroud, and K. Papadodimas, Chaos of Berry curvature for BPS microstates, arXiv:2604.23287.
  45. Y. Chen, Fortuity with a single matrix, arXiv:2511.00790.
  46. N. Rosenzweig and C. E. Porter, “repulsion of energy levels” in complex atomic spectra, Phys. Rev. 120, 1698 (1960).
  47. V. E. Kravtsov, I. M. Khaymovich, E. Cuevas, and M. Amini, A random matrix model with localization and ergodic transitions, New J. Phys. 17, 122002 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation