- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

de Sitter complexity grows linearly in the static patch

Vyshnav Mohan1 and Watse Sybesma2

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, L121902 – Published 5 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vx68-95yy

Abstract

The observable Universe has undergone periods of expansion that are well approximated by de Sitter (dS) space. Still lacking is a quantum-mechanical description of dS spacetime, both globally and when restricted to the static patch. We develop a novel prescription, to the best of our knowledge, for computing holographic complexity in the dS static patch to determine its microscopic features. Specifically, we propose that the natural candidate for dS complexity is the volume of extremal “timelike” surfaces restricted to the static patch, anchored to the cosmological horizon or an observer worldline. Our anchoring prescription provides a clear definition of a reference state, overcoming a common ambiguity in prior definitions of de Sitter holographic complexity. The late-time growth of our complexity functional is linear and proportional to the number of degrees of freedom associated with the cosmological horizon and, therefore, does not exhibit hyperfast growth. Our results imply the dS static patch is characterized by a quantum-mechanical system, with a finite-dimensional Hilbert space whose evolution is governed by a chaotic Hamiltonian.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  2. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 (1998).
  3. E. Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998).
  4. D. Baumann, Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2022).
  5. S. Baiguera, V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, S. Chapman, J. Haferkamp, M. P. Heller, and N. Y. Halpern, Quantum complexity in gravity, quantum field theory, and quantum information science, Phys. Rep. 1159, 1 (2026).
  6. L. Susskind, Computational complexity and black hole horizons, Fortschr. Phys. 64, 24 (2016); 64, 44(A) (2016).
  7. D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Complexity and shock wave Geometries, Phys. Rev. D 90, 126007 (2014).
  8. J. L. F. Barbón, E. Rabinovici, R. Shir, and R. Sinha, On the evolution of operator complexity beyond scrambling, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 264.
  9. W. Fischler and L. Susskind, Holography and cosmology, arXiv:hep-th/9806039.
  10. M. K. Parikh and E. P. Verlinde, De Sitter holography with a finite number of states, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2005) 054.
  11. T. Banks, Some thoughts on the quantum theory of stable de Sitter space, arXiv:hep-th/0503066.
  12. V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten, An algebra of observables for de Sitter space, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 082 (2022).
  13. J. Maldacena, Real observers solving imaginary problems, arXiv:2412.14014.
  14. J. Couch, S. Eccles, T. Jacobson, and P. Nguyen, Holographic complexity and volume, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 044.
  15. L. Susskind, Entanglement and chaos in De Sitter space hholography: An SYK example, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 001.
  16. E. Jørstad, R. C. Myers, and S.-M. Ruan, Holographic complexity in dSd+1, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 119.
  17. S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, M. P. Heller, and S. Van der Schueren, Complexity equals anything can grow forever in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 110, 066009 (2024).

  18. Timelike codimension-two surfaces in de Sitter space have been previously studied, and the corresponding boundary dual has been proposed to be what is referred to as pseudoentropy (see, for example, [19, 20, 21, 22]).

  19. K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi, and Y. Taki, Pseudoentropy in dS/CFT and timelike entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 031601 (2023).
  20. K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi, and Y. Taki, Timelike entanglement entropy, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 052.
  21. K. Narayan, de Sitter space, extremal surfaces, and time entanglement, Phys. Rev. D 107, 126004 (2023).
  22. K. Narayan and H. K. Saini, Notes on time entanglement and pseudo-entropy, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 499 (2024).
  23. D. Carmi, S. Chapman, H. Marrochio, R. C. Myers, and S. Sugishita, On the time dependence of holographic complexity, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 188.
  24. F. F. Gautason, V. Mohan, and L. Thorlacius, Late-time saturation of black hole complexity, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 056.

  25. As this trivial solution will turn out to be absent when anchoring to the horizon, one could muse that this solution can be associated with some sort of “internal” complexity of the observer.

  26. T. Anegawa and N. Iizuka, Shock waves and delay of hyperfast growth in de Sitter complexity, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 115.
  27. S. Baiguera, R. Berman, S. Chapman, and R. C. Myers, The cosmological switchback effect, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 162.
  28. S. Baiguera and R. Berman, The cosmological switchback effect. Part II, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 086.
  29. A. R. Brown, D. A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle, and Y. Zhao, Holographic complexity equals bulk action?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 191301 (2016).
  30. A. Belin, R. C. Myers, S.-M. Ruan, G. Sárosi, and A. J. Speranza, Does complexity equal anything?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 081602 (2022).
  31. A. Belin, R. C. Myers, S.-M. Ruan, G. Sárosi, and A. J. Speranza, Complexity equals anything II, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 154.
  32. W. Sybesma, Pure de Sitter space and the island moving back in time, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 145012 (2021).
  33. L. Aalsma and W. Sybesma, The Price of Curiosity: Information Recovery in de Sitter Space, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 291.
  34. L. Schneiderbauer, W. Sybesma, and L. Thorlacius, Holographic complexity: Stretching the horizon of an evaporating black hole, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 069.
  35. T. Anegawa, N. Iizuka, S. K. Sake, and N. Zenoni, Is action complexity better for de Sitter space in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity?, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 213.
  36. L. Susskind, De Sitter space, double-scaled SYK, and the separation of scales in the semiclassical limit, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 001.
  37. L. Susskind, Scrambling in double-scaled SYK and De Sitter space, arXiv:2205.00315.
  38. V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde, Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter holography, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 032.
  39. A. A. Rahman, dS JT gravity and double-scaled SYK, arXiv:2209.09997.
  40. A. A. Rahman and L. Susskind, Comments on a paper by Narovlansky and Verlinde, arXiv:2312.04097.
  41. H. Verlinde, Double-scaled SYK, chords and de Sitter gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 076.
  42. A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens, and J. Papalini, The dilaton gravity hologram of double-scaled SYK, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 050.
  43. E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner, A bulk manifestation of Krylov complexity, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 213.
  44. M. P. Heller, J. Papalini, and T. Schuhmann, Krylov spread complexity as holographic complexity beyond JT gravity, arXiv:2412.17785.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, L121902– Published 5 June, 2026
  • Received 18 September 2025
  • Accepted 1 May 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation