Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

ZN equivariant Virasoro algebra via alternative Sugawara constructions

Armin Ghazi* and Ahmad Moradpouri†

  • *Contact author: armin.gh.kh@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: Ahmadreza.Moradpour@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 114, 066013 – Published 21 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/tmss-5n5q

Abstract

In this paper, we study the u(1)2 Kac-Moody algebra and generalize the standard Sugawara construction of the Virasoro algebra to an infinite family of new realizations. In this case, in addition to the standard invariant tensor δij, there exists another invariant tensor εij, which enables the construction of genuinely new realizations beyond the conventional one. We show that these new realizations arise from a ZN grading of the mode index n of the Virasoro generators Ln and the space of such realizations corresponds to points of a possibly singular algebraic variety. For the Z2 and Z3 cases, the space of all such constructions is topologically equivalent to a cylinder, while for Z4 it forms a noncompact real four-dimensional manifold. We show that the spaces of constructions for Z2N and Z2N+1 are closely similar. Furthermore, we reformulate the problem within an action-principle framework by introducing ZN-equivariant maps, which provide a systematic method for constructing conformal field theories endowed with these generalized Virasoro symmetries. This formulation reproduces the Z2 case and supports the idea that ZN equivariance offers a consistent and unified approach to generating extended conformal algebras. Finally, we analyze the corresponding Virasoro-Kac-Moody-like algebras associated with these constructions and show that they represent nontrivial (up to local field transformations) of the well-known Virasoro-Kac-Moody algebra.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (59)

  1. A. Belavin, A. Polyakov, and A. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B241, 333 (1984).
  2. P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal, Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997).
  3. P. Ginsparg, arXiv:hep-th/9108028.
  4. R. Blumenhagen and E. Plauschinn, Introduction to Conformal Field Theory: With Applications to String Theory (Springer Nature, New York, 2009), Vol. 779.
  5. D. Friedan, Notes on string theory and two-dimensional conformal field theory, in Unified String Theories (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986), pp. 162–213.
  6. A. M. Polyakov, JETP Lett. 12, 381 (1970).
  7. D. Friedan, Z. Qiu, and S. Shenker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1575 (1984).
  8. J. L. Cardy, Nucl. Phys. B270, 186 (1986).
  9. J. Cardy, arXiv:0807.3472.
  10. C. Itzykson and J. M. Drouffe, Statistical Field Theory. Vol. 2: Strong Coupling, Monte Carlo Methods, Conformal Field Theory, and Random Systems, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1989).
  11. D. Tong, arXiv:1606.06687.
  12. E. Fradkin, Quantum Field Theory: An Integrated Approach (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2021).
  13. G. Moore and N. Read, Nucl. Phys. B360, 362 (1991).
  14. V. A. Fateev and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Sov. Phys. JETP 62, 215 (1985).
  15. J. Polchinski, String Theory. Vol. 1: An Introduction to the Bosonic String, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
  16. K. Becker, M. Becker, and J. H. Schwarz, String Theory and M-Theory: A Modern Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2006).
  17. R. Blumenhagen, D. Lüst, and S. Theisen, Basic Concepts of String Theory, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2013).
  18. J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 104, 207 (1986).
  19. E. Verlinde, Nucl. Phys. B300, 360 (1988).
  20. G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg, Commun. Math. Phys. 123, 177 (1989).
  21. P. Goddard and D. I. Olive, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 01, 303 (1986).
  22. G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B 220, 422 (1989).
  23. E. Frenkel, Lectures on the langlands program and conformal field theory, in Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics, and Geometry II (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007).
  24. R. E. Borcherds, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 3068 (1986).
  25. R. E. Borcherds, arXiv:math/9903038.
  26. I. Frenkel, J. Lepowsky, and A. Meurman, Vertex Operator Algebras and the Monster, Pure and Applied Mathematics Vol. 134 (Academic Press, New York, 1988).
  27. J. Lepowsky and R. L. Wilson, Commun. Math. Phys. 62, 43 (1978).
  28. I. B. Frenkel and Y. Zhu, Duke Math. J. 1 (66), 123 (1992).
  29. I. B. Frenkel and V. G. Kac, Inventiones Mathematicae 62, 23 (1980).
  30. P. Goddard, A. Kent, and D. I. Olive, Commun. Math. Phys. 103, 105 (1986).
  31. R. V. Moody, J. Algebra 10, 211 (1968).
  32. V. Kac, Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras, Progress in Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1990).
  33. E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 121, 351 (1989).
  34. V. G. Kac and A. K. Raina, Bombay Lectures on Highest Weight Representations of Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras, Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics Vol. 2 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987), p. 145.
  35. B. L. Feigin and D. B. Fuchs, Funct. Anal. Appl. 16, 114 (1982).
  36. L. J. Dixon, J. A. Harvey, C. Vafa, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B261, 678 (1985).
  37. L. J. Dixon, D. Friedan, E. J. Martinec, and S. H. Shenker, Nucl. Phys. B282, 13 (1987).
  38. R. Dijkgraaf, C. Vafa, E. Verlinde, and H. Verlinde, Commun. Math. Phys. 123, 485 (1989).
  39. V. G. Knizhnik and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B247, 83 (1984).
  40. E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 92, 455 (1984).
  41. D. Gepner and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B278, 493 (1986).
  42. H. Sugawara, Phys. Rev. 170, 1659 (1968).
  43. M. B. Halpern and E. Kiritsis, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 04, 1373 (1989).
  44. M. Halpern and J. P. Yamron, Nucl. Phys. B351, 333 (1991).
  45. M. Halpern and J. P. Yamron, Nucl. Phys. B332, 411 (1990).
  46. M. B. Halpern, E. Kiritsis, N. A. Obers, M. Porrati, and J. P. Yamron, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 05, 2275 (1990).
  47. J. de Boer and M. B. Halpern, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12, 1551 (1997).
  48. A. Y. Morozov, A. Perelomov, A. Rosly, M. Shifman, and A. Turbiner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 05, 803 (1990).
  49. J. E. Moyal, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 45, 99 (1949).
  50. H. J. Groenewold, Physica 12, 405 (1946).
  51. T. Curtright, D. Fairlie, and C. Zachos, A Concise Treatise on Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space (World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, 2013).
  52. M. Kontsevich, Lett. Math. Phys. 66, 157 (2003).
  53. N. Moshayedi, in Kontsevich’s Deformation Quantization and Quantum Field Theory, Lect. Notes Math., Vol. 2311 (Springer, New York, 2022).
  54. J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 30, 2735 (1989).
  55. M. Levy-Nahas, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 8, 1211 (1967).
  56. A. Ghazi and A. Moradpouri, arXiv:2606.29323.
  57. B. Zumino, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 1055 (1962).
  58. H. G. Becker, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 8, 185 (1973).
  59. W. Greub, Linear Algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer, New York, 2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation