Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Role of electromagnetic corrections in the ππ distributions of ψ′→J/ψππ

Zhao-Sai Jia1,2, Gang Li1,*, and Zhen-Hua Zhang3,†

  • *Contact author: gli@qfnu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: zhhzhang@pku.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 014013 – Published 6 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/t1z7-1c5j

Abstract

The cusp structure at the π+π− threshold in the π0π0 invariant mass spectrum serves as a sensitive probe for extracting the S-wave ππ scattering lengths in processes where an S-wave π0π0 pair is produced in the final states. Within the framework of nonrelativistic effective field theory with coupled channels π0π0 and π+π−, we revisit the near-threshold structures in the π0π0 spectrum of ψ′→J/ψππ. Our analysis incorporates the ππ final-state rescattering, including both strong and Coulomb interactions. It turns out that the cusp near the π+π− threshold becomes more prominent when Coulomb interactions are included. The electromagnetic corrections are found to alter the magnitude of the threshold cusp by about 2%–3%, underscoring the necessity of including these effects in precision determinations of the ππ scattering lengths. The coupled-channel amplitude constructed in this work provides a ready-to-use theoretical framework for experimental analyses of fine structures near ππ thresholds.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler, The ππS wave scattering lengths, Phys. Lett. B 488, 261 (2000).
  2. G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler, ππ scattering, Nucl. Phys. B603, 125 (2001).
  3. S. Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A (Amsterdam) 96, 327 (1979).
  4. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral perturbation theory to one loop, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 158, 142 (1984).
  5. S. M. Roy, Exact integral equation for pion pion scattering involving only physical region partial waves, Phys. Lett. 36B, 353 (1971).
  6. R. Garcia-Martin, R. Kaminski, J. R. Pelaez, J. Ruiz de Elvira, and F. J. Yndurain, The Pion-pion scattering amplitude. IV: Improved analysis with once subtracted Roy-like equations up to 1100 MeV, Phys. Rev. D 83, 074004 (2011).
  7. B. Ananthanarayan, G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler, Roy equation analysis of ππ scattering, Phys. Rep. 353, 207 (2001).
  8. S. Descotes-Genon, N. H. Fuchs, L. Girlanda, and J. Stern, Analysis and interpretation of new low-energy ππ scattering data, Eur. Phys. J. C 24, 469 (2002).
  9. L. Rosselet et al., Experimental study of 30,000 Ke4 decays, Phys. Rev. D 15, 574 (1977).
  10. S. Pislak et al., High statistics measurement of Ke4 decay properties, Phys. Rev. D 67, 072004 (2003); 81, 119903(E) (2010).
  11. J. R. Batley et al. (NA48/2 Collaboration), New high statistics measurement of Ke4 decay form factors and ππ scattering phase shifts, Eur. Phys. J. C 54, 411 (2008).
  12. J. R. Batley et al. (NA48/2 Collaboration), Precise tests of low energy QCD from Ke4 decay properties, Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 635 (2010).
  13. T. R. Palfrey and J. L. Uretsky, Photoproduction and detection of the two meson bound state, Phys. Rev. 121, 1798 (1961).
  14. B. Adeva et al. (DIRAC Collaboration), First measurement of the π+π− atom lifetime, Phys. Lett. B 619, 50 (2005).
  15. P. Budini and L. Fonda, Pion-Pion Interaction from Threshold Anomalies in K+ Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 419 (1961).
  16. N. Cabibbo, Determination of the a0−a2 pion scattering length from K+→π+π0π0 decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 121801 (2004).
  17. N. Cabibbo and G. Isidori, Pion-pion scattering and the K→3π decay amplitudes, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2005) 021.
  18. G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, B. Kubis, and A. Rusetsky, Cusps in K→3π decays, Phys. Lett. B 638, 187 (2006).
  19. J. R. Batley et al. (NA48/2 Collaboration), Observation of a cusp-like structure in the π0π0 invariant mass distribution from K±→π±π0π0 decay and determination of the ππ scattering lengths, Phys. Lett. B 633, 173 (2006).
  20. J. R. Batley et al., Determination of the S-wave ππ scattering lengths from a study of K±→π±π0π0 decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 64, 589 (2009).
  21. M. Bissegger, A. Fuhrer, J. Gasser, B. Kubis, and A. Rusetsky, Radiative corrections in K—>3 pi decays, Nucl. Phys. B806, 178 (2009).
  22. J. Gasser, B. Kubis, and A. Rusetsky, Cusps in K→3π decays: A theoretical framework, Nucl. Phys. B850, 96 (2011).
  23. S. Gevorkyan, Pion-pion scattering lengths determination from kaon decays, Proc. Sci. CD12 (2013) 066.
  24. M. Bissegger, A. Fuhrer, J. Gasser, B. Kubis, and A. Rusetsky, Cusps in KL→3π decays, Phys. Lett. B 659, 576 (2008).
  25. C. Ditsche, B. Kubis, and U.-G. Meißner, Electromagnetic corrections in η→3π decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 60, 83 (2009).
  26. B. Kubis and S. P. Schneider, The Cusp effect in η′→ηππ decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 62, 511 (2009).
  27. U.-G. Meißner, G. Muller, and S. Steininger, Virtual photons in SU(2) chiral perturbation theory and electromagnetic corrections to ππ scattering, Phys. Lett. B 406, 154 (1997); 407, 454(E) (1997).
  28. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  29. F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, and H.-Q. Jiang, The ππ phase shifts from ψ′→J/ψπ+π− decays, HEPNP 29, 852 (2005).
  30. Z. X. Zhang, J. J. Sanz-Cillero, X. Y. Shen, N. Wu, L. Y. Xiao, and H. Q. Zheng, Studies on π+π− phase motion in the ψ′→J/ψπ+π− process, Phys. Rev. D 78, 076010 (2008).
  31. H. Chen, Study of ππ phase shifts in ψ(2S)→π+π−J/ψ, Phys. Rev. D 80, 034029 (2009).
  32. X.-H. Liu, F.-K. Guo, and E. Epelbaum, Extracting ππS-wave scattering lengths from cusp effect in heavy quarkonium dipion transitions, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2284 (2013).
  33. L. Liu, H.-W. Lin, and K. Orginos, Charmed hadron interactions, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2008 (2008) 112 [arXiv:0810.5412].
  34. S. R. Gevorkian, A. V. Tarasov, and O. O. Voskresenskaya, Electromagnetic corrections to final state interactions in K→3π decays, Phys. Lett. B 649, 159 (2007).
  35. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Determination of the number of ψ(3686) events taken at BESIII, Chin. Phys. C 48, 093001 (2024).
  36. M. Achasov et al., STCF conceptual design report: Volume 1—Physics & Detector, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 19, 14701 (2023).
  37. M. Ablikim et al. (BES Collaboration), Production of σ in ψ(2S)→π+π−J/ψ, Phys. Lett. B 645, 19 (2007).
  38. C. Hati, G. Kumar, and N. Mahajan (ATLAS Collaboration), Measurements of ψ(2S) and X(3872)→J/ψπ+π− production in pp collisions at s=8  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 117.
  39. E. Braaten, E. Johnson, and H. Zhang, Zero-range effective field theory for resonant wino dark matter. Part II. Coulomb resummation, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2017) 150.
  40. P.-P. Shi, Z.-H. Zhang, F.-K. Guo, and Z. Yang, D+D− hadronic atom and its production in pp and pp¯ collisions, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034024 (2022).
  41. Z.-S. Jia, Z.-H. Zhang, F.-K. Guo, and G. Li, Coupled-channel analysis of the near-threshold e+e−→NN¯ cross sections, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054014 (2025).
  42. X. Kong and F. Ravndal, Coulomb effects in low-energy proton proton scattering, Nucl. Phys. A665, 137 (2000).
  43. S. König, H. W. Grießhammer, H. W. Hammer, and U. van Kolck, Effective theory of H3 and He3, J. Phys. G 43, 055106 (2016).
  44. S. Sakai, F.-K. Guo, and B. Kubis, Extraction of ND scattering lengths from the Λb→π−pD0 decay and properties of the Σc(2800)+, Phys. Lett. B 808, 135623 (2020).
  45. J. Gasser, On the history of pion-pion scattering, Proc. Sci. EFT09, 029 (2009).
  46. E. Braaten and M. Kusunoki, Factorization in the production and decay of the X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 72, 014012 (2005).
  47. X.-K. Dong, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, and B.-S. Zou, Is the existence of a J/ψJ/ψ bound state plausible?, Sci. Bull. 66, 2462 (2021).
  48. B. Wu, X.-K. Dong, M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Deciphering the mechanism of J/ψ-nucleon scattering, Fund. Res. 5, 2530 (2025).
  49. T. Mannel and R. Urech, Hadronic decays of excited heavy quarkonia, Z. Phys. C 73, 541 (1997).
  50. N. Brambilla, G. a. Krein, J. Tarrús Castellà, and A. Vairo, Long-range properties of 1S bottomonium states, Phys. Rev. D 93, 054002 (2016).
  51. M. B. Voloshin, Charmonium, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 61, 455 (2008).
  52. F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, H.-C. Chiang, and R.-G. Ping, Heavy quarkonium π+π− transitions and a possible bb¯qq¯ state, Nucl. Phys. A761, 269 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation