Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Toward a refinement of Krylov complexity: Scrambling, classical operator growth and replicas

Hugo A. Camargo1,2,3,*, Yichao Fu3,†, Keun-Young Kim3,4,‡, and Yeong Han Park3,§

  • *Contact author: hugo.camargo@phys.ncts.ntu.edu.tw
  • †Contact author: yichao.fu@gm.gist.ac.kr
  • ‡Contact author: fortoe@gist.ac.kr
  • §Contact author: yeonghanp@gm.gist.ac.kr

Phys. Rev. D 114, 106004 – Published 5 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/s95g-g577

Abstract

We propose and test logarithmic Krylov (logK) complexity, an operator growth measure akin to Krylov complexity defined through a replica approach, as a viable probe of early time operator scrambling without false positives. In finite-dimensional quantum systems, such as the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model and the mixed-field Ising model at the chaotic point, we provide numerical evidence that logK-complexity discriminates between genuine and saddle-dominated scrambling at early times, correctly avoiding the exponential contribution coming from the unstable saddle in the former case, and closely tracking the conventional Krylov complexity in the latter. In integrable quantum systems admitting infinite-dimensional Krylov subspaces, such as the SYK2 model and the quantum inverted harmonic oscillator, we show that by modifying the Krylov spreading operator, obtained through generalizing the analytic continuation procedure in the replica trick, the logK complexity can be refined to capture the integrable properties of the theories. We supplement these analyses by extending the Krylov formalism in classical dynamical systems and defining classical versions of these operator growth measures, showing that the false positives arising from unstable saddles in classical phase space are nonexistent.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (98)

  1. M. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics (Springer, New York, 1991).
  2. J. Banks, V. Dragan, and A. Jones, Chaos: A Mathematical Introduction, Australian Mathematical Society Lecture Series (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2003).
  3. H. Degn, A. Holden, and L. Olsen, Chaos in Biological Systems, Nato Science Series A (Springer, New York, 2013).
  4. S. J. Schiff, K. Jerger, D. H. Duong, T. Chang, M. Spano, and W. Ditto, Nature (London) 370, 615 (1994).
  5. T. Asabuki and C. Clopath, Nat. Commun. 16, 6784 (2025).
  6. M. V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. A 400, 229 (1985).
  7. P. Walters, An Introduction to Ergodic Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer, New York, 2000).
  8. E. Gesteau, Phys. Rev. D 110, 106005 (2024).
  9. S. Ouseph, K. Furuya, N. Lashkari, K. L. Leung, and M. Moosa, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 112.
  10. H. A. Camargo, Y. Fu, V. Jahnke, K. Pal, and K.-Y. Kim, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 138.
  11. J. M. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991).
  12. M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
  13. M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Nature (London) 452, 854 (2008).
  14. S. Xu and B. Swingle, PRX Quantum 5, 010201 (2024).
  15. O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1 (1984).
  16. A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Sov. Phys. JETP 28, 1200 (1969), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969JETP...28.1200L/abstract.
  17. Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2008) 065.
  18. S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 067.
  19. D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford, and L. Susskind, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2015) 051.
  20. S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2015) 132.
  21. J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 106.
  22. R. Fan, P. Zhang, H. Shen, and H. Zhai, Sci. .Bull. 62, 707 (2017).
  23. D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi, and E. Altman, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041017 (2019).
  24. V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, J. M. Magan, and Q. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 106, 046007 (2022).
  25. B. L. Español and D. A. Wisniacki, Phys. Rev. E 107, 024217 (2023).
  26. K. Hashimoto, K. Murata, N. Tanahashi, and R. Watanabe, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 040.
  27. H. A. Camargo, V. Jahnke, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim, and M. Nishida, Phys. Rev. D 109, 046017 (2024).
  28. B. Bhattacharjee and P. Nandy, Phys. Rev. B 111, L060202 (2025).
  29. M. Baggioli, K.-B. Huh, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim, and J. F. Pedraza, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023028 (2025).
  30. H. A. Camargo, K.-B. Huh, V. Jahnke, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim, and M. Nishida, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 241.
  31. M. Alishahiha, S. Banerjee, and M. J. Vasli, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 749 (2025).
  32. A. Grabarits and A. del Campo, arXiv:2510.13947.
  33. T. Xu, T. Scaffidi, and X. Cao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 140602 (2020).
  34. B. Bhattacharjee, X. Cao, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 174.
  35. K.-B. Huh, H.-S. Jeong, and J. F. Pedraza, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 137.
  36. S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, Y. Fu, K. Pal, and K. Parmentier, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 039.
  37. N. Dowling, P. Kos, and K. Modi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 180403 (2023).
  38. D. A. Trunin, Phys. Rev. D 108, 105023 (2023).
  39. D. A. Trunin, Phys. Rev. D 108, L101703 (2023).
  40. V. S. Viswanath and G. Müller, The Recursion Method: Application to Many-Body Dynamics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 1994).
  41. J. M. Magán and J. Simón, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 071.
  42. E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 062.
  43. P. Nandy, A. S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, P. Martínez-Azcona, A. Dymarsky, and A. del Campo, Phys. Rep. 1125–1128, 1 (2025).
  44. E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner, arXiv:2507.06286.
  45. S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993).
  46. A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, in Talk at KITP Program: Entanglement in Strongly-Correlated Quantum Matter (2015), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015escq.progE...2K/abstract.
  47. A. Avdoshkin, A. Dymarsky, and M. Smolkin, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 066.
  48. H. A. Camargo, V. Jahnke, K.-Y. Kim, and M. Nishida, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 226.
  49. Y. Fu, K.-Y. Kim, K. Pal, and K. Pal, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 139.
  50. H. A. Camargo, Y. Fu, V. Jahnke, K.-Y. Kim, and K. Pal, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 182.
  51. Z.-Y. Fan, arXiv:2306.16118.
  52. Y. Fu, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim, and J. F. Pedraza, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2026) 056.
  53. E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 211.
  54. E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 151.
  55. P. Caputa, J. M. Magan, and D. Patramanis, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013041 (2022).
  56. A. Dymarsky and M. Smolkin, Phys. Rev. D 104, L081702 (2021).
  57. J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016).
  58. DLMF, NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, edited by F. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain, https://dlmf.nist.gov/ (Release 1.2.5 of 2025-12-15).
  59. A. Bhattacharya, P. P. Nath, and H. Sahu, Phys. Rev. D 109, 066010 (2024).
  60. H. J. Lipkin, N. Neshkov, and A. J. Glick, Nucl. Phys. 62, 188 (1965).
  61. B. Craps, M. De Clerck, D. Janssens, V. Luyten, and C. Rabideau, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174313 (2020).
  62. M. C. Bañuls, J. I. Cirac, and M. B. Hastings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 050405 (2011).
  63. K. Hashimoto, K.-B. Huh, K.-Y. Kim, and R. Watanabe, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 068.
  64. M. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1072 (1982).
  65. J. Florencio and M. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 31, 3231 (1985).
  66. J.-M. Liu and G. Müller, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5854 (1990).
  67. V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics (Springer, New York, 1989).
  68. L. Hackl and E. Bianchi, SciPost Phys. Core 4, 025 (2021).
  69. K. Husimi, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 3rd Series 22, 264 (1940).
  70. E. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932).
  71. P. Ribeiro, J. Vidal, and R. Mosseri, Phys. Rev. E 78, 021106 (2008).
  72. K. Pal, K. Pal, and K.-Y. Kim, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2026) 187.
  73. J. S. Cotler, D. Ding, and G. R. Penington, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 396, 318 (2018).
  74. A. W. Shrestha, B. Bhattacharjee, and A. del Campo, Phys. Rev. A 113, 062610 (2026).
  75. R. Basu, A. Ganguly, S. Nath, and O. Parrikar, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 264.
  76. F. Haneder, G. Caspari, J. D. Urbina, and K. Richter, arXiv:2512.19869.
  77. D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford, and A. Streicher, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 122.
  78. X.-L. Qi and A. Streicher, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 012.
  79. T. Li, M. Wang, and J. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 114, 046010 (2026).
  80. S. Xu, J. Phys. A 58, 045301 (2025).
  81. D. Patramanis and W. Sybesma, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2026) 085.
  82. E. Gozzi and M. Reuter, Chaos Solitons Fractals 4, 1117 (1994).
  83. C. Beetar, E. L. Graef, J. Murugan, H. Nastase, and H. J. R. Van Zyl, arXiv:2507.13226.
  84. S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 221.
  85. S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez and J. Xu, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 246.
  86. S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 044.
  87. S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 229.
  88. J. Murugan and H. J. R. van Zyl, arXiv:2602.02106.
  89. M. Pollicott, Inventiones Mathematicae 81, 413 (1985).
  90. D. Ruelle, J. Stat. Phys. 44, 281 (1986).
  91. I. García-Mata, M. Saraceno, R. A. Jalabert, A. J. Roncaglia, and D. A. Wisniacki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 210601 (2018).
  92. A. Avdoshkin and A. Dymarsky, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043234 (2020).
  93. E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 213.
  94. V. Balasubramanian, J. M. Magan, P. Nandi, and Q. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 113, 046004 (2026).
  95. R. C. Myers and S.-M. Ruan, in Gravity, Strings and Fields: A Conference in Honour of Gordon Semenoff (2024), arXiv:2403.17475.
  96. N. De Ro, A. Sánchez-Garrido, and J. Sonner, arXiv:2607.12585.
  97. Z.-Y. Fan, Phys. Rev. A 105, 062210 (2022).
  98. S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez and A. Rolph, Phys. Rev. D 109, L081701 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation