Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Thermal static potential and pseudoscalar quarkonium spectral functions from (2+1)-flavor lattice QCD

Sajid Ali1,2, Dibyendu Bala1, Olaf Kaczmarek1, and Pavan1 (HotQCD Collaboration)

Phys. Rev. D 112, 054510 – Published 22 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/s8gw-n43f

Abstract

Quarkonia, which are bound states of a heavy quark and antiquark, play a key role in probing the quark-gluon plasma (QGP). The dynamics of quarkonia in the QGP are encoded in their finite-temperature spectral functions. In this work, we estimate the quarkonium spectral functions in the pseudoscalar channel using (2+1)-flavor lattice QCD with a pion mass of 320 MeV, at temperatures of 220  MeV(1.2Tpc), 251  MeV(1.4Tpc), and 293  MeV(1.6Tpc). Reconstructing the spectral function from the Euclidean lattice correlator is a well-known ill-posed problem, requiring additional physics-motivated input. We address this by smoothly matching contributions from different frequency regions of the spectral function, using appropriate physics valid for each region. The spectral function around ω∼2Mq is obtained using a nonperturbative complex potential, while for ω≫2Mq it is modeled using results from vacuum perturbation theory. Since the pseudoscalar channel does not receive a transport contribution near ω∼0, we find that the combination of these two regions already provides a good description of the relativistic lattice pseudoscalar correlator. We observe a substantial thermal width in the ηc(1S) state, indicating that pseudoscalar charmonium (ηc) is nearing dissolution at the studied temperatures. In comparison, the ηb ground state exhibits little change and remains well defined.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (63)

  1. T. Matsui and H. Satz, Phys. Lett. B 178, 416 (1986).
  2. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 790, 270 (2019).
  3. B. Krouppa, A. Rothkopf, and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D 97, 016017 (2018).
  4. L. Dong, Y. Guo, A. Islam, A. Rothkopf, and M. Strickland, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 200.
  5. S. Kajimoto, Y. Akamatsu, M. Asakawa, and A. Rothkopf, Phys. Rev. D 97, 014003 (2018).
  6. N. Brambilla, M. A. Escobedo, A. Islam, M. Strickland, A. Tiwari, A. Vairo, and P. Vander Griend, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 303.
  7. N. Brambilla, M. A. Escobedo, A. Islam, M. Strickland, A. Tiwari, A. Vairo, and P. Vander Griend, Phys. Rev. D 108, L011502 (2023).
  8. R. Sharma and A. Tiwari, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074004 (2020).
  9. V. B. R and R. Sharma, arXiv:2504.19348.
  10. M. Asakawa and T. Hatsuda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 012001 (2004).
  11. S. Datta, F. Karsch, P. Petreczky, and I. Wetzorke, Phys. Rev. D 69, 094507 (2004).
  12. H. T. Ding, A. Francis, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, H. Satz, and W. Soeldner, Phys. Rev. D 86, 014509 (2012).
  13. S. Kim, P. Petreczky, and A. Rothkopf, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 088.
  14. G. Aarts, C. Allton, T. Harris, S. Kim, M. P. Lombardo, S. M. Ryan, and J.-I. Skullerud, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 097.
  15. R. Larsen, S. Meinel, S. Mukherjee, and P. Petreczky, Phys. Rev. D 100, 074506 (2019).
  16. R. Larsen, S. Meinel, S. Mukherjee, and P. Petreczky, Phys. Lett. B 800, 135119 (2020).
  17. H. T. Ding, W. P. Huang, R. Larsen, S. Meinel, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, and Z. Tang, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 149.
  18. S. Y. F. Liu and R. Rapp, Phys. Rev. C 97, 034918 (2018).
  19. Z. Tang, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, and R. Rapp, Phys. Rev. D 112, 034030 (2025).
  20. Z. Tang, B. Wu, A. Hanlon, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, and R. Rapp, arXiv:2502.09044.
  21. A. Mocsy and P. Petreczky, Phys. Rev. D 77, 014501 (2008).
  22. O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, P. Petreczky, and F. Zantow, Phys. Lett. B 543, 41 (2002).
  23. M. Laine, O. Philipsen, P. Romatschke, and M. Tassler, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2007) 054.
  24. N. Brambilla, J. Ghiglieri, A. Vairo, and P. Petreczky, Phys. Rev. D 78, 014017 (2008).
  25. M. Laine, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2007) 028.
  26. Y. Burnier, M. Laine, and M. Vepsalainen, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2008) 043.
  27. Y. Burnier, H. T. Ding, O. Kaczmarek, A. L. Kruse, M. Laine, H. Ohno, and H. Sandmeyer, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 206.
  28. H.-T. Ding, O. Kaczmarek, A.-L. Lorenz, H. Ohno, H. Sandmeyer, and H.-T. Shu, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114508 (2021).
  29. D. Bala, S. Ali, O. Kaczmarek, and Pavan (HotQCD Collaboration), J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol. 3, 100042 (2025).
  30. Y. Burnier, O. Kaczmarek, and A. Rothkopf, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 101.
  31. A. Rothkopf, T. Hatsuda, and S. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 162001 (2012).
  32. Y. Burnier, O. Kaczmarek, and A. Rothkopf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 082001 (2015).
  33. D. Bala and S. Datta, Phys. Rev. D 101, 034507 (2020).
  34. D. Bala, O. Kaczmarek, R. Larsen, S. Mukherjee, G. Parkar, P. Petreczky, A. Rothkopf, and J. H. Weber (HotQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 054513 (2022).
  35. A. Bazavov, D. Hoying, R. N. Larsen, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, A. Rothkopf, and J. H. Weber (HotQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 109, 074504 (2024).
  36. R. N. Larsen, G. Parkar, A. Rothkopf, and J. H. Weber, Phys. Rev. D 110, 114501 (2024).
  37. S. Caron-Huot, Phys. Rev. D 79, 125009 (2009).
  38. D. Banerjee, S. Datta, R. Gavai, and P. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. D 85, 014510 (2012).
  39. D. Banerjee, S. Datta, R. V. Gavai, and P. Majumdar, Nucl. Phys. A1038, 122721 (2023).
  40. D. Banerjee, S. Datta, and M. Laine, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 128.
  41. L. Altenkort, A. M. Eller, O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur, G. D. Moore, and H.-T. Shu, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014511 (2021).
  42. N. Brambilla, V. Leino, J. Mayer-Steudte, and P. Petreczky (TUMQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 107, 054508 (2023).
  43. H. Pandey, S. Schlichting, and S. Sharma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 222301 (2024).
  44. R. Sommer, Proc. Sci., LATTICE2013 (2014) 015 [arXiv:1401.3270].
  45. L. Altenkort, O. Kaczmarek, R. Larsen, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, H.-T. Shu, and S. Stendebach (HotQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 231902 (2023).
  46. E. Follana, Q. Mason, C. Davies, K. Hornbostel, G. P. Lepage, J. Shigemitsu, H. Trottier, and K. Wong (HPQCD and UKQCD Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 75, 054502 (2007).
  47. M. Luscher and P. Weisz, Commun. Math. Phys. 98, 433 (1985); 98, 433(E) (1985).
  48. L. Altenkort, D. de la Cruz, O. Kaczmarek, R. Larsen, G. D. Moore, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, H.-T. Shu, and S. Stendebach (HotQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 051902 (2024).
  49. S. Ali, D. Bala, A. Francis, G. Jackson, O. Kaczmarek, J. Turnwald, T. Ueding, and N. Wink (HotQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 054518 (2024).
  50. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  51. Y. Burnier and A. Rothkopf, Phys. Rev. D 87, 114019 (2013).
  52. O. Philipsen and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 89, 014509 (2014).
  53. D. Bala and S. Datta, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014512 (2021).
  54. A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 112002 (2010).
  55. Y. Sumino, arXiv:1411.7853.
  56. F. Herzog, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2017) 090.
  57. A. Laschka, N. Kaiser, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 83, 094002 (2011).
  58. F. Karsch, M. T. Mehr, and H. Satz, Z. Phys. C 37, 617 (1988).
  59. M. Laine and Y. Schroder, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2005) 067.
  60. Y. Guo, L. Dong, J. Pan, and M. R. Moldes, Phys. Rev. D 100, 036011 (2019).
  61. L. Mazur et al. (HotQCD Collaboration), Comput. Phys. Commun. 300, 109164 (2024).
  62. M. A. Clark, R. Babich, K. Barros, R. C. Brower, and C. Rebbi (QUDA Collaboration), Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1517 (2010).
  63. D. Bala, O. Kaczmarek, S. Ali, and Pavan, Data publication for “Thermal static potential and pseudoscalar quarkonium spectral functions from 2+1 flavor lattice QCD”, 10.4119/unibi/3006414.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation