Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Efficient computation of the N-th rank QED polarization tensor: Universal worldline structure of form factors

X. Feal1,4,*, A. Tarasov2,3,†, and R. Venugopalan3,4,5,‡

  • *Contact author: xgarciafe@bnl.gov
  • †Contact author: ataraso@ncsu.edu
  • ‡Contact author: rajuv@bnl.gov

Phys. Rev. D 114, 016019 – Published 20 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/s6zt-srrr

Abstract

We derived in [Phys. Rev. D 106, 056009 (2022), Phys. Rev. D 107, 096021 (2023)] a compact expression for the Nth rank QED polarization tensor Πμ1⋯μN(k1,…,kN) in a (0+1)-dimensional worldline framework. This fully off-shell object, a function of N external photon 4-momenta, is a key ingredient in high-order computations of cusp anomalous dimensions and lepton anomalous magnetic moments. We demonstrate here that Πμ1⋯μN can further be expressed simply in terms of a small number of independent “head” form factors [each representing (N−1)!/2 Feynman diagrams] which have a universal structure in terms of sums over fermion Green’s functions and (proper time derivative of) their boson worldline superpartners. This worldline representation bypasses explicit Wick contractions and avoids tensor reductions to scalar loop integrals à la Passarino and Veltman, order by order in perturbation theory. We give explicit expressions for the fourth and sixth rank head form factors and provide a computer script generalizing these results to arbitrary N external photons. The multiplicity of heads, and their growth with N, can be understood in terms of orbits of the permutation group. We employ the Burnside-Cauchy-Frobenius lemma to show that it scales as eN−1/N terms as opposed to the eN−1N!/N terms in conventional perturbation theory. We reexpress worldline parameter integrals that define the fourth rank heads as Feynman parameter integrals to reproduce the seminal results by Karplus and Neuman for the on-shell light-by-light amplitude and extend these to the fully off-shell case in massless QED employing a tailored integration-by-parts procedure. In a follow-up paper, we will discuss the direct computation of worldline integrals, potentially providing a further N! advantage relative to Feynman diagram computations at high orders in perturbation theory.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (126)

  1. X. Feal, A. Tarasov, and R. Venugopalan, QED as a many-body theory of worldlines: General formalism and infrared structure, Phys. Rev. D 106, 056009 (2022).
  2. X. Feal, A. Tarasov, and R. Venugopalan, QED as a many-body theory of worldlines. II. All-order S-matrix formalism, Phys. Rev. D 107, 096021 (2023).
  3. C. Schubert, Perturbative quantum field theory in the string inspired formalism, Phys. Rep. 355, 73 (2001).
  4. P. P. Kulish and L. D. Faddeev, Asymptotic conditions and infrared divergences in quantum electrodynamics, Theor. Math. Phys. 4, 745 (1970).
  5. D. Zwanziger, Reduction formulas for charged particles and coherent states in quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 7, 1082 (1973).
  6. H. Hannesdottir and M. D. Schwartz, S-matrix for massless particles, Phys. Rev. D 101, 105001 (2020).
  7. F. E. Low, Bremsstrahlung of very low-energy quanta in elementary particle collisions, Phys. Rev. 110, 974 (1958).
  8. S. Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons, Phys. Rev. 140, B516 (1965).
  9. D. Kapec, M. Perry, A.-M. Raclariu, and A. Strominger, Infrared divergences in QED, revisited, Phys. Rev. D 96, 085002 (2017).
  10. A. Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, England, 2018).
  11. A. Strominger, On BMS invariance of gravitational scattering, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 152.
  12. S. Choi and R. Akhoury, BMS supertranslation symmetry implies Faddeev-Kulish amplitudes, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 171.
  13. M. J. Strassler, Field theory without Feynman diagrams: One loop effective actions, Nucl. Phys. B385, 145 (1992).
  14. D. Kosower, B.-H. Lee, and V. P. Nair, Multi gluon scattering: A string based calculation, Phys. Lett. B 201, 85 (1988).
  15. Z. Bern and D. A. Kosower, The computation of loop amplitudes in gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B379, 451 (1992).
  16. X. Feal, A. Tarasov, and R. Venugopalan, Efficient computation of the N-th rank QED polarization tensor: Worldline results for gauge-invariant form factors (2026).
  17. T. Aoyama, T. Kinoshita, and M. Nio, Theory of the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, Atoms 7, 28 (2019).
  18. T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, Phys. Rep. 887, 1 (2020).
  19. R. Aliberti et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model: An update, Phys. Rep. 1143, 1 (2025).
  20. I. A. Korchemskaya and G. P. Korchemsky, High-energy scattering in QCD and cross singularities of Wilson loops, Nucl. Phys. B437, 127 (1995).
  21. I. A. Korchemskaya and G. P. Korchemsky, Evolution equation for gluon Regge trajectory, Phys. Lett. B 387, 346 (1996).
  22. L. J. Dixon, L. Magnea, and G. F. Sterman, Universal structure of subleading infrared poles in gauge theory amplitudes, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2008) 022.
  23. T. Becher and M. Neubert, Infrared singularities of scattering amplitudes in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 162001 (2009); 111, 199905(E) (2013).
  24. S. Caron-Huot, E. Gardi, J. Reichel, and L. Vernazza, Infrared singularities of QCD scattering amplitudes in the Regge limit to all orders, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 098.
  25. J. M. Henn and B. Mistlberger, Four-gluon scattering at three loops, infrared structure, and the Regge limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 171601 (2016).
  26. S. Caron-Huot, E. Gardi, and L. Vernazza, Two-parton scattering in the high-energy limit, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 016.
  27. F. Caola, A. Chakraborty, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel, and L. Tancredi, Three-loop helicity amplitudes for four-quark scattering in massless QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 206.
  28. G. Falcioni, E. Gardi, N. Maher, C. Milloy, and L. Vernazza, Scattering amplitudes in the Regge limit and the soft anomalous dimension through four loops, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 053.
  29. J. M. Henn, C. Milloy, and K. Yan, A new method for calculating the soft anomalous dimension matrix for massive particle scattering, arXiv:2310.10145.
  30. R. Brüser, C. Dlapa, J. M. Henn, and K. Yan, Full angle dependence of the four-loop cusp anomalous dimension in QED, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 021601 (2021).
  31. A. Grozin, J. M. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and P. Marquard, Three loop cusp anomalous dimension in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 062006 (2015).
  32. A. Grozin, J. M. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and P. Marquard, The three-loop cusp anomalous dimension in QCD and its supersymmetric extensions, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 140.
  33. J. M. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and B. Mistlberger, The full four-loop cusp anomalous dimension in N=4 super Yang-Mills and QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 018.
  34. A. von Manteuffel, E. Panzer, and R. M. Schabinger, Cusp and collinear anomalous dimensions in four-loop QCD from form factors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 162001 (2020).
  35. B. Agarwal, A. von Manteuffel, E. Panzer, and R. M. Schabinger, Four-loop collinear anomalous dimensions in QCD and N=4 super Yang-Mills, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136503 (2021).
  36. E. G. Floratos, D. A. Ross, and C. T. Sachrajda, Higher order effects in asymptotically free gauge theories: The anomalous dimensions of Wilson operators, Nucl. Phys. B129, 66 (1977); B139, 545(E) (1978).
  37. A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, C. Lopez, and F. J. Yndurain, Second order contributions to the structure functions in deep inelastic scattering. 1. Theoretical calculations, Nucl. Phys. B153, 161 (1979).
  38. G. P. Korchemsky and A. V. Radyushkin, Renormalization of the Wilson loops beyond the leading order, Nucl. Phys. B283, 342 (1987).
  39. S. Moch, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, The three loop splitting functions in QCD: The nonsinglet case, Nucl. Phys. B688, 101 (2004).
  40. A. Vogt, S. Moch, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, The three-loop splitting functions in QCD: The singlet case, Nucl. Phys. B691, 129 (2004).
  41. S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, On quartic colour factors in splitting functions and the gluon cusp anomalous dimension, Phys. Lett. B 782, 627 (2018).
  42. F. Herzog, S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, Five-loop contributions to low-N non-singlet anomalous dimensions in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 790, 436 (2019).
  43. K. G. Chetyrkin, A. L. Kataev, and F. V. Tkachov, New approach to evaluation of multiloop Feynman integrals: The gegenbauer polynomial x space technique, Nucl. Phys. B174, 345 (1980).
  44. K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov, Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops, Nucl. Phys. B192, 159 (1981).
  45. S. Laporta, High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 5087 (2000).
  46. J. M. Henn, Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 251601 (2013).
  47. E. W. Barnes, A new development of the theory of the hypergeometric functions, Proc. London Math. Soc. s2–6, 141 (1908).
  48. W. N. Bailey, Generalized Hypergeometric Series (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1964).
  49. E. E. Boos and A. I. Davydychev, A method of evaluating massive Feynman integrals, Theor. Math. Phys. 89, 1052 (1991).
  50. A. I. Davydychev, Some exact results for N point massive Feynman integrals, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 32, 1052 (1991).
  51. J. B. Tausk, Nonplanar massless two loop Feynman diagrams with four on-shell legs, Phys. Lett. B 469, 225 (1999).
  52. I. Dubovyk, J. Gluzza, and G. Somogyi, Mellin-Barnes Integrals: A Primer on Particle Physics Applications (Springer Nature, New York, 2022).
  53. M. E. Peskin, Short distance analysis for heavy quark systems. 1. Diagrammatics, Nucl. Phys. B156, 365 (1979).
  54. K. G. Wilson, Nonlagrangian models of current algebra, Phys. Rev. 179, 1499 (1969).
  55. H. Strubbe, Manual for schoonschip: A CDC 6000/7000 program for symbolic evaluation of algebraic expressions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 8, 1 (1974).
  56. G. J. van Oldenborgh and J. A. M. Vermaseren, New algorithms for one loop integrals, Z. Phys. C 46, 425 (1990).
  57. J. A. M. Vermaseren, New features of FORM, arXiv:math-ph/0010025.
  58. J. Kuipers, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and J. Vollinga, FORM version 4.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1453 (2013).
  59. R. N. Lee, Presenting LiteRed: A tool for the loop InTEgrals REDuction, arXiv:1212.2685.
  60. C. Anastasiou and A. Lazopoulos, Automatic integral reduction for higher order perturbative calculations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2004) 046.
  61. P. Maierhöfer, J. Usovitsch, and P. Uwer, Kira—A Feynman integral reduction program, Comput. Phys. Commun. 230, 99 (2018).
  62. A. V. Smirnov and F. S. Chukharev, FIRE6: Feynman integral reduction with modular arithmetic, Comput. Phys. Commun. 247, 106877 (2020).
  63. G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Scalar one loop integrals, Nucl. Phys. B153, 365 (1979).
  64. T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999).
  65. R. K. Ellis and G. Zanderighi, Scalar one-loop integrals for QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 002.
  66. E. Remiddi and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Harmonic polylogarithms, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 725 (2000).
  67. S. Moch, P. Uwer, and S. Weinzierl, Nested sums, expansion of transcendental functions and multiscale multiloop integrals, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 43, 3363 (2002).
  68. S. Moch and P. Uwer, XSummer: Transcendental functions and symbolic summation in form, Comput. Phys. Commun. 174, 759 (2006).
  69. S. Bloch and P. Vanhove, The elliptic dilogarithm for the sunset graph, J. Number Theory 148, 328 (2015).
  70. C. Duhr, Mathematical aspects of scattering amplitudes, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Journeys Through the Precision Frontier: Amplitudes for Colliders (World Scientific, 2015), pp. 419–476.
  71. C. Duhr, S. Maggio, C. Nega, B. Sauer, L. Tancredi, and F. J. Wagner, Aspects of canonical differential equations for Calabi-Yau geometries and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 128.
  72. P. Vanhove, The multiloop sunset to all orders, arXiv:2603.03183.
  73. R. Penrose and M. A. H. MacCallum, Twistor theory: An approach to the quantization of fields and space-time, Phys. Rep. 6, 241 (1972).
  74. V. P. Nair, A current algebra for some gauge theory amplitudes, Phys. Lett. B 214, 215 (1988).
  75. E. Witten, Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space, Commun. Math. Phys. 252, 189 (2004).
  76. N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo, C. Cheung, and J. Kaplan, The S-matrix in twistor space, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 110.
  77. D. Artico and L. Magnea, Integration-by-parts identities and differential equations for parametrised Feynman integrals, arXiv:2310.03939.
  78. P. Mastrolia and S. Mizera, Feynman integrals and intersection theory, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 139.
  79. H. Frellesvig, F. Gasparotto, S. Laporta, M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, L. Mattiazzi, and S. Mizera, Decomposition of Feynman integrals on the maximal cut by intersection numbers, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 153.
  80. R. P. Feynman, Mathematical formulation of the quantum theory of electromagnetic interaction, Phys. Rev. 80, 440 (1950).
  81. R. P. Feynman, An operator calculus having applications in quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 84, 108 (1951).
  82. J. S. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951).
  83. V. Costantini, B. De Tollis, and G. Pistoni, Nonlinear effects in quantum electrodynamics, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 2A, 733 (1971).
  84. R. Karplus and M. Neuman, Non-linear interactions between electromagnetic fields, Phys. Rev. 80, 380 (1950).
  85. R. Karplus and M. Neuman, The scattering of light by light, Phys. Rev. 83, 776 (1951).
  86. R. Dolen, The vacuum Regge Trajectory in conventional field theory, Ph.D. thesis, Caltech, IQI, 1966.
  87. N. Ahmadiniaz, C. Lopez-Arcos, M. A. Lopez-Lopez, and C. Schubert, The QED four-photon amplitudes off-shell: Part 1, Nucl. Phys. B991, 116216 (2023).
  88. N. Ahmadiniaz, C. Lopez-Arcos, M. A. Lopez-Lopez, and C. Schubert, The QED four-photon amplitudes off-shell: Part 2, Nucl. Phys. B991, 116217 (2023).
  89. N. Ahmadiniaz, V. M. Banda Guzmán, F. Bastianelli, O. Corradini, J. P. Edwards, and C. Schubert, Worldline master formulas for the dressed electron propagator. Part I. Off-shell amplitudes, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 049.
  90. S. Laporta, High-precision calculation of the 4-loop contribution to the electron g-2 in QED, Phys. Lett. B 772, 232 (2017).
  91. S. Laporta and E. Remiddi, Analytic QED calculations of the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, Adv. Ser. Dir. High Energy Phys. 20, 119 (2009).
  92. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita, and M. Nio, Complete tenth-order QED contribution to the muon g-2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 111808 (2012).
  93. C. Schubert, Photon-photon scattering, EPJ Web Conf. 301, 03003 (2024).
  94. P. Bargiela, A. Chakraborty, G. Gambuti, and M. A. Ozcelik, Light-by-light scattering at three loops in massless QCD and QED: Amplitudes and cross sections, arXiv:2603.22423.
  95. E. C. Aschenauer, S. Fazio, J. H. Lee, H. Mantysaari, B. S. Page, B. Schenke, T. Ullrich, R. Venugopalan, and P. Zurita, The electron–ion collider: Assessing the energy dependence of key measurements, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 024301 (2019).
  96. J. P. Edwards, C. M. Mata, U. Müller, and C. Schubert, New techniques for worldline integration, SIGMA 17, 065 (2021).
  97. J. P. Edwards, C. M. Mata, and C. Schubert, One-loop amplitudes in the worldline formalism, Phys. Scr. 97, 064002 (2022).
  98. S. Bhattacharya, Y. Hatta, and W. Vogelsang, Chiral and trace anomalies in deeply virtual Compton scattering, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014026 (2023).
  99. S. Bhattacharya, Y. Hatta, and W. Vogelsang, Chiral and trace anomalies in deeply virtual Compton scattering. II. QCD factorization and beyond, Phys. Rev. D 108, 014029 (2023).
  100. S. Bhattacharya, Y. Hatta, and J. Schoenleber, Nonlocal chiral anomaly and generalized parton distributions, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014013 (2025).
  101. C. Corianò, S. Lionetti, D. Melle, and R. Tommasi, The gravitational form factors of hadrons from CFT in momentum space and the dilaton in perturbative QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 498 (2025).
  102. N. Mueller and R. Venugopalan, The chiral anomaly, Berry’s phase and chiral kinetic theory, from world-lines in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D 97, 051901 (2018).
  103. N. Mueller and R. Venugopalan, Worldline construction of a covariant chiral kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. D 96, 016023 (2017).
  104. N. Mueller and R. Venugopalan, Constructing phase space distributions with internal symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 99, 056003 (2019).
  105. N. Mueller, A. Tarasov, and R. Venugopalan, Deeply inelastic scattering structure functions on a hybrid quantum computer, Phys. Rev. D 102, 016007 (2020).
  106. A. Tarasov and R. Venugopalan, Structure functions at small x from worldlines: Unpolarized distributions, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054007 (2019).
  107. A. Tarasov and R. Venugopalan, Role of the chiral anomaly in polarized deeply inelastic scattering: Finding the triangle graph inside the box diagram in Bjorken and Regge asymptotics, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114022 (2020).
  108. A. Tarasov and R. Venugopalan, Role of the chiral anomaly in polarized deeply inelastic scattering. II. Topological screening and transitions from emergent axionlike dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 105, 014020 (2022).
  109. A. Tarasov and R. Venugopalan, Role of the chiral anomaly in polarized deeply inelastic scattering. III. Wess-Zumino-Witten contributions and chiral Ward identities for finite quark mass, Phys. Rev. D 111, 074027 (2025).
  110. X. Feal, A. Tarasov, and R. Venugopalan, Worldline framework for deeply virtual compton scattering (to be published).
  111. C. Schubert, The structure of the Bern-Kosower integrand for the N gluon amplitude, Eur. Phys. J. C 5, 693 (1998).
  112. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/s6zt-srrr to download the computer script that automatically generates all head form factors for arbitrary N.
  113. B. De Tollis, Dispersive approach to photon-photon scattering, Nuovo Cimento 32, 757 (1964).
  114. Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower, Dimensionally regulated one loop integrals, Phys. Lett. B 302, 299 (1993); 318, 649(E) (1993).
  115. Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower, Dimensionally regulated pentagon integrals, Nucl. Phys. B412, 751 (1994).
  116. A. Denner, Techniques for calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one loop level and results for W physics at LEP-200, Fortschr. Phys. 41, 307 (1993).
  117. A. I. Davydychev, Four-point function in general kinematics through geometrical splitting and reduction, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1085, 052016 (2018).
  118. A. Denner and S. Dittmaier, Scalar one-loop 4-point integrals, Nucl. Phys. B844, 199 (2011).
  119. O. V. Tarasov, Connection between Feynman integrals having different values of the space-time dimension, Phys. Rev. D 54, 6479 (1996).
  120. S. Carrazza, R. K. Ellis, and G. Zanderighi, qcdloop: A comprehensive framework for one-loop scalar integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 209, 134 (2016).
  121. A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and L. Hofer, collier: A fortran-based complex one-loop library in extended regularizations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 212, 220 (2017).
  122. V. A. Smirnov, Analytic Tools for Feynman Integrals, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012).
  123. W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Dimensional regularization of infrared divergences, Nucl. Phys. B88, 86 (1975).
  124. N. I. Usyukina and A. I. Davydychev, An approach to the evaluation of three and four point ladder diagrams, Phys. Lett. B 298, 363 (1993).
  125. A. Hodges, The box integrals in momentum-twistor geometry, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2013) 051.
  126. F. Chavez and C. Duhr, Three-mass triangle integrals and single-valued polylogarithms, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2012) 114.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation