Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Fermionic backreaction on kink and topological charge pumping in the sl(2) affine Toda model coupled to matter

H. Blas1 and R. Quicaño2

Phys. Rev. D 112, 016019 – Published 21 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/s4s4-ksbn

Abstract

We explore the Faddeev-Jackiw symplectic Hamiltonian reduction of the sl(2) affine Toda model coupled to matter, which includes new parametrizations for a scalar field and a Grassmannian fermionic field. The structure of constraints and symplectic potentials primarily dictates the strong-weak dual coupling sectors of the theory, ensuring the equivalence between the Noether and topological currents. The analytical calculations encompass the fermion-kink classical solution, the excited fermion bound states localized on the kink, and the scattering states, all of which account for the fermion backreaction on the soliton. The total energy, which includes the classical fermion-soliton interaction energy, the bound-state fermion energy, and the fermion vacuum polarization energy, is determined by the topological charge of the kink. This system satisfies first-order differential equations and a chiral current conservation equation. Our results demonstrate that the excited fermion bound states and scattering states significantly alter the properties of the kink. Notably, they give rise to a pumping mechanism for the topological charge of the in-gap kink due to fermionic backreaction, as well as the appearance of kink states in the continuum.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. R. Rajaraman, Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction to Solitons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory, 1st ed. (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1987).
  2. O. Babelon, D. Bernard, and M. Talon, Introduction to Classical Integrable Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
  3. Y. Frihman and J. Sonnenschein, Non-Perturbative Field Theory. From Two-Dimensional Conformal Field Theory to QCD in Four Dimensions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2010).
  4. L. A. Ferreira, J-L. Gervais, J. Sánchez Guillen, and M. V. Saveliev, Nucl. Phys. B470, 236 (1996).
  5. H. Blas and L. A. Ferreira, Nucl. Phys. B571, 607 (2000).
  6. H. Blas, Nucl. Phys. B596, 471 (2001).
  7. H. Blas, Phys. Rev. D 66, 127701 (2002).
  8. R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. D 13, 3398 (1976).
  9. V. Klimashonok, I. Perapechka, and Y. Shnir, Phys. Rev. D 100, 105003 (2019).
  10. I. Perapechka and Y. Shnir, Phys. Rev. D 101, 021701 (2020).
  11. V. A. Gani, A. Gorina, I. Perapechka, and Y. Shnir, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 757 (2022).
  12. D. Saadatmand and H. Weigel, Phys. Rev. D 107, 036006 (2023).
  13. D. Saadatmand and H. Weigel, Universe 10, 13 (2024).
  14. L. Faddeev and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1692 (1988).
  15. R. Jackiw, in Constraint Theory and Quantization Methods, edited by F. Colmo et al. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994); R. Jackiw, Diverse Topics in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995).
  16. E. Farhi, N. Graham, R. L. Jaffe, and H. Weigel, Phys. Lett. B 475, 335 (2000).
  17. E. Farhi, N. Graham, R. L. Jaffe, and H. Weigel, Nucl. Phys. B585, 443 (2000).
  18. H. J. de Vega and F. A. Schaposnik, Phys. Rev. D 14, 1100 (1976).
  19. R. Friedberg and T. D. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1694 (1977).
  20. H. Blas and B. M. Pimentel, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 282, 67 (2000).
  21. R. Eneias and A. Ferraz, New J. Phys. 17, 123006 (2015).
  22. S.-J. Chang, S. D. Ellis, and B. W. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 11, 3572 (1975).
  23. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B145, 110 (1978).
  24. J. Kogut and D. K. Sinclair, Phys. Rev. D 12, 1742 (1975).
  25. C. P. Burgess and F. Quevedo, Nucl. Phys. B421, 373 (1994).
  26. P. H. Damgaard, H. B. Nielsen, and R. Sollacher, Nucl. Phys. B385, 227 (1992).
  27. C. Adam and F. Santamaria, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 047.
  28. C. Adam, L. A. Ferreira, E. da Hora, A. Wereszczynski, and W. J. Zakrzewski, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2013) 062.
  29. H. Blas, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 007.
  30. N. Graham and R. L. Jaffe, Nucl. Phys. B544, 432 (1999).
  31. J. Han, C. He, and D. E. Pelinovsky, Phys. Rev. E 110, 034202 (2024).
  32. H. Blas, J. J. Monsalve, R. Quicaño, and J. R. V. Pereira, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 082.
  33. D. A. Takahashi and M. Nitta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 131601 (2013).
  34. A. P. Koller, Z. Hwang, and M. Olshanii, J. Phys. A 48, 075203 (2015).
  35. D. A. Takahashi and M. Nitta, J. Low Temp. Phys. 175, 250 (2014).
  36. S. S. Gousheh, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032719 (2002).
  37. L. Shahkarami, A. Mohammadi, and S. S. Gousheh, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2011) 140.
  38. S. S. Gousheh, A. Mohammadi, and L. Shahkarami, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3020 (2014).
  39. L. A. Ferreira and Wojtek J. Zakrzewski, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2011) 130.
  40. H. Blas, H. F. Callisaya, and J. P. R. Campos, Nucl. Phys. B950, 114852 (2020).
  41. J. Barcelos-Neto and C. Wotzasek, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 07, 4981 (1992).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation