Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Shallow Tbc states from an EFT analysis of B(*)D¯(*) scattering on the lattice

Michael Abolnikov1, Lu Meng1,2, Vadim Baru1, Evgeny Epelbaum1, Arseniy A. Filin1, and Ashot M. Gasparyan1

Phys. Rev. D 113, 114041 – Published 22 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rrmd-z6nq

Abstract

We present an effective field theory (EFT) framework for coupled-channel B(*)D¯(*) scattering, applying it to recent lattice QCD results by Alexandrou et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 151902 (2024)]. Two complementary EFT approaches are developed: (1) a low-energy theory near the BD¯ (J=0) and B*D¯ (J=1) thresholds, where coupled-channel effects are integrated out; (2) coupled-channel formulation, where all relevant momentum scales are treated as soft, incorporating contact interactions and one-pion exchange (OPE). Importantly, OPE contributes to the lowest channels only through off-diagonal transitions, thus resulting in the appearance of the left-hand cut from two-pion exchange. The two approaches yield mutually consistent results, supporting the existence of shallow bound states in both channels, in agreement with the lattice findings. The finite-volume spectra and extracted pole positions show a near-degeneracy in J=0 and J=1 channels, consistent with heavy-quark spin symmetry (HQSS). Using HQSS, we predict additional shallow bound states near the BD¯* and B*D¯* thresholds, which are accessible to future lattice simulations. The effect of OPE on the finite volume spectra is found to be small, with only moderate impact on HQSS partners.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Phys. 18, 751 (2022).
  2. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Commun. 13, 3351 (2022).
  3. M. Padmanath and S. Prelovsek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 032002 (2022).
  4. S. Chen, C. Shi, Y. Chen, M. Gong, Z. Liu, W. Sun, and R. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137391 (2022).
  5. T. Whyte, D. J. Wilson, and C. E. Thomas (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 111, 034511 (2025).
  6. S. Collins, A. Nefediev, M. Padmanath, and S. Prelovsek, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094509 (2024).
  7. Y. Lyu, S. Aoki, T. Doi, T. Hatsuda, Y. Ikeda, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161901 (2023).
  8. L. Meng, E. Ortiz-Pacheco, V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, M. Padmanath, and S. Prelovsek, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034509 (2025).
  9. N. Pitanga Lachini, C. E. Thomas, and D. J. Wilson (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 114511 (2025).
  10. A. Francis, R. J. Hudspith, R. Lewis, and K. Maltman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 142001 (2017).
  11. P. Junnarkar, N. Mathur, and M. Padmanath, Phys. Rev. D 99, 034507 (2019).
  12. L. Leskovec, S. Meinel, M. Pflaumer, and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014503 (2019).
  13. P. Mohanta and S. Basak, Phys. Rev. D 102, 094516 (2020).
  14. S. Meinel, M. Pflaumer, and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 106, 034507 (2022).
  15. R. J. Hudspith and D. Mohler, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114510 (2023).
  16. C. Alexandrou, J. Finkenrath, T. Leontiou, S. Meinel, M. Pflaumer, and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054510 (2024).
  17. A. Francis, R. J. Hudspith, R. Lewis, and K. Maltman, Phys. Rev. D 99, 054505 (2019).
  18. R. J. Hudspith, B. Colquhoun, A. Francis, R. Lewis, and K. Maltman, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114506 (2020).
  19. M. Padmanath, A. Radhakrishnan, and N. Mathur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 201902 (2024).
  20. A. Radhakrishnan, M. Padmanath, and N. Mathur, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034506 (2024).
  21. J. Hoffmann, L. Müller, and M. Wagner, Proc. Sci., LATTICE2024 (2025) 091 [arXiv:2501.16188].
  22. P. Bicudo, K. Cichy, A. Peters, and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 93, 034501 (2016).
  23. C. Alexandrou, J. Finkenrath, T. Leontiou, S. Meinel, M. Pflaumer, and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 151902 (2024).
  24. M.-L. Du, A. Filin, V. Baru, X.-K. Dong, E. Epelbaum, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, J. Nieves, and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 131903 (2023).
  25. V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, and A. A. Filin, Phys. Rev. C 94, 014001 (2016).
  26. V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, and J. Gegelia, Phys. Rev. C 92, 014001 (2015).
  27. M. Lüscher, Commun. Math. Phys. 105, 153 (1986).
  28. M. Lüscher, Nucl. Phys. B354, 531 (1991).
  29. C. H. Kim, C. T. Sachrajda, and S. R. Sharpe, Nucl. Phys. B727, 218 (2005).
  30. R. A. Briceno, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074507 (2014).
  31. A. B. a. Raposo and M. T. Hansen, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 075.
  32. L. Meng, V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, and A. M. Gasparyan, Phys. Rev. D 109, L071506 (2024).
  33. R. Bubna, H.-W. Hammer, F. Müller, J.-Y. Pang, A. Rusetsky, and J.-J. Wu, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 168.
  34. M. T. Hansen, F. Romero-López, and S. R. Sharpe, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 051.
  35. S. M. Dawid, A. W. Jackura, and A. P. Szczepaniak, Phys. Lett. B 864, 139442 (2025).
  36. K. Yu, G.-J. Wang, J.-J. Wu, and Z. Yang, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 108.
  37. M. Abolnikov, V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, C. Hanhart, and L. Meng, Phys. Lett. B 860, 139188 (2025).
  38. J. T. Chacko, V. Baru, C. Hanhart, and S. L. Krug, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034042 (2025).
  39. N. Li, Z.-F. Sun, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 88, 114008 (2013).
  40. S. Sakai, L. Roca, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 96, 054023 (2017).
  41. L. M. Abreu, Nucl. Phys. B985, 115994 (2022).
  42. L. Meng, Y.-K. Chen, Y. Ma, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 108, 114016 (2023).
  43. Z. Liu, H. Xu, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 112, 034007 (2025).
  44. V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, and A. V. Nefediev, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 46 (2019).
  45. V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, and A. V. Nefediev, Phys. Lett. B 726, 537 (2013).
  46. D. Becirevic and F. Sanfilippo, Phys. Lett. B 721, 94 (2013).
  47. J. M. Flynn, P. Fritzsch, T. Kawanai, C. Lehner, B. Samways, C. T. Sachrajda, R. S. Van de Water, and O. Witzel (RBC and UKQCD Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 93, 014510 (2016).
  48. V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, and A. V. Nefediev, Phys. Lett. B 763, 20 (2016).
  49. V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, C. Hanhart, A. V. Nefediev, and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094013 (2019).
  50. V. G. Kadyshevsky, Nucl. Phys. B6, 125 (1968).
  51. V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, and X. L. Ren, Phys. Lett. B 798, 134987 (2019).
  52. L. Meng and E. Epelbaum, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 051.
  53. V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, F.-K. Guo, H.-W. Hammer, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, and A. V. Nefediev, Phys. Rev. D 91, 034002 (2015).
  54. P. Reinert, H. Krebs, and E. Epelbaum, Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 86 (2018).
  55. I. Matuschek, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, and C. Hanhart, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 101 (2021).
  56. S. Aldor-Noiman, L. D. Brown, A. Buja, W. Rolke, and R. A. Stine, Am. Stat. 67, 249 (2013).
  57. B. Efron and R. Tibshirani, Stat. Sci. 57, 54 (1986).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation