Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Topological stabilization via Higgs and Z-boson mediated repulsions in electroweak monopole-antimonopole pairs

Dan Zhu and Xurong Chen

Khai-Ming Wong

Phys. Rev. D 113, 053004 – Published 11 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rhy1-sy95

Abstract

We identify two distinct repulsive mechanisms in the Cho-Maison monopole-antimonopole pair (MAP) configuration. Our results show that the Higgs-mediated repulsion exhibits a nonmonotonic dependence on both topological charge and Higgs self-coupling, confirming its topological origin while revealing a mass-controlled range transition that deviates from the exponential form of a Yukawa potential. Simultaneously, the Z-boson field generates localized repulsive cores of radius Rc≈0.8mW−1, consistent with the weak interaction scale. The collaborative effect of these mechanisms—operating in different physics regimes—counteracts the magnetic attraction, establishing a stabilization paradigm for the Cho-Maison MAP that extends naturally to other topological solitons in the Standard Model.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (20)

  1. G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B79, 276 (1974).
  2. A. M. Polyakov, JETP Lett. 20, 194 (1974).
  3. J. Preskill, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 34, 461 (1984).
  4. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B426, 19 (1994).
  5. V. A. Rubakov, JETP Lett. 33, 644 (1981).
  6. C. G. Callan, Phys. Rev. D 25, 2141 (1982).
  7. C. H. Taubes, Commun. Math. Phys. 86, 257 (1982); 86, 299 (1982).
  8. B. Kleihaus and J. Kunz, Phys. Rev. D 61, 025003 (1999).
  9. T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 181601 (2016).
  10. A. Saurabh and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 96, 103536 (2017).
  11. A. Saurabh and T. Vachaspati, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 377, 20190143 (2019).
  12. Y. M. Cho and D. Maison, Phys. Lett. B 391, 360 (1997).
  13. Y. M. Cho, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 337, 20190038 (2019).
  14. D. Zhu, K. M. Wong, and G. Q. Wong, Commun. Theor. Phys. 76, 035201 (2024).
  15. R. Teh, A. Soltanian, and K. M. Wong, Phys. Rev. D 89, 045018 (2014).
  16. R. Teh, B. L. Ng, and K. M. Wong, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 362, 170 (2016).
  17. P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  18. Kyoungtae Kimm, J. H. Yoon, and Y. M. Cho, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 67 (2015); Kyoungtae Kimm, J. H. Yoon, S. H. Oh, and Y. M. Cho, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31, 1650053 (2016).
  19. F. Blaschke and P. Benes, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2018, 073B03 (2018).
  20. P. Zhang, L. Zou, and Y. M. Cho, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 280 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation