Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Convergence of heavy-flavor parton distribution functions at small x and its impact on future ep colliders

S. O. Kara*

  • *Contact author: seyitokankara@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 113, 015020 – Published 20 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/r4vm-x3qd

Abstract

The small-x regime remains a key testing ground for perturbative QCD and future lepton-hadron collider physics. We demonstrate that the long-standing ∼30% spread among global next-to-next-to-leading-order parton distribution functions (PDFs) for heavy-flavor parton densities at small x has now converged below ≈17%. Using the latest nnpdf4.0, ct18, and msht20 sets, we quantify a maximal relative deviation of Δmax≃16.8% at x=10−6 and Q=100  GeV. This convergence, further stabilized by consistent αs and scale variations, marks a new precision frontier for the heavy-flavor sector. We evaluate the phenomenological impact for heavy-quark electroproduction at future ep colliders (LHeC and FCC–eh), showing that PDF-driven cross section uncertainties for e−p→e−cc¯X and e−p→e−bb¯X have been reduced by nearly a factor of 2 compared to 2013 estimates.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (23)

  1. R. D. Ball et al., Nucl. Phys. B867, 244 (2013).
  2. S. Dulat, T.-J. Hou, J. Gao, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, P. Nadolsky, J. Pumplin, C. Schmidt, D. Stump, and C.-P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 93, 033006 (2016).
  3. L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, P. Motylinski, and R. S. Thorne, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 204 (2015).
  4. J. Ablinger et al., arXiv:2509.16124.
  5. J. Bluemlein et al., Nucl. Phys. B866, 196 (2013).
  6. A. Behring J. Blümlein, A. De Freitas, A. Hasselhuhn, A. von Manteuffel, and C. Schneider, Phys. Rev. D 92, 114005 (2015).
  7. A. Buckley, J. Ferrando, S. Lloyd, K. Nordström, B. Page, M. Rüfenacht, M. Schönherr, and G. Watt, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 132 (2015).
  8. V. Bertone, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1647 (2014).
  9. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H.-S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  10. R. D. Ball et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 958 (2021).
  11. T.-J. Hou et al., Phys. Rev. D 103, 014013 (2021).
  12. S. Bailey, T. Cridge, L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, and R. S. Thorne, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 341 (2021).
  13. P. C. Mahalanobis, Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India 2, 49 (1936).
  14. S. Forte et al., Nucl. Phys. B834, 116 (2010).
  15. J. L. Abelleira Fernandez et al., J. Phys. G 39, 075001 (2012).
  16. A. Abada et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 228, 755 (2019).
  17. H. Abramowicz et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 580 (2015).
  18. R. Aaij et al., J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2016) 159.
  19. R. Aaij et al., J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2017) 026.
  20. S. O. Kara, M. Sahin, S. Sultansoy, and S. Turkoz, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2011) 072.
  21. S. O. Kara, arXiv:2508.18496.
  22. J. L. A. Fernandez et al., J. Phys. G 39, 075001 (2012).
  23. P. Agostini et al., J. Phys. G 48, 110501 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation