- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Fermionic Casimir densities for a uniformly accelerating mirror in the Fulling-Rindler vacuum

A. A. Saharian1,*, L. Sh. Grigoryan2, and V. Kh. Kotanjyan1,2

  • *Contact author: saharian@ysu.am
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 085014 – Published 21 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/r3hf-lcl8

Abstract

We investigate the local characteristics of the Fulling-Rindler vacuum for a massive Dirac field induced by a planar boundary moving with constant proper acceleration in (D+1)-dimensional flat spacetime. On the boundary, the field operator obeys the bag boundary condition. The boundary divides the right Rindler wedge into two separate regions, called right-left (RL) and right-right (RR) regions. In both these regions, the fermion condensate and the vacuum expectation value (VEV) of the energy-momentum tensor are decomposed into two contributions. The first one presents the VEVs in the Fulling-Rindler vacuum when the boundary is absent and the second one is the boundary-induced contribution. For points away from the boundary, the renormalization is reduced to the one for the boundary-free geometry. The total VEVs are dominated by the boundary-free parts near the Rindler horizon and by the boundary-induced parts in the region near the boundary. For a massive field the boundary-free contributions in the fermion condensate and the vacuum energy density and effective pressures are negative everywhere. The boundary-induced contributions in the fermion condensate and the energy density are positive in the RL region and negative in the RR region. For a massless field the fermion condensate vanishes in spatial dimensions D≥2, while the VEV of the energy-momentum tensor is different from zero. This behavior contrasts with that of the VEVs in the Minkowski vacuum for the geometry of a boundary at rest relative to an inertial observer. In the latter case, the fermion condensate for a massless field is nonzero, while the VEV of the energy-momentum tensor becomes zero. The obtained results are used to investigate the VEV of the fermionic energy-momentum tensor in weak gravitational fields and background geometries that are conformally related to Rindler spacetime.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (68)

  1. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982).
  2. L. C. B. Crispino, A. Higuchi, and G. E. A. Matsas, The Unruh effect and its applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 787 (2008).
  3. P. P. Langlois, Imprints of spacetime topology in the Hawking-Unruh effect, arXiv:gr-qc/0510127.
  4. S. A. Fulling, Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Riemannian space-time, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2850 (1973).
  5. P. C. W. Davies, Scalar production in Schwarzschild and Rindler metrics, J. Phys. A 8, 609 (1975).
  6. W. G. Unruh, Notes on black-hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).
  7. I. Fuentes-Schuller and R. B. Mann, Alice falls into a black hole: Entanglement in noninertial frames, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 120404 (2005).
  8. P. M. Alsing, I. Fuentes-Schuller, R. B. Mann, and T. E. Tessier, Entanglement of Dirac fields in noninertial frames, Phys. Rev. A 74, 032326 (2006).
  9. K. Ueda, A. Higuchi, K. Yamamoto, A. Rohim, and Y. Nan, Entanglement of the vacuum between left, right, future, and past: Dirac spinor in Rindler and Kasner spaces, Phys. Rev. D 103, 125005 (2021).
  10. J. Yan and B. Zhang, Effect of spacetime dimensions on quantum entanglement between two uniformly accelerated atoms, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 051.
  11. V. M. Mostepanenko and N. N. Trunov, The Casimir Effect and its Applications (Clarendon, Oxford, 1997).
  12. K. A. Milton, The Casimir Effect: Physical Manifestation of Zero-Point Energy (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002).
  13. M. Bordag, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepanenko, Advances in the Casimir Effect (Oxford University Press, New York, 2009).
  14. Casimir Physics, edited by D. Dalvit, P. Milonni, D. Roberts, and F. da Rosa, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2011), Vol. 834.
  15. P. Candelas and D. Deutsch, Fermion fields in accelerated states, Proc. R. Soc. A 362, 251 (1978).
  16. M. Soffel, B. Müller, and W. Greiner, Dirac particles in Rindler space, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1935 (1980).
  17. S. Tagaki, On the response of a Rindler particle detector. III, Prog. Theor. Phys. 74, 501 (1985).
  18. S. Tagaki, Vacuum noise and stress induced by uniform acceleration, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 88, 1 (1986).
  19. R. Járegui, M. Torres, and S. Hacyan, Dirac vacuum: Acceleration and external-field effects, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3979 (1991).
  20. E. Bautista, Acceleration through the Dirac-Pauli vacuum and effects of an external field, Phys. Rev. D 48, 783 (1993).
  21. V. Moretti and L. Vanzo, Thermal Wightman functions and renormalized stress tensors in the Rindler wedge, Phys. Lett. B 375, 54 (1996).
  22. D. Oriti, The spinor field in Rindler spacetime: An analysis of the Unruh effect, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 115, 1005 (2000).
  23. D. A. T. Vanzella and G. E. A. Matsas, Decay of accelerated protons and the existence of the Fulling-Davies-Unruh Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 151301 (2001).
  24. P. P. Langlois, Causal particle detectors and topology, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 321, 2027 (2006).
  25. C. H. G. Béssa, J. G. Dueñas, and N. F. Svaiter, Accelerated detectors in Dirac vacuum: The effects of horizon fluctuations, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 215011 (2012).
  26. W. Zhou and H. Yu, Spontaneous excitation of a uniformly accelerated atom coupled to vacuum Dirac field fluctuations, Phys. Rev. A 86, 033841 (2012).
  27. J. Louko and V. Toussaint, Unruh-DeWitt detector’s response to fermions in flat spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 94, 064027 (2016).
  28. D. Hümmer, E. Martín-Martínez, and A. Kempf, Renormalized Unruh-DeWitt particle detector models for boson and fermion fields, Phys. Rev. D 93, 024019 (2016).
  29. S. Kaushal, Schwinger effect and a uniformly accelerated observer, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 872 (2022).
  30. V. Kh. Kotanjyan, A. A. Saharian, and M. R. Setare, Vacuum currents in partially compactified Rindler spacetime with an application to cylindrical black holes, Nucl. Phys. B 980, 115838 (2022).
  31. R. Falcone and C. Conti, Minkowski vacuum in Rindler spacetime and Unruh thermal state for Dirac fields, Phys. Rev. D 107, 105021 (2023).
  32. S. Bellucci, V. Kh. Kotanjyan, and A. A. Saharian, Fermionic condensate and the mean energy-momentum tensor in the Fulling-Rindler vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 108, 085014 (2023).
  33. P. Candelas and D. Deutsch, On the vacuum stress induced by uniform acceleration or supporting the ether, Proc. R. Soc. A 354, 79 (1977).
  34. A. A. Saharian, Polarization of the Fulling-Rindler vacuum by a uniformly accelerated mirror, Classical Quantum Gravity 19, 5039 (2002).
  35. R. M. Avagyan, A. A. Saharian, and A. H. Yeranyan, Casimir effect in the Fulling-Rindler vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 66, 085023 (2002).
  36. A. A. Saharian, R. S. Davtyan, and A. H. Yeranyan, Casimir energy in the Fulling-Rindler vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 69, 085002 (2004).
  37. A. A. Saharian and M. R. Setare, Surface vacuum energy and stresses on a plate uniformly accelerated through the Fulling-Rindler vacuum, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 5261 (2004).
  38. A. A. Saharian, R. M. Avagyan, and R. S. Davtyan, Wightman function and Casimir densities for Robin plates in the Fulling-Rindler vacuum, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 21, 2353 (2006).
  39. G. Bimonte, E. Calloni, G. Esposito, and L. Rosa, Energy-momentum tensor for a Casimir apparatus in a weak gravitational field, Phys. Rev. D 74, 085011 (2006); 77, 109903(E) (2008).
  40. S. A. Fulling, K. A. Milton, P. Parashar, A. Romeo, K. V. Shajesh, and J. Wagner, How does Casimir energy fall?, Phys. Rev. D 76, 025004 (2007).
  41. K. A. Milton, P. Parashar, K. V. Shajesh, and J. Wagner, How does Casimir energy fall? II. Gravitational acceleration of quantum vacuum energy, J. Phys. A 40, 10935 (2007).
  42. K. V. Shajesh, K. A. Milton, P. Parashar, and J. A. Wagner, How does Casimir energy fall? III. Inertial forces on vacuum energy, J. Phys. A 41, 164058 (2008).
  43. K. A. Milton, K. V. Shajesh, S. A. Fulling, and P. Parashar, How does Casimir energy fall? IV. Gravitational interaction of regularized quantum vacuum energy, Phys. Rev. D 89, 064027 (2014).
  44. G. Lambiase, A. Stabile, and A. Stabile, Casimir effect in extended theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 95, 084019 (2017).
  45. F. Sorge and J. H. Wilson, Casimir effect in free-fall towards a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D 100, 105007 (2019).
  46. L. Buoninfante, G. Lambiase, L. Petruzziello, and A. Stabile, Casimir effect in quadratic theories of gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 41 (2019).
  47. A. P. C. M Lima, G. Alencar, C. R. Muniz, and R. R. Landim, Null second order corrections to Casimir energy in weak gravitational field, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2019) 011.
  48. J. H. Wilson, F. Sorge, and S. A. Fulling, Tidal and nonequilibrium Casimir effects in free fall, Phys. Rev. D 101, 065007 (2020).
  49. F. Sorge, Quasi-local Casimir energy and vacuum buoyancy in a weak gravitational field, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 025009 (2021).
  50. V. B. Bezerra, H. F. S. Mota, A. P. C. M. Lima, G. Alencar, and C. R. Muniz, The Casimir effect in finite-temperature and gravitational scenarios, Physics (N.Y.) 6, 1046 (2024).
  51. K. Shimizu, C, P and T transformations in higher dimensions, Prog. Theor. Phys. 74, 610 (1985).
  52. L. Parker and J. D. Toms, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Fields and Gravity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2009).
  53. Handbook of Mathematical Functions, edited by M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun (Dover, New York, 1972).
  54. E. Elizalde, S. D. Odintsov, and A. A. Saharian, Fermionic condensate and Casimir densities in the presence of compact dimensions with applications to nanotubes, Phys. Rev. D 83, 105023 (2011).
  55. S. Bellucci and A. A. Saharian, Fermionic Casimir effect for parallel plates in the presence of compact dimensions with applications to nanotubes, Phys. Rev. D 80, 105003 (2009).
  56. S. Bellucci and A. A. Saharian, Fermionic current from topology and boundaries with applications to higher-dimensional models and nanophysics, Phys. Rev. D 87, 025005 (2013).
  57. S. Bellucci, W. Oliveira dos Santos, E. R. Bezerra de Mello, and A. A. Saharian, Cosmic string and brane induced effects on the fermionic vacuum in AdS spacetime, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 021.
  58. V. P. Gusynin, S. G. Sharapov, and J. P. Carbotte, AC conductivity of graphene: From tight-binding model to 2+1-dimensional quantum electrodynamics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 21, 4611 (2007).
  59. A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009).
  60. O. Vafek and A. Vishwanath, Dirac fermions in solids: From High-Tc cuprates and graphene to topological insulators and Weyl semimetals, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 83 (2014).
  61. A. Iorio and G. Lambiase, The Hawking-Unruh phenomenon on graphene, Phys. Lett. B 716, 334 (2012).
  62. A. Iorio and G. Lambiase, Quantum field theory in curved graphene spacetimes, Lobachevsky geometry, Weyl symmetry, Hawking effect, and all that, Phys. Rev. D 90, 025006 (2014).
  63. A. Bhardwaj and D. E. Sheehy, Unruh effect and Takagi’s statistics inversion in strained graphene, Phys. Rev. D 107, 224310 (2023).
  64. R. Emparan and H. S. Reall, Black holes in higher dimensions, Living Rev. Relativity 11, 6 (2008).
  65. V. V. Dodonov, Dynamical Casimir effect: 55 years later, Physics (N.Y.) 7, 10 (2025).
  66. A. P. Prudnikov, Yu. A. Brychkov, and O. I. Marichev, Integrals and Series (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1986), Vol. 2.
  67. A. A. Saharian, The Generalized Abel-Plana Formula with Applications to Bessel Functions and Casimir Effect (Yerevan State University Publishing House, Yerevan, 2008).
  68. A. A. Saharian, Vacuum currents in curved tubes, Phys. Rev. D 110, 065020 (2024).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 085014– Published 21 April, 2026
  • Received 10 November 2025
  • Accepted 2 April 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation