Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Medium modifications to jet angularities using SCET with Glauber gluons

Ankita Budhraja*, Rishi Sharma†, and Balbeer Singh‡

  • *Contact author: ankita@theory.tifr.res.in
  • †Contact author: rishi@theory.tifr.res.in
  • ‡Contact author: balbeer@theory.tifr.res.in

Phys. Rev. D 112, 034017 – Published 18 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/r12p-3jbm

Abstract

We perform a comprehensive analysis of medium modifications on ungroomed jet angularities, τa, within the framework of soft-collinear effective theory with Glauber gluons (SCETG). Angularities are a one-parameter family of jet substructure observables with angularity exponent a<2 for infrared safety. Variation of the angularity exponent allows one to modify the relative weighting of the collinear-to-soft radiations in the jet, thereby giving access to different moments of the jet transverse momentum spectrum. In this article, we focus on a<1 and provide detailed results for a=−1, 0, and 0.5. Within SCETG, the interactions between jet and medium constituents are mediated by off-shell Glauber gluons generated from the color sources in the medium. While medium modifications are incorporated into the jet function via the use of medium-induced splitting functions, the soft function remains unmodified for a<1. For all values of a, we find that compared to jets in vacuum, the medium-modified distributions are shifted towards smaller values of jet angularity and have a steeper fall. This redistribution of the ungroomed angularity spectrum is more apparent for a jet with a larger cone size and for higher values of a. We also present results for the medium sensitivity towards pT of the jet and for a jet initiated in a less central event (10%–30% centrality). Finally, we provide the ratios of nucleus-nucleus and proton-proton differential angularity distributions for different angularity exponents and for two values of the jet radius parameter.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (89)

  1. M. Connors, C. Nattrass, R. Reed, and S. Salur, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025005 (2018).
  2. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 719, 220 (2013).
  3. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 072302 (2015).
  4. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 790, 108 (2019).
  5. J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 746, 1 (2015).
  6. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 101, 034911 (2020).
  7. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 96, 015202 (2017).
  8. R. Baier, D. Schiff, and B. G. Zakharov, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 50, 37 (2000).
  9. U. A. Wiedemann, arXiv:0908.2306.
  10. A. Majumder and M. Van Leeuwen, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 66, 41 (2011).
  11. B. Singh and H. Mishra, Springer Proc. Phys. 277, 353 (2022).
  12. J. Casalderrey-Solana, Y. Mehtar-Tani, C. A. Salgado, and K. Tywoniuk, Phys. Lett. B 725, 357 (2013).
  13. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 161.
  14. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2012) 087.
  15. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 90, 024908 (2014).
  16. S. Acharya et al. (A Large Ion Collider Experiment Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 102001 (2022).
  17. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 730, 243 (2014).
  18. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 152001 (2019).
  19. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 802, 135227 (2020).
  20. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 115.
  21. Y.-T. Chien, O. Fedkevych, D. Reichelt, and S. Schumann, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 230.
  22. Y. Li, S.-Y. Chen, W. Kong, S. Wang, and B.-W. Zhang, Chin. Phys. Lett. 42, 011201 (2025).
  23. Y.-T. Chien and I. Vitev, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 023.
  24. C. F. Berger, T. Kucs, and G. F. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D 68, 014012 (2003).
  25. C. F. Berger and L. Magnea, Phys. Rev. D 70, 094010 (2004).
  26. A. Hornig, Y. Makris, and T. Mehen, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2016) 097.
  27. A. J. Larkoski, I. Moult, and B. Nachman, Phys. Rep. 841, 1 (2020).
  28. Z.-B. Kang, K. Lee, and F. Ringer, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2018) 110.
  29. S. Caletti, O. Fedkevych, S. Marzani, D. Reichelt, S. Schumann, G. Soyez, and V. Theeuwes, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 076.
  30. D. Reichelt, S. Caletti, O. Fedkevych, S. Marzani, S. Schumann, and G. Soyez, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 131.
  31. Z.-B. Kang, K. Lee, X. Liu, and F. Ringer, Phys. Lett. B 793, 41 (2019).
  32. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 061.
  33. Y. Mehtar-Tani, F. Ringer, B. Singh, and V. Vaidya, arXiv:2409.05957.
  34. P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2003) 030.
  35. P. Caucal, E. Iancu, A. H. Mueller, and G. Soyez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 232001 (2018).
  36. M. Gyulassy, P. Levai, and I. Vitev, Nucl. Phys. B594, 371 (2001).
  37. X.-f. Guo and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3591 (2000).
  38. U. A. Wiedemann, Nucl. Phys. B588, 303 (2000).
  39. J. a. Barata, Y. Mehtar-Tani, A. Soto-Ontoso, and K. Tywoniuk, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 153.
  40. G. Ovanesyan and I. Vitev, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 080.
  41. G. Ovanesyan and I. Vitev, Phys. Lett. B 706, 371 (2012).
  42. M. Ritzmann and W. J. Waalewijn, Phys. Rev. D 90, 054029 (2014).
  43. Y.-T. Chien and I. Vitev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 112301 (2017).
  44. H. T. Li and I. Vitev, Phys. Rev. D 101, 076020 (2020).
  45. M. Gyulassy, P. Levai, and I. Vitev, Phys. Lett. B 538, 282 (2002).
  46. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, and M. E. Luke, Phys. Rev. D 63, 014006 (2000).
  47. C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 66, 054005 (2002).
  48. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 63, 114020 (2001).
  49. C. W. Bauer and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Lett. B 516, 134 (2001).
  50. C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 65, 054022 (2002).
  51. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, I. Z. Rothstein, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 66, 014017 (2002).
  52. R. Kogler et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 045003 (2019).
  53. A. Budhraja, A. Jain, and M. Procura, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 144.
  54. A. Idilbi and A. Majumder, Phys. Rev. D 80, 054022 (2009).
  55. F. D’Eramo, H. Liu, and K. Rajagopal, Phys. Rev. D 84, 065015 (2011).
  56. V. Vaidya and X. Yao, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 024.
  57. B. Singh and V. Vaidya, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 071.
  58. A. Hornig, C. Lee, and G. Ovanesyan, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2009) 122.
  59. I. Schienbein, J. Y. Yu, K. Kovařík, C. Keppel, J. G. Morfín, F. I. Olness, and J. F. Owens, Phys. Rev. D 80, 094004 (2009).
  60. K. Kovarik et al., Phys. Rev. D 93, 085037 (2016).
  61. I. Vitev, J. T. Goldman, M. B. Johnson, and J. W. Qiu, Phys. Rev. D 74, 054010 (2006).
  62. I. Vitev, Phys. Rev. C 75, 064906 (2007).
  63. F. Aversa, P. Chiappetta, M. Greco, and J. P. Guillet, Nucl. Phys. B327, 105 (1989).
  64. B. Jager, A. Schafer, M. Stratmann, and W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. D 67, 054005 (2003).
  65. T. Kaufmann, A. Mukherjee, and W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054015 (2015); 101, 079901(E) (2020).
  66. Z.-B. Kang, F. Ringer, and I. Vitev, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 155.
  67. M. Gyulassy, P. Levai, and I. Vitev, Nucl. Phys. B571, 197 (2000).
  68. S. D. Ellis, C. K. Vermilion, J. R. Walsh, A. Hornig, and C. Lee, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2010) 101.
  69. S. Catani, Y. L. Dokshitzer, M. H. Seymour, and B. R. Webber, Nucl. Phys. B406, 187 (1993).
  70. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2008) 063.
  71. , A Cambridge-Aachen (C-A) based jet algorithm for boosted top-jet tagging, CERN Technical Report No. CMS-PAS-JME-09-001, 2009.
  72. I. W. Stewart, F. J. Tackmann, and W. J. Waalewijn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 092001 (2015).
  73. E.-C. Aschenauer, K. Lee, B. S. Page, and F. Ringer, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054028 (2020).
  74. C. Lee and G. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D 75, 014022 (2007).
  75. M. L. Miller, K. Reygers, S. J. Sanders, and P. Steinberg, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57, 205 (2007).
  76. N. Armesto, G. Corcella, L. Cunqueiro, and C. A. Salgado, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2009) 122.
  77. Y. Mehtar-Tani and K. Tywoniuk, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 187.
  78. M. Attems, J. Brewer, G. M. Innocenti, A. Mazeliauskas, S. Park, W. van der Schee, and U. A. Wiedemann, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 080.
  79. M. Gyulassy, P. Levai, and I. Vitev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5535 (2000).
  80. M. D. Sievert, I. Vitev, and B. Yoon, Phys. Lett. B 795, 502 (2019).
  81. M. D. Sievert and I. Vitev, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094010 (2018).
  82. N.-b. Chang et al., Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 59, 621001 (2016).
  83. R. Sharma and B. Singh, Phys. Rev. C 109, 054905 (2024).
  84. W. Ke and I. Vitev, Phys. Rev. C 107, 064903 (2023).
  85. J. Brewer, Proc. Sci. HardProbes2020 (2021) 012 [arXiv:2012.14457].
  86. J. Brewer, Q. Brodsky, and K. Rajagopal, Proc. Sci. HardProbes2020 (2021) 037 [arXiv:2009.03316].
  87. K. Rajagopal, A. V. Sadofyev, and W. van der Schee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 211603 (2016).
  88. Z. Ligeti, I. W. Stewart, and F. J. Tackmann, Phys. Rev. D 78, 114014 (2008).
  89. A. Vogt, Comput. Phys. Commun. 170, 65 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation