Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Dynamically generated tilt of isocurvature fluctuations

Saarik Kalia*

  • *Contact author: skalia@ifae.es

Phys. Rev. D 114, 023505 – Published 6 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/q86r-7msm

Abstract

Light scalar fields acquire isocurvature fluctuations during inflation. While these fluctuations could lead to interesting observable signatures at small scales, they are strongly constrained on large scales by cosmic microwave background observations. When the mass of the scalar is much lighter than the inflationary Hubble scale, m≪HI, the spectrum of these fluctuations is flat. Meanwhile, if m≫HI, the fluctuations are suppressed. A blue-tilted isocurvature spectrum that exhibits enhanced structure on small scales but avoids observational constraints on large scales therefore requires a coincidence of scales m∼HI for a free massive scalar. In this work, we show that if a scalar field possesses a nontrivial potential, its inflationary dynamics naturally cause this condition to be satisfied, and so a blue-tilted spectrum is generically expected for a large class of potentials. Specifically, if its potential V exhibits a region that satisfies the slow-roll condition V′′<3HI2, the scalar condensate will spend most of inflation close to the boundary of this region, so that its effective mass is typically close to HI. The resulting blue tilt is inversely proportional to the number of e-folds of inflation prior to horizon crossing. If the scalar is long-lived, this mechanism leads to an attractor prediction for its relic abundance, which is insensitive to initial conditions of the scalar. In particular, a scalar field with quartic self-interactions can achieve the correct abundance to constitute all of the dark matter for a wide range of masses. We compute the relationship between the mass and self-coupling of quartic dark matter predicted by this mechanism.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (66)

  1. J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the invisible axion, Phys. Lett. 120B, 127 (1983).
  2. L. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A cosmological bound on the invisible axion, Phys. Lett. 120B, 133 (1983).
  3. M. Dine and W. Fischler, The not so harmless axion, Phys. Lett. 120B, 137 (1983).
  4. P. J. E. Peebles and A. Vilenkin, Noninteracting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 60, 103506 (1999).
  5. P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo, and A. Ringwald, Wispy cold dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2012) 013.
  6. A. Arvanitaki, J. Huang, and K. Van Tilburg, Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks, Phys. Rev. D 91, 015015 (2015).
  7. D. Brzeminski, Z. Chacko, A. Dev, and A. Hook, Time-varying fine structure constant from naturally ultralight dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075019 (2021).
  8. D. Cyncynates and O. Simon, Scalar relics from the hot big bang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 101003 (2025).
  9. R. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977).
  10. S. Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978).
  11. F. Wilczek, Problem of strong P and T invariance in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978).
  12. T. Gherghetta, C. Kolda, and S. P. Martin, Flat directions in the scalar potential of the supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B468, 37 (1996).
  13. S. P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer, Adv. Ser. Dir. High Energy Phys. 18, 1 (1998).
  14. P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan, and S. Rajendran, Cosmological relaxation of the electroweak scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 221801 (2015).
  15. I. Affleck and M. Dine, A new mechanism for baryogenesis, Nucl. Phys. B249, 361 (1985).
  16. A. G. Cohen and D. B. Kaplan, Spontaneous baryogenesis, Nucl. Phys. B308, 913 (1988).
  17. R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya, Predictions for axion couplings from alp cogenesis, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 172.
  18. L. F. Abbott, A mechanism for reducing the value of the cosmological constant, Phys. Lett. 150B, 427 (1985).
  19. L. H. Ford, Cosmological-constant damping by unstable scalar fields, Phys. Rev. D 35, 2339 (1987).
  20. L. Alberte, P. Creminelli, A. Khmelnitsky, D. Pirtskhalava, and E. Trincherini, Relaxing the cosmological constant: A proof of concept, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 022.
  21. P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan, and S. Rajendran, Relaxation of the cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D 100, 015048 (2019).
  22. N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al., Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  23. A. H. Guth, Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981).
  24. A. D. Linde, A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems, Phys. Lett. 108B, 389 (1982).
  25. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982), 10.1017/CBO9780511622632.
  26. D. H. Lyth and D. Wands, Generating the curvature perturbation without an inflaton, Phys. Lett. B 524, 5 (2002).
  27. G. Domènech, S. Passaglia, and S. Renaux-Petel, Gravitational waves from dark matter isocurvature, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2022) 023.
  28. R. Ebadi, S. Kumar, A. McCune, H. Tai, and L.-T. Wang, Gravitational waves from stochastic scalar fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083519 (2024).
  29. M. A. G. Garcia and S. Verner, Gravitational waves from spectator scalar fields, arXiv:2506.12126.
  30. A. Linde and V. Mukhanov, Non-Gaussian isocurvature perturbations from inflation, Phys. Rev. D 56, R535 (1997).
  31. M. Kawasaki, K. Nakayama, T. Sekiguchi, T. Suyama, and F. Takahashi, A general analysis of non-gaussianity from isocurvature perturbations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2009) 042.
  32. S. Kalia, Stamps of state on structure: Probing the state of ultralight dark matter via its density fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 113, 043534 (2026).
  33. Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al., Planck 2018 results: X. constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A10 (2020).
  34. D. J. H. Chung and H. Yoo, Elementary theorems regarding blue isocurvature perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 91, 083530 (2015).
  35. A. Riotto, Inflation and the theory of cosmological perturbations, ICTP Lect. Notes Ser. 14, 317 (2003).
  36. D. Baumann, Tasi lectures on primordial cosmology, Proc. Sci. TASI2017 (2018) 009 [arXiv:1807.03098].
  37. K. S. Jeong and F. Takahashi, Suppressing isocurvature perturbations of QCD axion dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 727, 448 (2013).
  38. M. A. G. Garcia, M. Pierre, and S. Verner, Isocurvature constraints on scalar dark matter production from the inflaton, Phys. Rev. D 107, 123508 (2023).
  39. M. A. Garcia, W. Ke, Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, Scalar field fluctuations and the production of dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 039.
  40. P. W. Graham and D. Racco, Revisiting isocurvature bounds on the minimal QCD axion, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 028.
  41. P. W. Graham, J. Mardon, and S. Rajendran, Vector dark matter from inflationary fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 93, 103520 (2016).
  42. A. A. Starobinsky, Stochastic de Sitter (inflationary) stage in the early universe, Lect. Notes Phys. 246, 107 (1986).
  43. T. Markkanen, A. Rajantie, S. Stopyra, and T. Tenkanen, Scalar correlation functions in de Sitter space from the stochastic spectral expansion, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2019) 001.
  44. K. Dimopoulos, G. Lazarides, D. H. Lyth, and R. Ruiz de Austri, Curvaton dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 68, 123515 (2003).
  45. K. Harigaya, M. Ibe, M. Kawasaki, and T. T. Yanagida, Non-gaussianity from attractor curvaton, Phys. Rev. D 87, 063514 (2013).
  46. M. R. Buckley, P. Du, N. Fernandez, and M. J. Weikert, General constraints on isocurvature from the CMB and Ly-α forest, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2025) 006.
  47. R. T. Co and S. C. Tadepalli, New isocurvature constraints from JWST UV luminosity function, arXiv:2605.11079.
  48. S. Bird, H. V. Peiris, M. Viel, and L. Verde, Minimally parametric power spectrum reconstruction from the Lyman α forest, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 413, 1717 (2011).
  49. P. W. Graham and H. Ramani, Constraints on dark matter from dynamical heating of stars in ultrafaint dwarfs. II. Substructure and the primordial power spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075012 (2024).
  50. M. Gorghetto, S. Trifinopoulos, and G. Valogiannis, Large-scale structure probes of the post-inflationary axiverse, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2026) 031.
  51. P. W. Graham and A. Scherlis, Stochastic axion scenario, Phys. Rev. D 98, 035017 (2018).
  52. D. Budker, J. Eby, M. Gorghetto, M. Jiang, and G. Perez, A generic formation mechanism of ultralight dark matter solar halos, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2023) 021.
  53. https://github.com/skalia618/Isocurvature.
  54. J. McDonald, Curvaton potential terms, scale-dependent perturbation spectra and chaotic initial conditions, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2003) 005.
  55. K. Dimopoulos, D. H. Lyth, A. Notari, and A. Riotto, The curvaton as a Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2003) 053.
  56. A. Mazumdar and J. Rocher, Particle physics models of inflation and curvaton scenarios, Phys. Rep. 497, 85 (2011).
  57. D. J. H. Chung, E. W. Kolb, A. Riotto, and L. Senatore, Isocurvature constraints on gravitationally produced superheavy dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 72, 023511 (2005).
  58. D. Baumann, Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2022).
  59. B. Batell and A. Ghalsasi, Thermal misalignment of scalar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 107, L091701 (2023).
  60. A. Alachkar, M. Fairbairn, and D. J. E. Marsh, Dilatonic couplings and the relic abundance of ultralight dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 191003 (2025).
  61. R. H. Cyburt, B. D. Fields, K. A. Olive, and T.-H. Yeh, Big bang nucleosynthesis: Present status, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015004 (2016).
  62. S. Adhikari, A. Banerjee, K. K. Boddy, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, H. Desmond, C. Dvorkin et al., Astrophysical tests of dark matter self-interactions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 045004 (2025).
  63. D. Wands, K. A. Malik, D. H. Lyth, and A. R. Liddle, New approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales, Phys. Rev. D 62, 043527 (2000).
  64. D. H. Lyth, K. A. Malik, and M. Sasaki, A general proof of the conservation of the curvature perturbation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2005) 004.
  65. D. Artigas, J. Grain, and V. Vennin, Hamiltonian formalism for cosmological perturbations: The separate-universe approach, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2022) 001.
  66. L. Husdal, On effective degrees of freedom in the early universe, Galaxies 4, 78 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation