Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Shading A-polynomials via huge representations of Uq(suN)

Dmitry Galakhov* and Alexei Morozov†

  • *Contact author: d.galakhov.pion@gmail.com, galakhov@itep.ru
  • †Contact author: morozov@itep.ru

Phys. Rev. D 114, 066016 – Published 23 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/q45y-9mcr

Abstract

Classical A-polynomials A(ℓ,m) define constraints on coordinates ℓ and m in SL(2,C) [a complexification of SU(2)] character varieties associated to knot complements S3\K. Quantum A-polynomials A^(ℓ^,m^) are difference operators annihilating Jones polynomials believed to represent wave functions of 3D Chern-Simons theory with gauge group SU(2) on a toroidal pipe surrounding the knot K strand—a boundary of the knot complement S3\K. In this note we suggest a construction of classical shaded A-polynomials Aa(ℓb,mc) associated to Lie groups SU(N), assuming that color N adds some extra “depth” and “shade” to the classical notion of A-polynomials. We exploit a formalism of Clebsch-Gordan (CG) chords, where indices a, b, c run over 1,…,N−1. CG chords have a natural interpretation in terms of 2D conformal field theories of Wess–Zumino–Witten type, or, alternatively, in terms of quantum group Uq(suN). In the case of su2, CG chords could be associated to Reeb chords in a knot contact homology (KCH) framework. KCH suggests its own analog of A-polynomials, known as augmentation polynomials, which is allowed to have extra spurious roots in principle. Yet the CG chord formalism could be easily extended to arbitrary suN allowing us to generalize the construction of A(ugmentation)-polynomials to arbitrary suN and arbitrary representations as well. Here we primarily aim at classical A-polynomials by considering a double scaling limit in which q=eℏ, ℏ→0 and the representations are huge: highest weight vector components wi→∞ while combinations ℏwi∼mi remain finite. Still, we expect the presented techniques will be helpful in deriving quantum A-polynomials for arbitrary Lie (super)algebras g. Also, we discuss explicit examples of A-polynomials for knots 31, 41 and 51 for g=su3.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (94)

  1. D. Cooper, M. Culler, H. Gillet, D. D. Long, and P. B. Shalen, Plane curves associated to character varieties of knot complements, Inventiones Mathematicae 118, 47 (1994).
  2. C. Frohman, R. Gelca, and R. Litherland, The a-polynomial from the noncommutative viewpoint, arXiv:math/9812048.
  3. S. Gukov, Three-dimensional quantum gravity, Chern-Simons theory, and the A polynomial, Commun. Math. Phys. 255, 577 (2005).
  4. S. Garoufalidis, On the characteristic and deformation varieties of a knot, in Proceedings of the Casson Fest (Geometry & Topology Publications, Coventry, UK, 2004), pp. 291–309, 10.2140/gtm.2004.7.291.
  5. S. Garoufalidis and T. T. Lê, The colored jones function is q-holonomic, Geom. Topol. 9, 1253 (2005).
  6. S. Garoufalidis and X. Sun, The non-commutative a-polynomial of twist knots, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 19, 1571 (2010).
  7. H. Fuji, S. Gukov, and P. Sułkowski, Super-a-polynomial for knots and bps states, Nucl. Phys. B867, 506 (2013).
  8. M. Aganagic and C. Vafa, Large N duality, mirror symmetry, and a Q-deformed A-polynomial for knots, arXiv:1204.4709.
  9. M. Aganagic, T. Ekholm, L. Ng, and C. Vafa, Topological strings, D-model, and knot contact homology, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 18, 827 (2014).
  10. H. Larraguível, D. Noshchenko, M. Panfil, and P. Sułkowski, Nahm sums, quiver a-polynomials and topological recursion, arXiv:2005.01671.
  11. S. Gukov and C. Manolescu, A two-variable series for knot complements, Quantum Topol. 12, 1 (2021).
  12. T. Ekholm, L. Ng, and V. Shende, Branches, quivers, and ideals for knot complements, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 25, 1 (2023).
  13. D. Galakhov and A. Morozov, On geometric bases for quantum A-polynomials of knots, Phys. Lett. B 860, 139139 (2025).
  14. D. Galakhov and A. Morozov, On geometric bases for A-polynomials II: su3 and Kuperberg bracket, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 915 (2025).
  15. S. Garoufalidis, The C-polynomial of a knot, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 6, 1623 (2006).
  16. A. Mironov and A. Morozov, Algebra of quantum C-polynomials, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 142.
  17. P. Freyd, D. Yetter, J. Hoste, W. Lickorish, K. Millett, and A. Ocneanu, A new polynomial invariant of knots and links, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 12, 239 (1985).
  18. J. H. Przytycki and P. Traczyk, Invariants of links of Conway type, Kobe J. Math. 4, 115 (1988).
  19. E. Witten, Quantization of Chern-Simons gauge theory with complex gauge group, Commun. Math. Phys. 137, 29 (1991).
  20. E. Witten, Analytic continuation Of Chern-Simons theory, AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math. 50, 347 (2011).
  21. S. Garoufalidis and C. Koutschan, The SL_3 Jones polynomial of the trefoil: A case study of q-holonomic sequences, arXiv:1011.6329.
  22. V. G. Drinfeld, Quantum groups, Zap. Nauchn. Semin. POMI 155, 18 (1986) [J. Sov. Math. 41, 898 (1988)].
  23. M. Jimbo, A q-difference analogue of U(g) and the Yang-Baxter equation, Lett. Math. Phys. 10, 63 (1985).
  24. P. I. Etingof, I. Frenkel, and A. A. Kirillov, Lectures on Representation Theory and Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov Equations, No. 58 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1998).
  25. J. C. Jantzen, Lectures on Quantum Groups, Vol. 6 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996).
  26. L. Bishler, A. Mironov, and A. Morozov, Invariants of knots and links at roots of unity, J. Geom. Phys. 185, 104729 (2023).
  27. L. Bishler, Overview of knot invariants at roots of unity, JETP Lett. 116, 185 (2022).
  28. S. M. Khoroshkin and V. N. Tolstoy, Universal R-matrix for quantized (super)algebras, Commun. Math. Phys. 141, 599 (1991).
  29. N. Y. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev, Ribbon graphs and their invariants derived from quantum groups, Commun. Math. Phys. 127, 1 (1990).
  30. N. Y. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev, Invariants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups, Inventiones Mathematicae 103, 547 (1991).
  31. A. Mironov, A. Morozov, and A. Morozov, Character expansion for HOMFLY polynomials. II. Fundamental representation. Up to five strands in braid, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 034.
  32. A. Mironov, A. Morozov, A. Morozov, P. Ramadevi, and V. K. Singh, Colored HOMFLY polynomials of knots presented as double fat diagrams, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2015) 109.
  33. A. Mironov and A. Morozov, Towards effective topological field theory for knots, Nucl. Phys. B899, 395 (2015).
  34. A. Anokhina, E. Lanina, and A. Morozov, Planar decomposition of the HOMFLY polynomial for bipartite knots and links, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 990 (2024).
  35. D. Galakhov, D. Melnikov, A. Mironov, A. Morozov, and A. Sleptsov, Colored knot polynomials for arbitrary pretzel knots and links, Phys. Lett. B 743, 71 (2015).
  36. A. N. Kirillov and N. Y. Reshetikhin, Representations of the algebra uq(sl(2)), q-orthogonal polynomials and invariants of links, in Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras and Groups, Vol. 7 of Adv. Ser. Math. Phys. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989), pp. 285–337.
  37. J. R. Stembridge, Multiplicity-free products and restrictions of Weyl characters, Representation Theory 7, 404 (2003).
  38. P. Dunin-Barkowski, A. Sleptsov, and A. Smirnov, Explicit computation of Drinfeld associator in the case of the fundamental representation of gl(N), J. Phys. A 45, 385204 (2012).
  39. V. Dolotin and A. Morozov, Introduction to non-linear algebra, arXiv:hep-th/0609022.
  40. A. A. Markov, Über die freie äquivalenz der geschlossenen Zöpfe, Recueil Mathématique Moscou (Matematicheskii Sbornik) 1(43), 73 (1936), https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/sm5359.
  41. J. S. Birman, Braids, Links, and Mapping Class Groups, Vol. 82 of Annals of Mathematics Studies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1974).
  42. T. Ekholm, J. B. Etnyre, L. Ng, and M. G. Sullivan, Knot contact homology, Geom. Topol. 17, 975 (2013).
  43. L. Ng, Framed knot contact homology, Duke Math. J. 141, 365 (2008).
  44. L. Ng, Knot and braid invariants from contact homology I, Geom. Topol. 9, 247 (2005).
  45. L. Ng, Knot and braid invariants from contact homology II, Geom. Topol. 9, 1603 (2005).
  46. T. Ekholm, P. Longhi, and L. Nakamura, The worldsheet skein D-module and basic curves on Lagrangian fillings of the Hopf link conormal, arXiv:2407.09836.
  47. S. Chauhan, T. Ekholm, and P. Longhi, Open strings on knot complements, arXiv:2601.22922.
  48. L. Ng, A topological introduction to knot contact homology, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud. 26, 485 (2014).
  49. T. Ekholm, J. Etnyre, and M. Sullivan, The contact homology of Legendrian submanifolds in R2n+1, J. Diff. Geom. 71, 177 (2005).
  50. T. Ekholm, Morse flow trees and Legendrian contact homology in 1-jet spaces, Geom. Topol. 11, 1083 (2007).
  51. E. Witten, Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial, Commun. Math. Phys. 121, 351 (1989).
  52. G. Moore and N. Seiberg, Lectures on RCFT (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990).
  53. V. G. Knizhnik and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Current algebra and Wess-Zumino model in two dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B247, 83 (1984).
  54. P. D. Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal, Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer, New York, 1997).
  55. B. Simon, The classical limit of quantum partition functions, Commun. Math. Phys. 71, 247 (1980).
  56. A. M. Perelomov, Coherent states for arbitrary Lie group, Commun. Math. Phys. 26, 222 (1972).
  57. A. Perelomov, Coherent States and the Quasiclassical Limit (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986), pp. 256–259.
  58. A. Grassi, Q. Hao, and A. Neitzke, Exact WKB methods in SU(2) Nf=1, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 046.
  59. L. Hollands and A. Neitzke, Exact WKB and abelianization for the T3 equation, Commun. Math. Phys. 380, 131 (2020).
  60. L. Hollands and S. Murugesan, Liouville blocks from spectral networks, arXiv:2604.25463.
  61. D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation, Adv. Math. 234, 239 (2013).
  62. D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, Framed BPS states, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17, 241 (2013).
  63. D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, Wall-crossing in coupled 2d-4d systems, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2012) 082.
  64. D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, Spectral networks, Ann. Henri Poincaré 14, 1643 (2013).
  65. D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, Spectral networks and snakes, Ann. Henri Poincaré 15, 61 (2014).
  66. D. Galakhov, A. Mironov, and A. Morozov, Wall crossing invariants: From quantum mechanics to knots, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 120, 549 (2015).
  67. D. Galakhov, D. Melnikov, A. Mironov, and A. Morozov, Knot invariants from Virasoro related representation and pretzel knots, Nucl. Phys. B899, 194 (2015).
  68. D. Galakhov, A. Mironov, and A. Morozov, SU(2)/SL(2) knot invariants and Kontsevich–Soibelman monodromies, Theor. Math. Phys. 187, 678 (2016).
  69. V. Alekseev, A. Morozov, and A. Sleptsov, Interplay between symmetries of quantum 6j-symbols and the eigenvalue hypothesis, Lett. Math. Phys. 111, 50 (2021).
  70. V. Alekseev, A. Morozov, and A. Sleptsov, Multiplicity-free Uq(slN) 6-j symbols: Relations, asymptotics, symmetries, Nucl. Phys. B960, 115164 (2020).
  71. A. Gerasimov, A. Morozov, M. Olshanetsky, A. Marshakov, and S. Shatashvili, Wess-Zumino-Witten model as a theory of free fields, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 05, 2495 (1990).
  72. A. Mironov, A. Morozov, and S. Shakirov, Conformal blocks as Dotsenko-Fateev integral discriminants, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 25, 3173 (2010).
  73. V. S. Dotsenko and V. A. Fateev, Conformal algebra and multipoint correlation functions in 2d statistical models, Nucl. Phys. B240, 312 (1984).
  74. A. Morozov and S. Shakirov, The matrix model version of AGT conjecture and CIV-DV prepotential, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2010) 066.
  75. A. Mironov, A. Morozov, A. Popolitov, and S. Shakirov, Resolvents and Seiberg-Witten representation for Gaussian beta-ensemble, Theor. Math. Phys. 171, 505 (2012).
  76. A. Mironov, A. Morozov, and S. Shakirov, A direct proof of AGT conjecture at beta =1, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2011) 067.
  77. A. B. Zamolodchikov and Al. B. Zamolodchikov, Conformal Field Theory and Critical Phenomena in Two-Dimensional Systems, Section A: Physics Reviews (Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, Switzerland, 1989). Soviet Scientific Reviews, Section A: Physics Reviews, Vol. 10, Part 4.
  78. L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, and Y. Tachikawa, Liouville correlation functions from four-dimensional gauge theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 91, 167 (2010).
  79. T. Dimofte, S. Gukov, J. Lenells, and D. Zagier, Exact results for perturbative Chern-Simons theory with complex gauge group, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 3, 363 (2009).
  80. D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, Knot invariants from four-dimensional gauge theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 16, 935 (2012).
  81. Y. Terashima and M. Yamazaki, 3d N=2 theories from cluster algebras, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2014, 023B01 (2014).
  82. M. Bullimore, T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto, J. Hilburn, and H.-C. Kim, Vortices and vermas, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 22, 803 (2018).
  83. K. Hikami, Hyperbolic structure arising from a knot invariant, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 3309 (2001).
  84. K. Hikami, Generalized volume conjecture and the A-polynomials: The Neumann-Zagier potential function as a classical limit of the partition function, J. Geom. Phys. 57, 1895 (2007).
  85. K. Hikami and R. Inoue, Cluster algebra and complex volume of once-punctured torus bundles and two-bridge knots, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 23, 1450006 (2014).
  86. K. Hikami and R. Inoue, Braiding operator via quantum cluster algebra, J. Phys. A 47, 474006 (2014).
  87. K. Hikami and R. Inoue, Braids, complex volume and cluster algebras, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 15, 2175 (2015).
  88. D. Galakhov, P. Longhi, T. Mainiero, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, Wild wall crossing and BPS giants, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 046.
  89. T. Dimofte, M. Gabella, and A. B. Goncharov, K-decompositions and 3d gauge theories, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 151.
  90. L. H. Kauffman and H. Saleur, Free fermions and the Alexander-Conway polynomial, Commun. Math. Phys. 141, 293 (1991).
  91. M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman, Stability structures, motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants and cluster transformations, arXiv:0811.2435.
  92. A. Mironov, A. Morozov, A. Morozov, and A. Sleptsov, Racah matrices and hidden integrability in evolution of knots, Phys. Lett. B 760, 45 (2016).
  93. C. Bai, J. Jiang, J. Liang, A. Mironov, A. Morozov, A. Morozov, and A. Sleptsov, Quantum Racah matrices up to level 3 and multicolored link invariants, J. Geom. Phys. 132, 155 (2018).
  94. S. Dhara, A. Mironov, A. Morozov, A. Morozov, P. Ramadevi, V. K. Singh, and A. Sleptsov, Multi-colored links from 3-strand braids carrying arbitrary symmetric representations, Ann. Henri Poincare 20, 4033 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation