Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Leading large Nc contributions to lepton number violating meson decays

Andrea Donini1,*, Marcela González2,†, Martin Hirsch1,‡, and Nicolás A. Neill3,§

  • *Contact author: donini@ific.uv.es
  • †Contact author: marcela.gonzalezpi@uv.cl
  • ‡Contact author: mahirsch@ific.uv.es
  • §Contact author: nclsneill@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 113, 075004 – Published 3 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pwtl-6xkv

Abstract

Lepton number violating meson decays, such as M1−→M2+ℓ1−ℓ2−, provide constraints on d=9 ΔL=2 operators. Renormalization group equation (RGE)-improved bounds on the Wilson coefficients of these operators have been presented in the literature, taking into account perturbative quantum chromodynamics (QCD) one-loop corrections and the corresponding operator mixing. Here, we present for the first time the contribution of connected diagrams to the hadronic matrix elements ⟨M2|Oh|M1⟩. These diagrams, usually overlooked under the assumption that ⟨M2|Oh|M1⟩∼⟨M2|Jq3q4|0⟩×⟨0|Jq1q2|M1⟩≫⟨M2|Jq3q2×Jq1q4|M1⟩, can give indeed a significant contribution to the matrix element. Including these connected diagrams is but the first step toward a full nonperturbative computation of the long-range QCD effects in these operators, that should be performed using lattice field theory techniques. However, connected diagrams represent the leading order in the 1/Nc expansion of the QCD nonperturbative effects and thus our work can be understood as a realistic, first approximation to a complete calculation of the long-range part of the matrix elements.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (78)

  1. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  2. Brian Henning, Xiaochuan Lu, and Hitoshi Murayama, How to use the standard model effective field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 023.
  3. J. de Blas, J. C. Criado, M. Perez-Victoria, and J. Santiago, Effective description of general extensions of the standard model: The complete tree-level dictionary, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 109.
  4. Adam Falkowski, Martín González-Alonso, and Kin Mimouni, Compilation of low-energy constraints on 4-fermion operators in the SMEFT, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 123.
  5. Ilaria Brivio and Michael Trott, The standard model as an effective field theory, Phys. Rep. 793, 1 (2019).
  6. Steven Weinberg, Baryon and lepton nonconserving processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1566 (1979).
  7. K. S. Babu and Chung Ngoc Leung, Classification of effective neutrino mass operators, Nucl. Phys. B619, 667 (2001).
  8. Werner Rodejohann, Neutrino-less double beta decay and particle physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 20, 1833 (2011).
  9. Frank F. Deppisch, Martin Hirsch, and Heinrich Pas, Neutrinoless double beta decay and physics beyond the standard model, J. Phys. G 39, 124007 (2012).
  10. Michelle J. Dolinski, Alan W. P. Poon, and Werner Rodejohann, Neutrinoless double-beta decay: Status and prospects, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 219 (2019).
  11. S. Navas et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  12. Eduardo Cortina Gil et al., Searches for lepton number violating K+→π−(π0)e+e+ decays, Phys. Lett. B 830, 137172 (2022).
  13. Eduardo Cortina Gil et al., Searches for lepton number violating K+ decays, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134794 (2019).
  14. J. P. Lees et al., Searches for rare or forbidden semileptonic Charm decays, Phys. Rev. D 84, 072006 (2011).
  15. J. P. Lees et al., Search for lepton-number violating processes in B+→h−l+l+ decays, Phys. Rev. D 85, 071103 (2012).
  16. Eduardo Cortina Gil et al., Search for lepton number and flavor violation in K+ and π0 decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 131802 (2021).
  17. O. Seon et al., Search for lepton-number-violating B+→D−l+l′+ decays, Phys. Rev. D 84, 071106 (2011).
  18. Roel Aaij et al., Searches for 25 rare and forbidden decays of D+ and Ds+ mesons, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 044.
  19. Roel Aaij et al., Search for Majorana neutrinos in B−→π+μ−μ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 131802 (2014).
  20. R. Aaij et al., Searches for Majorana neutrinos in B− decays, Phys. Rev. D 85, 112004 (2012).
  21. R. Aaij et al., Search for the lepton number violating decays B+→π−μ+μ+ and B+→K−μ+μ+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 101601 (2012).
  22. Laurence S. Littenberg and Robert E. Shrock, Upper bounds on lepton number violating meson decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 443 (1992).
  23. A. Ilakovac, Probing lepton number / flavor violation in semileptonic τ decays into two mesons, Phys. Rev. D 54, 5653 (1996).
  24. Andre de Gouvea and James Jenkins, A survey of lepton number violation via effective operators, Phys. Rev. D 77, 013008 (2008).
  25. Juan Carlos Helo, Sergey Kovalenko, and Ivan Schmidt, Sterile neutrinos in lepton number and lepton flavor violating decays, Nucl. Phys. B853, 80 (2011).
  26. N. Quintero, G. Lopez Castro, and D. Delepine, Lepton number violation in top quark and neutral B meson decays, Phys. Rev. D 84, 096011 (2011); 86, 079905(E) (2012).
  27. Gabriel Lopez Castro and Nestor Quintero, Lepton number violating four-body tau lepton decays, Phys. Rev. D 85, 076006 (2012); 86, 079904(E) (2012).
  28. Hai-Rong Dong, Feng Feng, and Hai-Bo Li, Lepton number violation in D meson decay, Chin. Phys. C 39, 013101 (2015).
  29. Nestor Quintero, Constraints on lepton number violating short-range interactions from |ΔL|=2 processes, Phys. Lett. B 764, 60 (2017).
  30. Han Yuan, Yue Jiang, Tian-hong Wang, Qiang Li, and Guo-Li Wang, Testing the nature of neutrinos from four-body τ decays, J. Phys. G 44, 115002 (2017).
  31. Sanjoy Mandal, Manimala Mitra, and Nita Sinha, Constraining the right-handed gauge boson mass from lepton number violating meson decays in a low scale left-right model, Phys. Rev. D 96, 035023 (2017).
  32. Gorazd Cvetic and C. S. Kim, Sensitivity limits on heavy-light mixing |UμN|2 from lepton number violating B meson decays, Phys. Rev. D 96, 035025 (2017); 102, 019903(E) (2020); 102, 039902(E) (2020).
  33. Han Yuan, Tianhong Wang, Yue Jiang, Qiang Li, and Guo-Li Wang, Four-body decays of B meson with lepton number violation, J. Phys. G 45, 065002 (2018).
  34. Asmaa Abada, Valentina De Romeri, Michele Lucente, Ana M. Teixeira, and Takashi Toma, Effective Majorana mass matrix from tau and pseudoscalar meson lepton number violating decays, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 169.
  35. Javier Rendón, Pablo Roig, and Genaro Toledo Sánchez, Effective-field theory analysis of the τ−→(Kπ)−ντ decays, Phys. Rev. D 99, 093005 (2019).
  36. Eung Jin Chun, Arindam Das, Sanjoy Mandal, Manimala Mitra, and Nita Sinha, Sensitivity of lepton number violating meson decays in different experiments, Phys. Rev. D 100, 095022 (2019).
  37. Yi Liao, Xiao-Dong Ma, and Hao-Lin Wang, Effective field theory approach to lepton number violating decays K±→π∓l±l±: Short-distance contribution, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 127.
  38. Yi Liao, Xiao-Dong Ma, and Hao-Lin Wang, Effective field theory approach to lepton number violating decays K±→π∓lα±lβ±: Long-distance contribution, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 120.
  39. Frank F. Deppisch, Kåre Fridell, and Julia Harz, Constraining lepton number violating interactions in rare kaon decays, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 186.
  40. Yi Liao, Xiao-Dong Ma, and Hao-Lin Wang, Effective field theory approach to lepton number violating τ decays, Chin. Phys. C 45, 073102 (2021).
  41. F. Simkovic, P. Domin, S. V. Kovalenko, and Amand Faessler, The (muon-, e+) conversion in nuclei mediated by light Majorana neutrinos, Part. Nucl. Lett. 104, 40 (2001), https://inspirehep.net/literature/540656.
  42. Fedor Simkovic, Amand Faessler, Sergey Kovalenko, and Ivan Schmidt, The (muon-, muon+) conversion in nuclei as a probe of new physics, Phys. Rev. D 66, 033005 (2002).
  43. Jeffrey M. Berryman, André de Gouvêa, Kevin J. Kelly, and Andrew Kobach, Lepton-number-violating searches for muon to positron conversion, Phys. Rev. D 95, 115010 (2017).
  44. Beomki Yeo, Yoshitaka Kuno, MyeongJae Lee, and Kai Zuber, Future experimental improvement for the search of lepton-number-violating processes in the eμ sector, Phys. Rev. D 96, 075027 (2017).
  45. J. C. Helo, M. Hirsch, S. G. Kovalenko, and H. Pas, Neutrinoless double beta decay and lepton number violation at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 88, 011901 (2013).
  46. J. C. Helo, M. Hirsch, H. Päs, and S. G. Kovalenko, Short-range mechanisms of neutrinoless double beta decay at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 88, 073011 (2013).
  47. Tao Peng, Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf, and Peter Winslow, TeV lepton number violation: From neutrinoless double-β decay to the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 93, 093002 (2016).
  48. L. Gonzalez, J. C. Helo, M. Hirsch, and S. G. Kovalenko, Scalar-mediated double beta decay and LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 130.
  49. Marcela González and Nicolás A. Neill, QCD running in lepton number violating meson and tau decays, Phys. Rev. D 111, 015041 (2025).
  50. Laurence S. Littenberg and Robert Shrock, Implications of improved upper bounds on |ΔL|=2 processes, Phys. Lett. B 491, 285 (2000).
  51. M. González, M. Hirsch, and S. G. Kovalenko, QCD running in neutrinoless double beta decay: Short-range mechanisms, Phys. Rev. D 93, 013017 (2016); 97, 099907(E) (2018).
  52. Carolina Arbeláez, Marcela González, Martin Hirsch, and Sergey Kovalenko, QCD corrections and long-range mechanisms of neutrinoless double beta decay, Phys. Rev. D 94, 096014 (2016); 97, 099904(E) (2018).
  53. Carolina Arbeláez, Marcela González, Sergey Kovalenko, and Martin Hirsch, QCD-improved limits from neutrinoless double beta decay, Phys. Rev. D 96, 015010 (2017).
  54. Marcela González, Martin Hirsch, and Sergey Kovalenko, Neutrinoless double beta decay and QCD running at low energy scales, Phys. Rev. D 97, 115005 (2018).
  55. Andrzej J. Buras, Weak Hamiltonian, CP violation and rare decays, in Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics, Session 68 (1998), pp. 281–539.
  56. Andrzej J. Buras, Mikolaj Misiak, and Joerg Urban, Two loop QCD anomalous dimensions of flavor changing four quark operators within and beyond the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B586, 397 (2000); B1002, 116529(E) (2024).
  57. Gerard ’t Hooft, A planar diagram theory for strong interactions, Nucl. Phys. B72, 461 (1974).
  58. Edward Witten, Instantons, the quark model, and the 1/n expansion, Nucl. Phys. B149, 285 (1979).
  59. Edward Witten, Baryons in the 1/n expansion, Nucl. Phys. B160, 57 (1979).
  60. Y. Aoki et al., FLAG Review 2024, 2024, https://inspirehep.net/literature/2846474.
  61. R. L. Workman et al., Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  62. Andrzej J. Buras and J. M. Gerard, 1/n expansion for kaons, Nucl. Phys. B264, 371 (1986).
  63. William A. Bardeen, A. J. Buras, and J. M. Gerard, The ΔI=1/2 rule in the large N limit, Phys. Lett. B 180, 133 (1986).
  64. A. J. Buras, J. M. Gerard, and R. Ruckl, 1/n expansion for exclusive and inclusive Charm decays, Nucl. Phys. B268, 16 (1986).
  65. M. U. Ashraf et al., High Intensity Kaon Experiments (HIKE) at the CERN SPS Proposal for Phases 1 and 2, 2023, https://inspirehep.net/literature/2722407.
  66. Babak Abi et al., Deep underground neutrino experiment (DUNE), far detector technical design report, volume I introduction to DUNE, J. Instrum. 15, T08008 (2020).
  67. Igor Krasnov, DUNE prospects in the search for sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 100, 075023 (2019).
  68. Julian Y. Günther, Jordy de Vries, Herbi K. Dreiner, Zeren Simon Wang, and Guanghui Zhou, Long-lived neutral fermions at the DUNE near detector, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 108.
  69. M. Constantinou et al., BK-parameter from Nf=2 twisted mass lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 83, 014505 (2011).
  70. P. A. Boyle, N. Garron, and R. J. Hudspith, Neutral kaon mixing beyond the standard model with nf=2+1 chiral fermions, Phys. Rev. D 86, 054028 (2012).
  71. Peter A. Boyle, Nicolas Garron, Renwick J. Hudspith, Christoph Lehner, and Andrew T. Lytle, Neutral kaon mixing beyond the standard model with nf= 2+1 chiral fermions. Part 2: Non perturbative renormalisation of the ΔF=2 four-quark operators, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 054.
  72. G. Peter Lepage and Paul B. Mackenzie, On the viability of lattice perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 48, 2250 (1993).
  73. Stefano Capitani, Lattice perturbation theory, Phys. Rep. 382, 113 (2003).
  74. G. Martinelli, C. Pittori, Christopher T. Sachrajda, M. Testa, and A. Vladikas, A general method for non-perturbative renormalization of lattice operators, Nucl. Phys. B445, 81 (1995).
  75. A. Donini, G. Martinelli, Christopher T. Sachrajda, M. Talevi, and A. Vladikas, Nonperturbative renormalization of the lattice Δs=2 four fermion operator, Phys. Lett. B 360, 83 (1995).
  76. A. Donini, V. Gimenez, G. Martinelli, M. Talevi, and A. Vladikas, Nonperturbative renormalization of lattice four fermion operators without power subtractions, Eur. Phys. J. C 10, 121 (1999).
  77. L. Conti, A. Donini, V. Gimenez, G. Martinelli, M. Talevi, and A. Vladikas, Nonperturbative renormalization of the complete basis of four fermion operators and B parameters, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 63, 880 (1998).
  78. A. Donini, V. Gimenez, Leonardo Giusti, and G. Martinelli, Renormalization group invariant matrix elements of ΔS=2 and ΔI=3/2 four fermion operators without quark masses, Phys. Lett. B 470, 233 (1999).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation