Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Investigation of the Δ(1232) resonance substructure in the pγ*→Δ(1232) process through helicity amplitudes

A. Kaewsnod1,*, K. Xu1, T. Sangkhakrit1,2, Z. Zhao1, W. Sreethawong1, A. Limphirat1,†, K. Khosonthongkee1, and Y. Yan1,‡

  • *Contact author: a.kaewsnod@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: ayut@g.sut.ac.th
  • ‡Contact author: yupeng@g.sut.ac.th

Phys. Rev. D 113, 036010 – Published 10 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ptgv-jx85

Abstract

The substructure of the Δ(1232) resonance is studied in the pγ*→Δ(1232) transition via helicity amplitudes within a quark-model framework that treats baryons as three-quark systems and includes both quark-core and meson-cloud contributions. In the calculation of the transition amplitudes, the proton wave function is Lorentz boosted from the proton rest frame to the Δ(1232) resonance rest frame. The comparison of the calculated amplitudes A1/2, A3/2, and S1/2 with experimental data indicates a non-negligible L=2 admixture in the Δ(1232), about 80% of the Δ(1232) wave function in the S wave and 20% in the D wave. In particular, the S1/2 amplitude is found to be dominated by the L=2 quark-core component rather than the L=0 part. The results challenge the traditional understanding that the Δ(1232) baryon is dominantly an L=0 state.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (35)

  1. A. Thiel, F. Afzal, and Y. Wunderlich, Light baryon spectroscopy, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103949 (2022).
  2. L. Tiator, D. Drechsel, S. S. Kamalov, and M. Vanderhaeghen, Electromagnetic excitation of nucleon resonances, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 198, 141 (2011).
  3. L. Tiator, D. Drechsel, S. S. Kamalov, and M. Vanderhaeghen, Baryon resonance analysis from maid, Chin. Phys. C 33, 1069 (2009).
  4. I. G. Aznauryan, Electroexcitation of the roper resonance in relativistic quark models, Phys. Rev. C 76, 025212 (2007).
  5. I. G. Aznauryan, V. D. Burkert, W. Kim, K. Park, G. Adams, M. J. Amaryan, P. Ambrozewicz, M. Anghinolfi, G. Asryan, H. Avakian et al., Electroexcitation of the roper resonance for 1.7<q2<4.5  GeV2 in ep→enπ+, Phys. Rev. C 78, 045209 (2008).
  6. S. Capstick, B. D. Keister, and D. Morel, Nucleon to resonance form factor calculations, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 69, 012016 (2007).
  7. G. Ramalho and K. Tsushima, Valence quark contributions for the γn→p11(1440) form factors, Phys. Rev. D 81, 074020 (2010).
  8. B. Golli, S. Sirca, and M. Fiolhais, Pion electro-production in the roper region in chiral quark models, Eur. Phys. J. A 42, 185 (2009).
  9. V. D. Burkert and C. D. Roberts, Colloquium: Roper resonance: Toward a solution to the fifty year puzzle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 011003 (2019).
  10. Q. B. Li and D. O. Riska, Role of qq components in the n(1440) resonance, Phys. Rev. C 74, 015202 (2006).
  11. I. T. Obukhovsky, A. Faessler, D. K. Fedorov, T. Gutsche, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Electroproduction of the roper resonance on the proton: The role of the three-quark core and the molecular nσ component, Phys. Rev. D 84, 014004 (2011).
  12. F. Cano and P. Gonzalez, A consistent explanation of the roper phenomenology, Phys. Lett. B 431, 270 (1998).
  13. S. Štajner, P. Achenbach, T. Beranek, J. Beričič, J. C. Bernauer, D. Bosnar, R. Böhm, L. Correa, A. Denig, M. O. Distler et al., Beam-recoil polarization measurement of π0 electroproduction on the proton in the region of the roper resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 022001 (2017).
  14. A. V. Sarantsev et al., New results on the roper resonance and the p11 partial wave, Phys. Lett. B 659, 94 (2008).
  15. S. Capstick and W. Roberts, Quark models of baryon masses and decays, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 45, S241 (2000).
  16. K. Xu, A. Kaewsnod, Z. Zhao, X. Y. Liu, S. Srisuphaphon, A. Limphirat, and Y. Yan, Pentaquark components in low-lying baryon resonances, Phys. Rev. D 101, 076025 (2020).
  17. G. Ramalho and K. Tsushima, Meson cloud contributions to the dalitz decays of decuplet to octet baryons, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074019 (2023).
  18. G. Ramalho, Combined parametrization of gen and γ*n→δ(1232) quadrupole form factors, Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 32 (2019).
  19. G. Ramalho and M. T. Peña, Electromagnetic transition form factors of baryon resonances, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 136, 104097 (2024).
  20. A. Kaewsnod, K. Xu, Z. Zhao, X. Y. Liu, S. Srisuphaphon, A. Limphirat, and Y. Yan, Study of n(1440) structure via γ*p→n(1440) transition, Phys. Rev. D 105, 016008 (2022).
  21. A. Kaewsnod, K. Xu, Z. Zhao X. Liu, S. Srisuphaphon, A. Limphirat, and Y. Yan, Study of n(1520) and n(1535) structures via γ*p→n* transitions, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 185 (2022).
  22. B. Juliá-Díaz and D. O. Riska, D-state configurations in the electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon and the Δ(1232) resonance, Nucl. Phys. A757, 441 (2005).
  23. G. Ramalho, M. T. Peña, and Franz Gross, Electromagnetic form factors of the Δ with d-waves, Phys. Rev. D 81, 113011 (2010).
  24. K. Xu, A. Kaewsnod, X. Y. Liu, S. Srisuphaphon, A. Limphirat, and Y. Yan, Complete basis for the pentaquark wave function in a group theory approach, Phys. Rev. C 100, 065207 (2019).
  25. B. D. Keister and W. N. Polyzou, Relativistic Hamiltonian dynamics in nuclear and particle physics, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 20, 225 (1991).
  26. Thomas Berry and Matt Visser, Lorentz boosts and Wigner rotations: Self-adjoint complexified quaternions, Physics 3, 352 (2021).
  27. Thomas Berry and Matt Visser, Relativistic combination of non-collinear 3-velocities using quaternions, Universe 6, 237 (2020).
  28. Rafael Ferraro and Marc Thibeault, Generic composition of boosts: An elementary derivation of the Wigner rotation, Eur. J. Phys. 20, 143 (1999).
  29. Kane O’Donnell and Matt Visser, Elementary analysis of the special relativistic combination of velocities, Wigner rotation and thomas precession, Eur. J. Phys. 32, 1033 (2011).
  30. D Dreschsel and L Tiator, Threshold pion photoproduction on nucleons, J. Phys. G 18, 449 (1992).
  31. D. Drechsel, O. Hanstein, S. S. Kamalov, and L. Tiator, A unitary isobar model for pion photo- and electroproduction on the proton up to 1 gev, Nucl. Phys. A645, 145 (1999).
  32. D. Drechsel, S. S. Kamalov, and L. Tiator, Unitary isobar model—maid2007, Eur. Phys. J. A 34, 69 (2007).
  33. X. Y. Liu, K. Khosonthongkee, A. Limphirat, and Y. Yan, Study of baryon octet electromagnetic form factors in perturbative chiral quark model, J. Phys. G 41, 055008 (2014).
  34. C. Mertz et al., Search for quadrupole strength in the electroexcitation of the Δ+(1232), Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2963 (2001).
  35. V. V. Frolov et al., Electroproduction of the Δ(1232) resonance at high momentum transfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 45 (1999).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation