Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Chiral anomaly of Kogut-Susskind fermions in the (3+1)-dimensional Hamiltonian formalism

Shoto Aoki*

Yoshio Kikukawa† and Toshinari Takemoto‡

  • Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan

  • *Contact author: shoto.aoki@riken.jp
  • †Contact author: kikukawa@hep1.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp
  • ‡Contact author: takemoto@hep1.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 113, 034514 – Published 26 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pbm8-bv9w

Abstract

We consider Kogut-Susskind fermions (also known as staggered fermions) in a (3+1)-dimensional Hamiltonian formalism and examine a chiral transformation and its associated chiral anomaly. The Hamiltonian of the massless Kogut-Susskind fermion has symmetry under the shift transformations in each space direction Sk (k=1,2,3), and the product of the three shift transformations in particular (the odd shifts in general) may be regarded as a unitary discrete chiral transformation, modulo two-site translations. The Hermitian part of the transformation kernel Γ=−1S1S2S3 can define an axial charge as QA=(1/2)∑xχ†(x)(Γ+Γ†)χ(x), which is non–on site, nonquantized, and commutative with the vector charge, analogous to Q˜A=(1/2)∑n(χn†χn+1+χn+1†χn) for the (1+1)-dimensional Kogut-Susskind fermion. However, our QA cannot be expressed in terms of any quantized charges in a generalized Onsager algebra. Although QA does not commute with the fermion Hamiltonian in general when coupled to background link gauge fields, we show that they become commutative for a class of U(1) link configurations carrying nontrivial magnetic and electric fields. We then verify numerically that the vacuum expectation value of QA satisfies the anomalous conservation law of axial charge in the continuum two-flavor theory under an adiabatic evolution of the link gauge field.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 11, 395 (1975).
  2. T. Banks, L. Susskind, and J. B. Kogut, Phys. Rev. D 13, 1043 (1976).
  3. L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 16, 3031 (1977).
  4. C. Burden and A. N. Burkitt, Europhys. Lett. 3, 545 (1987).
  5. M. F. L. Golterman and J. Smit, Nucl. Phys. B245, 61 (1984).
  6. M. F. L. Golterman, Nucl. Phys. B273, 663 (1986).
  7. M. F. L. Golterman, Nucl. Phys. B278, 417 (1986).
  8. D. H. Adams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 141602 (2010).
  9. C. Hoelbling, Phys. Lett. B 696, 422 (2011).
  10. P. de Forcrand, A. Kurkela, and M. Panero, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2010 (2010) 080 [arXiv:1102.1000].
  11. M. Golterman, arXiv:2406.02906.
  12. R. Dempsey, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and B. Zan, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043133 (2022).
  13. N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, SciPost Phys. 16, 064 (2024).
  14. A. Chatterjee, S. D. Pace, and S.-H. Shao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 021601 (2025).
  15. L.-X. Xu, arXiv:2501.10837.
  16. S. Catterall, A. Pradhan, and A. Samlodia, Phys. Rev. D 113, 014504 (2026).
  17. T. Onogi and T. Yamaoka, arXiv:2509.04906.
  18. L. Gioia and R. Thorngren, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 061601 (2026).
  19. L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944).
  20. S. Catterall, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014501 (2023).
  21. G. Y. Cho, S. Ryu, and C.-T. Hsieh, Phys. Rev. B 96, 195105 (2017).
  22. T. Misumi and Y. Tanizaki, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 033B03 (2020).
  23. S. D. Pace, M. L. Kim, A. Chatterjee, and S.-H. Shao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 236501 (2025).
  24. S. L. Adler, Phys. Rev. 177, 2426 (1969).
  25. J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, Nuovo Cimento A 60, 47 (1969).
  26. G. V. Dunne and C. A. Trugenberger, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 195, 356 (1989).
  27. R. Arouca, A. Cappelli, and T. H. Hansson, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 62, 1 (2022).
  28. J. Ambjorn, J. Greensite, and C. Peterson, Nucl. Phys. B221, 381 (1983).
  29. T. Hayata, K. Nakayama, and A. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034511 (2023).
  30. Y. Hidaka and A. Yamamoto, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2025, 093B04 (2025).
  31. I. Horvath and H. B. Thacker, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 73, 682 (1999).
  32. S. Cheluvaraja and N. D. Hari Dass, Nucl. Phys. B598, 134 (2001).
  33. M. Creutz, I. Horvath, and H. Neuberger, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 106, 760 (2002).
  34. H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Phys. Lett. B105, 219 (1981).
  35. K. Isler, C. Schmid, and C. A. Trugenberger, Nucl. Phys. B301, 327 (1988).
  36. N. S. Manton, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 159, 220 (1985).
  37. H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 06, 2913 (1991).
  38. A. Tatsumi and Y. Kikukawa, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 113B06 (2019).
  39. W. Bietenholz and J. Nishimura, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2001) 015.
  40. K. Johnson and F. E. Low, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 37, 74 (1966).
  41. S. L. Adler and D. G. Boulware, Phys. Rev. 184, 1740 (1969).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation