Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Global determination of |Vus|

Matthew Kirk and Danny van Dyk

  • Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology and Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom

Phys. Rev. D 113, 054022 – Published 16 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/p4kh-3t9b

Abstract

In light of ongoing issues with the first-row unitarity test of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix, we showcase a global fit to measurements of K→ℓν, K→πℓν, τ→Kν, and τ→Kπν decays for the first time. Fitting the semileptonic and three-body τ decay data simultaneously becomes computationally feasible because we employ a simple form factor parametrization for the Kπ form factor that manifestly connects the semileptonic and pair-production regions. We find good agreement with the data and use our analyses to infer |Vus| and the parameters for the Kπ form factors. Our result for |Vus| sits close to the results extracted from exclusive Kℓ2 and somewhat above the Kℓ3 decay and inclusive τ decay result. Moreover, our results for the K→π vector form factor at zero momentum transfer are compatible with lattice QCD determinations, despite not using lattice QCD inputs for this quantity in our fit of the hadronic matrix elements. We are further able to determine some of the pole parameters of the individual scalar and vector Kπ resonances with masses below the τ mass. We caution that our results account only for short-distance electromagnetic corrections but not long-distance contributions; this is due to the lack of a consistent description of long-distance corrections to the Kπ matrix elements both above and below threshold for an arbitrary model of the form factors.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (89)

  1. M. Gorchtein, V. Katyal, B. Ohayon, B. K. Sahoo, and C.-Y. Seng, Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa unitarity deficit reduction via finite nuclear size, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L042002 (2025).
  2. F. Moretti, M. Gorbahn, and S. Jäger, Beyond leading logarithms in gV: The semileptonic weak Hamiltonian at O(ααs2), arXiv:2510.27648.
  3. Z. Cao, R. J. Hill, R. Plestid, and P. Vander Griend, The Zα2 correction to superallowed beta decays in effective field theory and implications for |Vud|, arXiv:2511.05446.
  4. Ò. L. Crosas and E. Mereghetti, Radiative corrections to superallowed beta decays at O(α2Z), J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 114.
  5. Particle Data Group, Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  6. Particle Data Group, Vud, Vus the Cabibbo Angle, and CKM Unitarity, https://pdg.lbl.gov/2025/reviews/rpp2024-rev-vud-vus.pdf.
  7. Y. Grossman, E. Passemar, and S. Schacht, On the statistical treatment of the Cabibbo angle anomaly, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 068.
  8. B. Belfatto and Z. Berezhiani, Are the CKM anomalies induced by vectorlike quarks? Limits from flavor changing and Standard Model precision tests, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 079.
  9. A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, and C. A. Manzari, Fermi constant from muon decay versus electroweak fits and Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 071801 (2021).
  10. A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, M. Kirk, C. A. Manzari, and L. Schnell, First-generation new physics in simplified models: From low-energy parity violation to the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 221.
  11. A. Crivellin, M. Kirk, T. Kitahara, and F. Mescia, Global fit of modified quark couplings to EW gauge bosons and vector-like quarks in light of the Cabibbo angle anomaly, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 234.
  12. V. Cirigliano, A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, and M. Moulson, Scrutinizing CKM unitarity with a new measurement of the Kμ3/Kμ2 branching fraction, Phys. Lett. B 838, 137748 (2023).
  13. V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries, E. Mereghetti, and T. Tong, Anomalies in global SMEFT analyses. A case study of first-row CKM unitarity, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 033.
  14. B. Belfatto and S. Trifinopoulos, Cabibbo angle anomalies and oblique corrections: The remarkable role of the vectorlike quark doublet, Phys. Rev. D 108, 035022 (2023).
  15. M. Kirk, B. Kubis, M. Reboud, and D. van Dyk, A simple parametrisation of the pion form factor, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139266 (2025).
  16. V. Cirigliano, M. Giannotti, and H. Neufeld, Electromagnetic effects in K(l3) decays, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2008) 006.
  17. M. Antonelli, V. Cirigliano, A. Lusiani, and E. Passemar, Predicting the τ strange branching ratios and implications for Vus, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2013) 070.
  18. F. V. Flores-Baéz and J. R. Morones-Ibarra, Model independent electromagnetic corrections in hadronic τ decays, Phys. Rev. D 88, 073009 (2013).
  19. R. Escribano, J. A. Miranda, and P. Roig, Radiative corrections to the τ−→(P1P2)−vτ (P1,2=π,K) decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 053003 (2024).
  20. J. Aebischer et al., WCxf: An exchange format for Wilson coefficients beyond the Standard Model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 232, 71 (2018).
  21. Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG) Collaboration, FLAG review 2024, Phys. Rev. D 113, 014508 (2026).
  22. Particle Data Group, Form factors for semileptonic kaon (Kℓ3), radiative pion (πℓ2γ) and kaon (Kℓ2γ) decays, https://pdg.lbl.gov/2025/reviews/rpp2024-rev-form-factors-radiative-pik-decays.pdf.
  23. Belle Collaboration, Study of τ−→KS0π−ντ decay at Belle, Phys. Lett. B 654, 65 (2007).
  24. M. Jamin, A. Pich, and J. Portoles, Spectral distribution for the decay τ−→ντKπ, Phys. Lett. B 640, 176 (2006).
  25. M. Jamin, A. Pich, and J. Portoles, What can be learned from the Belle spectrum for the decay τ−→ντKS0π−, Phys. Lett. B 664, 78 (2008).
  26. D. R. Boito, R. Escribano, and M. Jamin, Kπ vector form-factor, dispersive constraints and τ−→ντKπ decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 59, 821 (2009).
  27. D. R. Boito, R. Escribano, and M. Jamin, Kπ vector form factor constrained by τ→Kπντ and Kℓ3 decays, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2010) 031.
  28. J. Rendón, Exclusive hadronic τ decays as probes of non-SM interactions, Ph.D. thesis, CINVESTAV, IPN, 2021.
  29. C. G. Callan and S. B. Treiman, Equal time commutators and K meson decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 153 (1966).
  30. R. F. Dashen and M. Weinstein, Theorem on the form-factors in Kℓ3 decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1337 (1969).
  31. R. Oehme, Current algebras and the suppression of leptonic meson decays with ΔS=1, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 215 (1966).
  32. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Low-energy expansion of meson form-factors, Nucl. Phys. B250, 517 (1985).
  33. V. Bernard, M. Oertel, E. Passemar, and J. Stern, Dispersive representation and shape of the Kℓ3 form factors: Robustness, Phys. Rev. D 80, 034034 (2009).
  34. G. P. Lepage and S. J. Brodsky, Exclusive processes in quantum chromodynamics: Evolution equations for hadronic wave functions and the form-factors of mesons, Phys. Lett. 87B, 359 (1979).
  35. L. Ling-Fong and H. Pagels, Rigorous bound on Kℓ3 decay amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 3, 2191 (1971).
  36. S. Okubo, New improved bounds for Kℓ3 parameters, Phys. Rev. D 4, 725 (1971).
  37. C. G. Boyd, B. Grinstein, and R. F. Lebed, Model independent extraction of |Vcb| using dispersion relations, Phys. Lett. B 353, 306 (1995).
  38. I. Caprini, L. Lellouch, and M. Neubert, Dispersive bounds on the shape of B¯→D(*)ℓν¯ form-factors, Nucl. Phys. B530, 153 (1998).
  39. R. J. Hill, Constraints on the form factors for K→πℓν and implications for |Vus|, Phys. Rev. D 74, 096006 (2006).
  40. M. Bordone, N. Gubernari, D. van Dyk, and M. Jung, Heavy-quark expansion for B¯s→Ds(*) form factors and unitarity bounds beyond the SU(3)F limit, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 347 (2020).
  41. W. W. Buck and R. F. Lebed, New constraints on dispersive form-factor parameterizations from the timelike region, Phys. Rev. D 58, 056001 (1998).
  42. T. Becher and R. J. Hill, Comment on form-factor shape and extraction of |Vub| from B→πℓν, Phys. Lett. B 633, 61 (2006).
  43. C. Bourrely, I. Caprini, and L. Lellouch, Model-independent description of B→πℓν decays and a determination of |Vub|, Phys. Rev. D 79, 013008 (2009).
  44. N. C. Balz, F. Herren, B. Kubis, S. Mutke, and M. Reboud, Advanced parametrisations for hadronic form factors, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2026) 158.
  45. eos Authors Collaboration, eos: A software for flavor physics phenomenology, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 569 (2022).
  46. D. van Dyk, M. Reboud, F. Beaujean, M. Kirk, N. Gubernari, F. Herren et al., eos version 1.0.19, 10.5281/zenodo.17792609 (2025).
  47. E. Higson, W. Handley, M. Hobson, and A. Lasenby, Dynamic nested sampling: An improved algorithm for parameter estimation and evidence calculation, Stat. Comput. 29, 891 (2018).
  48. S. Koposov, J. Speagle, K. Barbary, G. Ashton, E. Bennett, J. Buchner et al., dynesty version 2.0.3, 10.5281/zenodo.7388523 (2022).
  49. M. Kirk and D. van Dyk, EOS/DATA-2025-05: Data for EOS/ANALYSIS-2025-01, Zenodo, 2025, 10.5281/zenodo.18788354.
  50. KLOE Collaboration, Measurement of the absolute branching ratio for the K+→μ+ν(γ) decay with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 632, 76 (2006).
  51. I. H. Chiang, J. L. Rosen, S. Shapiro, R. Handler, S. Olsen, and L. Pondrom, K+ decay in flight, Phys. Rev. D 6, 1254 (1972).
  52. KLOE Collaboration, Measurement of the charged kaon lifetime with the KLOE detector, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2008) 073.
  53. KLOE Collaboration, Measurement of the branching fraction for the decay KS→πeν, Phys. Lett. B 535, 37 (2002).
  54. KLOE-2 Collaboration, Measurement of the branching fraction for the decay KS→πμν with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 804, 135378 (2020).
  55. KLOE Collaboration, Measurements of the absolute branching ratios for the dominant KL decays, the KL lifetime, and Vus with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 632, 43 (2006).
  56. KTeV Collaboration, Measurements of KL branching fractions and the CP violation parameter |η±|, Phys. Rev. D 70, 092006 (2004).
  57. ALEPH Collaboration, One prong τ decays with kaons, Eur. Phys. J. C 10, 1 (1999).
  58. CLEO Collaboration, Measurement of Cabibbo suppressed decays of the τ lepton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1079 (1994).
  59. DELPHI Collaboration, Charged kaon production in τ decays at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 334, 435 (1994).
  60. OPAL Collaboration, A study of one prong τ decays with a charged kaon, Eur. Phys. J. C 19, 653 (2001).
  61. Belle Collaboration, Measurements of branching fractions of τ lepton decays with one or more KS0, Phys. Rev. D 89, 072009 (2014).
  62. L3 Collaboration, One prong τ decays with neutral kaons, Phys. Lett. B 352, 487 (1995).
  63. OPAL Collaboration, τ decays with neutral kaons, Eur. Phys. J. C 13, 213 (2000).
  64. BABAR Collaboration, Measurement of the τ−→K−π0νtau branching fraction, Phys. Rev. D 76, 051104 (2007).
  65. CLQCD Collaboration, Quark masses and low-energy constants in the continuum from the tadpole-improved clover ensembles, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054507 (2024).
  66. OPAL Collaboration, Measurement of the strange spectral function in hadronic τ decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 35, 437 (2004).
  67. Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration, Ratio of kaon and pion leptonic decay constants with Nf=2+1+1 Wilson-clover twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 104, 074520 (2021).
  68. N. Carrasco et al., Leptonic decay constants fK, fD, and fDs with Nf=2+1+1 twisted-mass lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91, 054507 (2015).
  69. A. Bazavov et al. (FNAL/MILC 14A Collaboration), Charmed and light pseudoscalar meson decay constants from four-flavor lattice QCD with physical light quarks, Phys. Rev. D 90, 074509 (2014).
  70. R. J. Dowdall, C. T. H. Davies, G. P. Lepage, and C. McNeile, Vus from π and K decay constants in full lattice QCD with physical u, d, s and c quarks, Phys. Rev. D 88, 074504 (2013).
  71. N. Carrasco, P. Lami, V. Lubicz, L. Riggio, S. Simula, and C. Tarantino, K→π semileptonic form factors with Nf=2+1+1 twisted mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 93, 114512 (2016).
  72. Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaborations, |Vus| from Kℓ3 decay and four-flavor lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 99, 114509 (2019).
  73. HPQCD and UKQCD Collaborations, High Precision determination of the π, K, D and Ds decay constants from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 062002 (2008).
  74. MILC Collaboration, Results for light pseudoscalar mesons, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2010 (2010) 074 [arXiv:1012.0868].
  75. RBC and UKQCD Collaborations, Domain wall QCD with physical quark masses, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074505 (2016).
  76. M. Bordone, M. Jung, and D. van Dyk, Theory determination of B¯→D(*)ℓ−ν¯ form factors at O(1/mc2), Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 74 (2020).
  77. NA48/2 Collaboration, Measurement of the form factors of charged kaon semileptonic decays, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 150.
  78. S. Müller, U. Nierste, and S. Schacht, Topological amplitudes in D decays to two pseudoscalars: A global analysis with linear SU(3)F breaking, Phys. Rev. D 92, 014004 (2015).
  79. E. Gamiz, M. Jamin, A. Pich, J. Prades, and F. Schwab, Determination of ms and |Vus| from hadronic τ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2003) 060.
  80. E. Gamiz, M. Jamin, A. Pich, J. Prades, and F. Schwab, Vus and ms from hadronic τ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 011803 (2005).
  81. K. Maltman, R. J. Hudspith, R. Lewis, C. E. Wolfe, and J. Zanotti, A resolution of the inclusive flavor-breaking sum rule τVus puzzle, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2015 (2016) 260 [arXiv:1510.06954].
  82. K. Maltman et al., Current status of inclusive hadronic τ determinations of |Vus|, SciPost Phys. Proc. 1, 006 (2019).
  83. RBC and UKQCD Collaborations, Novel |Vus| determination using inclusive strange τ decay and lattice hadronic vacuum polarization functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 202003 (2018).
  84. Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration, Inclusive hadronic decay rate of the τ lepton from lattice QCD: The u¯s flavor channel and the Cabibbo angle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 261901 (2024).
  85. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV, Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2023, Phys. Rev. D 113, 012008 (2026).
  86. Sw. Banerjee, M. Chrząszcz, K. Hayasaka, A. Lusiani, M. Roney, and B. Shwartz, HFLAV Tau 2023 web report, https://hflav-eos.web.cern.ch/hflav-eos/tau/end-2023/vus.html.
  87. CKMfitter Group, CP violation and the CKM matrix: Assessing the impact of the asymmetric B factories, Eur. Phys. J. C 41, 1 (2005).
  88. CKMfitter Summer 2023 update, http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr/www/results/plots_summer23/num/ckmEval_results_summer23.html.
  89. V. Cirigliano, D. Díaz-Calderón, A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso, and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Semileptonic τ decays beyond the standard model, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 152.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation