Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Observational tests for distinguishing classes of cosmological models

Asta Heinesen*

Timothy Clifton†

  • *Contact author: asta.heinesen@nbi.ku.dk
  • †Contact author: t.clifton@qmul.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 114, 083510 – Published 7 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nrt8-bgnf

Abstract

We investigate observational tests that can be used to distinguish between broad classes of cosmological models. This is achieved using curvature-consistency tests of the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) models, which we investigate in two scenarios where they can be violated; (i) when the optical properties of the cosmology deviate from the expectations of FLRW, and also (ii) when the large-scale expansion of the cosmology is different from FLRW. We identify useful ways to determine the properties of these alternative scenarios in terms of the violation of the curvature-consistency tests, and propose a new null test that can be used to isolate cosmologies with non-FLRW observational relations. The characteristic signatures we find can be used, together with the results of recent and upcoming cosmological observations, to probe and/or rule out large classes of cosmological models. This becomes an increasingly important task as the number of proposals in the literature increases, as cosmologists attempt to explain tensions, anomalies, and the dark sector of the Universe. Our approach provides a clear route for telling apart these different proposals, and offers a new opportunity for using precision cosmological data to efficiently discriminate between cosmological models.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (43)

  1. L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Dark Energy: Theory and Observations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2010).
  2. E. Di Valentino, Proc. Sci. COSMICWISPers2025(2026) 012 [arXiv:2601.01525].
  3. N. Schöneberg, G. Franco Abellán, A. Pérez Sánchez, S. J. Witte, V. Poulin, and J. Lesgourgues, Phys. Rep. 984, 1 (2022).
  4. L. A. Anchordoqui, E. Di Valentino, S. Pan, and W. Yang, J. High Energy Astrophys. 32, 28 (2021).
  5. E. Di Valentino et al. (CosmoVerse Network Collaboration), Phys. Dark Universe 49, 101965 (2025).
  6. C. Clarkson, B. Bassett, and T. H.-C. Lu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 011301 (2008).
  7. S. Räsänen, K. Bolejko, and A. Finoguenov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 101301 (2015).
  8. A. Shafieloo and C. Clarkson, Phys. Rev. D 81, 083537 (2010).
  9. F. Montanari and S. Rasanen, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2017) 032.
  10. C. Bengaly, Phys. Dark Universe 35, 100966 (2022).
  11. B. R. Dinda, R. Maartens, S. Saito, and C. Clarkson, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 018.
  12. Y. Liu, S. Cao, T. Liu, X. Li, S. Geng, Y. Lian, and W. Guo, Astrophys. J. 901, 129 (2020).
  13. C. Millard, B. L’Huillier, and M. Douspis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2026) 016.
  14. S. M. Koksbang and A. Heinesen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 091001 (2026).
  15. S. M. Koksbang and A. Heinesen, Phys. Rev. D 114, 043549 (2026).
  16. D. Camarena, K. Greene, J. Houghteling, and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083526 (2025).
  17. E. Abdalla et al., J. High Energy Astrophys. 34, 49 (2022).
  18. D. L. Wiltshire, Phys. Rev. D 80, 123512 (2009).
  19. A. Wiegand and T. Buchert, Phys. Rev. D 82, 023523 (2010).
  20. V. Busti and J. A. S. d. Lima, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.: Lett. 426, L41 (2012).
  21. J. Larena, J.-M. Alimi, T. Buchert, M. Kunz, and P.-S. Corasaniti, Phys. Rev. D 79, 083011 (2009).
  22. Y. B. Zel’dovich, Sov. Astron. 8, 13 (1964).
  23. V. M. Dashevskii and V. I. Slysh, Sov. Astron. 9, 671 (1966).
  24. C. C. Dyer and R. C. Roeder, Astrophys. J. Lett. 174, L115 (1972).
  25. C. C. Dyer and R. C. Roeder, Astrophys. J. Lett. 180, L31 (1973).
  26. G. F. R. Ellis and W. Stoeger, Classical Quantum Gravity 4, 1697 (1987).
  27. T. Buchert and S. Räsänen, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 57 (2012).
  28. A. Heinesen and T. Buchert, Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 164001 (2020); 37, 229601(E) (2020).
  29. T. Clifton and N. Hyatt, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2024) 052.
  30. Y. B. Ginat and P. G. Ferreira, arXiv:2601.20633.
  31. C. Dyer and R. Roeder, Astrophys. J. 180, L31 (1973).
  32. P. Fleury, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2014) 054.
  33. T. Buchert, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 32, 105 (2000).
  34. T. Buchert, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 33, 1381 (2001).
  35. T. Buchert, P. Mourier, and X. Roy, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 52, 27 (2020).
  36. S. Räsänen, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2009) 011.
  37. S. Koksbang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2019) 036.
  38. S. M. Koksbang, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 498, L135 (2020); 500, L11(E) (2021).
  39. T. Qiu, Y.-F. Cai, and X. Zhang, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23, 2787 (2008).
  40. J. Larena, J.-M. Alimi, T. Buchert, M. Kunz, and C. P.-S., Phys. Rev. D 79, 083011 (2009).
  41. S. M. Koksbang, Phys. Rev. D 114, 043508 (2026).
  42. L. L. Sales, K. E. de Farias, A. R. Queiroz, J. R. Santos, R. A. Batista, A. R. Oliveira, L. F. Santana, C. A. Wuensche, T. Villela, and J. Vieira, Astron. Astrophys. 712, A236 (2026).
  43. A. Blanchard, S. Camera, C. Carbone, V. Cardone, S. Casas, S. Clesse, S. Ilić, M. Kilbinger, T. Kitching, M. Kunz et al., Astron. Astrophys. 642, A191 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation