Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Improved prediction of the mass splitting for P-wave Ω baryons

Niu Su1,2,*, Hua-Xing Chen3,†, Philipp Gubler4,‡, and Atsushi Hosaka2,4,§

  • *Contact author: suniu@tyut.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: hxchen@seu.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: philipp.gubler1@gmail.com
  • §Contact author: hosaka@rcnp.osaka-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 113, 016005 – Published 7 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nrl4-2yst

Abstract

Using the QCD sum rule method, we investigate the mass splitting for the spin-orbit partner states of the Ω(2012) baryon assuming that it is a P-wave excitation with JP=3/2−. This study is an extension of the previous work [N. Su et al.Phys. Rev. D 110, 034007 (2024)] in which the masses of these states were estimated with uncertainties too large to extract the reliable mass splitting. In the present study, by directly formulating a sum rule for the mass splitting, we obtain an improved prediction, δM=M3/2−−M1/2−=−18.0−17.1+33.6  MeV. This result provides a more quantitative insight into the spectrum of P-wave Ω baryons and serves as a useful reference for future experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (56)

  1. M. Gell-Mann, A schematic model of baryons and mesons, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964).
  2. G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 2 (1964), pp. 22–101, 10.17181/CERN-TH-412.
  3. S. Navas et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  4. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rep. 639, 1 (2016).
  5. A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai, and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors: X, Y, Z, and related states, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 062C01 (2016).
  6. J.-M. Richard, Exotic hadrons: Review and perspectives, Few Body Syst. 57, 1185 (2016).
  7. R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Heavy-quark QCD exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143 (2017).
  8. A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Multiquark resonances, Phys. Rep. 668, 1 (2017).
  9. F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018); 94, 029901(E) (2022).
  10. A. Ali, J. S. Lange, and S. Stone, Exotics: Heavy pentaquarks and tetraquarks, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 123 (2017).
  11. S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, and D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015003 (2018).
  12. Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Pentaquark and tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237 (2019).
  13. N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, The XYZ states: Experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rep. 873, 1 (2020).
  14. L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Chiral perturbation theory for heavy hadrons and chiral effective field theory for heavy hadronic molecules, Phys. Rep. 1019, 1 (2023).
  15. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023).
  16. M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the nature of exotic hadrons: Multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions, Phys. Rep. 1108, 1 (2025).
  17. Z.-G. Wang, Review of the QCD sum rules for exotic states, Front. Phys. 21, 016300 (2026).
  18. J. Yelton et al., Observation of an excited Ω− baryon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 052003 (2018).
  19. Y. Li et al., Evidence for the decay Ωc0→π+Ω(2012)−→π+(K¯Ξ)−, Phys. Rev. D 104, 052005 (2021).
  20. S. Jia et al., Observation of Ω−(2012)→Ξ(1530)K and measurement of the effective couplings of Ω−(2012)→Ξ(1530)K and ΞK, Phys. Lett. B 860, 139224 (2025).
  21. T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Interpretation of the newly discovered Ω(2012), Phys. Rev. D 98, 014031 (2018).
  22. T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Nature of the Ω(2012) through its strong decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 894 (2018).
  23. M. V. Polyakov, H.-D. Son, B.-D. Sun, and A. Tandogan, Ω(2012) through the looking glass of flavour SU(3), Phys. Lett. B 792, 315 (2019).
  24. Z.-Y. Wang, L.-C. Gui, Q.-F. Lü, L.-Y. Xiao, and X.-H. Zhong, Newly observed Ω(2012) state and strong decays of the low-lying Ω excitations, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114023 (2018).
  25. L.-Y. Xiao and X.-H. Zhong, Possible interpretation of the newly observed Ω(2012) state, Phys. Rev. D 98, 034004 (2018).
  26. M.-S. Liu, K.-L. Wang, Q.-F. Lü, and X.-H. Zhong, Ω baryon spectrum and their decays in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D 101, 016002 (2020).
  27. A. J. Arifi, D. Suenaga, A. Hosaka, and Y. Oh, Strong decays of multistrangeness baryon resonances in the quark model, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094006 (2022).
  28. C. Menapara and A. K. Rai, Spectroscopic study of strangeness =−3Ω− baryon, Chin. Phys. C 46, 103102 (2022).
  29. K.-L. Wang, Q.-F. Lü, J.-J. Xie, and X.-H. Zhong, Toward discovering the excited Ω baryons through nonleptonic weak decays of Ωc, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034015 (2023).
  30. H.-H. Zhong, R.-H. Ni, M.-Y. Chen, X.-H. Zhong, and J.-J. Xie, Further study of within a chiral quark model*, Chin. Phys. C 47, 063104 (2023).
  31. Y.-H. Lin and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecular assignment for the newly observed Ω* state, Phys. Rev. D 98, 056013 (2018).
  32. M. P. Valderrama, Ω(2012) as a hadronic molecule, Phys. Rev. D 98, 054009 (2018).
  33. R. Pavao and E. Oset, Coupled channels dynamics in the generation of the Ω(2012) resonance, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 857 (2018).
  34. Y. Huang, M.-Z. Liu, J.-X. Lu, J.-J. Xie, and L.-S. Geng, Strong decay modes K¯Ξ and K¯Ξπ of the Ω(2012) in the K¯Ξ(1530) and ηΩ molecular scenario, Phys. Rev. D 98, 076012 (2018).
  35. T. Gutsche and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Strong decays of the hadronic molecule Ω*(2012), J. Phys. G 48, 025001 (2020).
  36. N. Ikeno, G. Toledo, and E. Oset, Molecular picture for the Ω(2012) revisited, Phys. Rev. D 101, 094016 (2020).
  37. C.-H. Zeng, J.-X. Lu, E. Wang, J.-J. Xie, and L.-S. Geng, Theoretical study of the Ω(2012) state in the Ωc0→π+Ω(2012)−→π+(K¯Ξ)− and π+(K¯Ξπ)− decays, Phys. Rev. D 102, 076009 (2020).
  38. J.-X. Lu, C.-H. Zeng, E. Wang, J.-J. Xie, and L.-S. Geng, Revisiting the Ω(2012) as a hadronic molecule and its strong decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 361 (2020).
  39. X. Liu, H. Huang, J. Ping, and D. Chen, Investigating Ω(2012) as a molecular state, Phys. Rev. C 103, 025202 (2021).
  40. X. Hu and J. Ping, Analysis of Ω(2012) as a molecule in the chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054028 (2022).
  41. Q.-F. Lü, H. Nagahiro, and A. Hosaka, Understanding the nature of Ω(2012) in a coupled-channel approach, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014025 (2023).
  42. J.-J. Xie and L.-S. Geng, The Ω(2012) as a hadronic molecule, Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 081402 (2024).
  43. L. Hockley, W. Kamleh, D. Leinweber, and A. Thomas, Exploring the Ω− spectrum in lattice QCD, J. Phys. G 52, 065103 (2025).
  44. S.-Q. Luo and X. Liu, Identifying triple-strangeness Ω hyperons in light of recent experimental results, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014047 (2025).
  45. F.-C. Han, Z.-W. Liu, D. B. Leinweber, and A. W. Thomas, Structure of the Ω-(2012) with Hamiltonian effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 112, L051503 (2025).
  46. M. Ablikim et al., Evidence for two excited Ω- hyperons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 131903 (2025).
  47. S. Acharya et al., Observation of the Ω(2012) baryon at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 112, 092002 (2025).
  48. N. Su, H.-X. Chen, P. Gubler, and A. Hosaka, Investigation on the Ω(2012) from QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034007 (2024).
  49. A. A. Ovchinnikov and A. A. Pivovarov, QCD sum rule calculation of the quark gluon condensate, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 48, 721 (1988).
  50. K.-C. Yang, W. Y. P. Hwang, E. M. Henley, and L. S. Kisslinger, QCD sum rules and neutron-proton mass difference, Phys. Rev. D 47, 3001 (1993).
  51. J. R. Ellis, E. Gardi, M. Karliner, and M. A. Samuel, Renormalization-scheme dependence of Padé summation in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 54, 6986 (1996).
  52. B. L. Ioffe and K. N. Zyablyuk, Gluon condensate in charmonium sum rules with three-loop corrections, Eur. Phys. J. C 27, 229 (2003).
  53. M. Jamin, Flavor-symmetry breaking of the quark condensate and chiral corrections to the Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation, Phys. Lett. B 538, 71 (2002).
  54. V. Gimenez, V. Lubicz, F. Mescia, V. Porretti, and J. Reyes, Operator product expansion and quark condensate from lattice QCD in coordinate space, Eur. Phys. J. C 41, 535 (2005).
  55. S. Narison, Gluon condensates and precise m¯c,b from QCD-moments and their ratios to order αs3 and ⟨G4⟩, Phys. Lett. B 706, 412 (2012).
  56. S. Narison, QCD parameter correlations from heavy quarkonia, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1850045 (2018); 33, 1892004(A) (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation