Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Gauge coupling unification and doublet-triplet splitting via GUT dynamical breaking

Isabella Masina1,2,* and Mariano Quirós3,†

  • *Contact author: masina@fe.infn.it
  • †Contact author: quiros@ifae.es

Phys. Rev. D 113, 115023 – Published 9 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nmlg-cmd1

Abstract

An interesting framework to achieve gauge coupling unification consists in adding to the Standard Model Lagrangian nonrenormalizable operators of d≥5, which affect the kinetic term of gauge fields. We first review the phenomenology related to this framework in the context of SU(5), identifying which are the most interesting representations for the sake of achieving coupling unification. Second, we point out that in the case of a dynamical breaking pattern, it is possible to relate gauge coupling unification with the doublet-triplet splitting problem. We show that condensates of fermions in the 5 representation do not lead to viable models because of proton decay constraints. At difference, we point out that successful models can be obtained by considering condensates of fermions in the 10, as well as in the 24 representations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (29)

  1. I. Masina and M. Quirós, Standard model partial unification scale as a guide to new physics model building, Phys. Rev. D 113, 095026 (2026).
  2. K. R. Dienes, String theory and the path to unification: A review of recent developments, Phys. Rep. 287, 447 (1997).
  3. G.-C. Cho and K. Hagiwara, String unification scale and the hypercharge Kac-Moody level in the nonsupersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 419, 199 (1998).
  4. C. T. Hill, Are there significant gravitational corrections to the unification scale?, Phys. Lett. 135B, 47 (1984).
  5. Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich, Modification of GUT predictions in the presence of spontaneous compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 875 (1984).
  6. C. Panagiotakopoulos and Q. Shafi, Dimension five interactions, fermion masses and Higgs mediated proton decay in SU(5), Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2336 (1984).
  7. L. J. Hall and U. Sarid, Gravitational smearing of minimal supersymmetric unification predictions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2673 (1993).
  8. H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Unity of all elementary particle forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974).
  9. L. Di Luzio and L. Mihaila, Unification scale vs. electroweak-triplet mass in the SU(5)+24F model at three loops, Phys. Rev. D 87, 115025 (2013).
  10. N. Haba, K. Nagano, Y. Shimizu, and T. Yamada, Gauge coupling unification and proton decay via 45 Higgs boson in SU(5) GUT, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024, 053B05 (2024).
  11. X. Calmet, S. D. H. Hsu, and D. Reeb, Grand unification and enhanced quantum gravitational effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 171802 (2008).
  12. J. R. Bhatt, S. Patra, and U. Sarkar, Gravitational correction to SU(5) gauge coupling unification, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25, 283 (2010).
  13. J. Chakrabortty and A. Raychaudhuri, A note on dimension-5 operators in GUTs and their impact, Phys. Lett. B 673, 57 (2009).
  14. X. Calmet, S. D. H. Hsu, and D. Reeb, Grand unification through gravitational effects, Phys. Rev. D 81, 035007 (2010).
  15. S. Navas et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  16. J.-S. Yoo, Y. Aoki, P. Boyle, T. Izubuchi, A. Soni, and S. Syritsyn, Proton decay matrix elements on the lattice at physical pion mass, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074501 (2022).
  17. J. Hisano, D. Kobayashi, and N. Nagata, Enhancement of proton decay rates in supersymmetric SU(5) grand unified models, Phys. Lett. B 716, 406 (2012).
  18. A. Masiero, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. Tamvakis, and T. Yanagida, Naturally massless Higgs doublets in supersymmetric SU(5), Phys. Lett. 115B, 380 (1982).
  19. B. Grinstein, A supersymmetric SU(5) gauge theory with no gauge hierarchy problem, Nucl. Phys. B206, 387 (1982).
  20. G. Altarelli, F. Feruglio, and I. Masina, From minimal to realistic supersymmetric SU(5) grand unification, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2000) 040.
  21. I. Masina, The problem of neutrino masses in extensions of the standard model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 5101 (2001).
  22. T. Kugo and J. Sato, Dynamical symmetry breaking in an E(6) GUT model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 91, 1217 (1994).
  23. R. Kitano and N. Okada, Dynamical doublet—triplet Higgs mass splitting, Phys. Rev. D 64, 055010 (2001).
  24. R. Kitano, Dynamical GUT breaking and mu-term driven supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 74, 115002 (2006).
  25. A. B. Lahanas and D. V. Nanopoulos, The road to no scale supergravity, Phys. Rep. 145, 1 (1987).
  26. S. Raby, S. Dimopoulos, and L. Susskind, Tumbling gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B169, 373 (1980).
  27. S. Bolognesi, K. Konishi, and A. Luzio, Anomalies and phases of strongly coupled chiral gauge theories: Recent developments, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37, 2230014 (2022).
  28. Y. Bai and D. Stolarski, Phases of confining SU(5) chiral gauge theory with three generations, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 113.
  29. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, M. B. Voloshin, and V. I. Zakharov, Low-energy theorems for Higgs boson couplings to photons, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 30, 711 (1979), https://inspirehep.net/literature/141287.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation